1
|
Bilenduke E, Anderson S, Brenner A, Currier J, Eberth JM, King J, Land SR, Risendal BC, Shannon J, Siegel LN, Wangen M, Waters AR, Zahnd WE, Studts JL. Equitable implementation of lung cancer screening: avoiding its potential to mirror existing inequities among people who use tobacco. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:209-216. [PMID: 37713024 PMCID: PMC10689540 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01790-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, but the advent of lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography offers a tremendous opportunity to improve lung cancer outcomes. Unfortunately, implementation of lung cancer screening has been hampered by substantial barriers and remains suboptimal. Specifically, the commentary emphasizes the intersectionality of smoking history and several important sociodemographic characteristics and identities that should inform lung cancer screening outreach and engagement efforts, including socioeconomic considerations (e.g., health insurance status), racial and ethnic identity, LGBTQ + identity, mental health history, military experience/veteran status, and geographic residence in addressing specific community risk factors and future interventions in efforts to make strides toward equitable lung cancer screening. METHODS Members of the Equitable Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Interest Group with the Cancer Prevention and Control Network (CPCRN) provide a critical commentary based on existing literature regarding smoking trends in the US and lung cancer screening uptake to propose opportunities to enhance implementation and support equitable distribution of the benefits of lung cancer screening. CONCLUSION The present commentary utilizes information about historical trends in tobacco use to highlight opportunities for targeted outreach efforts to engage communities at high risk with information about the lung cancer screening opportunity. Future efforts toward equitable implementation of lung cancer screening should focus on multi-level implementation strategies that engage and work in concert with community partners to co-create approaches that leverage strengths and reduce barriers within specific communities to achieve the potential of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bilenduke
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
| | - Shacoria Anderson
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alison Brenner
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Jaron King
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Stephanie R Land
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Betsy C Risendal
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Leeann N Siegel
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Austin R Waters
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Whitney E Zahnd
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bilenduke E, Dwyer AJ, Staples ES, Kilbourn K, Valverde PA, Fernández ME, Risendal BC. A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:113-123. [PMID: 37069456 PMCID: PMC10110487 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Community engagement is essential in effective public health programs. This paper illustrates the methods used to engage community in the development of a multi-level implementation intervention to address cancer disparities related to hereditary cancer syndromes. METHODS Implementation Mapping (IM), was used to guide the co-creation of an intervention. Key partners were recruited to a 13-member statewide community advisory board (CAB) representing healthcare and community-based organizations. As part of a needs assessment, a 3-round modified Delphi method with the CAB was used to identify implementation outcomes to use in later steps of IM. An anonymous online survey of a validated community engagement measure assessed CAB members' satisfaction with the process. RESULTS Using a modified Delphi method as part of the needs assessment of IM, the CAB identified three broad categories of strategies: Changing infrastructure using patient navigation; training and educating patients, navigators and providers; and supporting clinicians in case identification and management. Self-reported satisfaction with the IM and Delphi process was high. CONCLUSIONS Implementation Mapping facilitated the use of available evidence, new data, and community engagement to identify strategies to improve the delivery of programs to reduce hereditary cancer disparities. The modified Delphi method was easy to administer in a virtual environment and may be a useful for others in community-engaged research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bilenduke
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
| | - Andrea J Dwyer
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elsa S Staples
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Patricia A Valverde
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Maria E Fernández
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Betsy C Risendal
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carr AL, Bilenduke E, Adolf E, Kessler ER, Arch JJ, Ranby KW, Kilbourn K. A pilot randomized study of a telephone-based cognitive-behavioral stress-management intervention to reduce distress in phase 1 oncology trial caregivers. Palliat Support Care 2023; 21:820-828. [PMID: 36994841 PMCID: PMC10544682 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951523000196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Caregivers of adult phase 1 oncology trial patients experience high levels of distress and face barriers to in-person supportive care. The Phase 1 Caregiver LifeLine (P1CaLL) pilot study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and general impact of an individual telephone-based cognitive behavioral stress-management (CBSM) intervention for caregivers of phase I oncology trial patients. METHODS The pilot study involved 4 weekly adapted CBSM sessions followed by participant randomization to 4 weekly cognitive behavioral therapy sessions or metta-meditation sessions. A mixed-methods design used quantitative data from 23 caregivers and qualitative data from 5 caregivers to examine the feasibility and acceptability outcomes. Feasibility was determined using recruitment, retention, and assessment completion rates. Acceptability was assessed with self-reported satisfaction with program content and participation barriers. Baseline to post-intervention changes in caregiver distress and other psychosocial outcomes were assessed for the 8-session intervention. RESULTS The enrollment rate was 45.3%, which demonstrated limited feasibility based on an a priori criterion enrollment rate of 50%. Participants completed an average of 4.9 sessions, with 9/25 (36%) completing all sessions and an 84% assessment completion rate. Intervention acceptability was high, and participants found the sessions helpful in managing stress related to the phase 1 oncology trial patient experience. Participants showed reductions in worry and isolation and stress. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The P1CaLL study demonstrated adequate acceptability and limited feasibility and provided data on the general impact of the intervention on caregiver distress and other psychosocial outcomes. Caregivers of phase 1 oncology trial patients would benefit from supportive care services; a telephone-based intervention may have more utilization and thus make a larger impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaina L. Carr
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily Bilenduke
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Esmeralda Adolf
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth R. Kessler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joanna J. Arch
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Krista W. Ranby
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chebli P, Adsul P, Kranick J, Rohweder CL, Risendal BC, Bilenduke E, Williams R, Wheeler S, Kwon SC, Trinh-Shevrin C. Principles to operationalize equity in cancer research and health outcomes: lessons learned from the cancer prevention and control research network. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:371-387. [PMID: 36781715 PMCID: PMC9925365 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01668-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Reflecting their commitment to advancing health equity, the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) established a Health Equity Workgroup to identify and distill guiding principles rooted in health equity, community-engaged participatory research (CBPR), social determinants of health, and racial equity frameworks to guide its collective work. The Health Equity Workgroup utilized a multi-phase, participatory consensus-building approach to: (1) identify recurrent themes in health and racial equity frameworks; (2) capture perspectives on and experiences with health equity research among CPCRN members through an online survey; (3) engage in activities to discuss and refine the guiding principles; and (4) collect case examples of operationalizing equity principles in cancer research. Representatives from all CPCRN centers endorsed nine core principles to guide the Network's strategic plan: (1) Engage in power-sharing and capacity building with partners; (2) Address community priorities through community engagement and co-creation of research; (3) Explore and address the systems and structural root causes of cancer disparities; (4) Build a system of accountability between research and community partners; (5) Establish transparent relationships with community partners; (6) Prioritize the sustainability of research benefits for community partners; (7) Center racial equity in cancer prevention and control research; (8) Engage in equitable data collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination practices; and (9) Integrate knowledge translation, implementation, and dissemination into research plans. Dissemination products, such as toolkits and technical assistance workshops, reflecting these principles will foster knowledge transfer to intentionally integrate health and racial equity principles in cancer prevention and control research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perla Chebli
- Department of Population Health, Section for Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, 8th Fl. #8-21A, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Cancer Control and Populations Sciences Research Program, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Julie Kranick
- Department of Population Health, Section for Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, 8th Fl. #8-21A, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Catherine L Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Betsy C Risendal
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Emily Bilenduke
- Department of Psychology Denver, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Rebecca Williams
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie Wheeler
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Simona C Kwon
- Department of Population Health, Section for Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, 8th Fl. #8-21A, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Chau Trinh-Shevrin
- Department of Population Health, Section for Health Equity, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, 8th Fl. #8-21A, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|