Paoloni M, Tavernese E, Cacchio A, Tattoli M, Melis L, Ronconi R, Santilli V. Patient-oriented rehabilitation in the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;
49:273-281. [PMID:
23172400]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Management of chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP) still represents a challenge. A patient-oriented (Pa-O) therapeutic approach could be considered as the one in which therapies are scheduled at the start of each therapeutic session according to the patient's current physical status, and differs from a prescription-oriented (Pr-O) therapeutic approach, in which therapies are prescribed at the first medical referral and are not adjusted at any time during the treatment period.
AIM
To determine if a Pa-O approach may be more beneficial for CMNP patients when compared to a Pr-O one.
DESIGN
Randomized controlled trial.
POPULATION
220 CMNP outpatients randomized to either Pa-O group (N.=114) or Pr-O group (N.=106).
METHODS
Each group received 10 therapeutic sessions over 3 weeks. Primary outcome measures were pain assessment, evaluated by Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS), and disability level, evaluated by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS-I). Secondary outcome measures included patients' response to treatment and treatment failures. Measurements were carried out at baseline (T0) and 1 month after treatment ended (T1). Data were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS
Patients in both groups displayed at T1 a significant reduction in VAS and NPDS-I scores. The relative changes at T1 were greater in Pa-O group when compared with Pr-O group both for VAS (61.5% versus 48.8%; P<0.005) and for NPDS-I scores (48.4% versus 36.8%; P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
A Pa-O approach may be more beneficial in terms of pain and disability improvement in the short-term follow-up in suffers from CMNP. However, the occurrence of a performance-bias due to the increased level of attention from physicians to patients in Pa-O group, cannot be ruled-out.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT
A Pa-O approach should be considered for CMNP also in an outpatient facility.
Collapse