1
|
Lommi M, De Benedictis A, Porcelli B, Raffaele B, Latina R, Montini G, Tolentino Diaz MY, Guarente L, De Maria M, Ricci S, Giovanniello D, Rocco G, Stievano A, Sabatino L, Notarnicola I, Gualandi R, Tartaglini D, Ivziku D. Evaluation of Standard Precautions Compliance Instruments: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11101408. [PMID: 37239700 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11101408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard precautions (SPs) are first-line strategies with a dual goal: to protect health care workers from occupational contamination while providing care to infected patients and to prevent/reduce health care-associated infections (HAIs). This study aimed at (1) identifying the instruments currently available for measuring healthcare professionals' compliance with standard precautions; (2) evaluating their measurement properties; and (3) providing sound evidence for instrument selection for use by researchers, teachers, staff trainers, and clinical tutors. METHODS We carried out a systematic review to examine the psychometric properties of standard precautions self-assessment instruments in conformity with the COSMIN guidelines. The search was conducted on the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and APA PsycInfo. RESULTS Thirteen instruments were identified. These were classified into four categories of tools assessing: compliance with universal precautions, adherence to standard precautions, compliance with hand hygiene, and adherence to transmission-based guidelines and precautions. The psychometric properties of instruments and methodological approaches of the included studies were often not satisfactory. Only four instruments were classified as high-quality measurements. CONCLUSIONS The available instruments that measure healthcare professionals' compliance with standard precautions are of low-moderate quality. It is necessary that future research completes the validation processes undertaken for long-established and newly developed instruments, using higher-quality methods and estimating all psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lommi
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna De Benedictis
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Porcelli
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Raffaele
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Latina
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Graziella Montini
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luca Guarente
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevetion, University Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena De Maria
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevetion, University Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Ricci
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Dominique Giovanniello
- Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Gennaro Rocco
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
- Department of Nursing, Catholic University "Our Lady of Good Counsel", 1000 Tirana, Albania
| | - Alessandro Stievano
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Laura Sabatino
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Ippolito Notarnicola
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaella Gualandi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Tartaglini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Dhurata Ivziku
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lommi M, De Benedictis A, Ricci S, Guarente L, Latina R, Covelli G, Pozzuoli G, De Maria M, Giovanniello D, Rocco G, Stievano A, Sabatino L, Notarnicola I, Gualandi R, Tartaglini D, Ivziku D. Appraisal and Evaluation of the Learning Environment Instruments of the Student Nurse: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11071043. [PMID: 37046970 PMCID: PMC10094483 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11071043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nursing education consists of theory and practice, and student nurses' perception of the learning environment, both educational and clinical, is one of the elements that determines the success or failure of their university study path. This study aimed to identify the currently available tools for measuring the clinical and educational learning environments of student nurses and to evaluate their measurement properties in order to provide solid evidence for researchers, educators, and clinical tutors to use in the selection of tools. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the psychometric properties of self-reported learning environment tools in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Guidelines of 2018. The research was conducted on the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, and ERIC. RESULTS In the literature, 14 instruments were found that evaluate both the traditional and simulated clinical learning environments and the educational learning environments of student nurses. These tools can be ideally divided into first-generation tools developed from different learning theories and second-generation tools developed by mixing, reviewing, and integrating different already-validated tools. CONCLUSION Not all the relevant psychometric properties of the instruments were evaluated, and the methodological approaches used were often doubtful or inadequate, thus threatening the instruments' external validity. Further research is needed to complete the validation processes undertaken for both new and already developed instruments, using higher-quality methods and evaluating all psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lommi
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna De Benedictis
- Clinical Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 000128 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Ricci
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Guarente
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Latina
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuliana Covelli
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pozzuoli
- UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena De Maria
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Dominique Giovanniello
- Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Gennaro Rocco
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stievano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Laura Sabatino
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Ippolito Notarnicola
- Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Order of Nurses of Rome, 00136 Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaella Gualandi
- Department of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 000128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Tartaglini
- Department of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 000128 Rome, Italy
| | - Dhurata Ivziku
- Department of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 000128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ricciardi S, Giovanniello D, Di Martino M, Carleo F, Jaus M, Mantovani S, Salvadori L, Aratari M, Carbone L, De Massimi A, Treggiari S, Cardillo G. EP07.01-017 Malignant Fibrous Solitary Tumour of the Pleura Is Not All the Same: Evaluation of Risk Stratification Models in a Large Single Centre Series. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|