Motor and psychiatric features in idiopathic blepharospasm: A data-driven cluster analysis

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic blepharospasm is a clinically heterogeneous dystonia also characterized by non motor symptoms.

METHODS

We used a k-means cluster analysis to assess 188 patients with idiopathic blepharospasm in order to identify relatively homogeneous subpopulations of patients, using a set of motor and psychiatric variables to generate the cluster solution.

RESULTS

Blepharospasm patients reached higher scores on scales assessing depressive- and anxiety-related disorders than healthy/disease controls. Cluster analysis suggested the existence of three groups of patients that differed by type of spasms, overall motor severity, and presence/severity of psychiatric problems. The greater severity of motor symptoms was observed in Group 1, the least severity in Group 3, while the severity of blepharospasm in Group 2 was between that observed in Groups 1 and 3. The three motor subtypes also differed by psychiatric features: the lowest severity of psychiatric symptoms was observed in the group with least severe motor symptoms (group 3), while the highest psychiatric severity scores were observed in group 2 that carried intermediate motor severity rather than in the group with more severe motor symptoms (group 1). The three groups did not differ by disease duration, age of onset, sex or other clinical features.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that blepharospasm patients may be classified in different subtypes according to the type of spasms, overall motor severity and presence/severity of depressive symptoms and anxiety.

Measurement Properties of Clinical Scales Rating the Severity of Blepharospasm: A Multicenter Observational Study

Background

Several scales have been proposed to clinically evaluate the Motor Severity of Blepharospasm (BSP) but information about their measurement properties as a multicenter instrument is limited.

Objective

To compare the measurement properties of four clinical scales in rating the severity of BSP in a large sample of patients from multiple sites.

Methods

The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Scale (BFMS), the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (GDRS), the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS), and the Blepharospasm Severity Rating Scale (BSRS) were administered to 211 patients across 10 sites who were also requested to self-complete the Blepharospasm Disability Index (BDI). Measurement properties to be assessed included inter-/intra-observer agreement, item-to-total correlation, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effect, convergent/discriminant validity, and adherence to the distribution of BDI.

Results

The BFMS had unsatisfactory measurement properties, the GDRS had acceptable reliability but other properties could not be completely testable; the JRS had satisfactory measurement properties but the scale did not accurately reflect the distribution of disability parameter (BDI) in the sample, and the BSRS had satisfactory measurement properties and also showed the best adherence to the distribution of BDI in the assessed sample.

Conclusion

The comparison of the measurement properties of four rating scales to assess the motor state of the BSP in a large sample of patients from multiple sites showed that the GDRS should be used to simultaneously assess BSP and dystonia in other body parts, while the JRS (easier to use) and BSRS (better to discriminate severity) should be used to assess BSP alone.

Diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm: A multicenter international study

BACKGROUND

There are no widely accepted criteria to aid the physician in diagnosing BSP.

OBJECTIVE

To validate recently proposed diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm in a larger and geographically diverse population and to develop a screening system for blepharospasm.

METHODS

Video-recordings from 211 blepharospasm patients and 166 healthy/disease controls were examined by 8 raters. Agreement for presence of orbicularis oculi spasms, sensory trick, and increased blinking was measured by k statistics. Inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms was asked by the examiner but not captured in the video. Patients/controls were also requested to fill a self-administered questionnaire addressing relevant blepharospasm clinical aspects. The diagnosis at each site was the gold standard for sensitivity/specificity.

RESULTS

All the study items yielded satisfactory inter/intra-observer agreement. Combination of items rather than each item alone reached satisfactory sensitivity/specificity. The combined algorithm started with recognition of spasms followed by sensory trick. In the absence of a sensory trick, including "increased blinking" or "inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms" or both items yielded 88-92% sensitivity and 79-83% specificity. No single question of the questionnaire yielded high sensitivity/specificity. Serial application of the questionnaire to our blepharospasm and control subjects and subsequent clinical examination of subjects screening positive by the validated diagnostic algorithms yielded 78-81% sensitivity and 83-91% specificity.

CONCLUSION

These results support the use of proposed diagnostic criteria in multi-ethnic, multi-center cohorts. We also propose a case-finding procedure to screen blepharospasm in a given population with less effort than would be required by examination of all subjects.