1
|
Gouesbet S, Kvaskoff M, Riveros C, Diard E, Pane I, Gabillet M, Garoche C, Ravaud P, Tran VT. P–327 Patients’ perspectives on how to improve the management of endometriosis in France: The ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How should endometriosis management be improved from the patient’s point of view?
Summary answer
One thousand endometriosis patients proposed 2,587 ideas to improve the management of endometriosis that reflect three main themes: diagnosis, care, and information on the disease.
What is known already
Endometriosis is a gynecologic condition affecting 10% of reproductive-age women. The disease causes severe pelvic pain and has a dramatic impact on women’s quality of life. A mean delay of 7 years was described between onset of symptoms and diagnosis. There is an urgent need to reduce this delay and to rethink endometriosis care in order to adopt a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach, as women are often dissatisfied with the care they receive.
Study design, size, duration
This study was carried out in a random sample of endometriosis patients participating in ComPaRe (Community of Patients for Research), a prospective e-cohort of adult chronic disease patients who will be followed-up for 10 years. Participants complete monthly online questionnaires about their life with their disease(s). Recruitment began in January 2017 and is still ongoing, with currently 44,000 participants, including 10,000 endometriosis patients in the ComPaRe-Endometriosis sub-cohort.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We selected a random sample of 1,000 participants in ComPaRe-Endometriosis, forming 3 equal groups of age (<25, 25–45, >45 years old) and education (<12, 12–14, >14 years). We conducted a qualitative study to gather their ideas for improving the management of their disease. Participants were asked: “If you had a magic wand, what would you change in your health care?”. One interviewer and two patients independently extracted ideas from the open-ended responses using thematic analysis.
Main results and the role of chance
Patients proposed a total of 2,587 ideas to improve the management of endometriosis, which we classified in three main themes: diagnosis, care, and information on the disease. To improve diagnosis, women proposed 724 ideas classified into 11 areas of improvement, including training of health professionals, taking symptoms seriously, improving the diagnosis process, and recognition of the disease by clinicians. To improve care, patients gave 1,677 ideas classified into 71 areas of improvement. For example, they asked for a better pain management, more listening from caregivers, the reimbursement of care or medical treatments, help in accessing clinicians that are expert in endometriosis, and reduced waiting times for medical appointments and exams. Finally, to improve information on the disease, participants suggested 186 ideas classified into 5 areas of improvement, covering more explanation about the disease, public recognition of endometriosis and general awareness, and more research and more explanation of research results.
Limitations, reasons for caution
The results were reviewed by three people in order to reduce the margin of interpretation in the analysis of this open-ended question, but some subjectivity remains. Generalizability may be difficult because the results are linked to the specificities of the French model of care.
Wider implications of the findings: Through the many ideas proposed by patients, we identified a total of 87 areas for improvement in endometriosis diagnosis, care, and information. These results reflect patients’ expectations in terms of management of their disease and will be useful to design a better global care for endometriosis from the patients’ perspective.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gouesbet
- Inserm U1018- Exposome and Heredity Team, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health CESP, Paris 15e Arrondissement, France
| | - M Kvaskoff
- Inserm U1018- Exposome and Heredity Team, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health CESP, Paris 15e Arrondissement, France
| | - C Riveros
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Center for Clinical Epidemiology- Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - E Diard
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Center for Clinical Epidemiology- Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - I Pane
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Center for Clinical Epidemiology- Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Gabillet
- ENDOmind France, Patient organization, Paris, France
| | - C Garoche
- The ComPaRe cohort, Volunteer patient, Gujan-Mestras, France
| | - P Ravaud
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Center for Clinical Epidemiology- Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V T Tran
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Center for Clinical Epidemiology- Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tran VT, Diard E, Ravaud P. Priorities to improve the care for chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a survey of patients and stakeholders nested within the ComPaRe e-cohort. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 30:577-587. [PMID: 32839207 PMCID: PMC8237178 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective To set priorities to improve consultations, care structures and the healthcare system from the perspective of patients with chronic conditions, care professionals, hospital administrators and health policy makers. Methods Adult patients with chronic conditions recruited from the ComPaRe e-cohort in France ranked their 15 most important areas of improvement among 147 previously defined by patients. Priorities at a population level were obtained by using logit models for sets of ranked items in a data set calibrated to represent the French population of patients with chronic conditions. Care professionals, hospital managers and health policy makers rated the complexity involved in improving the areas identified. We calculated the number of patients who considered as a priority at least one of the areas considered easy to implement. Results Between September 2018 and May 2019, 3002 patients (84% women, 47% with multimorbidity) and 149 professionals (including 50 care professionals, 79 hospital directors, 11 health policy decision makers) were recruited. Patients’ top priorities were (1) Transforming care to be holistic and personalised, at a consultation level; (2) Smoothing patients' journey in the care system, increasing their knowledge of their own health and improving care coordination, at a care structure level (3) Training clinicians in better interpersonal skills and knowledge of specific conditions/treatments, reducing stigma and making care more affordable, at a healthcare system level. In total, 48%, 71% and 57% patients ranked in their top priorities one area considered easy to improve by professionals at consultation, care structure and health system levels, respectively. Conclusion This is the first comprehensive map of patients’ priorities to improve the management of chronic conditions. Implementing simple actions could benefit a large number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viet-Thi Tran
- METHODS Team, Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France .,Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elise Diard
- METHODS Team, Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.,Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Ravaud
- METHODS Team, Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.,Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|