Pitfalls and Pearls in Esophageal Carcinoma

The management of patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) requires accurate clinical staging and post-therapeutic evaluation. Currently, esophagogastroduodenoscopy/endoscopic ultrasound (EGD/EUS), endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), computed tomography (CT), 18F- fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are used for the initial clinical staging, evaluation of therapeutic response and follow-up in patients with EC. However, there are limitations and pitfalls that are commonly encountered when imaging these patients that can limit accurate assessment. Knowledge of the limitations and pitfalls associated with the use of these different imaging modalities is essential in avoiding misinterpretation and guaranteeing the appropriate management for patient with EC.

Esophageal Cancer: Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging

Esophageal cancer is an uncommon malignancy that ranks sixth in terms of mortality worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant histologic subtype worldwide whereas adenocarcinoma represents the majority of cases in North America, Australia, and Europe. Esophageal cancer is staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union for Cancer Control TNM system and has separate classifications for the clinical, pathologic, and postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groups. The determination of clinical TNM is based on complementary imaging modalities, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy/endoscopic ultrasound; endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration; computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Esophageal Carcinoma: Applications and Limitations

Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma represent approximately 98% of esophageal malignant tumors. During the last 30 years, the incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased in Western countries (including the USA) where adenocarcinoma currently represents more than 60% of esophageal malignancies, although, worldwide, squamous cell carcinoma continues to be the predominant histologic type. Integrated positron emission tomography or computed tomography with 2-[fluorine18] fluro-2-deoxy-d-glucose is used in many institutions routinely as a tool in the initial staging and then repeated after therapy for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy and detection of recurrent disease in patients with esophageal carcinoma. As with any other imaging modality, 2-[fluorine18] fluro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography or computed tomography has strengths and limitations that should be understood in order to maximize its utility.

Intra- and Extra-Thoracic Muscle Flaps and Chest Wall Reconstruction Following Resection of Thoracic Tumors

Improvements in surgical technique over the last decade enable surgeons to perform extensive resection and reconstruction in patients presenting with tumors involving the soft tissue or bony structures of the chest wall. The type of surgical resection and its size, depend on the type of tumor resected and its location. In addition to providing a better esthetic result, the reconstruction restores support and functionality of the thoracic cage. The approach to chest wall repair includes primary closure or reconstruction by using transposition flaps, free flaps, prosthetic material, or a mixture of a flap and prosthetic material.

18FDG-PET/CT is useful in the follow-up of surgically treated patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate fludeoxyglucose-positron emission ;tomography/CT's (FDG-PET/CT) performance in the follow ;up of patients with surgically treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The follow-up FDG-PET/CT scans of 162 consecutive patients with surgically treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Histopathological and/or imaging examinations confirmed recurrent disease. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 71 (43%) patients, usually within the first year following surgery (60%) and in more than one site (76%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for anastomotic recurrence were 77, 76, 16, 98 and 76%; for regional nodal recurrence were 88, 85, 43, 97 and 86%; and for distant metastatic recurrence were: 97, 96, 91, 99 and 96%. In 5 of the 42 patients (12%) with distant metastases, the metastatic sites were outside the area covered by a conventional follow-up chest-abdomen CT and in 4 patients (9%) metastases were barely perceptible on the CT component of the FDG-PET/CT and consequently were unlikely to be detected without the aid of the FDG uptake.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT is accurate in detecting oesophageal adenocarcinoma recurrence, especially within the first post-operative year when most recurrences occur, and is useful in identifying patients with a solitary metastasis. Advances in knowledge: FDG-PET/CT should be considered as a valuable tool in the routine follow ;up of surgically treated oesophageal cancer patients within the first 2 years after surgery.