Comparison of the pull-out bond strength of endodontically treated anterior teeth with monolithic zirconia endocrown and post-and-core crown restorations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of endodontically treated anterior teeth that had been restored with monolithic zirconia endocrowns using different extension depths (EDs) and post-and-core crowns after chewing simulation.

METHODS

Thirty-six maxillary central teeth were used (n = 12). Group I: Glass fiber post-and-core crown, Group II: Endocrown with 3-mm EDs, Group III: Endocrown with 5-mm EDs. Restorations were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks using a CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) device. For cementation, conventional resin luting agent (Multilink N) was used. All samples were aged with a chewing simulator and PBS tests were conducted at a speed of 1 mm/min using an electromechanical servo universal testing machine. The values were recorded in MPa by dividing the failure load by the bonding area. One-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey test were used for statistical analysis (P = 0.05).

RESULTS

Group III demonstrated significantly greater PBS values than Groups I and II (P = 0.001). No significant difference was found between Groups I and II (P = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

Increasing the ED of an endocrown influences the PBS of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with monolithic zirconia endocrowns.

Effect of surface treatment, ferrule height, and luting agent type on pull-out bond strength of monolithic zirconia endocrowns

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments, ferrule heights, and luting agents on the pull-out bond strength (PBS) of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic endocrowns.

METHODS

After endodontic treatment and preparation for two endocrown designs (ferrule height 0 mm or 2 mm), CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia endocrowns were fabricated for 80 mandibular molars. Each endocrown design group was then divided on the basis of surface treatment into two groups: half were air-abraded and half were air-abraded/laser-irradiated. Then, all treated groups were further divided into two subgroups (n = 10) and cemented to teeth with either a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing resin luting agent (Panavia SA) or a combination of MDP-containing primer and MDP-free resin luting agent (Monobond Plus/Multilink Automix). PBS was measured with a universal test machine after simulated chewing and thermocycling. Three-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Bonferroni test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

PBS was significantly associated with type of surface treatment, type of luting agent, and ferrule height. Air-abraded/laser-irradiated endocrowns with a 2-mm ferrule that were cemented with Monobond Plus/Multilink Automix had the highest PBS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surface treatment with air abrasion/laser irradiation, presence of a ferrule, and priming with an MDP-containing primer increased the PBS of monolithic zirconia endocrowns.

Effects of Postsurface Treatments Including Femtosecond Laser and Aluminum-oxide Airborne-particle Abrasion on the Bond Strength of the Fiber Posts

Context

Bond strength of fiber posts.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different Post Surface treatment techniques on the push-out bond strength of the quartz fiber posts.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 30 maxillary central incisors were decoronated at cementoenamel junction. Root canals were filled and postspaces were prepared. The specimens were classified into three groups according to the surface treatment performed to the postsurface (n = 10) as no surface treatment (control group) (Group 1), A 50-μm aluminum-oxide airborne-particle abrasion group (Group 2), femtosecond laser (FS) group (Group 3). A self-curing adhesive cement was used for cementation of posts. Six sections (two coronal, two middle, and two apical) of 1-mm thickness specimens were prepared with a slow speed diamond saw. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Then, push-out test was performed on a universal testing machine.

Results

The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). The test results indicated that push-out test values significantly different according to surface treatments among groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between root sections of each group for bond strength (P > 0.05). All dislodged Group 3 posts were free of cement, indicating adhesive failure, Group 1 and 2 were partially coated with cement, indicating a mixed failure at the cement/postsurface.

Conclusions

Based on the results, aluminum-oxide airborne-particle abrasion group showed higher and FS irradiation group showed lower bond strength values. Push-out bond strength values of the root segments were the same in all groups.