1
|
Heberlein EC, Smith JC, LaBoy A, Britt J, Crockett A. Birth Outcomes for Medically High-Risk Pregnancies: Comparing Group to Individual Prenatal Care. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:414-421. [PMID: 34710941 DOI: 10.1055/a-1682-2704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Group prenatal care models were initially designed for women with medically low-risk pregnancies, and early outcome data focused on these patient populations. Pregnancy outcome data for women with medically high-risk pregnancies participating in group prenatal care is needed to guide clinical practice. This study compares rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions among women with medical risk for poor birth outcomes who receive group versus individual prenatal care. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study uses vital statistics data to compare pregnancy outcomes for women from 21 obstetric practices participating in a statewide expansion project of group prenatal care. The study population for this paper included women with pregestational or gestational hypertension, pregestational or gestational diabetes, and high body mass index (BMI > 45 kg/m2). Patients were matched using propensity scoring, and outcomes were compared using logistic regression. Two levels of treatment exposure based on group visit attendance were evaluated for women in group care: any exposure (one or more groups) or minimum threshold (five or more groups). RESULTS Participation in group prenatal care at either treatment exposure level was associated with a lower risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (10.2 group vs. 13.8% individual care, odds ratio [OR] = 0.708, p < 0.001). Participating in the minimum threshold of groups (five or more sessions) was associated with reduced risk of preterm birth (11.4% group vs. 18.4% individual care, OR = 0.569, p < 0.001) and NICU admissions (8.4% group vs. 15.9% individual care, OR = 0.483, p < 0.001). No differences in birth weight were observed. CONCLUSION This study provides preliminary evidence that women who have or develop common medical conditions during pregnancy are not at greater risk for preterm birth, low birth weight, or NICU admissions if they participate in group prenatal care. Practices who routinely exclude patients with these conditions from group participation should reconsider increasing inclusivity of their groups. KEY POINTS · This study compares outcomes for women who receive group versus individual prenatal care. · The study population was limited to women with diabetes, hypertension, and/or high BMI.. · Group participants did not have higher rates of preterm birth, low birth weight, or NICU admissions..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Heberlein
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jessica C Smith
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ana LaBoy
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jessica Britt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Amy Crockett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health Upstate, Greenville, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith JC, Heberlein EC, Domingue A, LaBoy A, Britt J, Crockett AH. Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2023; 52:467-480. [PMID: 37604352 PMCID: PMC10840617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of group prenatal care (GPNC) compared with individual prenatal care (IPNC) on psychosocial outcomes in late pregnancy, including potential differences in outcomes by subgroups. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING An academic medical center in the southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 2,348 women with low-risk pregnancies who entered prenatal care before 20 6/7 weeks gestation were randomized to GPNC (n = 1,175) or IPNC (n = 1,173) and stratified by self-reported race and ethnicity. METHODS We surveyed participants during enrollment (M = 12.21 weeks gestation) and in late pregnancy (M = 32.51 weeks gestation). We used standard measures related to stress, anxiety, coping strategies, empowerment, depression symptoms, and stress management practices in an intent-to-treat regression analysis. To account for nonadherence to GPNC treatment, we used an instrumental variable approach. RESULTS The response rates were high, with 78.69% of participants in the GPNC group and 83.89% of participants in the IPNC group completing the surveys. We found similar patterns for both groups, including decrease in distress and increase in anxiety between surveys and comparable levels of pregnancy empowerment and stress management at the second survey. We identified greater use of coping strategies for participants in the GPNC group, particularly those who identified as Black or had low levels of partner support. CONCLUSION Group prenatal care did not affect stress and anxiety in late pregnancy; however, the increased use of coping strategies may suggest a benefit of GPNC for some participants.
Collapse
|
3
|
Heberlein EC, Smith JC, Marton J, Otekunrin A, LaBoy A, Britt JL, Crockett AH. Well Child Visit Attendance for Group Prenatal Care Participants. Acad Pediatr 2023; 23:296-303. [PMID: 36220619 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Participation in group prenatal care (GPNC) has been associated with increased attendance at prenatal, family planning and postpartum visits. We explored whether GPNC participation is associated with pediatric care engagement by measuring well-child visit (WCV) attendance among infants whose births were covered by Medicaid. METHODS We used Medicaid claims and vital statistics from the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and GPNC site participation records (2013-2018). We compared WCV attendance of CenteringPregnancy GPNC patients to a propensity-score matched cohort of individual prenatal care patients (IPNC) across 21 prenatal care practices using linear probability models. The primary outcome measure was attending 6 or more WCVs in the first 15 months, a Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measure. RESULTS No differences in WCV were observed when comparing any exposure to GPNC (one or more sessions) to IPNC. We identified 3191 patients who participated in GPNC and matched these with 5184 in IPNC. Participation in 5 or more GPNC sessions compared to 5 or more prenatal visits was associated with higher rates of WCV compliance over the first 15 months (4.7 percentage point difference [95% CI 3.1-6.3%, P < .001]), with stronger associations between GPNC and WCV attendance for low birthweight infants, for Black infants, and for infants of mothers with no previous live births. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests GPNC may modestly influence WCV attendance. The potential mechanisms and dose response require further investigation. Gaps in WCV attendance compared to benchmarks persist regardless of PNC model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Heberlein
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies (EC Heberlein, JC Smith, A Otekunrin, and A LaBoy), Georgia State University, Atlanta.
| | - Jessica C Smith
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies (EC Heberlein, JC Smith, A Otekunrin, and A LaBoy), Georgia State University, Atlanta
| | - James Marton
- Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies (J Marton), Georgia State University, Atlanta
| | - Adejumobi Otekunrin
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies (EC Heberlein, JC Smith, A Otekunrin, and A LaBoy), Georgia State University, Atlanta
| | - Ana LaBoy
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies (EC Heberlein, JC Smith, A Otekunrin, and A LaBoy), Georgia State University, Atlanta
| | - Jessica L Britt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health (JL Britt), Greenville, SC
| | - Amy H Crockett
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health (AH Crockett), University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Crockett AH, Chen L, Heberlein EC, Britt JL, Covington-Kolb S, Witrick B, Doherty E, Zhang L, Borders A, Keenan-Devlin L, Smart B, Heo M. Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:893.e1-893.e15. [PMID: 36113576 PMCID: PMC9729420 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States has persistently high rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and is characterized by significant racial disparities in these rates. Innovative group prenatal care models, such as CenteringPregnancy, have been proposed as a potential approach to improve the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and to reduce disparities in these pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test whether participation in group prenatal care would reduce the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight compared with individual prenatal care and whether group prenatal care would reduce the racial disparity in these rates between Black and White patients. STUDY DESIGN This was a randomized controlled trial among medically low-risk pregnant patients at a single study site. Eligible patients were stratified by self-identified race and ethnicity and randomly allocated 1:1 between group and individual prenatal care. The primary outcomes were preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation and low birthweight of <2500 g. The primary analysis was performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. The secondary analyses were performed according to the as-treated principle using modified intent-to-treat and per-compliance approaches. The analysis of effect modification by race and ethnicity was planned. RESULTS A total of 2350 participants were enrolled, with 1176 assigned to group prenatal care and 1174 assigned to individual prenatal care. The study population included 952 Black (40.5%), 502 Hispanic (21.4%), 863 White (36.8%), and 31 "other races or ethnicity" (1.3%) participants. Group prenatal care did not reduce the rate of preterm birth (10.4% vs 8.7%; odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.63; P=.17) or low birthweight (9.6% vs 8.9%; odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.45; P=.62) compared with individual prenatal care. In subgroup analysis, greater attendance in prenatal care was associated with lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight. This effect was most noticeable for the rates of low birthweight for Black participants in group care: intent to treat (51/409 [12.5%]), modified intent to treat (36/313 [11.5%]), and per compliance (20/240 [8.3%]). Although the rates of low birthweight were significantly higher for Black participants than White participants seen in individual care (adjusted odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.50), the difference was not significant for Black participants in group care compared with their White counterparts (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-3.34). CONCLUSION There was no difference in the overall rates of preterm birth or low birthweight between group and individual prenatal care. With increased participation in group prenatal care, lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight for Black participants were observed. The role of group care models in reducing racial disparities in these birth outcomes requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H Crockett
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health and the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
| | - Liwei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Emily C Heberlein
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jessica L Britt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC
| | - Sarah Covington-Kolb
- Center for Community Health Alignment, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Brian Witrick
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Emily Doherty
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Ann Borders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Lauren Keenan-Devlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Britney Smart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Moonseong Heo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Pregnancy-related complaints are a significant driver of emergency room (ER) utilization among women. Because of additional time for patient education and provider relationships, group prenatal care may reduce ER visits among pregnant women by helping them identify appropriate care settings, improving understanding of common pregnancy discomforts, and reducing risky health behaviors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, utilizing Medicaid claims and birth certificate data from a statewide expansion of group care, to compare ER utilization between pregnant women participating in group prenatal care and individual prenatal care. Using propensity score matching methods, we found that group care was associated with a significant reduction in the likelihood of having any ER utilization (-5.9% among women receiving any group care and -6.0% among women attending at least five group care sessions). These findings suggest that group care may reduce ER utilization among pregnant women and encourage appropriate health care utilization during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ana Laboy
- Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heberlein EC, Frongillo EA, Picklesimer AH, Covington-Kolb S. Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Food Insecurity during Late Pregnancy and Early Postpartum. Matern Child Health J 2017; 20:1014-24. [PMID: 26662280 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-015-1886-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compared the effects of group to individual prenatal care in late pregnancy and early postpartum on (1) women's food security and (2) psychosocial outcomes among food-insecure women. METHODS AND RESULTS We recruited 248 racially diverse, low-income, pregnant women receiving CenteringPregnancy™ group prenatal care (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124) to complete surveys in early pregnancy, late pregnancy, and early postpartum, with 84 % completing three surveys. Twenty-six percent of group and 31 % of individual care participants reported food insecurity in early pregnancy (p = 0.493). In multiple logistic regression models, women choosing group versus individual care were more likely to report food security in late pregnancy (0.85 vs. 0.66 average predicted probability, p < 0.001) and postpartum (0.89 vs. 0.78 average predicted probability, p = 0.049). Among initially food-insecure women, group participants were more likely to become food-secure in late pregnancy (0.67 vs. 0.35 individual care average predicted probability, p < 0.001) and postpartum (0.76 vs. 0.57 individual care average predicted probability, p = 0.052) in intention-to-treat models. Group participants were more likely to change perceptions on affording healthy foods and stretching food resources. Group compared to individual care participants with early pregnancy food insecurity demonstrated higher maternal-infant attachment scale scores (89.8 vs. 86.2 points for individual care, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS Group prenatal care provides health education and the opportunity for women to share experiences and knowledge, which may improve food security through increasing confidence and skills in managing household food resources. Health sector interventions can complement food assistance programs in addressing food insecurity during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Heberlein
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health, Education, and Human Development, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
| | - Edward A Frongillo
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Amy H Picklesimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greenville Health System, 890 W. Faris Road, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA
| | - Sarah Covington-Kolb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greenville Health System, 890 W. Faris Road, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crockett AH, Pickell LB, Heberlein EC, Billings DL, Mills B. Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform. Contraception 2017; 95:71-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
8
|
Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington-Kolb S, Farber N, Frongillo EA. Qualitative Comparison of Women's Perspectives on the Functions and Benefits of Group and Individual Prenatal Care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2016; 61:224-34. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|