4
|
Focke CM, Gläser D, Finsterbusch K, Bürger H, Korsching E, Berghäuser KH, Hinrichs B, Krause U, Lorenzen J, Packeisen J, van Diest PJ, Decker T. Abstract P3-05-09: Interlaboratory variability of Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer tissue microarrays. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p3-05-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Assessment of tumor proliferation using the Ki67 labeling index (Ki67-LI) is increasingly recommended for prognostication and adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer. Our aim was to investigate interlaboratory variance of Ki67-LI results using TMA and centralised assessment to exclude preanalytic influences and postanalytic variance, respectively.
Methods: Nine pathology laboratories (8 German and 1 Dutch) performed Ki67 staining of a TMA slide according to their routine in house protocol (including internal and external quality assurance). 40 samples per lab were centrally analyzed. The Ki67-LI was calculated after counting first all tumor cells and subsequently all Ki67 positive tumor cells of each sample regardless of staining intensity. For each tissue sample we evaluated the range of Ki67-LIs between different labs. Further 20 labs of the German Breast Screening Pathology Initiative will participate in 2013.
Results: The range of Ki67-LIs between the labs was: 1-5% in 4 (10%), 6-10% in 6 (15%), 11-15% in 7 (17,5%), 16-20% in 2 (5%), 21-25% in 7 (17%), 26-30% in 4 (10%), 31-35% in 1 (1%), 36-40% in 4 (10%), 41-45% in 2 (5%), 46-50 in 0 (0%) and >50% in 3 samples (7%), respectively. Thus, in 35% of results of the 9 labs (26 of the 40 TMA specimens) the Ki67-LI differed by more than 25%. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) came out with F = 4.24 which is much larger than the critical F value of 1.97 for these study results (p = 7.74902E-05). This means that the observed interlaboratory variance of 4.24 is systematic and not due to sampling error. The respective standard deviation is 33.4%.
Conclusion: In a setting strictly standardised in terms of preanalytic influences by using TMA and postanalytic variance by centralised quantification, Ki67-LI seems to be heavily influenced by laboratory-specific analytic variables. Taking this into consideration, there may be a risk of prognostic or predictive misclassification in some breast cancer patients in daily practice.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-05-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CM Focke
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - D Gläser
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - K Finsterbusch
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - H Bürger
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - E Korsching
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - K-H Berghäuser
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - B Hinrichs
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - U Krause
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J Lorenzen
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J Packeisen
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - PJ van Diest
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - T Decker
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Thüringen-Hospital Georgius Agricola, Saalfeld, Saalfeld, Germany; Medical Care Center for Pathology and Cytology, Köln, Köln, Germany; Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Klinikzentrum Mitte, Dortmund, Germany; Joint Practice for Pathology, Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boecker W, Hallas C, Korsching E, Stahnke L, Decker T, Tio J, Weigel S, Buchwalow I, Loening T. Abstract P6-01-08: Keratin 5/14+ Progenitor Cell Concept of Breast Epithelium: Revisited. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p6-01-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The role of keratin (K) 5/14+ progenitor cells as precursor cells of the breast epithelium has been demonstrated both in culture and in situ. This cell model opens a new field in which distinct cell subtypes can be evaluated in terms of their functional state and describes how these cells may give rise to either benign or malignant tumors. Material and Methods: In this study, we used modern triple immunofluorescent labeling experiments to visualize directly different cell types and their functional status applying, as a reference, antibodies to basal (K5/14) and glandular (K8/18) keratins and a myoepithelial marker in combination with antibodies to ER-alpha, Ki67, BCL2 and c-kit in normal resting breast epithelium and in 30 cases of ductal neoplasia of low grade pathway and 8 cases of epithelial hyperplasia. Different cell types were quantitatively assayed. Immunolabeling results were supported with quantitative real time PCR.
Results: Basal and glandular keratins in the normal luminal breast epithelium were found to be expressed in highly specific sequential pattern from K5/14+progenitor cells to K8/18+ glandular cells. ER alpha, Ki67, c-kit and BCL2 were found differentially expressed in various subtypes of the breast epithelium, ER-alpha was expressed only in a subset of glandular cells thus subdividing the glandular lineage into ER-alphapositive and negative subcategories. The highest Ki67-proliferation was found in phenotypically glandular cells which are ER-alpha negative. BCL2 was characteristically co-expressed in glandular cells, whereas c-kit was detected mainly in earlier glandular cells. Benign epithelial hyperplasia showed a striking similarity to normal luminal breast epithelium. In terms of functional differentiation these cells disclosed the same ER-alpha, BCL2 and c-kit expression as that observed in normal epithelium. In contrast to UDH, all types of low-grade in-situ neoplasia of ductal type are characterized by expression of only glandular keratins 8/18. The tumour cells co-expressed ER-alpha, BCL2 and Ki67. On the other hand, c-Kit was not expressed in these lesions.
Discussion: From our data, it is evident that basal (K5/14) and glandular keratins (K8/18) are expressed in highly specific hierarchical patterns related to stage of glandular differentiation. This phenotypic hierarchy of cells is furthermore bound to a differential expression of ER, Ki67, c-kit and BCL2 in a very specific manner. Usual ductal hyperplasia disclosed a striking similarity to the resting glandular epithelium. In contrast, all types of low grade intraepithelial neoplasia not only retain the keratin patterns of their (normal) glandular counterpart but show the same functional differentiation with a positive expression of ER and BcL2 and lack of c-kit. This similarity indicates that these lesions may derive from more differentiated glandular cells of the lobular breast epithelium. The data presented here confirm that the K5/14+ progenitor cell concept provides important insight into the functional nature of normal breast epithelium and in proliferative diseases.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Boecker
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Hallas
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Korsching
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - L Stahnke
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Tio
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Weigel
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I Buchwalow
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T. Loening
- University of Muenster, Germany; Institute for Hematopatholgy, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Korsching E, Packeisen J, Helms MW, Kersting C, Voss R, van Diest PJ, Brandt B, van der Wall E, Boecker W, Bürger H. Deciphering a subgroup of breast carcinomas with putative progression of grade during carcinogenesis revealed by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and immunohistochemistry. Br J Cancer 2004; 90:1422-8. [PMID: 15054466 PMCID: PMC2409666 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Distinct parallel cytogenetic pathways in breast carcinogenesis could be identified in recent years. Nevertheless, it remained unclear as to which tumours may have progressed in grade or which patterns of cytogenetic alteration may define the switch from an in situ towards an invasive lesion. In order to gain more detailed insights into cytogenetic mechanisms of the pathogenesis of breast cancer, the chromosomal imbalances of 206 invasive breast cancer cases were characterised by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). CGH data were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis and the results were further compared with immunohistochemical findings on tissue arrays from the same breast cancer cases. The combined analysis of immunohistochemical and cytogenetic data provided evidence that carcinomas with gains of 7p, and to a lesser extent losses of 9q and gains of 5p, are a distinct subgroup within the spectrum of ductal invasive grade 3 breast carcinomas. These aberrations were associated with a high degree of cytogenetic instability (16.6 alterations per case on average), 16q-losses in over 70% of these cases, strong oestrogen receptor expression and absence of strong expression of p53, c-erbB2 and Ck 5. These characteristics provide strong support for the hypothesis that these tumours may develop through stages of well- and perhaps intermediately differentiated breast cancers. Our results therefore underline the existence of several parallel and also stepwise progression pathways towards breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Korsching
- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - J Packeisen
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - M W Helms
- Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - C Kersting
- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - R Voss
- Institute of Atherosclerosis Research, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - P J van Diest
- Institute of Pathology, Utrecht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - B Brandt
- Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - E van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - W Boecker
- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - H Bürger
- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Domagkstr. 17, 48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|