1
|
Michael S, Borgmann-Staudt A, Sommerhäuser G, Kepakova K, Klco-Brosius S, Kruseova J, Nagele E, Panasiuk A, Vetsch J, Balcerek M. Educational pathways of childhood cancer survivors-a parental cohort. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:518-525. [PMID: 36459379 PMCID: PMC10036444 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01303-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), we examined the educational and vocational pathways of two comparable, parental cohorts: childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and their siblings. Both cohorts had previously entered parenthood. The aim of the study was to elucidate whether childhood cancer and treatment affect the educational pathways chosen by parents who are former patients. METHODS We analysed data that was collected from childhood cancer survivors and their siblings regarding their offspring's health within the FeCt Multicentre Offspring Study (conducted 2013-2016). We evaluated and compared the professional pathways of (i) all participating survivors and all participating siblings and those of (ii) survivors and their biological siblings. RESULTS Overall information on parental gender, age, and education were available from 1077 survivors and 246 siblings (group (i)). The majority of participants were female with a mean age of 35.2 (survivor) and 37.9 (sibling) years at time of survey. For subgroup (ii), analysis information was available on 191 survivors and 210 siblings. Fathers achieved university degrees significantly more often than mothers (p = 0.003 (i), p < 0.001 (ii)). The distribution of professional education was not significantly different between cancer survivors and siblings in either cohort (i) or (ii). CONCLUSIONS Regarding our research on the educational and vocational trajectory of CCS, patients can be reassured that family planning and vocational education are well compatible. Inequalities regarding gender-specific educational pathways remain to be addressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS CCS should monitor their fertility status regularly and, if necessary, cryopreserve germ cells or tissue in order to optimize their family planning. Educational opportunities should be pursued as desired and with confidence. Local as well as European aftercare programs can assist with family planning and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Michael
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Borgmann-Staudt
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - G Sommerhäuser
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Kepakova
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - S Klco-Brosius
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Kruseova
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - E Nagele
- Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - A Panasiuk
- Medical University Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - J Vetsch
- Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - M Balcerek
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Winters ZE, Afzal M, Rutherford C, Holzner B, Rumpold G, da Costa Vieira RA, Hartup S, Flitcroft K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Oberguggenberger A, Panouilleres M, Mani M, Catanuto G, Douek M, Kokan J, Sinai P, King MT, Spillane A, Snook K, Boyle F, French J, Elder E, Chalmers B, Kabir M, Campbell I, Wong A, Flay H, Scarlet J, Weis J, Giesler J, Bliem B, Nagele E, del Angelo N, Andrade V, Assump¸ão Garcia D, Bonnetain F, Kjelsberg M, William-Jones S, Fleet A, Hathaway S, Elliott J, Galea M, Dodge J, Chaudhy A, Williams R, Cook L, Sethi S, Turton P, Henson A, Gibb J, Bonomi R, Funnell S, Noren C, Ooi J, Cocks S, Dawson L, Patel H, Bailey L, Chatterjee S, Goulden K, Kirk S, Osborne W, Harter L, Sharif MA, Corcoran S, Smith J, Prasad R, Doran A, Power A, Devereux L, Cannon J, Latham S, Arora P, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Roberts R, Absar M, Hodgkiss T, Connolly K, Johnson J, Doyle K, Lunt N, Cooper M, Fuchs I, Peall L, Taylor L, Nicholson A. International validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BRECON23 quality-of-life questionnaire for women undergoing breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2017; 105:209-222. [PMID: 29116657 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim was to carry out phase 4 international field-testing of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) breast reconstruction (BRECON) module. The primary objective was finalization of its scale structure. Secondary objectives were evaluation of its reliability, validity, responsiveness, acceptability and interpretability in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction.
Methods
The EORTC module development guidelines were followed. Patients were recruited from 28 centres in seven countries. A prospective cohort completed the QLQ-BRECON15 before mastectomy and the QLQ-BRECON24 at 4–8 months after reconstruction. The cross-sectional cohort completed the QLQ-BRECON24 at 1–5 years after reconstruction, and repeated this 2–8 weeks later (test–retest reliability). All participants completed debriefing questionnaires.
Results
A total of 438 patients were recruited, 234 in the prospective cohort and 204 in the cross-sectional cohort. A total of 414 reconstructions were immediate, with a comparable number of implants (176) and donor-site flaps (166). Control groups comprised patients who underwent two-stage implant procedures (72, 75 per cent) or delayed reconstruction (24, 25 per cent). Psychometric scale validity was supported by moderate to high item-own scale and item-total correlations (over 0·5). Questionnaire validity was confirmed by good scale-to-sample targeting, and computable scale scores exceeding 50 per cent, except nipple cosmesis (over 40 per cent). In known-group comparisons, QLQ-BRECON24 scales and items differentiated between patient groups defined by clinical criteria, such as type and timing of reconstruction, postmastectomy radiotherapy and surgical complications, with moderate effect sizes. Prospectively, sexuality and surgical side-effects scales showed significant responsiveness over time (P < 0·001). Scale reliability was supported by high Cronbach's α coefficients (over 0·7) and test–retest (intraclass correlation more than 0·8). One item (finding a well fitting bra) was excluded based on high floor/ceiling effects, poor test–retest and weak correlations in factor analysis (below 0·3), thus generating the QLQ-BRECON23 questionnaire.
Conclusion
The QLQ-BRECON23 is an internationally validated tool to be used alongside the EORTC QLQ-C30 (cancer) and QLQ-BR23 (breast cancer) questionnaires for evaluating quality of life and satisfaction after breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z E Winters
- Breast Cancer Surgery Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
- Surgical and Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Afzal
- Breast Cancer Surgery Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - C Rutherford
- Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - G Rumpold
- Department of Medical Psychology, Evaluation Software Development, Rum, Austria
| | | | - S Hartup
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - K Flitcroft
- Breast and Surgical Oncology, Poche Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - V Bjelic-Radisic
- Department of Breast Surgery and Gynaecology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - A Oberguggenberger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Panouilleres
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - M Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Catanuto
- Multidisciplinary Breast Care, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - M Douek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, London, UK
| | - J Kokan
- Cancer Resource Centre, Macclesfield Hospital, Macclesfield, UK
| | - P Sinai
- Breast Cancer Surgery Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - M T King
- Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A Spillane
- Poche Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K Snook
- Poche Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - F Boyle
- Poche Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J French
- The Crown Princess Mary Westmead Breast Cancer Centre and Specialist Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - E Elder
- The Crown Princess Mary Westmead Breast Cancer Centre and Specialist Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Chalmers
- The Crown Princess Mary Westmead Breast Cancer Centre and Specialist Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Kabir
- The Crown Princess Mary Westmead Breast Cancer Centre and Specialist Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - A Wong
- Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - H Flay
- Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - J Scarlet
- Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - J Weis
- University of Freiburg, Freiberg, Germany
| | - J Giesler
- University of Freiburg, Freiberg, Germany
| | - B Bliem
- Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - E Nagele
- Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - V Andrade
- Barretos Cancer Hospital, Sao Paolo, Brazil
| | | | - F Bonnetain
- Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | | | - S William-Jones
- Clinical Research Network, West Midlands, Queen-s Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK
| | - A Fleet
- Clinical Research Network, West Midlands, Queen-s Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK
| | - S Hathaway
- Clinical Research Network, West Midlands, Queen-s Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK
| | - J Elliott
- Clinical Research Network, West Midlands, Queen-s Hospital, Burton upon Trent, UK
| | - M Galea
- Cancer Research Unit, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | - J Dodge
- Cancer Research Unit, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | - A Chaudhy
- Cancer Research Unit, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | | | - L Cook
- Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - P Turton
- Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - A Henson
- Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - J Gibb
- Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R Bonomi
- Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals, Worthing, UK
| | - S Funnell
- Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals, Worthing, UK
| | - C Noren
- Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals, Worthing, UK
| | - J Ooi
- Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
| | - S Cocks
- Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
| | - L Dawson
- Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
| | - H Patel
- Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
| | - L Bailey
- Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
| | | | | | - S Kirk
- Salford Royal Hospital, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - J Smith
- Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK
| | - R Prasad
- Royal AlbertEdward Infirmary, Wigan, UK
| | - A Doran
- Royal AlbertEdward Infirmary, Wigan, UK
| | - A Power
- Royal AlbertEdward Infirmary, Wigan, UK
| | | | - J Cannon
- Royal AlbertEdward Infirmary, Wigan, UK
| | - S Latham
- Royal AlbertEdward Infirmary, Wigan, UK
| | - P Arora
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - S Ridgway
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - M Coulding
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - R Roberts
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - M Absar
- North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - T Hodgkiss
- North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - K Connolly
- North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - J Johnson
- North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - K Doyle
- North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - N Lunt
- Cancer Resource Centre, Macclesfield Hospital, Macclesfield, UK
| | - M Cooper
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - I Fuchs
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - L Peall
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - L Taylor
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - A Nicholson
- Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|