A split strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus after kidney transplantation using prophylaxis in serological high-risk patients and a pre-emptive strategy in intermediate-risk patients: Combining the best of two options?

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important challenge after kidney transplantation. Current Transplantation Society International Consensus Guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy for high-risk CMV-seronegative recipients with a CMV-seropositive donor (D+/R-) and moderate-risk CMV-seropositive recipients (R+). However, a split strategy according to CMV serostatus is not specifically mentioned.

METHODS

We evaluated a split strategy to prevent CMV infection after kidney transplantation in which D+/R- patients received valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis for 200 days, and R + patients were treated pre-emptively according to CMV DNAemia. Patients were followed until 1-year post-transplant.

RESULTS

Between April 2014 and March 2018, 40 D+/R- and 92 R + patients underwent kidney transplantation. Forty-six percent received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction, and 98% was treated with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and steroids. No D+/R- patient developed CMV disease during prophylaxis (median 200 days), but 15% developed post-prophylaxis or late-onset disease. Fifty-three percent developed neutropenia during prophylaxis, including 16/40 (40%) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia requiring reduction/discontinuation of MPA (30%) and/or VGC (35%), and an occasional need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5%). In the R + group, 40% received antiviral therapy for a median duration of 21 days; 5% developed early-onset CMV disease. Only 5% developed neutropenia. D+/R + status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.09,P = .004) and ATG use (HR 2.81, P < .0001) were risk factors for CMV reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis leads to acceptable CMV control in high-risk patients but comes with a high risk of neutropenia. Pre-emptive therapy is effective and limits drug exposure in those at lower risk of CMV.

"Does Perioperative Patient Perfusion Obviate the Need for Kidney Machine Perfusion?" A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Receiving a Kidney From "Donation After Circulatory Death" Donors

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a clinically relevant problem in the post-transplant period, especially in patients with a renal graft from a "donation after cardiac death" (DCD) donor. Controversy exists around the optimal perioperative fluid therapy in such patients. These patients may benefit from a perioperative saline loading fluid protocol, which may reduce the risk of DGF.

METHODS

We compared 2 cohorts of patients who underwent a renal transplantation with a graft from a DCD donor. From January 2003 until December 2012, patients (N = 46) were hemodynamically managed at the discretion of the care-giving physician, without a preoperative fluid administration protocol (first study period). From January 2015 until March 2019 (N = 26), patients received saline loading before, during, and after kidney transplantation according to a well-defined saline loading fluid protocol (second study period). The relationship between the use of this perioperative fluid protocol and DGF was analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

DGF occurred in 11 of 46 (24%) patients in the first study period and in 1 of 26 (4%) in the second study period (P < .05). In a multivariable model, correcting for cold ischemia time and Kidney Donor Risk Index, the use of a saline loading fluid protocol in the perioperative phase was nearly significantly associated with a decrease in DGF (P = .07).

CONCLUSION

In our DCD transplant population, DGF rates were low. Our data further strongly suggest that implementation of a perioperative saline loading fluid protocol was independently associated with a lower risk of DGF.

P1765COMBINING THE BEST OF TWO OPTIONS: A SPLIT STRATEGY WITH PROPHYLAXIS OR PRE-EMPTIVE THERAPY TO PREVENT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Background and Aims

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important challenge after kidney transplantation. Current Transplantation Society International Consensus Guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy for either high risk CMV-seronegative recipients of a CMV-seropositive donor (D+/R-) and moderate-risk CMV-seropositive recipients (R+). A split strategy according to CMV risk, however, is not specifically mentioned.

Method

We evaluated a split strategy to prevent cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation. D+/R- patients received valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis during 200 days and R+ patients were treated pre-emptively according to CMV DNAemia.

Results

Between April 2014 and March 2018, 40 D+/R- and 92 R+ patients underwent kidney transplantation. Forty-six % received antithymocyte globuline (ATG) induction and 98 % were treated with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and steroids. No D+/R- patient developed CMV disease during prophylaxis (median 200 days), 15 % developed late-onset disease. Fifty-three % developed neutropenia during prophylaxis, including 16/40 (40 %) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia requiring reduction/discontinuation of MPA (30 %) and/or VGC (30 %), and occasional need for granulocyte colony stimulating factors (5 %). In the R+ group, 40 % received antiviral therapy for a median duration of 21 days. Five percent developed CMV disease. Only 5 % developed neutropenia. D+/R+ status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.09, P 0.004) and ATG use (HR 2.81, P &lt; 0.0001) were risk factors for CMV reactivation.

Conclusion

Prophylaxis leads to acceptable CMV control in high risk patients, but comes with a high risk of neutropenia. Pre-emptive therapy is effective and limits drug exposure in those at lower risk for CMV.

Does Kidney Donor Risk Index implementation lead to the transplantation of more and higher-quality donor kidneys?

Background

The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) is a quantitative evaluation of the quality of donor organs and is implemented in the US allocation system. This single-centre study investigates whether the implementation of the KDRI in our decision-making process to accept or decline an offered deceased donor kidney, increases our acceptance rate.

Methods

From April 2015 until December 2016, we prospectively calculated the KDRI for all deceased donor kidney offers allocated by Eurotransplant to our centre. The number of the transplanted versus declined kidney offers during the study period were compared to a historical set of donor kidney offers.

Results

After implementation of the KDRI, 26.1% (75/288) of all offered donor kidneys were transplanted, compared with 20.7% (136/657) in the previous period (P < 0.001). The median KDRI of all transplanted donor kidneys during the second period was 0.97 [Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) 47%], a value significantly higher than the median KDRI of 0.85 (KDPI 34%) during the first period (P = 0.047). A total of 68% of patients for whom a first-offered donor kidney was declined during this period were transplanted after a median waiting time of 386 days, mostly with a lower KDRI donor kidney.

Conclusions

Implementing the KDRI in our decision-making process increased the transplantation rate by 26%. The KDRI can be a supportive tool when considering whether to accept or decline a deceased donor kidney offer. More data are needed to validate this score in other European centres.

Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome (PLS): A Single-center Retrospective Analysis of Minor ABO-incompatible Liver Transplants

Background and Aims: Due to the shortage of donor livers, minor ABO-incompatible liver transplantations are commonly performed. Together with the allograft, immunocompetent B-lymphocytes, called passenger lymphocytes, are transplanted. In case of minor ABO-incompatibility, these passenger lymphocytes produce antibodies directed towards the recipient's red blood cells, which causes immune-mediated hemolysis, also known as the passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS). Although this is a self-limiting disorder, serious complications can occur, including graft failure. Retrospectively, we evaluated the role of PLS in minor ABO-incompatible liver transplantations performed at our center. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all minor ABO-incompatible liver transplantations performed at the Antwerp University Hospital between 2003 and 2015. All patient files were inspected for clinical and laboratory findings. In cases of PLS diagnosis, the applied treatment was also studied. Results: In total, 10 patients underwent a minor ABO-incompatible liver transplantation and 4 showed signs of PLS. All 4 PLS patients were treated with different therapeutic strategy, corresponding to the severity of hemolysis. In all 4 cases, PLS resolved following treatment. Conclusion: When performing minor ABO-incompatible liver transplantations, knowledge of PLS is elemental. Next to a high index of clinical suspicion, we suggest routine screening for markers of hemolysis, with emphasis on haptoglobin level and direct antiglobulin test, weekly in the first 4 weeks post-transplantation as well as in case of a sudden hemoglobin drop within the first 3 months after transplantation. Peri- and postoperative transfusion support using donor-compatible blood has been suggested to prevent the occurrence or limit the extent of hemolysis.

Basophil activation in the diagnosis of life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction to iodinated contrast media: a case report

Hypersensitivity to iodinated radiologic contrast media occurs in 1-3% of patients. A complete allergological work-up requires the identification of the pathogenetic mechanism as well as the identification of safe alternatives. The current diagnostic approach relies upon skin tests, since no other in vitro test is standardized. However skin tests do not have an absolute predictive value, cannot be executed immediately and may expose the patients to the risk of severe reactions. Recently the flow-cytometric evaluation of activated basophils, also known as basophil activation test (BAT) has been introduced. Our case report of a 28-year old female who experienced an anaphylactic shock immediately after administration of iomeprol supports the role of BAT in the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media. The possibility of shortening the diagnostic work-up without endangering the health of patients represents the main advantage of this test.

Age-related sensitization profiles for hazelnut (Corylus avellana) in a birch-endemic region

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of hazelnut allergy seem related to geographic and possibly age variations in allergen recognition.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate sensitization profiles of hazelnut allergy in different age groups in a birch-endemic region using component resolved diagnosis (CRD) by microarray.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with hazelnut allergy, 27 healthy control individuals tolerant to hazelnut, and 34 birch pollen allergic but hazelnut tolerant individuals were included. All blood samples were analyzed using ISAC microarray.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with hazelnut allergy suffered from a systemic reaction (17 preschool children with a median age of 2 years, six school children, and six adults), whereas 36 patients reported an oral allergy syndrome (OAS; three preschool and nine school children and 24 adults). In the hazelnut allergic preschool children with systemic reactions, 65% were sensitized to Cor a 9, 12% to Cor a 8, 18% to Cor a 1.04, 6% to Cor a 1.0101, and 29% to Bet v 1. Of the school-aged systemic reactors, 50% were sensitized to Cor a 9, 17% to Cor a 8, 50% to Cor a 1.04 and Cor a 1.0101, and 67% to Bet v 1. In adults with hazelnut allergy, 3.3% were sensitized to Cor a 9, 6.7% to Cor a 8, 90% to Cor a 1.04 and Bet v 1, and 87% to Cor a 1.0101. In regard to systemic reactors in this group, 17% were sensitized to Cor a 9, 33% to Cor a 8 and Cor a 1.0101, and 50% to Cor a 1.04 and Bet v 1. In the patients with OAS, irrespective the age group, all were sensitized to Bet v 1 and over 97% to Cor a 1.04 and Cor a 1.0101. No sensitization to Cor a 9 or Cor a 8 was found in patients with only an OAS. Of the patients with birch pollen allergy, tolerant to hazelnut, none were sensitized to Cor a 9 or Cor a 8, 56% to Cor a 1.0101, 82% to Cor a 1.04, and 92% to Bet v 1. In healthy controls, no sensitization to components of hazelnut, hazel pollen or birch pollen was demonstrable.

CONCLUSION

Hazelnut allergy in a birch-endemic region exhibits age-related sensitization profiles with distinct clinical outcomes that can be identified using CRD. The majority of hazelnut allergic preschool and school children in a birch-endemic region show systemic reactions on consumption of processed hazelnut, mostly being sensitized to the hazelnut legumin-like allergen Cor a 9 but unrelated to birch pollen allergy. In contrast, adults generally suffer from an OAS apparently as a result of cross-reactivity between Cor a 1.04 from hazelnut and Bet v 1 from birch pollen.