Efficacious response with lower dose indapamide therapy in the treatment of elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension

A low dose (1.25 mg) of indapamide (Lozol, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, PA) was evaluated in 222 elderly patients (> or = 50 years) with mild to moderate essential hypertension in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. A 4-week single-blind placebo washout period was followed by an 8-week double-blind treatment period. Patients were randomized to receive indapamide 1.25 mg/day or to receive placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change in sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 8. Eighty-one patients in the indapamide group (73%) and 87 patients in the placebo group (78%) completed the 8 weeks of double-blind therapy. Therapy with 1.25 mg of indapamide produced greater reductions compared with placebo in sitting diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of therapy, with statistical significance (P < or = 0.0015) seen after only 2 weeks of therapy and continuing throughout the 8 weeks. All secondary efficacy measures (sitting systolic blood pressure, standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and > or = 10 mm Hg decrease or final value of < or = 90 mm Hg in sitting diastolic blood pressure) also showed superior (P < or = 0.0014) improvement in the indapamide group compared with placebo after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. During the 8-week double-blind treatment period, incidence rates for all adverse events and for drug-related adverse events were similar between the two treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lower dose diuretic therapy in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension

Indapamide (Lozol), an indoline antihypertensive drug with diuretic and vasodilating activities, was evaluated in 195 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting DBP between 95 and 110 mmHg) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group design trial. A four week single-blind placebo wash-out period was followed by an eight week double-blind period. Patients were randomised to indapamide 1.25 mg/day or to placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in sitting DBP from baseline to week 8. Ninety patients in the placebo group (93%) and 82 patients (84%) in the indapamide group completed the eight weeks of double-blind therapy. Indapamide produced a mean (SE) decrease in sitting DBP of 7.4 (0.63) mmHg (from 100.1 to 92.8 mmHg) compared with a decrease of 3.6 (0.75) mmHg (from 99.6 to 95.8 mmHg) produced by placebo (p < 0.0001). Indapamide and placebo also produced mean decreases in standing DBP of 6.8 (0.75) and 2.8 (0.77) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0002), in sitting SBP of 11.1 (1.18) and 3.2 (1.35) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0001) and in standing SBP of 11.4 (1.29) and 4.0 (1.43) mmHg, respectively (P = 0.0002). Reduction in BP of > or = 10 mmHg or to a DBP of < or = 90 mmHg was more frequent (P = 0.0005) among indapamide (46.6%) compared with placebo (23.7%) treated patients. During the eight week double-blind treatment period, incidence rates for all adverse experiences and for drug-related adverse experiences were similar between the two treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to enalapril: an evaluation of efficacy and patient compliance

This four-center, 20-week, open-label study evaluated transdermal clonidine as an adjunct to enalapril 10 mg daily and demonstrated patterns of compliance. Seventy-four mildly to moderately hypertensive patients (mean seated blood pressure, 150/101 mm Hg) received enalapril 10 mg once daily as initial monotherapy. In 66 patients, the seated diastolic blood pressure remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg at the trough blood levels of enalapril. Transdermal clonidine (3.5 cm2, 7.0 cm2, or 10.5 cm2, equivalent to 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, and 0.3 mg clonidine/day, respectively) then was added as needed to achieve blood pressure control. Forty-eight patients achieved diastolic blood pressures less than 90 mm Hg on concomitant therapy; 44 patients completed 8 weeks of maintenance dosing with a mean blood pressure of 134/85 mm Hg. Oral compliance, as measured by an electronic device that was actuated each time the medication vial was opened, varied from 48 to 140%. Compliance with the transdermal clonidine regimen was excellent; the patch was worn as directed during 96% of the patient-weeks of therapy. The authors conclude that blood pressure can be controlled by a combination of transdermal clonidine and enalapril in patients that do not adequately respond to enalapril monotherapy. Patients poorly complying with oral regimens may be candidates for a trial of transdermal clonidine monotherapy.

Disposition of ampiroxicam, a prodrug of piroxicam, in man

1. Ampiroxicam, a prodrug of the effective anti-inflammatory agent piroxicam, was completely converted to piroxicam after oral administration to man. 2. At clinical doses there was no detectable portal or systemic exposure of man to ampiroxicam, indicating that conversion to piroxicam was complete during the absorption process. 3. The pharmacokinetics of piroxicam from ampiroxicam were essentially the same as those after piroxicam itself except that Cmax was slightly lower and tmax was slightly longer after administration of ampiroxicam.

Nalmefene: safety and kinetics after single and multiple oral doses of a new opioid antagonist

The aim of these two studies was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral nalmefene, a new orally effective opioid antagonist. In the first study, single ascending doses of 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg of nalmefene HCl were administered in double-blind fashion to four groups of healthy men. There were six subjects in each group; four received nalmefene and two received placebo. The drug was well tolerated at all dose levels with only mild and transient side effects, such as lightheadedness, at the higher doses. Model-independent pharmacokinetic analysis of the plasma concentration-time data showed that nalmefene was rapidly absorbed and had an elimination half-life that ranged from seven to 15 hours (mean, 10.7 hr). There was a good linear relationship (r = .97) between administered dose and total area under the curve at each dose level. Only about 4% of the dose was excreted in the urine as unchanged nalmefene, whereas up to 60% was excreted as a beta-glucuronidase/sulfatase hydrolysable conjugate(s) of nalmefene. In the second study, six healthy men were initially administered a single 50-mg dose of drug, and plasma samples were obtained at selected time intervals for 48 hours. A dosing schedule of 20 mg q12h was then started and continued for seven days. Plasma samples were collected immediately before each dose and at selected times for up to 48 hours after the last dose. The drug was well tolerated by all subjects, and no clinically significant adverse effects were observed during the seven-day administration period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Etodolac kinetics in the elderly

The effects of age and chronic dosing on the pharmacokinetics of the anti-inflammatory drug etodolac were evaluated in healthy young subjects, healthy elderly subjects, and elderly patients with osteoarthritis. After either single or chronic (7 days) dosing, both the healthy elderly subjects and the elderly patients with osteoarthritis had values for etodolac peak concentration, time to reach peak concentration, the AUC from 0 to 24 hours, elimination t1/2, and free fraction that did not differ significantly from those in the young (control) subjects. Despite the expected increases in the peak concentration and AUC from 0 to 24 hours for all groups after chronic dosing, there were no changes in etodolac free fraction, time to peak concentration, or t1/2. Because significant accumulation of etodolac was not observed in our elderly participants, adjustment of dosage when elderly subjects receive etodolac therapy is not indicated.

Nalmefene: intravenous safety and kinetics of a new opioid antagonist

In a placebo-controlled, double-blind study we evaluated the safety and kinetics of a new narcotic antagonist, nalmefene, after 2, 6, 12, and 24 mg intravenous doses to healthy men. At each dose level four subjects received active drug and two received placebo. The drug was well tolerated at all dose levels with only mild and transient side effects, the most common of which was lightheadedness. The plasma concentration-time data were best fit with a triexponential equation, and the terminal elimination phase had a harmonic mean t1/2 of 8 to 9 hours. Only about 5% of the dose was excreted in the urine as intact nalmefene, with up to 60% excreted as nalmefene glucuronide. Although intersubject differences were noted, mean or dose-normalized mean kinetic parameters such as clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, terminal t1/2, and AUC showed no consistent trends related to increasing doses, indicating that nalmefene has linear pharmacokinetics.

Gastrointestinal microbleeding associated with the use of etodolac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, and naproxen in normal males

Etodolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory and analgesic drug, was used in a randomized, parallel group, open-label design study, with stool analysis conducted in a blind fashion, to compare its effect in normal men in doses of 400 mg (N = 11) and 600 mg (N = 12) b.i.d. on gastrointestinal microbleeding with that of 600 mg ibuprofen, q.i.d. (N = 12), 50 mg indomethacin in the morning, 50 mg at noon, and 100 mg h.s. (N = 9), and 375 mg naproxen b.i.d. (N = 9). Etodolac was given at about 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 times the mean effective dose used for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The other drugs were given at their manufacturers' maximum recommended doses. Lead-in placebo was given for one week, active drug for one week, and washout placebo for one week. Fecal blood loss was measured by the 51Cr-tagged red cell method, and was averaged over days 4-7 (baseline), 11-14 (treatment period), and 17-20 (washout). The mean increase in blood loss for the treatment period for the 400 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.13 ml) and 600 mg etodolac b.i.d. group (0.10 ml) was significantly less (P = 0.001) than the corresponding values for ibuprofen (1.14 ml), indomethacin (1.20 ml), and naproxen (0.87 ml). There was no tendency for greater blood loss at higher doses of etodolac. Etodolac at doses in excess of the mean effective dose in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis caused significantly less microbleeding in normal male volunteers during the seven-day treatment period than the other drugs tested, and not clinically more than that occurring during baseline placebo.

Dynamics of propranolol dosing schedules

Kinetic and dynamic data from 27 healthy male subjects were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, double-crossover study to test the hypothesis that 180 mg/day propranolol twice and three times a day would provide much the same plasma levels and beta 1-blockade. The data indicate that propranolol twice rather than three times a day should be favored when beta 1-blockade is needed in therapy. The dynamic efficacy of the two schedules was the same and maximum concentration, AUC0-24, and 0-hr plasma propranolol values were higher after twice-than after three-times-daily dosing. The degree of beta 1-blockade (reduction in exercise tachycardia) was much the same on both dosing regimens at trough concentrations. These data indicate that both twice- and three-times-a-day dosing schedules provide well-sustained 24-hr beta-blockade and are probably interchangeable for therapeutic purposes.