Likelihood of Antimicrobial Resistance in Urinary E coli Isolates among US Female Patients with Recurrent vs Non-Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative likelihood of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and multi-drug resistance (MDR) among E coli isolates from outpatients with recurrent versus non-recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational US cohort study, female outpatients (≥12 years) with uUTI, positive E coli culture, and treated with ≥1 oral antibiotic within ±5 days of diagnosis were grouped into recurrent and non-recurrent uUTI cohorts per their UTI history (past 12 months). AMR to specific drug classes was evaluated at index. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models estimated the likelihood of not-susceptible E coli isolates (AMR/MDR) among patients with recurrent uUTI versus non-recurrent uUTI.

RESULTS

Recurrent (N = 12,234) and non-recurrent (N = 68,033) uUTI cohorts had similar distributions (race, ethnicity, region). Patients with recurrent uUTI had a higher prevalence of E coli resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (21.8% vs 18.7%) and fluoroquinolones (14.2% vs 8.6%), and more isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (5.9% vs 4.1%) compared to non-recurrent uUTI patients. Patients with recurrent uUTI had a higher likelihood (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) of any AMR (1.28 [1.22-1.34]), single drug-class resistance (1.18 [1.12-1.24]), and resistance to 2 (1.53 [1.41-1.67]) or ≥3 drug classes (1.70 [1.48-1.96]) (all P <.001).

CONCLUSION

This study delineated the likelihood of AMR and MDR among E coli isolates from patients with recurrent versus non-recurrent uUTI. While some treatment guidelines support empiric therapy in recurrent uUTI, the increased likelihood of resistance among these patients suggests that culture and susceptibility testing should be undertaken to inform recurrent uUTI treatment.

New avenue of diagnostic stewardship: procedural stewardship for recurrent urinary tract infections in female patients

Introduction

Societal guidelines offer a weak recommendation to perform cystoscopy for female patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) of advanced age and/or with high-risk features. These guidelines lack the support of robust data and are instead based on expert opinion. In this retrospective cohort study, we aim to determine the utility of cystoscopy in patients with and without high-risk features for rUTI.

Materials and methods

We identified 476 women who underwent cystoscopy for the evaluation of rUTI at a single tertiary academic medical center from May 1, 2015 and March 15, 2021. Patients were excluded if they had a competing indication for cystoscopy. Risk factors, demographic information, cystoscopic findings, and patient outcomes were analyzed.

Results

192 (41.1%) were classified as having complicated UTI. We identified six patients (1.3%) with findings that prompted management to significantly impact patient outcomes. All six patients had high-risk features. 14 patients (3.0%) were found to have mucosal abnormalities prompting biopsy, three of which required general anesthesia. All 14 biopsies were ultimately benign.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate a low diagnostic yield and increased risk exposure for women undergoing cystoscopy for the evaluation of complicated rUTI. Additionally, our observations support prior studies indicating that cystoscopy has limited utility in the evaluation of rUTI without high-risk features.

Female urethral condyloma acuminata mimicking urethral caruncle

Condyloma acuminata are epidermal lesions caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) most commonly affecting the anogenital region. Urethral involvement is uncommon, and may mimic other urethral lesions. In this case report, a 62-year-old patient presents with what was believed to be a urethral caruncle and underwent successful resection with the final pathologic diagnosis of urethral condyloma. The clinical features and diagnosis are reviewed. This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis of females with known HPV or those who are deemed higher risk with unprotected sexual encounters.

Transvaginal Mesh Placement and the Instructions for Use: A Survey of North American Urologists

INTRODUCTION

Since the issue of the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Public Health Notification in 2008 regarding complications associated with the use of transvaginal surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, multimillion dollar litigation has been brought against the companies that have manufactured these products. One component of the litigation has focused on risk information provided in the Instructions for Use document provided with each mesh kit. In this study we evaluated the types of urologists using transvaginal mesh kits and their use of the Instructions for Use provided with each mesh kit.

METHODS

A 14-question survey was e-mailed to all urologists registered with 7 of the 8 geographic sections of the American Urological Association in 2016. The survey inquired about the use of transvaginal mesh kits for prolapse and incontinence as well as how often, if ever, the urologist had read the Instructions for Use.

RESULTS

Overall there were 314 respondents. The majority (79.3%) identified as general urologists and 12.7% identified as Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery trained urologists. Of the respondents who reported having placed mid urethral slings and/or a mesh prolapse repair kit, 36.9% and 23.1%, respectively, had never read the Instructions for Use. Of those providers who had read the Instructions for Use the most common frequency was once before the first placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The pertinent role of the Instructions for Use in mesh related litigation stands in contrast to our finding that many surgeons who use these kits read the Instructions for Use infrequently, if ever.

Evaluation of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass

The increased use of abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging has led to the classification of adrenal lesions termed the incidentally identified adrenal mass or adrenal incidentaloma. Unlike for the large, clinically, or biochemically symptomatic adrenal mass, the evaluation of patients with small, asymptomatic, or nonfunctional adrenal lesions remains controversial. The evaluation of these adrenal incidentalomas presents a challenge to endocrinologists, radiologists, and urologic surgeons alike. A multidisciplinary approach with biochemical screening and radiologic evaluation is essential to assess the nature and function of these lesions. Furthermore, it is of great importance to identify patients who are morbidly affected by hormonal hypersecretion or malignant potential. This article describes the emerging guidelines for the evaluation of the incidental adrenal mass.

Simultaneous multiple double pigtail stents for malignant ureteral obstruction

Ureteral obstruction caused by extrinsic compression from pelvic malignancies often persists after ureteral stent placement. We describe a new technique and present our experience with the simultaneous placement of two ipsilateral ureteral stents after simple stenting has failed.