1
|
Findlay MC, Drexler R, Khan M, Cole KL, Karbe A, Rotermund R, Ricklefs FL, Flitsch J, Smith TR, Kilgallon JL, Honegger J, Nasi-Kordhishti I, Gardner PA, Gersey ZC, Abdallah HM, Jane JA, Marino AC, Knappe UJ, Uksul N, Rzaev JA, Galushko EV, Gormolysova EV, Bervitskiy AV, Schroeder HWS, Eördögh M, Losa M, Mortini P, Gerlach R, Antunes ACM, Couldwell WT, Budohoski KP, Rennert RC, Azab M, Karsy M. A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Assessment of Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Approaches in the Management of Pituitary Adenomas. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:794-801. [PMID: 37057921 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is considerable controversy as to which of the 2 operating modalities (microsurgical or endoscopic transnasal surgery) currently used to resect pituitary adenomas (PAs) is the safest and most effective intervention. We compared rates of clinical outcomes of patients with PAs who underwent resection by either microsurgical or endoscopic transnasal surgery. METHODS To independently assess the outcomes of each modality type, we sought to isolate endoscopic and microscopic PA surgeries with a 1:1 tight-caliper (0.01) propensity score-matched analysis using a multicenter, neurosurgery-specific database. Surgeries were performed between 2017 and 2020, with data collected retrospectively from 12 international institutions on 4 continents. Matching was based on age, previous neurological deficit, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumor functionality, tumor size, and Knosp score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Among a pool of 2826 patients, propensity score matching resulted in 600 patients from 9 surgery centers being analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed that microscopic surgery had a 1.91 odds ratio (OR) ( P = .03) of gross total resection (GTR) and shorter operative duration ( P < .01). However, microscopic surgery also had a 7.82 OR ( P < .01) for intensive care unit stay, 2.08 OR ( P < .01) for intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, 2.47 OR ( P = .02) for postoperative syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), and was an independent predictor for longer postoperative stay (β = 2.01, P < .01). Overall, no differences in postoperative complications or 3- to 6-month outcomes were seen by surgical approach. CONCLUSION Our international, multicenter matched analysis suggests microscopic approaches for pituitary tumor resection may offer better GTR rates, albeit with increased intensive care unit stay, CSF leak, SIADH, and hospital utilization. Better prospective studies can further validate these findings as matching patients for outcome analysis remains challenging. These results may provide insight into surgical benchmarks at different centers, offer room for further registry studies, and identify best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Findlay
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Richard Drexler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg , Germany
| | - Majid Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno , Nevada , USA
| | - Kyril L Cole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Arian Karbe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg , Germany
| | - Roman Rotermund
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg , Germany
| | - Franz L Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg , Germany
| | - Jörg Flitsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg , Germany
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - John L Kilgallon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen , Germany
| | - Isabella Nasi-Kordhishti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen , Germany
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Zachary C Gersey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Hussein M Abdallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA
| | - John A Jane
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Alexandria C Marino
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| | - Ulrich J Knappe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Minden , Germany
| | - Nesrin Uksul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Minden , Germany
| | - Jamil A Rzaev
- Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk , Russia
- Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk , Russia
| | | | | | - Anatoliy V Bervitskiy
- Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk , Russia
- Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk , Russia
| | - Henry W S Schroeder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald , Germany
| | - Márton Eördögh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald , Germany
| | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan , Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan , Italy
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helios Kliniken, Erfurt , Germany
| | - Apio C M Antunes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre , Rio Grande do Sul , Brazil
| | - William T Couldwell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Karol P Budohoski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Robert C Rennert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles , California , USA
| | - Mohammed Azab
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- Boise State University, Boise , Idaho , USA
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- Global Neurosciences Institute, Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drexler R, Rotermund R, Smith TR, Kilgallon JL, Honegger J, Nasi-Kordhishti I, Gardner PA, Gersey ZC, Abdallah HM, Jane JA, Marino AC, Knappe UJ, Uksul N, Rzaev JA, Galushko EV, Gormolysova EV, Bervitskiy AV, Schroeder HWS, Eördögh M, Losa M, Mortini P, Gerlach R, Azab M, Budohoski KP, Rennert RC, Karsy M, Couldwell WT, Antunes ACM, Westphal M, Ricklefs FL, Flitsch J. Defining benchmark outcomes for transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenomas: a multicenter analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2023; 189:379-386. [PMID: 37668325 DOI: 10.1093/ejendo/lvad124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Benchmarks aid in improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, best achievable results that have been validated internationally for transsphenoidal surgery (TS) are not available. OBJECTIVE We aimed to establish standardized outcome benchmarks for TS of pituitary adenomas. DESIGN A total of 2685 transsphenoidal tumor resections from 9 expert centers in 3 continents were analyzed. SETTING Patients were risk stratified, and the median values of each center's outcomes were established. The benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all median values for a particular outcome. The postoperative benchmark outcomes included surgical factors, endocrinology-specific values, and neurology-specific values. RESULTS Of 2685 patients, 1149 (42.8%) defined the low-risk benchmark cohort. Within these benchmark cases, 831 (72.3%) patients underwent microscopic TS, and 308 (26.8%) patients underwent endoscopic endonasal resection. Of all tumors, 799 (29.8%) cases invaded the cavernous sinus. The postoperative complication rate was 19.6% with mortality between 0.0% and 0.8%. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤2.9% for reoperation rate, ≤1.9% for cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention, and ≤15.5% for transient diabetes insipidus. At 6 months, benchmark cutoffs were calculated as follows: readmission rate: ≤6.9%, new hypopituitarism ≤6.0%, and tumor remnant ≤19.2%. CONCLUSIONS This analysis defines benchmark values for TS targeting morbidity and mortality and represents the best outcomes in the best patients in expert centers. These cutoffs can be used to assess different centers, patient populations, and novel surgical techniques. It should be noted that the benchmark values may influence each other and must be evaluated in their own context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Drexler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roman Rotermund
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John L Kilgallon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Isabella Nasi-Kordhishti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Zachary C Gersey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Hussein M Abdallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - John A Jane
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Alexandria C Marino
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Ulrich J Knappe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Nesrin Uksul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Wesling Hospital Minden, Ruhr-University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Jamil A Rzaev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Evgeniy V Galushko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - Anatoliy V Bervitskiy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk, Russia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Henry W S Schroeder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Márton Eördögh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helios Kliniken, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Mohammed Azab
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Karol P Budohoski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Robert C Rennert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - William T Couldwell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Apio C M Antunes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franz L Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Flitsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chernov SV, Rzaev DA, Kalinovsky AV, Dmitriev AB, Kasymov AR, Zotov AV, Gormolysova EV, Uzhakova EK. [Early postoperative results of surgical treatment of patients with anterior clinoidal meningiomas]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 2017; 81:74-80. [PMID: 28291217 DOI: 10.17116/neiro201780774-80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Resection of anterior clinoidal meningiomas is a challenging task due to their localization, frequent involvement of the major cerebral arteries and cranial nerves, a high risk of postoperative neurological deficits, and low radicalness of surgery. AIM To evaluate the radicalness of microsurgical removal and a neurological deficit in the early postoperative period in patients with anterior clinoidal meningiomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 35 patients with anterior clinoidal meningiomas underwent surgery at the Department of Neurooncology of the Novosibirsk Federal Neurosurgical Center in the period from 2013 to July 2016. There were 29 (82.9%) females and 6 (17.1%) males. The mean patient age was 50.1 years (31-72 years). According to the Al-Mefty classification (1990), type 1 tumors occurred in 10 (28.6%) patients, type 2 tumors were in 22 (62.8%) patients, and type 3 tumors were in 3 (8.6%) patients. Twenty four (68.6%) patients had large (greater than 4.0 cm) tumors, 7 (20.0%) patients had medium (2.0-4.0 cm) tumors, and 4 (11.4%) patients had small (less than 2.0 cm) meningiomas. The tumor involved the major arteries in 21 (60.0%) patients. RESULTS The lateral supraorbital approach was used in 26 (74.3%) patients, and the pterional approach was used in 9 (25.7%) cases. The tumor was resected totally (Simpson II) in 25 (71.4%) cases and subtotally (Simpson IV, subtype A and B) in 10 (28.6%) patients. In the early postoperative period, cerebral symptoms regressed in 20 (57.1%) patients; visual acuity improved in 2 of 13 (15.4%) patients. Four (11.4%) patients developed IIIrd nerve palsy; 2 (5.7%) patients developed severe hemiparesis. The mortality rate was 2.9%. CONCLUSION The completeness of resection directly depends on the tumor consistency: soft meningiomas can be totally resected (Simpson II) with a good functional outcome. In the case of solid tumors, total resection may lead to serious ischemic disorders with a high risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S V Chernov
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - D A Rzaev
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - A V Kalinovsky
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - A B Dmitriev
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - A R Kasymov
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - A V Zotov
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - E V Gormolysova
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| | - E K Uzhakova
- Federal Neurosurgical Center, Nemirovicha-Danchenko Str., 132/1, Novosibirsk, 630087, Russia
| |
Collapse
|