Comparison of Total Body Irradiation-based Versus Chemotherapy-based Conditionings for Early Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With ALL

BACKGROUND

Total body irradiation (TBI) is the cornerstone of conditioning regimens in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As the late effects and survival comparison between TBI and chemotherapy were well analyzed before, in this study, we aim to focus on the first 100 days and early complications of transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study involves 72 pediatric patients (0 to 18 y) underwent first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia between October 2015 and May 2019. Patients are divided into 2 groups regarding conditioning regimens. Conditionings includes either TBI 1200 cGy/6 fractions/3 days and etoposide phosphate or busulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa. Busulfan was administered IV and according to body weight.

RESULTS

The incidences of acute graft versus host disease grade 2 to 4, veno-occlusive disease, capillary leakage syndrome, thrombotic microangiopathy, blood stream infection, hemorrhagic cystitis and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome before day 100 were similar for both conditioning regimens; however, patients received TBI-based conditioning had significantly longer neutrophil engraftment time (17.5 vs. 13 d, P=0.001) and tended to have more engraftment syndrome (ES) (45.5% for TBI vs. 24.0% for chemotherapy, P=0.069). Multivariate analysis showed that TBI-based conditioning was associated with a longer neutrophil engraftment time (hazard ratio [HR]=1.20, P=0.006), more cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (HR=3.65, P=0.038) and more ES (HR=3.18, P=0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support chemotherapy-based regimens with early neutrophil engraftment, less ES and CMV reactivation compared with TBI. Although there is no impact on survival rates, increased incidence of ES and CMV reactivation should be considered in TBI-based regimens.

Analyzing the clinical outcomes of switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The selection of graft-vs. -host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis is vital for the success of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been used for decades as the backbone of GvHD prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of switching cyclosporine (CSA) to tacrolimus because of acute GvHD, engraftment syndrome (ES), persistent low level of CSA, or various CSA-associated adverse events in the first 100 days of pediatric HSCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 192 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Medicalpark Göztepe and Antalya Hospitals between April 2014 and May 2019 had therapy switched from CSA to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression within 100 days of transplant.

RESULTS

The reasons for conversion to tacrolimus were low level of CSA (n = 70), aGvHD (n = 63), CSA-associated neurotoxicity (n = 15), CSA-associated nephrotoxicity (n = 10), hypertension (n = 10), allergic reactions (n = 9), ES (n = 7), CSA-associated hepatotoxicity (n = 5), and vomiting (n = 3). The median day after transplant for conversion to tacrolimus for all patients was day 20 (range 0-100 days). Response rates to conversion were 38% for GvHD, 86% for neurotoxicity, 50% for nephrotoxicity, 60% for hepatotoxicity, 80% for hypertension, 66% for vomiting, and 57% for ES. Twenty-nine patients (15%) experienced tacrolimus-associated toxicities after therapy conversion to tacrolimus. Neurotoxicity emerged as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which was the most common toxicity observed after conversion (18/29 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the quick conversion to tacrolimus in the condition of persistent low CSA levels with acceptable efficacy and safety. Although both drugs are CNI and share a very similar mechanism of action, the conversion could be preferred especially in specific organ toxicities with special attention for neurotoxicity after conversion.