1
|
Belkovsky M, Passerotti CC, Maia RS, de Almeida Artifon EL, Otoch JP, Da Cruz JAS. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis. Urolithiasis 2024; 52:37. [PMID: 38413490 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01537-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Flexible ureterolithotripsy is a frequent urological procedure, usually used to remove stones from the kidney and upper ureter. Reusable uretero-scopes were the standard tool for that procedure, but recent concerns related to sterility and maintenance and repair costs created the opportunity to develop new technologies. In 2016, the first single-use digital flexible ureteroscope was introduced. Since then, other single-use ureteroscopes were developed, and studies compared them with the reusable ureteroscopes with conflicting results. The purpose of this study is to describe the literature that compares the performance of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for urinary stones. A Systematic Review was performed in October 2022 in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA). A search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar and LILACS retrieved 10,039 articles. After screening, 12 articles were selected for the Meta-Analysis. No differences were found in stone-free rate (OR 1.31, CI 95% [0.88, 1.97]), operative time (MD 0.12, CI 95% [-5.52, 5.76]), incidence of post-operative fever (OR 0.64, CI 95% [0.22, 1.89]), or incidence of post-operative urinary tract infection (OR 0.63 CI 95% [0.30, 1.32]). No differences were observed in the studied variables. Hence, the device choice should rely on the availability, cost analysis and surgeons' preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhael Belkovsky
- Surgical Technique & Experimental Surgery Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Ronaldo Soares Maia
- Surgical Technique & Experimental Surgery Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - José Pinhata Otoch
- Surgical Technique & Experimental Surgery Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
dos Santos LL, Fraga IDA, de Almeida VA, Santos AHR, Almeida IM, Nascimento TR, Porto BC, Passerotti CC, Artifon ELDA, Otoch JP, da Cruz JAS. Antibiotics prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Acta Cir Bras 2024; 39:e390424. [PMID: 38324800 PMCID: PMC10854371 DOI: 10.1590/acb390424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to identify whether antibiotic prophylaxis after removal of the indwelling urinary catheter reduces posterior infections. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, using the keywords "antibiotics" AND "prostatectomy" AND "urinary catheter." RESULTS Three articles were identified having the scope of our review, with 1,040 patients, which were subjected to our meta-analysis revealing a marginally significant decrease in the risk of urinary infection after indwelling urinary catheter removal (odds ratio-OR = 0.51; 95% confidence interval-95%CI 0.27-0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%). No difference was found regarding the presence of bacteriuria (OR = 0.39; 95%CI 0.12-1.24; p = 0.11; I2 = 73%). CONCLUSIONS In our meta-analysis, there was a significant decrease in urinary tract infection with antibiotic prophylaxis after indwelling urinary catheter removal following radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Breno Cordeiro Porto
- Universidade de São Paulo – School of Medicine – Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
| | - Carlo Camargo Passerotti
- Universidade de São Paulo – School of Medicine – Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz – Specialized Center for Urology – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
| | | | - Jose Pinhata Otoch
- Universidade de São Paulo – School of Medicine – Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
| | - José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
- Universidade Nove de Julho – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo – School of Medicine – Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz – Specialized Center for Urology – São Paulo (SP) – Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lino ADADS, Cruz JASD, Porto BC, Nogueira RP, Otoch JP, Artifon ELDA. Comparing financing models for supplementary healthcare in appendectomy: activity-based costing (fee-for-service) vs. diagnosis related group remuneration (bundled payment) - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Cir Bras 2023; 38:e386923. [PMID: 38055385 DOI: 10.1590/acb386923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In Brazil, healthcare services traditionally follow a fee-for-service (FFS) payment system, in which each medical procedure incurs a separate charge. An alternative reimbursement with the aim of reducing costs is diagnosis related group (DRG) remuneration, in which all patient care is covered by a fixed amount. This work aimed to perform a systematic review followed by meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of the Budled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) versus FFS. METHODS Our work was performed following the items of the PRISMA report. We included only observational trials, and the primary outcome assessed was the effectiveness of FFS and DRG in appendectomy considering complications. We also assessed the costs and length of hospital stay. Meta-analysis was performed with Rev Man version 5.4. RESULTS Out of 735 initially identified articles, six met the eligibility criteria. We demonstrated a shorter hospital stay associated with the DRG model (mean difference = 0.39; 95% confidence interval - 95%CI - 0.38-0.40; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), however the hospital readmission rate was higher in this model (odds ratio = 1.57; 95%CI 1.02-2.44, p = 0.04; I2 = 90%). CONCLUSIONS This study reveals a potential decrease in the length of stay for appendectomy patients using the DRG approach. However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes analysis between the two approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - Specialized Center for Urology - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | - Breno Cordeiro Porto
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | - Rhuan Pimentel Nogueira
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | - José Pinhata Otoch
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santana RN, Porto BC, Passerotti CC, Artifon ELDA, Otoch JP, Cruz JASD. Does displacement of lower pole stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves stone-free status? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Cir Bras 2023; 38:e386623. [PMID: 38055401 DOI: 10.1590/acb386623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Kidney stones are one of the most common urological diseases worldwide. The size and location of the stone are the most important factors in determining the most suitable treatment options. The aim of this review was to evaluate the displacement of lower pole stones. METHODS Three studies assessing the efficacy of translocating kidney stones from the lower pole of the kidney to other locations during retrograde intrarenal surgery published in the last 20 years were included. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Web of Science databases using the following search terms: "Lower pole," "Lithotripsy." Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. RESULTS Stone-free rates were improved through displacement (odds ratio - OR = -0.15; 95% confidence interval-95%CI -0.24--0.05; p = 0.002; I2 = 21%), but at the cost of increased surgical duration (mean difference = -12.50; 95%CI -24.06--0.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 94%). Although this represents a potentially negative outcome, the improvement in clearance rates justifies the additional investment of time and effort. CONCLUSIONS Displacement of lower pole kidney stones for subsequent lithotripsy brings significant benefits in terms of stone-free rate, with no difference in laser energy usage. However, it results in increased surgical time. Despite these factors, the benefits to patients undergoing the procedure are substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Breno Cordeiro Porto
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | | | | | - José Pinhata Otoch
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| | - José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
- Universidade Nove de Julho - Surgery Department - São Bernardo do Campo (SP) - Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo - School of Medicine - Surgical Technique and Experimental Surgery - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz - Urology Department - São Paulo (SP) - Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Artifon ELDA, Magon MG, Facanali Junior MR, Montero EFDS. Public and private fundraising as a tool for professional development: What is fundraising? Acta Cir Bras 2023; 38:e388123. [PMID: 38055407 DOI: 10.1590/acb388123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
|
6
|
Belkovsky M, Zogaib GV, Passerotti CC, de Almeida Artifon EL, Otoch JP, da Cruz JAS. Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2023; 49:668-676. [PMID: 37903004 PMCID: PMC10947629 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm. The best drug for MET is still uncertain. In this review, we aim to compare the effectiveness of tadalafil and tamsulosin for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm in terms of stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET) and the side effect profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception until April 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. RESULTS Eleven publications with 1,330 patients were included. We observed that tadalafil has a higher SER (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.38;0.80, p=0.02, I2=52%) and the same efficacy in SET (MD 1.07, CI 95% -0.25; 2.39, p=0.11, I2=84%). No differences were found when comparing side effects as headache, backache, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension. CONCLUSION Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhael Belkovsky
- Universidade de São PauloDepartamento de Técnica CirúrgicaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Técnica Cirúrgica, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - Giulia Veneziani Zogaib
- Universidade Nove de JulhoDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Carlo Camargo Passerotti
- Serviço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo CruzSão PauloSPBrasilServiço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
- Universidade de São PauloDepartamento de Técnica CirúrgicaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Técnica Cirúrgica, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - José Pinhata Otoch
- Universidade de São PauloDepartamento de Técnica CirúrgicaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Técnica Cirúrgica, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
| | - José Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz
- Universidade de São PauloDepartamento de Técnica CirúrgicaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Técnica Cirúrgica, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
- Universidade Nove de JulhoDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloSPBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Serviço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo CruzSão PauloSPBrasilServiço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martins RK, Brunaldi VO, Fernandes AL, Otoch JP, Artifon ELDA. Palliative therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: how does the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy compare with surgery and endoscopic stenting? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 16:26317745221149626. [PMID: 36698443 PMCID: PMC9869232 DOI: 10.1177/26317745221149626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The gold-standard procedure to address malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJJ). Two endoscopic alternatives have also been proposed: the endoscopic stenting (ES) and the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-G). This study aimed to perform a thorough and strict meta-analysis to compare EUS-G with the SGJJ and ES in treating patients with MGOO. Materials and Methods Studies comparing EUS-G to endoscopic stenting or SGJJ for patients with MGOO were considered eligible. We conducted online searches in primary databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Central Cochrane) from inception through October 2021. The outcomes were technical and clinical success rates, serious adverse events (SAEs), reintervention due to obstruction, length of hospital stay (LOS), and time to oral intake. Results We found similar technical success rates between ES and EUS-G but clinical success rates favored the latter. The comparison between EUS-G and SGJJ demonstrated better technical success rates in favor of the surgical approach but similar clinical success rates. EUS-G shortens the LOS by 2.8 days compared with ES and 5.8 days compared with SGJJ. Concerning reintervention due to obstruction, we found similar rates for EUS-G and SGJJ but considerably higher rates for ES compared with EUS-G. As to AEs, we demonstrated equivalent rates comparing EUS-G and SGJJ but significantly higher ones compared with ES. Conclusion Despite being novel and still under refinement, the EUS-G has good safety and efficacy profiles compared with SGJJ and ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Surgery and Anatomy Department, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil,Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kuga R, Facanali MR, Artifon ELDA. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: observational study in a supplementary health system. Acta Cir Bras 2023; 37:e371106. [PMID: 36629532 PMCID: PMC9829243 DOI: 10.1590/acb371106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer is responsible for 9.4% of cancer deaths, and low polyp detection rate and cecal intubation rate increase the risks of interval colorectal cancer. Despite several population studies that address colonoscopy quality measures, there is still a shortage of these studies in Latin America. The aim of this study was to assess quality indicators in colonoscopy, enabling future strategies to improve colorectal cancer prevention. METHODS An observational retrospective study, in which all colonoscopies performed in 11 hospitals were evaluated through a review of medical records. Information such as procedure indication, colorectal polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, quality of colonic preparation, and immediate adverse events were collected and analyzed. RESULTS In 17,448 colonoscopies performed by 86 endoscopists, 57.9% were in patients aged 50 to 74 years old. Colon preparation was adequate in 94.4% procedures, with rates of cecal intubation and polyp detection of 94 and 36.6%, respectively. Acute adverse events occurred in 0.2%. In 53.9%, high-definition imaging equipment was used. The procedure location, colon preparation and high-definition equipment influenced polyp detection rates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The extraction and analysis of electronic medical records showed that there are opportunities for improvement in colonoscopy quality indicators in the participating hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogerio Kuga
- MD, MSc. Universidade de São Paulo – Postgraduate Program in Anesthesiology, Surgical Sciences and Perioperative Medicine – School of Medicine – São Paulo (SP), Brazil; Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo , Americas Medical Services, UnitedHealth Group Brasil – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.,Corresponding author:
- (55 11) 998088119
| | - Marcio Roberto Facanali
- MD. Universidade de São Paulo – Gastroenterology Department – Hospital das Clínicas – School of Medicine – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
- MD, MSc, PhD. Universidade de São Paulo – Surgery Department – Hospital das Clínicas – School of Medicine – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
da Silva RRR, Facanali Junior MR, Brunaldi VO, Otoch JP, Rocha ACA, Artifon ELDA. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter comparative study between plastic and metallic stents. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12:120-127. [PMID: 36861511 PMCID: PMC10134915 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is commonly employed to address malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) after a failed ERCP. In this context, both self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) and double-pigtail stents (DPSs) are suitable devices. However, few data comparing the outcomes of SEMS and DPS exist. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SEMS and DPS at performing EUS-CDS. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study between March 2014 and March 2019. Patients diagnosed with MBO were considered eligible after at least one failed ERCP attempt. Clinical success was defined as a drop of direct bilirubin levels ≥ 50% at 7 and 30 postprocedural days. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized as early (≤7 days) or late (>7 days). The severity of AEs was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. Results Forty patients were included, 24 in the SEMS group and 16 in the DPS group. Demographic data were similar between the groups. Technical success rates and clinical success rates at 7 and 30 days were similar between the groups. Similarly, we found no statistical difference in the incidence of early or late AEs. However, there were two severe AEs (intracavitary migration) in the DPS group and none in the SEMS cohort. Finally, there was no difference in median survival (DPS 117 days vs. SEMS 217 days; P = 0.99). Conclusion EUS-guided CDS is an excellent alternative to achieve biliary drainage after a failed ERCP for MBO. There is no significant difference regarding the effectiveness and safety of SEMS and DPS in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Roda Rodrigues da Silva
- General Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
- Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, HC/EBSERH, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Center for Digestive Endoscopy, Surgery and Anatomy Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Jose Pinhata Otoch
- General Surgery Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Flumignan VK, Seike MG, Souza VSD, Cirqueira MI, Silva AB, Artifon ELDA. DIFFICULT BILIARY CANNULATION: SHOULD WE ALWAYS TRY A SECOND ERCP AFTER A FAILED NEEDLE-KNIFE FISTULOTOMY? Arq Gastroenterol 2021; 58:509-513. [PMID: 34909858 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A successful bile duct cannulation is a prerequisite for the realization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When biliary cannulation is not possible, needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) can be performed. However, when biliary access is not successfully achieved even after performing NKF, it is possible to interrupt the procedure, and repeat the ERCP after a short interval. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to analyze if repeating an ERCP after a short interval of 48 hours is effective in achieving biliary access after an initial NKF was unsuccessfully performed. METHODS A total of 1024 patients with a naive papilla, that underwent ERCP between the years of 2009-2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Difficult biliary cannulation was identified in 238 of these cases and NKF was performed. Success of biliary cannulation, NKF success at the first and second ERCPs, the associations between the type of the papilla, biliary dilatation, and overall success of NKF and adverse events rates were evaluated. RESULTS Biliary access was initially achieved in 183 (76.8%) cases. Of the 55 (23.1%) remaining cases a second attempt was performed after 48 hours, and biliary access was successfully achieved in 46 (83.6%) of them. The overall success of NKF after the first and second ERCP, the success rate was 96.2%. Papilla located out of its normal position was related to a minor chance of success at NKF (P<0.05). CONCLUSION We conclude that when biliary access is not achieved after the performance of a NKF, a second attempt is safe and effective and should be attempted.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vanella G, Capurso G, Burti C, Fanti L, Ricciardiello L, Souza Lino A, Boskoski I, Bronswijk M, Tyberg A, Krishna Kumar Nair G, Angeletti S, Mauro A, Zingone F, Oppong KW, de la Iglesia-Garcia D, Pouillon L, Papanikolaou IS, Fracasso P, Ciceri F, Rovere-Querini P, Tomba C, Viale E, Eusebi LH, Riccioni ME, van der Merwe S, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Yoo JWG, Dilaghi E, Speight RA, Azzolini F, Buttitta F, Porcari S, Petrone MC, Iglesias-Garcia J, Savarino EV, Di Sabatino A, Di Giulio E, Farrell JJ, Kahaleh M, Roelandt P, Costamagna G, Artifon ELDA, Bazzoli F, Testoni PA, Greco S, Arcidiacono PG. Gastrointestinal mucosal damage in patients with COVID-19 undergoing endoscopy: an international multicentre study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:e000578. [PMID: 33627313 PMCID: PMC7907837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evidence suggests frequent gastrointestinal (GI) involvement during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), endoscopic findings are scarcely reported. AIMS We aimed at registering endoscopic abnormalities and potentially associated risk factors among patients with COVID-19. METHODS All consecutive patients with COVID-19 undergoing endoscopy in 16 institutions from high-prevalence regions were enrolled. Mann-Whitney U, χ2 or Fisher's exact test were used to compare patients with major abnormalities to those with negative procedures, and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors. RESULTS Between February and May 2020, during the first pandemic outbreak with severely restricted endoscopy activity, 114 endoscopies on 106 patients with COVID-19 were performed in 16 institutions (men=70.8%, median age=68 (58-74); 33% admitted in intensive care unit; 44.4% reporting GI symptoms). 66.7% endoscopies were urgent, mainly for overt GI bleeding. 52 (45.6%) patients had major abnormalities, whereas 13 bled from previous conditions. The most prevalent upper GI abnormalities were ulcers (25.3%), erosive/ulcerative gastro-duodenopathy (16.1%) and petechial/haemorrhagic gastropathy (9.2%). Among lower GI endoscopies, 33.3% showed an ischaemic-like colitis.Receiver operating curve analysis identified D-dimers >1850 ng/mL as predicting major abnormalities. Only D-dimers >1850 ng/mL (OR=12.12 (1.69-86.87)) and presence of GI symptoms (OR=6.17 (1.13-33.67)) were independently associated with major abnormalities at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In this highly selected cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring endoscopy, almost half showed acute mucosal injuries and more than one-third of lower GI endoscopies had features of ischaemic colitis. Among the hospitalisation-related and patient-related variables evaluated in this study, D-dimers above 1850 ng/mL was the most useful at predicting major mucosal abnormalities at endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrial.gov (ID: NCT04318366).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Burti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lorella Fanti
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Ricciardiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andre Souza Lino
- GI Endoscopy Service, Hospital Casa de Saude de Santos, Santos, Brazil
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Govind Krishna Kumar Nair
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Stefano Angeletti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Aurelio Mauro
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Kofi W Oppong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel de la Iglesia-Garcia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela. Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Lieven Pouillon
- Imelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imeldaziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Fabio Ciceri
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Rovere-Querini
- Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Tomba
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Edi Viale
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Schalk van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Haroon Shahid
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Avik Sarkar
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jin Woo Gene Yoo
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Emanuele Dilaghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - R Alexander Speight
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Azzolini
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Buttitta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Serena Porcari
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Julio Iglesias-Garcia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela. Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Emilio Di Giulio
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - James J Farrell
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Philip Roelandt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Franco Bazzoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Per Alberto Testoni
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Greco
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Purpose To present new endoscopic robotic devices in the context of minimally invasive procedures with high precision and automation. Methods Review of the literature by December 2018 on robotic endoscopy. Results We present the studies and investments for robotic implementation and flexible endoscopy evolution. We divided them into forceps manipulation platforms, active endoscopy and endoscopic capsule. They try to improve forceps handling and stability and to promote active movement. Conclusion The implementation and propagation of robotic models depend on doing what the endoscopist is unable to. The new devices are moving forward in this direction.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheng S, Brunaldi VO, Silva GLR, Furuya CK, Minata MK, Matuguma SE, Artifon ELDA. Endoscopic-ultrasound evaluation and fine needle aspiration with a linear echoendoscope in the cecum: it is possible. Endoscopy 2019; 51:E270-E271. [PMID: 31083753 DOI: 10.1055/a-0896-2086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer Cheng
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Luis Rodela Silva
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos Kiyoshi Furuya
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mauricio Kazuyoshi Minata
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sergio Eiji Matuguma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lopes CV, Hartmann AA, Artifon ELDA. EUS-FNA WITH 19 OR 22 GAUGES NEEDLES FOR GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS OF THE MUSCLE LAYER. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 31:e1350. [PMID: 29947684 PMCID: PMC6049997 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Tissue diagnosis is required for gastric subepithelial lesions for
differential diagnosis of GISTs. However, there has not been consensus about
the best needle for EUS-guided sampling of these lesions. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for gastric subepithelial
lesions of the proper muscle layer with large-bore 19 gauge needles. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify
consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with 19 and 22 gauge needles for
gastric subepithelial lesions of the fourth endosonographic layer in a
tertiary care referral center. EUS-FNA was performed by the same
endosonographer, using the fanning technique, without on-site
cytopathologist. Specimens were analysed through cell blocks by the same
pathologist. Procedure results were categorized into diagnostic, defined as
enough material for histopathology and immunohistochemistry, or
nondiagnostic. Results: Eighty-nine patients (mean age: 59 years, 77% women) underwent 92 EUS-FNA
with 19 (75) or 22 (17) gauge needles. Mean lesion size was 22.6 mm. Overall
diagnostic yield was 88%. The diagnostic yield of 19 gauge was higher than
that of 22 gauge needle (92%x70.6%; p=0.0410), and similar for lesions >2
cm and <2 cm (93.7%x90.7%; p=0.9563). The best performance for 19 gauge
needles was obtained performing <3 needle passes. Complication rate was
2.8%. Conclusions: Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with 19 gauge needles is 92% for gastric
subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer. It is safe and highly
valuable for differentiation between GIST and leiomyoma, no matter the size
of the lesion.
Collapse
|
15
|
Furuya CK, Sakai P, Marinho FRT, Otoch JP, Cheng S, Prudencio LL, de Moura EGH, Artifon ELDA. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:1803-1811. [PMID: 29713133 PMCID: PMC5922998 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare the cannulation success, biochemical profile, and complications of the papillary fistulotomy technique vs catheter and guidewire standard access.
METHODS From July 2010 to May 2017, patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: Cannulation with a catheter and guidewire (Group I) and papillary fistulotomy (Group II). Amylase, lipase and C-reactive protein at T0, as well as 12 h and 24 h after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation) were recorded.
RESULTS We included 102 patients (66 females and 36 males, mean age 59.11 ± 18.7 years). Group I and Group II had 51 patients each. The successful cannulation rates were 76.5% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.0002). Twelve patients (23.5%) in Group I had a difficult cannulation and underwent fistulotomy, which led to successful secondary biliary access (Failure Group). The complication rate was 13.7% (2 perforations and 5 mild pancreatitis) vs 2.0% (1 patient with perforation and pancreatitis) in Groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.0597).
CONCLUSION Papillary fistulotomy was more effective than guidewire cannulation, and it was associated with a lower profile of amylase and lipase. Complications were similar in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Kiyoshi Furuya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05409001, Brazil
| | - Paulo Sakai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05409001, Brazil
| | | | - Jose Pinhata Otoch
- Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403000, Brazil
| | - Spencer Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05409001, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Almeida Artifon EL, Marinho FRT. Endoscopic screening for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: one size does not fit all. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:405-407. [PMID: 29406927 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
17
|
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided hemostasis is an evolving technique that has the potential to improve the care of patients with refractory variceal and nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. EUS-guided treatment of fundal varices with coil and/or cyanoacrylate seems to be highly effective in active bleeding, as well as for primary and secondary bleeding prophylaxis. Reports of EUS-guided treatment of refractory nonvariceal sources of bleeding are more scarce, but show high success rates. The procedures involve a medium to high technical difficulty level, and this has been replicated worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
- Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 255 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.
| | - Fernando Pavinato Marson
- Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 255 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Avenue, Suite H 314, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carvalho PHBD, Otoch JP, Khan MA, Sakai P, Guedes HG, Artifon ELDA. SEDATION IN COLONOSCOPY BY USING THREE DIFFERENT PROPOFOL INFUSION METHODS AND ANALYSIS OF PLASMA CONCENTRATION LEVELS: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2017; 29:264-268. [PMID: 28076483 PMCID: PMC5225868 DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201600040012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background The propofolemia becomes directly linked to the clinical effects of this anesthetic and is the focus for studies comparing propofol clinical use, in different administration methods routinely used in endoscopy units where sedation is widely administered to patients. Aim To evaluate the effects of three different regimens of intravenous propofol infusion in colonoscopies. Methods A total of 50 patients that underwent colonoscopies were consecutively assigned to three groups: 1) intermittent bolus infusion; 2) continuous manually controlled infusion; 3) continuous automatic infusion. Patients were monitored with Bispectral IndexTM (BIS) and propofol serum levels were collected at three different timepoints. The development of an original dilution of propofol and an inventive capnography catheter were necessary. Results Regarding clinical outcomes, statistical differences in agitation (higher in group 1, p=0.001) and initial blood pressure (p=0.008) were found. As for propofol serum levels, findings were similar in consumption per minute (p=0.748) and over time (p=0.830). In terms of cost analysis, group 1 cost was R$7.00 (approximately US$2,25); group2, R$17.50 (approximately US$5,64); and group 3, R$112.70 (approximately US$36,35, p<0.001). Capnography was able to predict 100% of the oxygen saturation drop (below 90%). Conclusion The use of propofol bolus administration for colonoscopies, through continuous manually controlled infusion or automatic infusion are similar regarding propofolemia and the clinical outcomes evaluated. The use of an innovative capnography catheter is liable and low-cost solution for the early detection of airway obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mohamad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Paulo Sakai
- Division of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Hugo Gonçalo Guedes
- Division of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
- Department of Surgery.,Division of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aparício DPDS, Otoch JP, Montero EFDS, Khan MA, Artifon ELDA. Endoscopic approach for management of biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 5:827-845. [PMID: 29026597 DOI: 10.1177/2050640616681909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The most common biliary complication after liver transplantation is anastomotic stricture (AS) and it can occur isolated or in combination with other complications. Liver graft from a cadaveric donor or a living donor has an influence on the incidence of biliary strictures as well as on the response to endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic treatment using balloon dilation and insertion of biliary stents by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the initial approach to these complications. AIM The aim of this article is to compare different endoscopic techniques to treat post-liver transplantation biliary strictures. METHODS The search was carried out on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scielo-LILACS and Cochrane Library databases through June 2015. A total of 1100 articles were retrieved. Ten clinical trials were analyzed, and seven were included in the meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic treatment of AS was equally effective when compared the use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) vs. plastic stents, but the use of FCSEMS was associated with a lower complication risk. The treatment of AS with balloon dilation or balloon dilation associated with plastic stents presented similar results. Deceased donor liver transplantation reduced the risk of biliary stenosis and the endoscopic treatment in these patients was more effective when compared with Living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38103, USA
| | - Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
- University of São Paulo, Pancreatic and Biliary Endoscopy Department/Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chaves DM, Meine GC, Moura DTHD, Matuguma SE, Lera ME, Artifon ELDA, Moura EGHD, Sakai P. ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND IN THE EVALUATION OF UPPER SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS. Arq Gastroenterol 2016; 52:186-9. [PMID: 26486284 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032015000300006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound is considered the best imaging test for the diagnosis and evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. OBJECTIVE The present study aims to describe the endosonographic characteristics of upper gastric subepithelial lesions and our experience using endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of such lesions. METHODS Retrospective data study of 342 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions. RESULTS Lesions of the fourth layer were more common in the stomach (63.72%) than in the esophagus (44.68%) and duodenum (29.03%). In stomach, 81.1% of the lesions ≥2 cm, and 96.5% ≥3 cm, were from the fourth layer. Endosonographic signs that could be related to malignant behavior, such as irregular borders, echogenic foci, cystic spaces and/or size greater than 3 cm were identified in 34 (15.81%) lesions at the first endoscopic ultrasound evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration did the diagnosis in 21 (61.76%) patients who were submitted a puncture. Three (12.0%) lesions of 25 who were submitted to regular endoscopic ultrasound surveillance increased the size. CONCLUSION Stomach is the organ most affected with subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and the fourth layer was the most common layer of origin. More than 80% of gastric subepithelial lesions from the fourth layer are ≥2 cm. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions has been very important for stratification into risk groups and to determine the best management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalton Marques Chaves
- Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Gilmara Coelho Meine
- Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | | | - Sergio Eiji Matuguma
- Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Marcos Eduardo Lera
- Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR
| | | | | | - Paulo Sakai
- Unidade de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zorrón Pu L, de Moura EGH, Bernardo WM, Baracat FI, Mendonça EQ, Kondo A, Luz GO, Furuya Júnior CK, Artifon ELDA. Endoscopic stenting for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:13374-13385. [PMID: 26715823 PMCID: PMC4679772 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i47.13374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Revised: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To analyze through meta-analyses the benefits of two types of stents in the inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted, with the last update on March 2015, using EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE, LILACS/CENTRAL (BVS), SCOPUS, CAPES (Brazil), and gray literature. Information of the selected studies was extracted in sight of six outcomes: primarily regarding dysfunction, complication and re-intervention rates; and secondarily costs, survival, and patency time. The data about characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria and types of stents were also extracted. The bias was mainly assessed through the JADAD scale. This meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database by the number CRD42014015078. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software RevMan, by computing risk differences (RD) of dichotomous variables and mean differences (MD) of continuous variables. Data on RD and MD for each primary outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in χ2 and the Higgins method (I2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. Student’s t-test was used for the comparison of weighted arithmetic means regarding secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Initial searching identified 3660 studies; 3539 were excluded through title, repetition, and/or abstract, while 121 studies were fully assessed and were excluded mainly because they did not compare self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and plastic stents (PS), leading to thirteen RCT selected, with 13 articles and 1133 subjects meta-analyzed. The mean age was 69.5 years old, that were affected mostly by bile duct (proximal) and pancreatic tumors (distal). The preferred SEMS diameter used was the 10 mm (30 Fr) and the preferred PS diameter used was 10 Fr. In the meta-analysis, SEMS had lower overall stent dysfunction compared to PS (21.6% vs 46.8%, P < 0.00001) and fewer re-interventions (21.6% vs 56.6%, P < 0.00001), with no difference in complications (13.7% vs 15.9%, P = 0.16). In the secondary analysis, the mean survival rate was higher in the SEMS group (182 d vs 150 d, P < 0.0001), with a higher patency period (250 d vs 124 d, P < 0.0001) and a lower cost per patient (4193.98 vs 4728.65 Euros, P < 0.0985).
CONCLUSION: SEMS are associated with lower stent dysfunction, lower re-intervention rates, better survival, and higher patency time. Complications and costs showed no difference.
Collapse
|
22
|
Guedes HG, Lopes RI, Oliveira JFD, Artifon ELDA. Reality named endoscopic ultrasound biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:1181-1185. [PMID: 26504507 PMCID: PMC4613807 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i15.1181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for diagnosis and evaluation of many diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In the past, it was used to guide a cholangiography, but nowadays it emerges as a powerful therapeutic tool in biliary drainage. The aims of this review are: outline the rationale for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EGBD); detail the procedural technique; evaluate the clinical outcomes and limitations of the method; and provide recommendations for the practicing clinician. In cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), patients are usually referred for either percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgical bypass. Both these procedures have high rates of undesirable complications. EGBD is an attractive alternative to PTBD or surgery when ERCP fails. EGBD can be performed at two locations: transhepatic or extrahepatic, and the stent can be inserted in an antegrade or retrograde fashion. The drainage route can be transluminal, duodenal or transpapillary, which, again, can be antegrade or retrograde [rendezvous (EUS-RV)]. Complications of all techniques combined include pneumoperitoneum, bleeding, bile leak/peritonitis and cholangitis. We recommend EGBD when bile duct access is not possible because of failed cannulation, altered upper GI tract anatomy, gastric outlet obstruction, a distorted ampulla or a periampullary diverticulum, as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery or radiology.
Collapse
|
23
|
Moura EGHD, Franzini T, Moura RN, Carneiro FOAA, Artifon ELDA, Sakai P. Cholangioscopy in bile duct disease: a case series. Arq Gastroenterol 2015; 51:250-4. [PMID: 25296087 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000300015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Direct endoscopic visualization of biliopancreatic duct is certainly one of the greatest advances of therapeutic endoscopy. The use of a single-operator cholangioscopy platform (SpyGlass) is a promising technique in the evaluation of diseases such as indeterminate biliary stricture and giant choledocholitiasis. This is the first Brazilian case series using this technology. METHODS We report a case series of 20 patients in whom SpyGlass was used with diagnostic and therapeutic intention. RESULTS Most patients were female (60%) and the median age was 48 years (ranging from 14 to 94). Choledocholitiasis was the most common indication (12/20), and electrohydraulic lithotripsy was applied in eight (66%). Electrohydraulic lithotripsy was successful in seven (87.5%) patients. Partial stone fragmentation occurred in one patient with large stone causing stone-choledochal disproportion, which was conducted with biliary plastic stent placement and a second scheduled endoscopic approach in 3 months. In cases of undefined etiology of biliary strictures, it was possible to exclude malignancy due to direct visualization (7/8) or biopsy (1/8). One complication occurred (duodenal perforation) after papillary balloon dilation. CONCLUSION The use of SpyGlass demonstrated the benefits, especially in cases of large bile duct stones and indeterminate biliary strictures. Other potencial improvements such as reduction on radiation exposure should be confirmed in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tomazo Franzini
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Renata Nobre Moura
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | - Paulo Sakai
- Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lima SLAD, Bustamante FAC, Moura EGHD, Bernardo WM, Artifon ELDA, Chaves DM, Franzini TAP, Junior CKF. Endoscopic palliative treatment versus surgical bypass in malignant low bile duct obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.5348/ijhpd-2015-32-cr-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
25
|
Loureiro JFM, Artifon ELDA, Ilias EJ. What is the role of endoscopic ultrasound in palliative drainage of malignant biliary obstruction? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2013; 59:409-10. [PMID: 23992743 DOI: 10.1016/j.ramb.2013.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
26
|
Otoch JP, Minamoto H, Perini M, Carneiro FO, de Almeida Artifon EL. Is there a correlation between right bronchus length and diameter with age? J Thorac Dis 2013; 5:306-9. [PMID: 23825764 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.03.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Right main bronchial anatomy knowledge is essential to guide endoscopic stent placement in modern era. The aim is to describe right bronchial anatomy, cross-area and its relation with the right pulmonary artery and patient's age. METHODS One hundred thirty four cadaveric specimens were studied after approval by the Research and Ethics Committee at the University of São Paulo Medical School and Medical Forensic Institute of São Paulo. All necropsies were performed in natura after 24 hours of death and patients with previous pulmonary disease were excluded. Landmarks to start measurement were the first tracheal ring, vertex of carina, first right bronchial ring, and right pulmonary artery area over the right main bronchus. After mobilization, the specimens were measured using a caliper and measurement of distances was recorded in centimeters at landmarks points. All the measures (distances, cross sectional area and planes) were performed by three independent observers and recorded as mean, standard error and ranges. Student t test was used to compare means and linear regression was applied to correlate the measurements. RESULTS From 134 specimens studied, 34 were excluded (10 with previous history of pulmonary diseases, surgery or deformities and 24 of female gender). Linear regression showed proportionality between tracheal length and right bronchus length; with the area at first tracheal ring and carina and also between the cross sectional area at these points. Linear regression analysis between tracheal length and age (R=0.593 P<0.005), right bronchus length and age (R=0.523, P<0.005), area of contact between right bronchus and right pulmonary artery and age (R=0.35, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS We can conclude that large airways grow progressively with increasing age in male gender. There was a direct correlation between age and tracheal length; as has age and right bronchus length. There was a direct correlation between age and the area of the right bronchus covered by the right pulmonary artery.
Collapse
|
27
|
Artifon ELDA, Lopasso FP, Moura GB, Fernandes FAMH, Sakai P, Carrilho FJ, Caldini ETEG, Silva Junior ODCE. Effects of plastic stenting in commom bile duct of rats: a quantitative reaction analysis using collagen and elastin morphometry. Acta Cir Bras 2010; 25:153-7. [DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502010000200006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2009] [Accepted: 12/11/2009] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of biliary stenting in rats through analysis of collagen and elastin deposition in the bile ducts. METHODS: Twenty male rats underwent midline laparotomy, duodenotomy and transampullary stenting of the common bile duct with a 22Fr plastic stent. Animals were randomized in 4 groups, with 5 components in each: (I) control, (II) biliary stenting for 7 days, (III) biliary stenting for 14 days, and (IV) biliary stenting for 30 days. Sections of the common bile duct were stained using Hematoxylin Eosin; Sirius Red to quantitate the amount of collagen present; and Weigert's Resorcin-fuchsin to quantitate the amount of elastin present. RESULTS: The percentage of area stained for collagen was 13.4; 21.5; 29.5 and 32.8, for groups I to IV, respectively. The percentage of area stained for elastin fibers was 7.0; 5.2; 4.0 and 2.9, for groups I to IV, respectively. Collagen/Elastin ratio was 2.4; 5.1; 11.0 and 14.4 for groups I to IV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The biliary stenting leads to collagen and elastin deposition in the bile ducts; and collagen deposition and collagen/elastin ratio are proportional to the period of stenting.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Endoscopic removal of an adjustable gastric band is a feasible procedure with few complications, according to our series of 8 patients. We report the case of a 56 year-old woman who underwent endoscopic removal of a gastric band which had eroded through the gastric wall; this procedure was performed under general anesthesia, while the surgical group removed the subcutaneous port. The patient developed a large pneumoperitoneum after the procedure, and complained of back, shoulder and epigastric pain. A plain abdominal X-ray confirmed the pneumoperitoneum, and esophagogastric radiography with water-soluble contrast did not show a perforation. The treatment approach was conservative. This experience demonstrates an expected complication of endoscopic removal of an adjustable gastric band, and that the treatment may be conservative. The technique of band removal and the mechanism of pneumoperitoneum are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Sakai
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|