1
|
Magri V, Marino L, De Renzi G, De Meo M, Salvatori F, Buccilli D, Bianco V, Santini D, Nicolazzo C, Gazzaniga P. Early Detection of Disease Progression in Metastatic Cancers: Could CTCs Improve RECIST Criteria? Biomedicines 2024; 12:388. [PMID: 38397990 PMCID: PMC10887063 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Early detection of disease progression is a crucial issue in the management of cancer patients, especially in metastatic settings. Currently, treatment selection mostly relies on criteria based on radiologic evaluations (RECIST). The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the potential inclusion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in hybrid criteria. CTC counts from a total of 160 patients with different metastatic tumors were analyzed for this purpose. In our cohort, 73 patients were affected by breast cancer, 69 by colorectal cancer and 18 by prostate cancer. PFS and OS were evaluated according to the corresponding prediction of disease progression by CTCs and RECIST criteria. In breast cancer, CTC-I has an important impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values. When CTC-I predicted earlier than RECIST-I, the disease progression, the PFS and OS were shorter with respect to the opposite case. In particular, PFS was 11 (5-16) vs. 34 (23-45)-with p < 0.001-and OS was 80 (22-138) vs. 116 (43-189), p = 0.33. The results suggest a promising role of CTCs as complementary information which could significantly improve the clinical outcomes, and they encourage consideration of future trials to evaluate new hybrid criteria, particularly for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Magri
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Luca Marino
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gianluigi De Renzi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Michela De Meo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Francesca Salvatori
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Dorelsa Buccilli
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Bianco
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Chiara Nicolazzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Paola Gazzaniga
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buccilli D, Onesti C, Vari S, Maggi G, Faltyn W, Cenci C, Ceddia S, Biagini R, Ferraresi V, Cercato M. 62P Digital narrative diary: The role in daily clinical practice of soft tissue and bone sarcomas patients. ESMO Open 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
|
3
|
Roberto M, Panebianco M, Aschelter AM, Buccilli D, Cantisani C, Caponnetto S, Cortesi E, d’Amuri S, Fofi C, Ierinò D, Maestrini V, Marchetti P, Marignani M, Stigliano A, Vivona L, Santini D, Tomao S. The value of the multidisciplinary team in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Paving the way for precision medicine in toxicities management. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1026978. [PMID: 36713496 PMCID: PMC9879059 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1026978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The new landscape of treatments for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) is constantly expanding, but it is associated with the emergence of novel toxicities, adding to up to those observed in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. Indeed, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination has been associated with the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving multiple-organ systems which, even if rarely, had led to fatal outcomes. Moreover, due to the relatively recent addition of ICIs to the previously available treatments, the potential additive adverse effects of these combinations are still unknown. A prompt recognition and management of these toxicities currently represents a fundamental issue in oncology, since it correlates with the outcome of cancer patients. Even if clinical guidelines provide indications for the management of irAEs, no specific protocol to evaluate the individual risk of developing an adverse event during therapy is currently available. A multidisciplinary approach addressing appropriate interventions aimed at reducing the risk of any insidious, severe, and/or dose-limiting toxicity might represent the most efficacious strategy to timely prevent and manage severe irAEs, allowing indirectly to improve both patients' cancer-specific survival and quality of life. In this review, we reported a five-case series of toxicity events that occurred at our center during treatment for mRCC followed by the remarks of physicians from different specialties, pinpointing the relevant role of an integrated and extended multidisciplinary team in a modern model of mRCC patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Roberto
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Panebianco
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,*Correspondence: Martina Panebianco,
| | - Anna Maria Aschelter
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Dorelsa Buccilli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Cantisani
- Department of Dermatology, Complex Operative Unit (UOC) of Dermatology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Caponnetto
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara d’Amuri
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Fofi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Ierinò
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Oncology Unit, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Viviana Maestrini
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Scientific Direction, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata (IDI-IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Marignani
- Head Liver Disease Section, Digestive and Liver Diseases Department, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Stigliano
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Endocrinology Unit, Sant ‘Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Vivona
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Complex Operative Unit (UOC) Oncologia Medica, Sapienza University, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cosimati A, Onesti C, Salvatori F, Riva F, Vari S, Renna D, Buccilli D, Covello R, Casini B, Rollo F, Ciliberto G, Ferraresi V. 29P Sarcoma patients need precision oncology: Is molecular tumor board the right way? Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
5
|
Verrico M, Roberto M, Barchiesi G, Di Lisa FS, Arcuri T, Vivona L, Fuccillo F, Astorino V, Buccilli D, Maltese G, Di Civita MA, Votto A, Ballario A, Cara N, de Meo S, Bianco V, Speranza I, Botticelli A, Tomao S. Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte and myelocite-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic markers for immunotherapy response in patients with advanced solid tumors, a retrospective analysis from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e14529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e14529 Background: PD-L1 is the only biomarker that has been accepted to identify patients who could potentially benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administration, but also PD-L1 negative tumors respond to immunotherapy. However, other biomarkers have been proposed but they are too expensive and actually, there is not a consensus for detection and analytical methods. Thus, there is an urgent need for inexpensive and reproducible tests to better optimize the clinical use of ICIs. Recent findings suggest that host parameters may help to select patients to treat with ICIs: performance status (PS) and some laboratory parameters, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and blood cells count. Inflammation and inflammatory response have been considered surrogate biomarkers of host immunity. An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), myeloid-to-lymphocyte (MLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio have been associated with systemic inflammation and some evidences suggest that these biomarkers could play a role as prognostic factors. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 250 patients treated with ICIs at our institution. The associations between basal NLR, MLR and PLR, clinicopathological features and their impact on progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities were assessed. Results: From May 2015 to January 2022, 250 patients were screened, of whom 66 were excluded from the analysis. A total of 184 patients (64.7% men), with a median age of 68 years (37-90) a PS 0 (52.2%), 1 (39.7%) and 2 (8.1%), were enrolled. The primary tumor origin was lung (93 adenocarcinoma, 19 squamous, 14 small cell lung cancer), urothelial (33), melanoma (4) and renal (21). Nivolumab was used in 103 patients, Pembrolizumab in 67 and atezolizumab in 18. At 24 months median follow up there were 131 progression diseases and 122 deaths. Overall, the median value of NLR, PLR and MLR was 3.15 (1-41), 168 (4-797) and 3.5 (0-245), respectively. Lower values of NLR and PLR were associated with a better median PFS (HR for NLR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p = 0.002; HR for PLR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.6 - 3.2, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR for NLR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.017; HR for PLR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.7 p < 0.0001). MLR was not statistically significant. According to primary tumor origin, renal cancer reported a value significantly under the median of NLR and PLR (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021 respectively). Toxicity and clinico-pathological factors showed a significant association between female sex and both severe fatigue (p = 0.002) and pain (p = 0.018). Pain was also related to younger age (p = 0.009) and to a PS ≥2 (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our study shows that NLR and PLR represent inexpensive, reproducible and reliable markers that may help identifying patients who can have a greater benefit from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verrico
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Giacomo Barchiesi
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Sofia Di Lisa
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Arcuri
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche, Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Vivona
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche, Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Fuccillo
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Astorino
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Dorelsa Buccilli
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Maltese
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Alberto Di Civita
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Amedeo Votto
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ballario
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Nertila Cara
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone de Meo
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bianco
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Iolanda Speranza
- Uoc Oncologia “A”, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomopatologiche, “Sapienza” Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barchetti G, Simone G, Ceravolo I, Salvo V, Campa R, Del Giudice F, De Berardinis E, Buccilli D, Catalano C, Gallucci M, Catto JWF, Panebianco V. Multiparametric MRI of the bladder: inter-observer agreement and accuracy with the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) at a single reference center. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:5498-5506. [PMID: 30887202 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06117-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate accuracy and inter-observer variability using Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for discrimination between non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS Between September 2017 and July 2018, 78 patients referred for suspected bladder cancer underwent multiparametric MRI of the bladder (mpMRI) prior to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). All mpMRI were reviewed by two radiologists, who scored each lesion according to VI-RADS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each VI-RADS cutoff. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to evaluate the performance of mpMRI. The Ƙ statistics was used to estimate inter-reader agreement. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were included in the final analysis, 53 with NMIBC and 22 with MIBC. Sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 89% for reader 1 and 82% and 85% for reader 2 respectively when the cutoff VI-RADS > 2 was used to define MIBC. At the same cutoff, PPV and NPV were 77% and 96% for reader 1 and 69% and 92% for reader 2. When the cutoff VI-RADS > 3 was used, sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 94% for reader 1 and 77% and 89% for reader 2. Corresponding PPV and NPV were 86% and 93% for reader 1 and 74% and 91% for reader 2. Area under curve was 0.926 and 0.873 for reader 1 and 2 respectively. Inter-reader agreement was good for the overall score (Ƙ = 0.731). CONCLUSIONS VI-RADS is accurate in differentiating MIBC from NMIBC. Inter-reader agreement is overall good. KEY POINTS • Traditionally, the local staging of bladder cancer relies on transurethral resection of bladder tumor. • However, transurethral resection of bladder tumor carries a significant risk of understaging a cancer; therefore, more accurate, faster, and non-invasive staging techniques are needed to improve outcomes. • Multiparametric MRI has proved to be the best imaging modality for local staging; therefore, its use in suitable patients has the potential to expedite radical treatment when necessary and non-invasive diagnosis in patients with poor fitness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Barchetti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Insitute, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Ceravolo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salvo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campa
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Gynecological-Obstetric and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Gynecological-Obstetric and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Dorelsa Buccilli
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Insitute, Rome, Italy
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|