Role of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in gastroesophageal cancer: relationship with 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography, computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging parameters

BACKGROUND

Identification of pretherapeutic predictive markers in gastro-esophageal cancer is essential for individual-oriented treatment. This study evaluated the relationship of multimodality parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion method (IVIM), 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT) perfusion and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with gastro-esophageal cancer and investigated their histopathological correlation.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients (28 males; median age 63.9 years; range 37-84 years) with gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (N.=22) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (N.=9) were analyzed. IVIM parameters: pseudodiffusion (D*), perfusion fraction (fp), true diffusion (D) and the threshold b-value (bval); PET-parameters: SUV<inf>max</inf>, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG); CT perfusion parameters: blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV) and mean transit time (MTT); and MR perfusion parameters: time to enhance, positive enhancement integral, time-to-peak (TTP), maximum-slope-of-increase, and maximum-slope-of-decrease were determined, and correlated to each other and to histopathology.

RESULTS

IVIM and PET parameters showed significant negative correlations: MTV and bval (r<inf>s</inf> =-0.643, P=0.002), TLG and bval (r<inf>s</inf>=-0.699, P<0.01) and TLG and fp (r<inf>s</inf>=-0.577, P=0.006). Positive correlation was found for TLG and D (r<inf>s</inf>=0.705, P=0.000). Negative correlation was found for bval and staging (r<inf>s</inf>=0.590, P=0.005). Positive correlation was found for positive enhancement interval and BV (r<inf>s</inf>=0.547, P=0.007), BF and regression index (r<inf>s</inf>=0.753, P=0.005) and for time-to-peak and staging (r<inf>s</inf>=0.557, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

IVIM parameters (bval, fp, D) provide quantitative information and correlate with PET parameters (MTV, TLG) and staging. IVIM might be a useful tool for additional characterization of gastro-esophageal cancer.

Evaluation of multifunctional imaging parameters in gastro-oesophageal cancer using F-18-FDG-PET/CT with integrated perfusion CT

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) / computed tomography (CT) is among the most frequently used imaging modalities for initial staging of gastro-oesophageal (GE) cancer, whereas CT-perfusion (CTP) provides different multiparametric information. This proof of concept study compares CTP- and PET-parameters in patients with GE cancer to evaluate correlations and a possible prognostic value of a combined PET/CTP imaging procedure.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients with F-18-FDG-PET/CT and CTP studies were prospectively analysed. Patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 22) and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 9). Imaging was performed before start of treatment. CTP parameters [blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT)] and metabolic parameters [(maximum and mean standardised uptake values and standard deviation (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVsd), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and tumour lesion glycolysis (TLG)], as well as flow metabolic product [FMP (BF × SUVmax)] were determined and their relationship was compared. Additionally their association to clinical parameters (differentiation grading, staging, HER2-status, follow-up status) and to histopathological regression (post-neoadjuvant regression grading) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Correlation between parameters of both modalities was significant between MTT and MTV (r = 0.375, p = 0.038); no other significant correlation was found. Patients with complete histopathological regression showed significantly lower BF and BV than patients with nearly complete or partial response. TLG and regression grading showed significant correlation with staging. All other quantitative parameters for CTP and PET data did not correlate significantly with histopathological regression grading, differentiation or staging.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PET and CTP parameters (FMP) showed no significant prognostic value. Significant correlations were only found between MTT and MTV, which indicates a possible perfusional/metabolic coupling. Therefore, pre-therapeutic CTP and PET- parameters provide complementary information about the pre-therapeutic tumour status and are not interchangeable. Only CTP parameters might be able to predict complete histopathological regression. On the other hand, only PET parameters are correlated with staging.

Local resectability assessment of head and neck cancer: Positron emission tomography/MRI versus positron emission tomography/CT

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI with PET/CT for local resectability of head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Sequential contrast-enhanced PET/CT-MRI was performed in 58 patients referred for the staging or restaging of head and neck cancer. Tumors were assessed with PET/CT and PET/MRI for the presence of resectability-defining factors: T4b status (mediastinal invasion, invasion of the prevertebral space, and vascular encasement), and another 8 findings that would imply obstacles for surgical cure (invasion of the laryngeal cartilage, invasion of the preepiglottic fat pad, perineural spread, orbital invasion, bone infiltration, skull base invasion, dural infiltration, and invasion of the brachial plexus).

RESULTS

The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of local resectability-defining factors of PET/CT and PET/MRI was 0.92/0.99/0.98 and 0.98/0.99/0.99 (P = .727), respectively, per lesion, and 0.96/0.87/0.91 and 0.96/0.90/0.93 (P = .687), respectively, per patient.

CONCLUSION

Both contrast-enhanced PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced PET/CT can serve as reliable examinations for defining local resectability of head and neck cancer.