1
|
Burke ES, Slaven JE, Taylor TA, Monahan PO, Sachs GA, Torke AM. The Quick FICS: 5 and 10 Item Versions of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 66:e461-e468. [PMID: 37343901 PMCID: PMC10528228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Communication quality in the hospital impacts outcomes like satisfaction, depression, and anxiety for families, and assessment tools must be efficient and reliable. OBJECTIVES We developed the Quick FICS-5 and -10, shorter versions of the 30-item Family Inpatient Communication Survey (FICS). METHODS The Quick FICS were developed from the original FICS study of hospitalized patients 65+ and their surrogates. The development sample came from the original FICS-30 scale. The validation sample came from a randomized controlled trial of surrogates for adult ICU patients. Participants were family members of patients on medical ICU or inpatient medicine services at three hospitals in a Midwest metropolitan area. We evaluated validity and reliability using factor analysis, internal consistency, and associations with surrogate psychological and decision-making outcomes. RESULTS In the development sample of 364 patient/surrogate dyads, most surrogates were adult children (66.8%), female (70.9%), and white (68.9%). We identified 5-item and 10-item surveys. Exploratory factor analysis supported an overall communication score for the FICS-5 and FICS-10, as well as information and emotional support subscales for the FICS-10. There was high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 for the FICS-5 and 0.90 for the FICS-10; information and emotional support subscales were 0.89 and 0.75 respectively). There was good predictive validity when comparing FICS scores to outcomes six to eight weeks after discharge, including anxiety (P = -0.13; P = 0.0234), and satisfaction with the hospital stay (P = 0.48; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the validation sample (n = 188) revealed Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.81 to 0.93 and significant correlations (P < 0.05) with concurrent distress, anxiety, depression, and decision regret. CONCLUSIONS The Quick FICS offers efficient, valid, and reliable evaluation of communication quality in the hospital that can be useful for research and quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S Burke
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research (E.S.B., T.A.T., G.A.S., A.M.T.), Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| | - James E Slaven
- Indiana University, Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science (J.E.S., P.O.M.), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Tracy A Taylor
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research (E.S.B., T.A.T., G.A.S., A.M.T.), Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Indiana University, Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science (J.E.S., P.O.M.), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Greg A Sachs
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research (E.S.B., T.A.T., G.A.S., A.M.T.), Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine (G.A.S., A.M.T.), School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Eskenazi Health (G.A.S., A.M.T.), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alexia M Torke
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research (E.S.B., T.A.T., G.A.S., A.M.T.), Regenstrief Institute Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine (G.A.S., A.M.T.), School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana University Health (A.M.T.), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Eskenazi Health (G.A.S., A.M.T.), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Candrian C, Burke ES, Kline D, Torke AM. Experiences of caregiving with Alzheimer's disease in the LGBT community. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:293. [PMID: 37189062 PMCID: PMC10184068 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03914-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this paper is to develop a more thorough understanding of the experiences of LGBT older adults living with dementia and their caregivers. METHODS A phenomenological approach using in-depth interviews with current or former caregivers of LGBT persons living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) was conducted. RESULTS Participants ranged in age from 44-77 years old; 74% were lesbian, 16% gay, 5% straight, and 5% unknown. Five themes were identified from the analysis: Caregiver tension and isolation; financial stress & security; lack of social support & connection; engineering grief support, and entrapment of past and present stigma and discrimination. CONCLUSIONS Discrimination related to LGBT status was an important theme over the participants' lives and occurred for several during dementia care. While other themes were similar to prior AD studies, LGBT status affected these other aspects of the caregiving experience. Findings can inform future programs that better meet needs of LGBT people and those who care for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carey Candrian
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Emily S Burke
- Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Danielle Kline
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Alexia M Torke
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torke AM, Varner-Perez SE, Burke ES, Taylor TA, Slaven JE, Kozinski KL, Maiko SM, Pfeffer BJ, Banks SK. Effects of Spiritual Care on Well-Being of Intensive Care Family Surrogates: A Clinical Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:296-307. [PMID: 36526251 PMCID: PMC10129066 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Critical illness of a family member is associated with high emotional and spiritual distress and difficult medical decisions. OBJECTIVES To determine if a semistructured spiritual care intervention improves the well-being of family surrogate decision makers in intensive care (ICU) settings. METHODS This study is a randomized, allocation-concealed, parallel group, usual care-controlled, single-blind trial of patient/surrogate dyads in five ICUs in one Midwest, academic medical center. Patients were 18 and older admitted to the ICU and unable to make medical decisions. The intervention involved proactive contact from the chaplain, scheduled, semi-structured visits, weekly follow-up, and bereavement calls. The control group received usual care. The primary endpoint was the surrogate's anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorders-7 scale), six to eight weeks after discharge. RESULTS Of 192 patient/surrogate dyads enrolled, 128 completed outcome assessments. At follow-up, anxiety in the intervention group was lower than control (median score 1 (interquartile range 0,6) vs. 4 (1,9), P = 0.0057). The proportion of patients with a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in anxiety of 2+ was 65.2% in the intervention group vs. 49.2% in control. The odds of an MCID remained higher in adjusted analysis (Odds Ratio 3.11, 95% confidence interval 1.18, 8.21; P = 0.0218) The adjusted odds of an MCID were higher for spiritual well-being (OR 3.79, CI 1.41,10.17; P = 0.0081). Satisfaction with spiritual care was also higher (adjusted mean 3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.9 ± 0.1); P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Proactive, semistructured spiritual care delivered by chaplains improves well-being for ICU surrogates. Results provide evidence for inclusion of chaplains in palliative and intensive care teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M Torke
- Indiana University School of Medicine (A.M.T., S.M.M., S.K.B.), Indianapolis, Indiana; Daniel F. Evans Center (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., S.M.M., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; IU Center for Aging Research (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., E.S.B., T.A.T.), Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - Shelley E Varner-Perez
- Daniel F. Evans Center (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., S.M.M., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; IU Center for Aging Research (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., E.S.B., T.A.T.), Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana; Spiritual Care and Chaplaincy Department (S.E.V.P., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Emily S Burke
- IU Center for Aging Research (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., E.S.B., T.A.T.), Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Tracy A Taylor
- IU Center for Aging Research (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., E.S.B., T.A.T.), Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - James E Slaven
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science (J.E.S.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Saneta M Maiko
- Indiana University School of Medicine (A.M.T., S.M.M., S.K.B.), Indianapolis, Indiana; Daniel F. Evans Center (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., S.M.M., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Bruce J Pfeffer
- Daniel F. Evans Center (A.M.T., S.E.V.P., S.M.M., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; Spiritual Care and Chaplaincy Department (S.E.V.P., B.J.P.), Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sarah K Banks
- Indiana University School of Medicine (A.M.T., S.M.M., S.K.B.), Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Varner-Perez SE, Mathis KA, Banks SK, Burke ES, Slaven JE, Morse GJ, Whitaker MK, Cottingham AH, Ahmed RA. A descriptive study of the multidisciplinary healthcare experiences of inpatient resuscitation events. Resusc Plus 2023; 13:100349. [PMID: 36654725 PMCID: PMC9841215 DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In-hospital resuscitation events have complex and enduring effects on clinicians, with implications for job satisfaction, performance, and burnout. Ethically ambiguous cases are associated with increased moral distress. We aim to quantitatively describe the multidisciplinary resuscitation experience. Methods Multidisciplinary in-hospital healthcare professionals at an adult academic health center in the Midwestern United States completed surveys one and six weeks after a resuscitation event. Surveys included demographic data, task load (NASA-TLX), overall and moral distress, anxiety, depression, and spiritual peace. Spearman's rank correlation was computed to assess task load and distress. Results During the 5-month study period, the study included 12 resuscitation events across six inpatient units. Of 82 in-hospital healthcare professionals eligible for recruitment, 44 (53.7%) completed the one-week post-resuscitation event survey. Of those, 37 (84.1%) completed the six-week survey. Highest median task load burden at one week was seen for temporal demand, effort, and mental demand. Median moral distress scores were low, while "at peace" median scores tended to be high. There were no significant non-zero changes in task load or distress scores from weeks 1-6. Mental demand (r = 0.545, p < 0.001), physical demand (r = 0.464, p = 0.005), performance (r = -0.539, p < 0.001), and frustration (r = 0.545, p < 0.001) significantly correlated with overall distress. Performance (r = -0.371, p = 0.028) and frustration (r = 0.480, p = 0.004) also significantly correlated with moral distress. Conclusions In-hospital healthcare professionals' experiences of resuscitation events are varied and complex. Aspects of task load burden including mental and physical demand, performance, and frustration contribute to overall and moral distress, deserving greater attention in clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley E. Varner-Perez
- Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA,IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA,Corresponding author at: Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Spiritual Care & Chaplaincy, 1812 N Capitol, Wile Hall W230, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | | | | | - Emily S. Burke
- IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James E. Slaven
- IU Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Ann H. Cottingham
- IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA,IU Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rami A. Ahmed
- IU Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Simulation, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Na SY, Slaven JE, Burke ES, Torke AM. Health Care System Distrust, Race, and Surrogate Decision-Making Regarding Code Status. Health Equity 2022; 6:809-818. [PMID: 36338803 PMCID: PMC9629912 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2022.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Previous studies have shown that black patients are more likely to prefer life-sustaining treatments such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation at end-of-life (EOL) compared to non-Hispanic white patients. Given prior racial disparities in health care, distrust has been proposed to explain these preferences. As many hospitalized older adults require surrogates to make medical decisions, we explored surrogates' code status preferences and the role of trust in these decisions. Methods We conducted secondary analyses of an observational study of patient/surrogate dyads admitted to three hospitals in a Midwest metropolitan area. Distrust was assessed using the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale. A single item asked the surrogate which code status they thought was best for the patient, full code or do not resuscitate. Results We enrolled 350 patient/surrogate dyads (101 black; 249 white). In bivariate analysis, higher proportion of black surrogates preferred full code (62.4% vs. 38.3%, p=0.0001). After adjusting for trust and sociodemographic and psychological covariates, race was still significantly associated with preference for full code (adjusted odds ratio=2.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-3.92; p=0.0153). Surrogate race was not associated with distrust in bivariate or multivariable analysis, adjusting for sociodemographic and psychological covariates (p=0.3049). Conclusion Although black race was associated with preferences for full code status, we observed no association between race and distrust. Differences in code status preference may be due to other factors related to race and culture. To ensure that patients are receiving EOL care that is consistent with their values, more work is needed to understand the cultural complexities behind EOL care preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Yoon Na
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - James E. Slaven
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emily S. Burke
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alexia M. Torke
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Address correspondence to: Alexia Torke, MD, MS, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perez SEV, Maiko S, Burke ES, Slaven JE, Johns SA, Smith OJ, Helft PR, Kozinski K, Torke AM. Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) for Adult Outpatients With Advanced Cancer and Caregivers: A Pilot Trial to Assess Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:895-906. [PMID: 34467769 PMCID: PMC8928229 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211042860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although religion and spirituality are important to adults with cancer and their family caregivers, few studies have tested spiritual care interventions in the outpatient setting. AIM To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of chaplain-delivered, semi-structured spiritual care to adult outpatients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. DESIGN In this pre/post pilot intervention study, board-certified chaplains utilized the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework during 4 individual sessions. Surveys at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 weeks post-intervention assessed spiritual well-being, quality of life, depression, anxiety, and religious coping. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS We enrolled U.S. adult outpatients with or without an eligible family caregiver. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old and at least 2 weeks post-diagnosis of incurable and advanced-stage lung or gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. RESULTS Of 82 eligible patients, 24 enrolled (29.3%); of 22 eligible caregivers, 18 enrolled (81.8%). Four planned chaplain visits were completed by 87.5% of patients and 77.8% of caregivers. All enrolled participants completed baseline surveys, and more than 75% completed follow-up surveys at 2 of 3 time points. More than 80% of patients and caregivers reported they would recommend the sessions to a friend or family member. Patients' spiritual well-being improved significantly at all timepoints compared to baseline: 1-week post (p < .006), 6-weeks post (p < .001), and 12-weeks post (p < .004). CONCLUSIONS Spiritual care through SCAI is feasible, acceptable, and shows promise in improving spiritual well-being and other important outcomes in advanced-stage cancer patients and family caregivers. Further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley E Varner Perez
- Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Saneta Maiko
- Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Emily S Burke
- IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James E Slaven
- IU Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shelley A Johns
- IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Paul R Helft
- IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN. Maiko is now with Indiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana; Smith is now Wright State Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH; Kozinski is now with Trinity Health, Waterville, ME
| | | | - Alexia M Torke
- IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comer AR, Hickman SE, Slaven JE, Monahan PO, Sachs GA, Wocial LD, Burke ES, Torke AM. Assessment of Discordance Between Surrogate Care Goals and Medical Treatment Provided to Older Adults With Serious Illness. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e205179. [PMID: 32427322 PMCID: PMC7237962 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE An important aspect of high-quality care is ensuring that treatments are in alignment with patient or surrogate decision-maker goals. Treatment discordant with patient goals has been shown to increase medical costs and prolong end-of-life difficulties. OBJECTIVES To evaluate discordance between surrogate decision-maker goals of care and medical orders and treatments provided to hospitalized, incapacitated older patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study included 363 patient-surrogate dyads. Patients were 65 years or older and faced at least 1 major medical decision in the medical and medical intensive care unit services in 3 tertiary care hospitals in an urban Midwestern area. Data were collected from April 27, 2012, through July 10, 2015, and analyzed from October 5, 2018, to December 5, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Each surrogate's preferred goal of care was determined via interview during initial hospitalization and 6 to 8 weeks after discharge. Surrogates were asked to select the goal of care for the patient from 3 options: comfort-focused care, life-sustaining treatment, or an intermediate option. To assess discordance, the preferred goal of care as determined by the surrogate was compared with data from medical record review outlining the medical treatment received during the target hospitalization. RESULTS A total of 363 dyads consisting of patients (223 women [61.4%]; mean [SD] age, 81.8 [8.3] years) and their surrogates (257 women [70.8%]; mean [SD] age, 58.3 [11.2] years) were included in the analysis. One hundred sixty-nine patients (46.6%) received at least 1 medical treatment discordant from their surrogate's identified goals of care. The most common type of discordance involved full-code orders for patients with a goal of comfort (n = 41) or an intermediate option (n = 93). More frequent in-person contact between surrogate and patient (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.82), patient residence in an institution (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.82), and surrogate-rated quality of communication (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) were associated with lower discordance. Surrogate marital status (AOR for single vs married, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.01-3.66), number of family members involved in decisions (AOR for ≥2 vs 0-1, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.05-3.21), and religious affiliation (AOR for none vs any, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.12-21.09) were associated with higher discordance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that discordance between surrogate goals of care and medical treatments for hospitalized, incapacitated patients was common. Communication quality is a modifiable factor associated with discordance that may be an avenue for future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber R. Comer
- Department of Health Sciences, Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Susan E. Hickman
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
| | - James E. Slaven
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Patrick O. Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Greg A. Sachs
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Lucia D. Wocial
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
| | - Emily S. Burke
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
| | - Alexia M. Torke
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wocial LD, Slaven JE, Montz K, Monahan PO, Hickman SE, Callahan CM, Helft PR, Sachs GA, Inger L, Burke ES, Torke AM. Factors Associated with Physician Moral Distress Caring for Hospitalized Elderly Patients Needing a Surrogate Decision-maker: a Prospective Study. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:1405-1412. [PMID: 32096085 PMCID: PMC7210358 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05652-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When working with surrogate decision-makers, physicians often encounter ethical challenges that may cause moral distress which can have negative consequences for physicians. OBJECTIVE To determine frequency of and factors associated with physicians' moral distress caring for patients requiring a surrogate. DESIGN Prospective survey. PARTICIPANTS Physicians (n = 154) caring for patients aged 65 years and older and their surrogate decision-makers (n = 362 patient/surrogate dyads). Patients were admitted to medicine or medical intensive care services, lacked decisional capacity and had an identified surrogate. MAIN MEASURES Moral distress thermometer. KEY RESULTS Physicians experienced moral distress in the care of 152 of 362 patients (42.0%). In analyses adjusted for physician, patient, and surrogate characteristics, physician/surrogate discordance in preferences for the plan of care was not significantly associated with moral distress. Physicians were more likely to experience moral distress when caring for older patients (1.06, 1.02-1.10), and facing a decision about life-sustaining treatment (3.58, 1.54-8.32). Physicians were less likely to experience moral distress when caring for patients residing in a nursing home (0.40, 0.23-0.69), patients who previously discussed care preferences (0.56, 0.35-0.90), and higher surrogate ratings of emotional support from clinicians (0.94, 0.89-0.99). Physicians' internal discordance when they prefer a more comfort-focused plan than the patient is receiving was associated with significantly higher moral distress (2.22, 1.33-3.70) after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Physician moral distress occurs more frequently when the physician is male, the patient is older or requires decisions about life-sustaining treatments. These findings may help target interventions to support physicians. Prior discussions about patient wishes is associated with lower distress and may be a target for patient-centered interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia D Wocial
- Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | | | - Kianna Montz
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Susan E Hickman
- Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Christopher M Callahan
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
- IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Paul R Helft
- Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- IU Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Greg A Sachs
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
- IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lev Inger
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Emily S Burke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alexia M Torke
- Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
- IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Torke AM, Fitchett G, Maiko S, Burke ES, Slaven JE, Watson BN, Ivy S, Monahan PO. The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs With End-of-Life Decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:261-269. [PMID: 31539603 PMCID: PMC6989362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life-sustaining treatments. OBJECTIVES To determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates. METHODS This prospective observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2 and 10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange six months after enrollment identified the use of life-sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died. RESULTS There were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for do-not-resuscitate status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization. CONCLUSION Few religious variables are associated with end-of-life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M Torke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| | - George Fitchett
- Department of Religion, Health and Human Values, College of Health Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Saneta Maiko
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana, USA
| | - Emily S Burke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - James E Slaven
- IU Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Steven Ivy
- Association for Clinical Pastoral Education, Decatur, Georgia, USA
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- IU Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Torke AM, Maiko S, Watson BN, Ivy SS, Burke ES, Montz K, Rush SA, Slaven JE, Kozinski K, Axel-Adams R, Cottingham A. The Chaplain Family Project: Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of an Intervention to Improve Spiritual Care of Family Surrogates. J Health Care Chaplain 2019; 25:147-170. [DOI: 10.1080/08854726.2019.1580979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M. Torke
- Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Saneta Maiko
- Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Department of Spiritual Care and Chaplaincy Services, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Beth N. Watson
- Indiana Conference of the United Methodist Church, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Steven S. Ivy
- Christian Theological Seminary, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Emily S. Burke
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kianna Montz
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sarah A. Rush
- Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, Indiana University (IU) Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - James E. Slaven
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kathryn Kozinski
- Department of Spiritual Care and Chaplaincy Services, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Robyn Axel-Adams
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ann Cottingham
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Torke AM, Callahan CM, Sachs GA, Wocial LD, Helft PR, Monahan PO, Slaven JE, Montz K, Burke ES, Inger L. Communication Quality Predicts Psychological Well-Being and Satisfaction in Family Surrogates of Hospitalized Older Adults: An Observational Study. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:298-304. [PMID: 29185176 PMCID: PMC5834961 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4222-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many hospitalized older adults require family surrogates to make decisions, but surrogates may perceive that the quality of medical decisions is low and may have poor psychological outcomes after the patient's hospitalization. OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between communication quality and high-quality medical decisions, psychological well-being, and satisfaction for surrogates of hospitalized older adults. DESIGN Observational study at three hospitals in a Midwest metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS Hospitalized older adults (65+ years) admitted to medicine and medical intensive care units who were unable to make medical decisions, and their family surrogates. Among 799 eligible dyads, 364 (45.6%) completed the study. MAIN MEASURES Communication was assessed during hospitalization using the information and emotional support subscales of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. Decision quality was assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 4-6 weeks post-discharge included anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), post-traumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), and satisfaction (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems). KEY RESULTS The mean patient age was 81.9 years (SD 8.32); 62% were women, and 28% African American. Among surrogates, 67% were adult children. Six to eight weeks post-discharge, 22.6% of surrogates reported anxiety (11.3% moderate-severe anxiety); 29% reported depression, (14.0% moderate-severe), and 14.6% had high levels of post-traumatic stress. Emotional support was associated with lower odds of anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.85) and depression (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.65, 0.99) at follow-up. In multivariable linear regression, emotional support was associated with lower post-traumatic stress (β = -0.30, p = 0.003) and higher decision quality (β = -0.44, p < 0.0001). Information was associated with higher post-traumatic stress (β = 0.23, p = 0.022) but also higher satisfaction (β = 0.61, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Emotional support of hospital surrogates is consistently associated with better psychological outcomes and decision quality, suggesting an opportunity to improve decision making and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M Torke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA. .,IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA. .,Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. .,Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Christopher M Callahan
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Greg A Sachs
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lucia D Wocial
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Paul R Helft
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Kianna Montz
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Emily S Burke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Lev Inger
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Torke AM, Monahan P, Callahan CM, Helft PR, Sachs GA, Wocial LD, Slaven JE, Montz K, Inger L, Burke ES. Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 53:96-108.e4. [PMID: 27720790 PMCID: PMC5191959 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. METHODS After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. RESULTS Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation -0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (-0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M Torke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| | | | - Christopher M Callahan
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Paul R Helft
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Greg A Sachs
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lucia D Wocial
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - James E Slaven
- IU Department of Biostatistics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Kianna Montz
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lev Inger
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emily S Burke
- Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Torke AM, Wocial LD, Johns SA, Sachs GA, Callahan CM, Bosslet GT, Slaven JE, Perkins SM, Hickman SE, Montz K, Burke ES. The Family Navigator: A Pilot Intervention to Support Intensive Care Unit Family Surrogates. Am J Crit Care 2016; 25:498-507. [PMID: 27802950 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2016730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication problems between family surrogates and intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians have been documented, but few interventions are effective. Nurses have the potential to play an expanded role in ICU communication and decision making. OBJECTIVES To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the family navigator (FN), a distinct nursing role to address family members' unmet communication needs early in an ICU stay. METHODS An interprofessional team developed the FN protocol. A randomized controlled pilot intervention trial of the FN was performed in a tertiary referral hospital's ICU to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. The intervention addressed informational and emotional communication needs through daily contact by using structured clinical updates, emotional and informational support modules, family meeting support, and follow-up phone calls. RESULTS Twenty-six surrogate/patient pairs (13 per study arm) were enrolled. Surrogates randomized to the intervention had contact with the FN on 90% or more of eligible patient days. All surrogates agreed that they would recom mend the FN to other families. Open-ended comments from both surrogates and clinicians were uniformly positive. CONCLUSIONS Having a fully integrated nurse empowered to facilitate decision making is a feasible intervention in an ICU and is well-received by ICU families and staff. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to demonstrate impact on important outcomes, such as surrogates' well-being and decision quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia M Torke
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
| | - Lucia D Wocial
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Shelley A Johns
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Greg A Sachs
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Christopher M Callahan
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Gabriel T Bosslet
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - James E Slaven
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Susan M Perkins
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Susan E Hickman
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Kianna Montz
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| | - Emily S Burke
- Alexia M. Torke is a scientist, Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, an associate professor, IU School of Medicine, fellowship director, Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics (FCME), IU Health, and a core faculty, IU Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Lucia D. Wocial is a nurse ethicist, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and an adjunct assistant professor, IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana. Shelley A. Johns is an assistant professor, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Greg A. Sachs is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, chief, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, IU School of Medicine, and co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center. Christopher M. Callahan is a scientist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, and a professor of medicine, IU School of Medicine. Gabriel T. Bosslet is an assistant professor of clinical medicine, IU School of Medicine, an affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, and a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center. James E. Slaven is a biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan M. Perkins is a core faculty, IUPUI RESPECT Center and a professor, Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine. Susan E. Hickman is a senior affiliate faculty, FCME, IU Health, co-director, IUPUI RESPECT Center, and a professor, IU School of Nursing. Kianna Montz is a research coordinator and Emily Burke is a research specialist, IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burke ES, Braun RB, Stikler GB. [The results of 10 years of experience with steroid therapy nephrotic syndrome in children]. Pediatriia 1967; 46:29-32. [PMID: 5610019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|