Balancing risks and benefits in the use of hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and glucocorticoids (GCs) constitute the oldest and more used drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite this long experience, both are still subject to a number of uncertainties, mainly regarding the dose.

AREAS COVERED

We review the main mechanisms of action, the clinical and toxic effects of HCQ and GCs and analyze the recommendations for the use of both in guidelines published since 2018. We offer a set of recommendations based on the pharmacology, mechanisms of action and clinical evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

HCQ is the backbone therapy for SLE, and a judicious use must be accomplished, using doses that allow a good control of lupus without compromising the safety of treatments very much prolonged over the time. Stable doses of 200 mg/day seem to accomplish both conditions. GCs should be used more judiciously, with methyl-prednisolone pulses as the main therapy for inducing rapid remission and doses ≤5-2.5 mg/day be never exceeded in long-term maintenance treatments.

ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES DO NOT PREDICT DAMAGE IN SLE PATIENTS IN THE XXI CENTURY. AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY FROM THE LUPUS-CRUCES COHORT

OBJECTIVE

To compare the influence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) on global and cardiovascular damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosed before and after year 2000.

METHODS

286 patients from the Lupus-Cruces cohort with a minimum follow-up of 5 years, divided into two sub-cohorts according to the date of diagnosis, before 2000 (<2000) and from 2000 on (≥2000). We compared the mean SDI score and global and cardiovascular damage-free survival rates in the presence/absence of aPL in both sub-cohorts. Variables potentially modulating damage among aPL-positive patients were analysed.

RESULTS

The sub-cohorts were comparable for demographic and lupus-related variables except for treatment variables: the ≥2000 sub-cohort received lower doses of prednisone and more hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, statins, immunosuppressive agents and Vitamin D. aPL-positive patients in the <2000, but not in the ≥2000 sub-cohort, accrued more damage compared with aPL-negative. In the <2000 sub-cohort, the adjusted HRs for global and cardiovascular damage in aPL-positive vs. aPL-negative patients were 1.98 (95% CI 1.24-3.14) and 9.3 (95% CI 3.24-26.92), respectively. No differences in damage were seen between aPL-positive and aPL-negative patients in the ≥2000 sub-cohort. Hypertension (HR 4.64, 95%CI 1.33-16.19), lupus anticoagulant (HR 3.85, 95%CI 1.1-13.41) and the number of months on hydroxychloroquine (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99) were independent predictors of vascular damage in the combined analysis of all aPL-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

The effects of aPL on damage accrual in SLE patients have been reduced over the last years. The widespread use of hydroxychloroquine and a better thromboprophylaxis are likely causing this change.