1
|
Venkatraman T, Honeyford K, van Sluijs EMF, Costelloe C, Saxena S. Are children at schools registered to The Daily Mile™ more physically active? Eur J Public Health 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Daily Mile (TDM) is among the most popular school-based running programmes recommended globally by governments and the WHO to meet the shortfalls in children's physical activity. In England, it has been adopted by 1 in 5 primary schools. However, its impact on children's physical activity has not been assessed at scale. We aimed to compare a)minutes (mins) of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in and outside school hours and b)meeting physical activity guidelines in primary school children in England, comparing those in schools registered with TDM with those that were not.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study. We used self-reported data of 49,561 English primary school children(5-11 years) from the Active Lives Children and Young People Survey and TDM registration data of their school. We compared mins of MVPA in and outside school hours between children in TDM-registered and non-registered schools using a multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial model; and the differences in the likelihood of meeting physical activity guidelines based on TDM registration with a multilevel logistic regression model. All models included a random effect for school and adjusted for potential confounders.
Results
Children attending TDM-registered schools reported an extra 36 mins of MVPA a week overall, including 10 additional mins (95%CI:3,16) MVPA/week during school hours and 26 additional (95%CI:4,44) mins MVPA/week outside school hours. Children in TDM-registered schools were 6% more likely to meet physical activity guidelines compared to those who were not(RR:1.06 (95%CI:1.02,1.11)).
Conclusions
Children in primary schools registered to TDM report more physical activity that is not compensated for outside school hours. However, the absolute differences fall considerably short of international guidelines across the whole child population. Therefore, a whole school and systems-based approach is required, embedding school-based running programmes.
Key messages
Children in schools registered to TDM report more MVPA overall, inside, and outside school hours; suggesting no compensation of activity in those who are registered. TDM is a potential solution to increase children’s physical activity during the school day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Venkatraman
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - K Honeyford
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - EMF van Sluijs
- Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Costelloe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - S Saxena
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simpson RF, Hesketh KR, Crozier SR, Baird J, Cooper C, Godfrey KM, Harvey NC, Westgate K, Inskip HM, van Sluijs EMF. Cross-sectional associations between number and ages of children and maternal physical activity. Eur J Public Health 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Physical activity (PA) has many health benefits, but parenthood is often associated with reduced PA in mothers. Determinants of adult PA are diverse, but ages and number of children may be key factors linked to maternal PA. Few studies have compared PA levels of mothers of school-aged children with those who have younger children, which is vital considering that maternal PA patterns may change at transition to formal schooling. Studies using device-assessment to investigate this association are also sparse. We aimed to investigate the association between number and ages of children and maternal device-measured moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA).
Methods
Cross-sectional analyses were conducted using data from 848 mothers from the Southampton Women's Survey when the index child was 4 or 6-7 years old. Two-level random intercept linear models were run to investigate associations between self-reported number (1, 2, 3+) and ages (4y and under, 5y and over, both age groups) of children, and their potential interaction, and accelerometer-assessed log-transformed minutes of maternal MVPA. Results are presented as % difference in minutes of MVPA.
Results
41% of mothers met PA guidelines (150 minutes of MVPA/week). Women who had any children 5y and over engaged in more MVPA than those with only children 4y and under (e.g. % difference in minutes of MVPA: 42.2, 95% CI 18.7 to 70.4 for mothers with only children 5y and over vs those with only children 4y and under). Mothers with 2 or 3+ children did less MVPA than those with 1 child (e.g. 13.9, 1.0 to 25.2 less MVPA for women with 2 children vs those with 1 child).
Conclusions
Mothers with multiple children or any children 4y and under do less MVPA than those with 1 child or only school-aged children. Interventions and policies are needed to support these mothers to increase their time spent doing MVPA, especially considering the additional health benefits associated with this level of intensity of PA.
Key messages
Most mothers are insufficiently physically active to gain the associated health benefits. Interventions to increase MVPA particularly need to target mothers of younger children and those with multiple children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RF Simpson
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - KR Hesketh
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - SR Crozier
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton Science Park, Innovation Centre, Chilworth, Southampton, UK
| | - J Baird
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - KM Godfrey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - NC Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - K Westgate
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - HM Inskip
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - EMF van Sluijs
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|