Prostatic Artery Embolization: Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Radiation Exposure, Procedure Time, and Contrast Media Use

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast media (CM) use in prostatic artery embolization (PAE).

Materials and Methods

Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients received PAE without (group A; n = 39) or with (group B; n = 39) CBCT. Total dose-area product (DAP_total; Gycm²), total entrance skin dose (ESD_total; mGy), and total effective dose (ED_total; mSv) were primary outcomes. Number of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) series, CM use, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time were secondary outcomes. PAE in group A was performed by a single radiologist with 15 years experience, PAE in group B was conducted by four radiologists with 4 to 6 years experience.

Results

For groups A vs. B, respectively, median (IQR): DAP_total 236.94 (186.7) vs. 281.20 (214.47) Gycm²(p = 0.345); ED_total 25.82 (20.35) vs. 39.84 (23.75) mSv (p =  < 0.001); ESD_total 2833 (2278) vs. 2563 (3040) mGy(p = 0.818); number of DSA series 25 (15) vs. 23 (10)(p = 0.164); CM use 65 (30) vs. 114 (40) mL(p =  < 0.001); fluoroscopy time 23 (20) vs. 28 (25) min(p = 0.265), and procedure time 70 (40) vs.120 (40) min(p =  < 0.001). Bilateral PAE was achieved in 33/39 (84.6%) group A and 32/39 (82.05%) group B(p = 0.761), all other patients received unilateral PAE. There were no significant differences between clinical parameters and origins of the prostatic arteries (PA) (p = 0.206–1.00).

Conclusion

Operators with extensive expertise on PAE may not benefit from addition of CBCT to DSA runs, whereas for operators with less expertise, CBCT when used alongside with DSA runs increased the overall radiation exposure.

Image quality and safety of automated carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography in femoropopliteal lesions: Results from a randomized single-center study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality and the safety of automated carbon dioxide (CO₂) digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients receiving DSA for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were enrolled in this single-center prospective study. All patients received iodinated contrast media (ICM) and CO₂ as a contrast agent in the same target lesion. As a primary endpoint, four raters independently evaluated the angiography images based on overall image quality, visibility of collaterals, and assessment of stenoses/occlusions. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and differences between the raters were evaluated using Friedmann's test. Secondary endpoints were procedure safety and patient pain assessment.

RESULTS

Inter-rater agreement between CO₂-DSA and ICM-DSA images was fair to excellent for overall image quality (ICC: 0.399-0.748), fair to excellent for the visibility of collaterals (ICC: 0.513-0.691), and poor to excellent for the assessment of stenoses/occlusions (ICC: -0.065-0.762). There were no significant differences between the raters. Two patients had a hematoma, one reported pain related to puncture, one became nauseous, and one vomited. No other adverse events were observed. Reported pain scores were significantly higher for CO₂-DSA vs. ICM-DSA (1.25 vs. 0625; p < 0.028).

CONCLUSION

CO2-DSA using automated injection system in combination with proprietary post-processing software is safe and comparable diagnostic test compared to ICM-DSA.