Position Statement: Range Orders in the Management of Pain

American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) supports safe medication practices and the appropriate use of pro re nata (PRN) range orders for analgesics in the management of pain within the scope of nursing practice. Although range orders may apply to many medications prescribed as PRN, the focus of this ASPMN position statement is on PRN analgesic medication. PRN range orders are commonly used to provide flexibility in dosing to meet the analgesic requirements of an individual patient. There are many patient-specific factors that require professional clinical assessment when administering medications to patients. Unfortunately, several myths persist regarding The Joint Commission's (TJC) standard around the implementation of range orders leading many to assume that range orders are not supported or safe. On the contrary, if utilized in a consistent and appropriate manner, PRN range orders can allow nurses to provide optimal pain management while still providing safe administration (Paquette et al., 2022).

Pain in Critically Ill Patients With Substance Use Disorder or Long-term Opioid Use for Chronic Pain

Opioid tolerance resulting from long-term opioid consumption for chronic pain or from substance use disorder adds a layer of complexity to managing pain in the critical care setting. This article discusses similarities and differences of these 2 conditions. The phenomenon of tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia are presented. Prevention of opioid withdrawal, when patients are on methadone or buprenorphine, is described. An overview of the neurophysiology of pain and substance use disorder is presented. Practical clinical suggestions are given to assist the critical care nurse in caring for these complex patients.

Head nurse leadership style with staff nurse burnout and job satisfaction in neonatal intensive care units

Leadership style has been defined as a two-factor construct composed of "consideration" and "initiating structure." Research has suggested that these factors affect the behavior and attitude of subordinates. This study's purpose was to quantify the relationships of head nurse leadership style with self-reported staff nurse burnout and job satisfaction in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). Three instruments--the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, the Tedium Scale, and the Leadership Opinion Questionnaire--were voluntarily completed by 283 registered nurses employed by 14 level-III NICUs in the United States. The leadership dimensions of consideration and structure were distinct (r = -.10). Staff nurse satisfaction and burnout were related (r = -.41). Head nurse consideration was clearly related to staff nurse satisfaction (r = -.55) and to a lesser extent to burnout (r = -.29). Initiating structure alone was not related to satisfaction or burnout. Aggregate perceptions of head nurse leadership were ranked across NICUs in order to classify the head nurses on consideration and structure. The 14 head nurses were separated into four groups: high consideration-high structure, high consideration-low structure, low consideration-high structure, and low consideration-low structure. Satisfaction and burnout of staff nurses in each of the leadership-style groups were then compared. Analysis of variance for satisfaction (F(3,279) = 3.10, p = .03) and burnout (F(3,279) = 3.90, p = .01) were both significant. For both satisfaction and burnout, the head nurse leadership classification of low consideration-high structure was most deviant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)