1
|
Karabulut S, Şen S, Soydinç HO, Doğan İ, Taştekin D, Karabulut M, Duman M, Turan M. Investigation of the potential of miRNA candidates as non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and follow-up of colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 254:155094. [PMID: 38219497 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and despite advances in treatment, molecular biomarkers are needed for both early diagnosis and prognosis monitoring. It is known that microRNAs (miRNA), one of the epigenetic mechanisms, are effective in the initiation and development of cancer by regulating the activity of tumor suppressors and/or oncogenes. In this study, the potential of the molecules let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a, which are known to play a role in cellular processes, as biomarkers for colorectal cancer and their molecular mechanisms were investigated in this model. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive utility of the target miRNAs in colorectal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The expression changes of miRNAs let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a were investigated by miRNAs isolation and cDNA synthesis from the serum samples of 60 patients diagnosed with CRC or from the serum samples of 20 healthy individuals. The calculation was performed using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method to determine the expression level. The results were compared with clinical parameters. RESULT An 8-fold decrease in the expression of let-7 and miRNA125b and a 60-fold decrease in the expression of miRNA30a were found in the serum samples of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the healthy group. A decrease in let-7 was observed in 53.3%, miRNA125b in 58.3%, and miRNA30a in 55% of patients. A significant correlation was found between the reduced expression status and the stage, lymph nodes, local recurrence, and metastasis (p < 0.05). The ROC analysis showed that the miRNA30a level could be a diagnostic biomarker for CRC (p < 0.001). No significant impact of target miRNA expression changes on overall disease survival was observed. CONCLUSION It is thought that the target miRNA30a can be used for early diagnosis and screening and that the target miRNA let-7, miRNA125b, and miRNA30a can be used as non-invasive biomarkers for disease follow-up, with larger patient studies being conducted on CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senem Karabulut
- Department of Clinic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye; Department of Molecular Oncology, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye.
| | - Sena Şen
- Department of Basic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Hilal Oğuz Soydinç
- Department of Basic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - İzzet Doğan
- Department of Clinic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Didem Taştekin
- Department of Clinic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mehmet Karabulut
- Department of General Surgery, Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Duman
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mustafa Turan
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ünal Ç, Azizy A, Karabulut S, Taştekin D, Akyıldız A, Yaşar S, Yalçın Ş, Çoban E, Evrensel T, Kalkan Z, Oruç Z, Derin S, Turna ZH, Bayram D, Köş FT, Şendur MAN, Sever N, Ercelep Ö, Seyyar M, Kefeli U, Uygun K, Özçelik M, Ön S, Şanlı UA, Canaslan K, Ünek İT, Yücel KB, Özdemir N, Yazıcı O, Güzel HG, Salim DK, Göksu SS, Tatlı AM, Ordu Ç, Selvi O, Sakin A, Büyükbayram ME, Dursun B, Ürün Y, Arak H, Ağdaş G, Uğraklı M, Hendem E, Eryılmaz MK, Bilgin B, Topçu A, Şimşek M, Büyükşimşek M, Akay B, Erdal GŞ, Karataş F, Alan Ö, Çağlayan M, Kahvecioğlu FA, Demirci A, Paksoy N, Çetin B, Gümüş M, Ak N, Aydınalp Y, Paydaş S, Güven DC, Kılıçkap S, Sağlam S. Efficacy of Capecitabine and Temozolomide Regimen in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Data From the Turkish Oncology Group. Oncologist 2023; 28:875-884. [PMID: 37676712 PMCID: PMC10546829 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) across different lines of treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective study analyzing the data of 308 patients with metastatic NETs treated with CAPTEM between 2010 and 2022 in 34 different hospitals across various regions of Turkey. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 41.0 months (range: 1.7-212.1), and the median age was 53 years (range: 22-79). Our results across the entire patient cohort showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 60.4 months. First-line CAPTEM treatment appeared more effective, with a median PFS of 16.1 months and a median OS of 105.8 months (median PFS 16.1, 7.9, and 9.6 months in first-, second- and ≥third-line respectively, P = .01; with median OS values of 105.8, 47.2, and 24.1 months, respectively, P = .003) In terms of ORR, the first-line treatment again performed better, resulting in an ORR of 54.7% compared to 33.3% and 30.0% in the second and third or higher lines, respectively (P < .001). Grade 3-4 side effects occurred only in 22.5% of the patients, leading to a discontinuation rate of 9.5%. Despite the differences in outcomes based on treatment line, we did not observe a significant difference in terms of side effects between the first and subsequent lines of treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The substantial superior outcomes in patients receiving first-line CAPTEM treatment highlight its potential as an effective treatment strategy for patients with metastatic NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Çağlar Ünal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdulmunir Azizy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul University Institute of Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Senem Karabulut
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul University Institute of Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Didem Taştekin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul University Institute of Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Arif Akyıldız
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serkan Yaşar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Şuayib Yalçın
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Eyüp Çoban
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uludağ University Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Türkkan Evrensel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uludağ University Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ziya Kalkan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Oruç
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dicle University Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Sümeyra Derin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Hande Turna
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpaşa University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Doğan Bayram
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fahriye Tuğba Köş
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nihat Şendur
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nadiye Sever
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Özlem Ercelep
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Marmara University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Seyyar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kocaeli University Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Umut Kefeli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kocaeli University Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Kazım Uygun
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kocaeli University Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Melike Özçelik
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ümraniye Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Sercan Ön
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Ulus Ali Şanlı
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Kübra Canaslan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - İlkay Tuba Ünek
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Kadriye Bir Yücel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Özdemir
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Yazıcı
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Halil Göksel Güzel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Derya Kıvrak Salim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Sema Sezgin Göksu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ali Murat Tatlı
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Çetin Ordu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gayrettepe Florence Nightinagle Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Oğuzhan Selvi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Okmeydanı Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Sakin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bahçelievler Medipol Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Emin Büyükbayram
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ataturk University Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Bengü Dursun
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hacı Arak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Gözde Ağdaş
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Osmangazi University Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Uğraklı
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konya Meram University Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Engin Hendem
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konya Meram University Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Melek Karakurt Eryılmaz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konya Meram University Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Burak Bilgin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Atakan Topçu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Melih Şimşek
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bezmialem Vakıf University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Büyükşimşek
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Adana Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Büşra Akay
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara Yurtaslan City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gülçin Şahingöz Erdal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Karataş
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Karabük University Hospital, Karabük, Turkey
| | - Özkan Alan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Koc University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Melek Çağlayan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konya Selçuk University Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Fatma Akdağ Kahvecioğlu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sakarya Research and Training Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Demirci
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sakarya Research and Training Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Nail Paksoy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tekirdağ City Hospital, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| | - Bülent Çetin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Gümüş
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Göztepe Medeniyet University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Naziye Ak
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, İstanbul Florence Nightinagle Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Aydınalp
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Adana Balcalı University Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Semra Paydaş
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Adana Balcalı University Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Deniz Can Güven
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Elazığ, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kılıçkap
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezer Sağlam
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Demiroglu Bilim University, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ay S, Atcı MM, Arıkan R, Dülgar Ö, Özyükseler DT, Paksoy N, Doğan İ, Öztosun B, Taştekin D, Öven BB, Gümüş M. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as the first-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Chemother 2022; 34:465-471. [PMID: 35037592 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2022.2026125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas cancer (PCa) is one of the mortal cancer types with ranking as fourth leading cancer death in both sexes together. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) are approved as first-line metastatic treatment in PCa. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, treated with FFX and GNP as first-line metastatic PCa. Medical records of patients diagnosed with metastatic PCa, from January 2010 to December 2020 were analyzed. This study was a retrospective cohort, multi-institution analysis. The focus of the present study was to compare the efficiency of FFX and GNP chemotherapy combinations in the first-line treatment of PCa. Efficacy had been measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). 182 patients diagnosed with PCa receiving metastatic first-line treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups one hundred and three (56.6%) patients treated with FFX and seventy-nine (43.4%) patients treated with GNP. Patients in the FFX group were younger and had a better ECOG performance status. Overall response rate (ORR) was 69.9% in FFX and 37.9% in GNP group (p: 0.000). Disease control rate (DCR) was 73.7% in patients treated with FFX and 39.2% in GNP group (p: 0.000). The median PFS was 8.3 months (FFX 9.1 vs. GNP 6.7, HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.38) the median OS was 12.2 months (FFX 14.1 vs. GNP 9.6, HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.72). Guidelines recommend both FFX and GNP regimens as a first-line treatment of metastatic PCa. In clinical routine, it is still unclear which regiment is more effective. The present study showed increased survival parameters with FFX versus GNP with similar toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seval Ay
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Rukiye Arıkan
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University
| | - Özgecan Dülgar
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Nail Paksoy
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University
| | - İzzet Doğan
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul University
| | - Buğra Öztosun
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Didem Taştekin
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Bahçeşehir University
| | - Başak Bala Öven
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Bahçeşehir University
| | - Mahmut Gümüş
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|