Resilience and challenges of peritoneal dialysis survivors in the aftermath of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains understudied in disaster nephrology. This retrospective multicenter study explores the experiences of PD survivors following the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquake.

METHODS

Adult PD patients from 11 affected cities were analyzed to assess challenges faced during and postearthquake, alongside clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 101 participants (median age: 45 years, median PD duration: 24 months), 57 were female, with 79 on continuous ambulatory PD. Challenges included power outages and water shortages, with primary shelter in kin's houses (33%) and homes (28%). Twelve patients experienced PD program delays, and three lacked assistance postdisaster. Sixteen patients changed PD modalities, with seven experiencing postearthquake peritonitis. Clinical parameters remained stable, except for a slight decrease in hemoglobin levels.

CONCLUSION

Despite challenges, PD survivors exhibited resilience, highlighting the importance of addressing peritonitis and unusual pathogens in disaster preparedness initiatives.

Primary glomerulonephritis in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Primary glomerulonephritis (PGN) has a significant part in non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. In our study, we compared the clinical, demographic and laboratory features of patients with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy (DN) and PGN with type 2 DM.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, type 2 DM patients who underwent kidney biopsy between 2011 and 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of DN and PGN patients were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with a mean age of 55.7 ± 9.4 and 43 (61.4%) males were included. About 38 (54.3%) of the patients had DN and 32 (45.7%) had PGN. In the PGN, membranous GN (20, 62.5%) was most common. In DN patients, diabetes duration was longer; complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure were more frequent. At the time of renal biopsy, blood sugar, HbA1C, blood pressure, serum albumin and proteinuria values were similar in two groups. The pathological damage findings of kidney biopsy in DN patients were more severe. In the first year after kidney biopsy decrease in eGFR was higher in DN patients, whereas eGFR did not change in PGN patients.

CONCLUSION

In a diabetic patient, fasting blood sugar, hbA1C, serum albumin and proteinuria did not differ in the differential diagnosis of DN and PGN, whereas complications of DM (retinopathy, neuropathy, hypertension, coronary artery disease) were more characteristic in differentiation. Detection of PGN in a diabetic patient is crucial for the success of the treatment, according to DN.

P0490IS THE SEVERITY OF GLOMERULAR IGG STAINING IN PATIENT WITH IGA NEPHROPATHY USEFUL FOR PREDICTING POOR RENAL PROGNOSIS? THE DATA FROM TSN-GOLD WORKING GROUP

Background and Aims

In IgA nephropathy (IgAN), which is characterized by mesangial IgA accumulation, there is the formation of circulating autoantibodies against galactose deficient IgA1s (Gd-IgA1). IgG / Gd-IgA1 immunocomplexes accumulate in the glomerular mesangium and play a role in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Recent studies have suggested a relationship between glomerular IgG deposition and the severity of glomerular inflammation. However, detection of the presence and severity of IgG in routine immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) may fail. This study aims to investigate whether IgG positivity detected by IFM is associated with poor renal prognostic indicators and whether renal prognosis can be predicted according to IgG positivity.

Method

4399 patients who were enrolled between May 2009-June 2019 in database of Turkish Society of Nephrology, Glomerular Diseases Working Group (TSN-GOLD) including 44 centers were evaluated. After exclusion criteria, 994 primary IgAN patients were included in the study. Glomerular IgG negative and positive patients were compared by means of Oxford classification scores, histopathological evaluations, proteinuria, creatinine, albumin, blood pressures. IgG positive patients were divided into subgroups according to the grade of the IFM positivity. The relationship between IgG positivity and poor prognosis criteria were evaluated.

Results

Demographic and biochemical findings of glomerular IgG positive and negative patients at the time of biopsy are shown in Table 1. No difference was found between the groups. There was no difference in the demographic and biochemical findings at the time of biopsy in IgG subgroup analyses (Table 2). There was no difference between the histopathological and Oxford MEST scores of the subgroups. Glomerular IgG positivity was not associated with diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, urea, uric acid, age, eGFR, albumin, proteinuria (p> 0.05 for all, r= -0.084, r= -0.102, r= -0.006, r=0.062, r= 0.014, r= -0.044, r= -0.061, r= -0.066, r= 0.150, respectively).

Conclusion

Glomerular IgG positivity detected by routine IFM in IgAN is not associated with poor renal prognostic indicators. It is difficult to predict renal prognosis by looking at the severity of IgG positivity at the baseline evaluation.