Peripheral facial palsy post SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A regional pharmacovigilance cases series

Peripheral facial palsy (PFP) is a rare adverse reaction identified from clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines (messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA] and viral vector). Few data are available on their onset patterns and risk of recurrence after re-injection of a COVID-19 vaccine; the objective of this study was to describe PFP cases attributed to COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of facial paralysis reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Centre-Val de Loire area between January and October 2021, in which the role of a COVID-19 vaccine was suspected, were selected. Based on initial data and following additional information requested, each case was reviewed and analyzed to include only confirmed cases of PFP for which the role of the vaccine could be retained. From the 38 cases reported, 23 were included (15 excluded because of diagnosis not retained). They occurred in 12 men and 11 women (median age of 51 years). The first clinical manifestations occurred with a median time of 9 days after COVID-19 vaccine injection, and the paralysis was homolateral to the vaccinated arm in 70%. The etiological workup, always negative, included brain imaging (48%), infectious serologies (74%) and Covid-19 PCR (52%). Corticosteroid therapy was prescribed for 20 (87%) patients, combined with aciclovir in 12 (52%). At 4-month follow-up, clinical manifestations had regressed completely or partially in 20 (87%) of the 23 patients (median time of 30 days). From them 12 (60%) received another dose of COVID-19 vaccine and none had a recurrence and the PFP regressed despite the second dose in 2 of the 3 patients not fully recovered at 4 months. The potential mechanism of PFP after COVID-19 vaccine, which don't have a specific profile, is probably the interferon-γ. Moreover, the risk of recurrence after a new injection appears to be very low, which makes it possible to continue the vaccination.

When to investigate for secondary hyperhidrosis: data from a retrospective cohort of all causes of recurrent sweating

Background: Identification of underlying diseases is crucial for secondary hyperhidrosis management, but data are lacking to guide appropriate investigation.Objective: To describe aetiologies of recurrent sweating in a hospital setting and the diagnostic performance parameters of their respective clinical/biological features.Patients and Methods: We performed a monocentric evaluative study in a tertiary care centre. Patients with recurrent generalised sweating were selected via the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) by screening all electronic hospital documents from the year 2018 using a keyword-based algorithm. All in and out-patients aged ≥ 18 years having reported recurrent sweating for at least 2 weeks in 2018 were included, with a minimum one-year follow-up after symptoms' onset.Results: A total of 420 patients were included. Over 130 different aetiologies were identified; 70 patients (16.7%) remained without diagnosis. Solid organ cancers (14.3% with 13 lung cancers), haematologic malignancies (14.0% with 35 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas) and Infectious Diseases (10.5% including 13 tuberculosis) were the most frequent diagnoses. Other aetiologies were gathered into inflammatory (16.9%) and non-inflammatory (27.6%) conditions. To distinguish non-inflammatory and undiagnosed hyperhidrosis from other causes, fever had a specificity of 94%, impaired general condition a sensitivity of 78%, and C-reactive protein (CRP) > 5.6 mg/l a positive predictive value of 0.86. Symptoms' duration over 1 year was in favour of non-infectious and non-malignant causes (94% specificity).Conclusions: We identified fever, impaired general condition, duration, and CRP as helpful orientation parameters to assess the need for complementary explorations for hyperhidrosis. The study provides a diagnostic algorithm for the investigation of recurrent sweating.KEY MESSAGESIn a hospital setting, malignancies and infections are the most frequently associated diseases, but 1/5 remain without diagnosis.Fever is a specific but not sensitive sign to distinguish inflammatory conditions.Over 1 year duration of symptoms significantly reduce the probability of malignancy or infection as the underlying diagnosis.

De novo and relapsing necrotizing vasculitis after COVID-19 vaccination

We describe 5 cases of severe necrotizing vasculitis following the RNA-based vaccine for SARS-COV2, including 4 relapsing ANCA vasculitis, 27 days (1-60) after vaccination and 1 patient with quiescent chronic hepatitis B and de novo polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) 21 days after vaccination. Ten other cases were reported to the French national pharmacovigilance database: 6 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and 4 patients with PAN (first symptoms 19 days on average after vaccination). Five of these 10 patients developed kidney dysfunction. In conclusion, COVID-19-vaccines can be associated with de novo or recurrent ANCA vasculitis or PAN. Attention should be paid to patients with known ANCA vasculitis or patients with history of hepatitis B infection.