Is 80 the New 70? Octogenarians with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

As the human papilloma virus (HPV) pandemic evolves and life expectancy increases, the number of older adults with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continues to increase. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the fastest growing subset of this population: octogenarians (OGs). We sought to understand differences in treatment tolerability and clinical outcomes between septuagenarians (SGs) and OGs with OPSCC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified SGs (age 70-79) and OGs (age 80-89) with OPSCC from a cohort of older adults with nonrecurrent, nonmetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated curatively from 2007-2020. We compared demographics, treatment characteristics and toxicities using Fischer's exact test. Time-to-event outcomes, overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and disease-specific survival (DSS), were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 293 patients (age 70-89) with HNSCC, 39% (n = 114) had OPSCC: 93 SGs (median age: 73; interquartile range [IQR]: 71-76), and 21 OGs (median age: 81, IQR: 80-84). The median follow-up for included patients was 2.4 years; 82% were male, 64% white, 48% > 20 pack year smoking history, 37% ECOG 1. Patients had AJCC 8th edition Stage: I (27%); II (33%); III (18%); IV (22%) OPSCC. Treatment consisted of adjuvant radiation (RT) (19%), adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) (8%), surgery alone (6%), induction/concurrent CRT (27%), concurrent CRT (28%), or RT (12%), with no significant differences in stage or treatment modalities noted between SGs and OGs. Of note, 69% of SGs and 76% of OGs were HPV+. Among 107 patients who received any RT, 24% experienced a treatment interruption (19% of SGs vs. 48% of OGs, p = 0.001) and 2 patients (both HPV- SGs) died on treatment due to unrelated health conditions. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes were placed prior to or during treatment in 43% of SGs and 62% of OGs, with OGs more likely to have a PEG placed during treatment (p = 0.025). There was no difference in the prevalence of late (> 6 months) CTCAE grade 2+ dysphagia (36%) or xerostomia (31%) between SGs and OGs. Estimated 3-year LRC, DSS, and OS were not significantly different between SGs (LRC:85%; DSS:87%; OS:76%) and OGs (LRC: 81%; DSS:94%; OS: 55%, p-values: 0.98, 0.42, 0.052, respectively). However, HPV+ disease significantly increased estimated 3-year OS for both SGs (HPV+: 84%; HPV-: 56%, p = 0.0006) and OGs (HPV+: 68%; HPV-: 20%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, OGs had a higher proportion of HPV+ OPSCC, which was associated with improved OS. This finding may provide insight into the latency of the virus. While there were similar amounts of toxicities among SGs and OGs, OGs more frequently underwent PEG tube placement and experienced more treatment interruptions. Given high rates of HPV+ OPSCC in OGs, our findings suggest that de-escalation strategies should be further investigated to improve tolerability and maximize outcomes for this neglected population.