Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel somatostatin receptor 2 antagonist, ZT-01, for hypoglycemia prevention in a rodent model of type 2 diabetes

Background: Elevated levels of somatostatin blunt glucagon counterregulation during hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and this can be improved using somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) antagonists. Hypoglycemia also occurs in late-stage type 2 diabetes (T2D), particularly when insulin therapy is initiated, but the utility of SSTR2 antagonists in ameliorating hypoglycemia in this disease state is unknown. We examined the efficacy of a single-dose of SSTR2 antagonists in a rodent model of T2D. Methods: High-fat fed (HFF), low dose streptozotocin (STZ, 35 mg/kg)-induced T2D and HFF only, nondiabetic (controls-no STZ) rats were treated with the SSTR2 antagonists ZT-01/PRL-2903 or vehicle (n = 9-11/group) 60 min before an insulin tolerance test (ITT; 2-12 U/kg insulin aspart) or an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 2 g/kg glucose via oral gavage) on separate days. Results: This rodent model of T2D is characterized by higher baseline glucose and HbA1c levels relative to HFF controls. T2D rats also had lower c-peptide levels at baseline and a blunted glucagon counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia when subjected to the ITT. SSTR2 antagonists increased the glucagon response and reduced incidence of hypoglycemia, which was more pronounced with ZT-01 than PRL-2903. ZT-01 treatment in the T2D rats increased glucagon levels above the control response within 60 min of dosing, and values remained elevated during the ITT (glucagon Cmax: 156 ± 50 vs. 77 ± 46 pg/mL, p < 0.01). Hypoglycemia incidence was attenuated with ZT-01 vs. controls (63% vs. 100%) and average time to hypoglycemia onset was also delayed (103.1 ± 24.6 vs. 66.1 ± 23.6 min, p < 0.05). ZT-01 administration at the OGTT onset increased the glucagon response without exacerbating hyperglycemia (2877 ± 806 vs. 2982 ± 781), potentially due to the corresponding increase in c-peptide levels (6251 ± 5463 vs. 14008 ± 5495, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Treatment with SSTR2 antagonists increases glucagon responses in a rat model of T2D and results in less hypoglycemia exposure. Future studies are required to determine the best dosing periods for chronic SSTR2 antagonism treatment in T2D.

The Impact of Sex, Body Mass Index, Age, Exercise Type and Exercise Duration on Interstitial Glucose Levels during Exercise

The impact of age, sex and body mass index on interstitial glucose levels as measured via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during exercise in the healthy population is largely unexplored. We conducted a multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis on CGM data (Dexcom G6, 10 days) collected from 119 healthy exercising individuals using CGM with the following specified covariates: age; sex; BMI; exercise type and duration. Females had lower postexercise glycemia as compared with males (92 ± 18 vs. 100 ± 20 mg/dL, p = 0.04) and a greater change in glycemia during exercise from pre- to postexercise (p = 0.001) or from pre-exercise to glucose nadir during exercise (p = 0.009). Younger individuals (i.e., <20 yrs) had higher glucose during exercise as compared with all other age groups (all p < 0.05) and less CGM data in the hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL) as compared with those aged 20-39 yrs (p < 0.05). Those who were underweight, based on body mass index (BMI: <18.5 kg/m2), had higher pre-exercise glycemia than the healthy BMI group (104 ± 20 vs. 97 ± 17 mg/dL, p = 0.02) but similar glucose levels after exercise. Resistance exercise was associated with less of a drop in glycemia as compared with aerobic or mixed forms of exercise (p = 0.008) and resulted in a lower percent of time in the hypoglycemic (p = 0.04) or hyperglycemic (glucose > 140 mg/dL) (p = 0.03) ranges. In summary, various factors such as age, sex and exercise type appear to have subtle but potentially important influence on CGM measurements during exercise in healthy individuals.

A Brief Review on the Evolution of Technology in Exercise and Sport in Type 1 Diabetes: Past, Present, and Future

One hundred years ago, insulin was first used to successfully lower blood glucose levels in young people living with what was then called juvenile diabetes. While insulin was not a cure for diabetes, it allowed individuals to resume a near normal life and have some freedom to eat more liberally and gain the strength they needed to live a more active lifestyle. Since then, a number of therapeutic and technical advances have arisen to further improve the health and wellbeing of individuals living with type 1 diabetes, allowing many to participate in sport at the local, regional, national or international level of competition. This review and commentary highlights some of the key advances in diabetes management in sport over the last 100 years since the discovery of insulin.