Implementation and Use of a Patient Symptom Diary During Chemotherapy: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Nurse Perspective

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To gain a deeper understanding of nurses' experience working with a patient diary for tracking and treating side effects during chemotherapy.
.

DESIGN

A mixed-methods design was used to learn about oncology nurses' use and perceptions of a symptom diary. 
.

SETTING

Six oncology wards and two outpatient clinics at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
.

SAMPLE

79 nurses completed a survey, and 14 nurses participated in focus group discussions.
.

METHODS

First, a survey sampled nurses' use and perceptions of the diary. Next, focus group discussions were held with the aim of arriving at a deeper understanding of the survey results.
.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Use and perceptions of a symptom diary.
.

FINDINGS

Most nurses reported performing diary-related behavior to some extent. The survey and focus groups indicated that many nurses strongly believed in the value of the diary, but some were still hesitant or had concerns about patients' perceptions of the diary. The focus group results showed that nurses' use of the diary in daily practice was influenced by their personal beliefs about the value of the diary, the team's, and those of their patients.
.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a positive trend was noted, nurses' use of the symptom diary was suboptimal six months after its implementation.
.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

This study highlights important issues that need to be addressed to advance the successful implementation of the symptom diary.

Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography

Mammography is the only useful examination in screening for breast cancer. Mortality from breast cancer can be reduced if women go regularly for a screening mammography. Moreover, it is still the key examination in diagnosis of breast diseases and in the follow-up of patients treated for breast cancer. Pain with mammography can deter women from going for regular screening or follow-up; therefore, it is important to reduce pain experience or discomfort from mammography. In this study we evaluate the impact of the "radiographer" on the pain risk during mammography by analysing questionnaires filled in by women and radiographers. Study results reveal that the opinion of the radiographer, the information and communication during the examination and the number of years of experience are important factors in pain and discomfort experience. The attitude of the radiographer plays an important role in the pain experience.

Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening

Mammography is an important tool in the secondary prevention of breast cancer. However, earlier research has pointed out that an unpleasant experience during a previous mammography can deter women from returning for mammography screening. It is known that mammography can be a painful examination for some women. The research presented in this article focuses on the experience of pain during and after mammography (247 patients). Firstly, the study sets out to determine the extent to which women actually experience pain as a result of mammographic examination. Secondly, it focuses on identifying the factors that determine the risk of a painful experience during the screening procedure. A pain model was developed that takes into account a broad range of potential pain factors, including other than woman-related factors and factors associated with the actual examination. Special attention was paid to the examination context, the mammographic procedure and the screening staff. The research results show that the majority of women experience pain during mammography. With a logistic regression a number of women-related factors, staff-related and procedural factors were found significant in assessing the pain risk during mammography.