1
|
Cohen D, Hondelink LM, Solleveld-Westerink N, Uljee SM, Ruano D, Cleton-Jansen AM, von der Thüsen JH, Ramai SRS, Postmus PE, Graadt van Roggen JF, Hoppe BPC, Clahsen PC, Maas KW, Ahsmann EJM, Ten Heuvel A, Smedts F, van Rossem RN, van Wezel T. Optimizing Mutation and Fusion Detection in NSCLC by Sequential DNA and RNA Sequencing. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15:1000-1014. [PMID: 32014610 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frequently, patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC are screened for mutations and fusions. In most laboratories, molecular workup includes a multitude of tests: immunohistochemistry (ALK, ROS1, and programmed death-ligand 1 testing), DNA sequencing, in situ hybridization for fusion, and amplification detection. With the fast-emerging new drugs targeting specific fusions and exon-skipping events, this procedure harbors a growing risk of tissue exhaustion. METHODS In this study, we evaluated the benefit of anchored, multiplexed, polymerase chain reaction-based targeted RNA sequencing (RNA next-generation sequencing [NGS]) in the identification of gene fusions and exon-skipping events in patients, in which no pathogenic driver mutation was found by DNA-based targeted cancer hotspot NGS (DNA NGS). We analyzed a cohort of stage IV NSCLC cases from both in-house and referral hospitals, consisting 38.5% cytology samples and 61.5% microdissected histology samples, mostly core needle biopsies. We compared molecular findings in a parallel workup (DNA NGS and RNA NGS, cohort 1, n = 198) with a sequential workup (DNA NGS followed by RNA NGS in selected cases, cohort 2, n = 192). We hypothesized the sequential workup to be the more efficient procedure. RESULTS In both cohorts, a maximum of one oncogenic driver mutation was found per case. This is in concordance with large, whole-genome databases and suggests that it is safe to omit RNA NGS when a clear oncogenic driver is identified in DNA NGS. In addition, this reduced the number of necessary RNA NGS to only 53% of all cases. The tumors of never smokers, however, were enriched for fusions and exon-skipping events (32% versus 4% in former and current smokers, p = 0.00), and therefore benefited more often from the shorter median turnaround time of the parallel approach (15 d versus only 9 d in the parallel workup). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that sequentially combining DNA NGS and RNA NGS is the most efficient strategy for mutation and fusion detection in smoking-associated NSCLC, whereas for never smokers we recommend a parallel approach. This approach was shown to be feasible on small tissue samples including for cytology tests, can drastically reduce the complexity and cost of molecular workup, and also provides flexibility in the constantly evolving landscape of actionable targets in NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Cohen
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth M Hondelink
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sandra M Uljee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dina Ruano
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H von der Thüsen
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Rajen S Ramai
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter E Postmus
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart P C Hoppe
- Department of Pulmonology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter C Clahsen
- Department of Pathology, Haaglanden Medical Centre (HMC), Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje W Maas
- Department of Pulmonology, Haaglanden Medical Centre (HMC), Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Els J M Ahsmann
- Department of Pathology, Groene Hart Hospital (GHZ), Gouda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Smedts
- Department of Pathology, Reinier de Graaf gasthuis (RdGG), Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald N van Rossem
- Department of Pulmonology, Reinier de Graaf gasthuis (RdGG), Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eshuis M, Ahsmann EJM, van Egmond NH. [Fatal interstitial lung disease associated with erlotinib use]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2013; 157:A5519. [PMID: 23406641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erlotinib is used to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The use of this tyrosine kinase inhibitor can result in interstitial lung disease, but the aetiology of this phenomenon is not clear. CASE DESCRIPTION A 68-year-old man with NSCLC, who had been undergoing treatment with erlotinib (150 mg daily) for the previous two weeks, presented with dyspnoea. A chest x-ray revealed infiltrates for which we started broad-spectrum antibiotics, high dose glucocorticoids and oxygen supplementation; erlotinib was discontinued. Despite these measures, the patient died of respiratory failure. Autopsy showed diffuse alveolar damage; the blood cultures taken while the patient was still alive and the post-mortem lung cultures were negative. The alveolar damage was possibly a consequence of the use of erlotinib. CONCLUSION Clinicians should be alert to worsening pulmonary symptoms without signs of infection in patients using erlotinib. Discontinuation of erlotinib and glucocorticoid treatment should be considered until alveolar damage caused by the use of erlotinib can be excluded.
Collapse
|