Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension for Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease: A subgroup analysis of Japanese patients in the randomized, phase 3, CONVERT study

BACKGROUND

CONVERT, a randomized, active-controlled, global, Phase 3 trial demonstrated that patients with treatment-refractory Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease were more likely to achieve culture conversion with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) plus guideline-based therapy (GBT) versus those continuing on GBT alone. This subgroup analysis reports the efficacy and safety of ALIS in Japanese patients enrolled in CONVERT.

METHODS

Japanese patients aged ≥20 years with treatment-refractory MAC pulmonary disease from Japanese sites were included. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily 590 mg ALIS + GBT or GBT alone; patients converting by Month 6 remained in the study to complete 12-month treatment followed by a 12-month off-treatment period. Nonconverters exited the study at Month 8. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving culture conversion by Month 6.

RESULTS

Of the 59 Japanese patients screened, 48 were randomized to receive ALIS + GBT (n = 34) or GBT alone (n = 14), and 41/48 (85.4 %) were women. The mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 64.5 (8.6) years, and 83.3 % of patients had bronchiectasis at baseline. By Month 6, sputum culture conversion was cumulatively achieved in 9/34 (26.5 %) patients receiving ALIS + GBT versus none receiving GBT alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 94.1 % and 100.0 % of patients receiving ALIS + GBT and GBT alone, respectively. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy observed in the Japanese subpopulation was largely consistent with that in the overall CONVERT study population, with more patients achieving culture conversion with ALIS + GBT versus GBT alone. Safety profiles were similar between the overall population and the Japanese subpopulation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02344004.

Time-to-positivity of Mycobacterium avium complex in broth culture associates with culture conversion

Background

Mycobacterial time to positivity (TTP) in liquid culture media has predictive value for longer term outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis, but has not been thoroughly studied in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. This study sought to evaluate for association between TTP and sputum culture conversion to negative in pulmonary disease caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC).

Methods

Data from the CONVERT trial (NCT02344004) that evaluated efficacy of guideline-based-therapy with or without amikacin liposome inhalation suspension in adults with refractory MAC-PD (Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease) were analyzed. We evaluated TTP measures for sputum obtained prior to study treatment initiation and at monthly visits, assessing reproducibility of measures as well as association of TTP with culture conversion on treatment.

Results

Data from 71 participants with at least one screening visit TTP value were analyzed. For participants who provided more than one sputum sample at a given visit, there was moderate between-sample reliability, with median intraclass correlation coefficient 0.62 (IQR 0.50, 0.70). Median TTP at screening was longer in those participants who subsequently achieved vs. did not achieve culture conversion (10.5 [IQR 9.4] days vs. 4.2 [IQR 2.8] days, p = 0.0002). Individuals with culture conversion by study treatment month 6 were more likely to have a screening TTP > 5 days compared to those who did not achieve culture conversion (OR 15.4, 95% CI 1.9, 716.7, p = 0.0037) and had increasing TTPs over time.

Conclusions

TTP prior to and on treatment is associated with microbiological treatment response in patients with MAC-PD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07250-4.

Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension for Refractory Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease: Sustainability and Durability of Culture Conversion and Safety of Long-term Exposure

BACKGROUND

In the CONVERT study, treatment with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) added to guideline-based therapy (GBT) met the primary end point of increased culture conversion by month 6 in patients with treatment-refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (ALIS plus GBT, 29% [65/224] vs GBT alone, 8.9% [10/112]; P < .0001).

RESEARCH QUESTION

In patients who achieved culture conversion by month 6 in the CONVERT study, was conversion sustained (negative sputum culture results for 12 months with treatment) and durable (negative sputum culture results for 3 months after treatment) and were there any additional safety signals associated with a full treatment course of 12 months after conversion?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Adults were randomized 2:1 to receive ALIS plus GBT or GBT alone. Patients achieving culture conversion by month 6 continued therapy for 12 months followed by off-treatment observation.

RESULTS

More patients randomized to ALIS plus GBT (intention-to-treat population) achieved conversion that was both sustained and durable 3 months after treatment vs patients randomized to GBT alone (ALIS plus GBT, 16.1% [36/224] vs GBT alone, 0% [0/112]; P < .0001). Of the patients who achieved culture conversion by month 6, 55.4% of converters (36/65) in the ALIS plus GBT treated arm vs no converters (0/10) in the GBT alone arm achieved sustained and durable conversion (P = .0017). Relapse rates through 3 months after treatment were 9.2% (6/65) in the ALIS plus GBT arm and 30.0% (3/10) in the GBT alone arm. Common adverse events among ALIS plus GBT-treated patients (dysphonia, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis) occurred mainly within the first 8 months of treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In a refractory population, conversion was sustained and durable in more patients treated with ALIS plus GBT for 12 months after conversion than in those treated with GBT alone. No new safety signals were associated with 12 months of treatment after conversion.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02344004; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Pressure prediction model for compression garment design

Based on the application of Laplace's law to compression garments, an equation for predicting garment pressure, incorporating the body circumference, the cross-sectional area of fabric, applied strain (as a function of reduction factor), and its corresponding Young's modulus, is developed. Design procedures are presented to predict garment pressure using the aforementioned parameters for clinical applications. Compression garments have been widely used in treating burning scars. Fabricating a compression garment with a required pressure is important in the healing process. A systematic and scientific design method can enable the occupational therapist and compression garments' manufacturer to custom-make a compression garment with a specific pressure. The objectives of this study are 1) to develop a pressure prediction model incorporating different design factors to estimate the pressure exerted by the compression garments before fabrication; and 2) to propose more design procedures in clinical applications. Three kinds of fabrics cut at different bias angles were tested under uniaxial tension, as were samples made in a double-layered structure. Sets of nonlinear force-extension data were obtained for calculating the predicted pressure. Using the value at 0° bias angle as reference, the Young's modulus can vary by as much as 29% for fabric type P11117, 43% for fabric type PN2170, and even 360% for fabric type AP85120 at a reduction factor of 20%. When comparing the predicted pressure calculated from the single-layered and double-layered fabrics, the double-layered construction provides a larger range of target pressure at a particular strain. The anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of the fabrics have thus been determined. Compression garments can be methodically designed by the proposed analytical pressure prediction model.

A clinical review of statins and cancer: helpful or harmful?

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are the second most prescribed therapeutic drug class in the United States after analgesics. Although these agents are used predominantly to reduce cholesterol concentrations in patients with hyperlipidemia, numerous studies have investigated the pleiotropic effects of statins and their potential in the prevention and/or treatment of other disease states, including cancer. Many theories have been proposed as to how statins may affect the risk or development of malignancies, prompting a clinical review of the literature. Studies have revealed statins to be associated with both increased and decreased cancer risk. Most of the published studies have been observational and retrospective in nature, and most prospective trials evaluated cancer as a secondary end point or adverse event, making it difficult to determine causality. Although most of the available evidence suggests a possible beneficial effect of statins on cancer, further study is needed with better designed trials and/or increased efforts in evaluating cancer as secondary end points in all statin trials until definite conclusions regarding statin effects on cancer risk and occurrence can be made.