Characteristics, comorbidities, and complications in multiple sclerosis (MS) and non-MS patients undergoing lumbar fusion for deformity

BACKGROUND

We compared the characteristics, comorbidities, and complications in spinal deformity patients with and without multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing primary lumbar spine fusion.

METHODS

We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2014, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes to create experimental MS (842 patients) and non-MS control (165,726 patients) cohorts undergoing primary lumbar spine fusion. Characteristics, comorbidities, and complications in spinal deformity patients with and without MS were evaluated using univariate and bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

MS spinal deformity patients undergoing primary lumbar spine fusion were younger, more likely to be female and more likely to undergo surgery at urban teaching hospitals. They also exhibited higher rates of depression and lower rates of diabetes without chronic complications, hypertension, and renal failure. However, no significant differences were found in mortality or total perioperative complication rates between MS and nonMS patients.

CONCLUSION

We found that MS versus non-MS patients undergoing primary lumbar fusion for spinal deformity were younger, more likely to be female and had higher rates of depression but lower rates of diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure. Notably, both groups experienced comparable mortality and perioperative complication rates.

Gender Disparities in Financial Relationships Between Industry and Orthopaedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Recent studies in a number of surgical subspecialties have demonstrated that financial relationships with industry differ between men and women. This study aimed to determine if gender disparities exist in industry relationships with orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at OpenPayments.cms.gov. Data were extracted for payments made to orthopaedic surgeons from industry for royalties, licensing, or consulting fees from 2016 to 2017. A physician's profile was used to determine name, gender, practice location, and subspecialty. Years of experience were recorded from publicly available websites. Total number of payments and amounts were compared among men and women, subspecialties, and locations. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine predictors of total payments and number of payments.

RESULTS

Royalties and consulting fees were paid to 3,418 individual physicians (11% of 29,996 physicians in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [AAOS] census) and accounted for 88% of total payments. The majority of the total payment amount (99.6%) was made to men, while only 0.4% went to women. Male gender was a predictor of total number of payments (β = 5.17, p < 0.001), as were years of experience (β = 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10 to 0.20], p < 0.001), Mountain region (β = 2.77 [95% CI: 0.37 to 5.17], p = 0.02), and adult reconstructive subspecialty (β = 4.07 [95% CI: 1.89 to 6.25], p < 0.001). Years of experience (β = 0.046 [95% CI: 0.039 to 0.052], p < 0.001), male gender (β = 1.09 [95% CI: 0.67 to 1.51], p < 0.001), Mountain region (β = 0.35 [95% CI: 0.020 to 0.68], p = 0.04), and adult reconstructive subspecialty (β = 0.33 [95% CI: 0.030 to 0.63], p = 0.03) were associated with higher payments.

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender, years of experience, Mountain region, and adult reconstructive subspecialty are independent predictors of a higher number of industry payments and payment amount. These disparities in industry payments may contribute to continued inequities in scholarship, academic rank, and leadership opportunities.