Age-Related Differences between Old and Very Old Men in Performance and Fatigability Are Evident after Cycling but Not Isometric or Concentric Single-Limb Tasks

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare performance and fatigability between young (n = 13; 18-30 yr), old (n = 13; 60-80 yr), and very old (n = 12; >80 yr) men during a single-joint isometric (ISO) and concentric (CON) task performed on an isokinetic dynamometer and a cycling (BIKE) task.

METHODS

Participants randomly performed incremental tasks consisting of stages of 75 contractions (i.e., 120 s, 0.8 s on/0.8 s off) for ISO and CON and 120 s at 37.5 rpm (similar duty cycle) for BIKE. Increments were set as a percentage of body weight. Knee extensor maximal force, voluntary activation, and twitch amplitude were measured at baseline, after each stage, and at task failure (five out of eight contractions below the target force or 6 s in a row at a cadence <37.5 rpm).

RESULTS

Compared with young men, performance (number of stages) was 24% and 40% lower in old and very old men in ISO, 54% and 59% lower in CON, and 36% and 60% lower in BIKE (all P < 0.05). Performance of old and very old differed only in BIKE (P < 0.01). For the last common stages performed, compared with young, force loss was greater for very old men in ISO and for old and very old men in BIKE (all P < 0.05). Overall, for the last common stage performed and task failure, old and very old men presented similar force loss, alterations in voluntary activation, and twitch amplitude.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that, with workloads relative to body weight, differences in performance between old and very old men could only be observed during BIKE (i.e., the more ecologically valid task). Results from isometric or concentric conditions might not be transferable to dynamic exercise with large muscle masses.

Acute effects of conventional versus wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps evoked torque and neuromuscular function

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) program is proportional to the level of evoked torque, which can be achieved with either conventional or wide-pulse stimulations. The aim of this study was to compare evoked torque, objective fatigability, and related peripheral and central alterations, as well as changes in central nervous system (CNS) excitability induced by an acute session of conventional versus wide-pulse NMES.

METHODS

Seventeen young men underwent three 20-min NMES sessions: conventional (0.2 ms/50 Hz), wide-pulse at 50 Hz (1 ms/50 Hz), and wide-pulse at 100 Hz (1 ms/100 Hz). Neuromuscular measurements (i.e., maximal voluntary contraction, voluntary activation, evoked responses to femoral nerve stimulation, and CNS excitability) were performed on the right quadriceps femoris muscle before and after each NMES session. CNS excitability was measured using transcranial magnetic, thoracic, and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulations.

RESULTS

The level of evoked torque was not significantly different between conventional and wide-pulse protocols applied at the maximal tolerable current intensity. All NMES protocols induced objective fatigability (~14% decrease in maximal voluntary contraction torque, p < 0.001) associated with peripheral (decrease in doublet torque and potentiated M-wave amplitude, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) but not central (unchanged voluntary activation, p = 0.79) alterations. However, these acute changes did not differ between NMES protocols and none of the NMES protocols modified markers of CNS excitability.

CONCLUSION

These results may allow to conjecture that chronic effects and treatment effectiveness could be comparable between conventional and wide-pulse NMES.

Bedside voluntary and evoked forces evaluation in intensive care unit patients: a narrative review

Around one third of intensive care unit (ICU) patients will develop severe neuromuscular alterations, known as intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW), during their stay. The diagnosis of ICUAW is difficult and often delayed as a result of sedation or delirium. Indeed, the clinical evaluation of both Medical Research Council score and maximal voluntary force (e.g., using handgrip and/or handheld dynamometers), two independent predictors of mortality, can be performed only in awake and cooperative patients. Transcutaneous electrical/magnetic stimulation applied over motor nerves combined with the development of dedicated ergometer have recently been introduced in ICU patients in order to propose an early and non-invasive measurement of evoked force. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the different tools allowing bedside force evaluation in ICU patients and the related experimental protocols. We suggest that non-invasive electrical and/or magnetic evoked force measurements could be a relevant strategy to characterize muscle weakness in the early phase of ICU and diagnose ICUAW.