Vila-Candel R, Martin-Moreno JM, Alamar S, Soriano-Vidal FJ, Naranjo de la Puerta FG, Murillo M. Can we improve the birth weight prediction? The effect of normal BMI using a multivariate model.
NUTR HOSP 2014;
31:1345-51. [PMID:
25726232 DOI:
10.3305/nh.2015.31.3.8150]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The construction of a predictive model that improves the estimation of the fetal weight (EFW).
STUDY DESIGN
a comparative, descriptive study. One hundred forty pregnant women were recruited at two-stage sample in health department in Spain. They were classified in four groups depending on the pre-gestational BMI. Fetal weight at term was estimated by ultrasound at 33-35 weeks (EFW40w) by one gynecologist. A regression model was created with the variables that reacted to the newborn's weight, symphysis-fundal height (SFH), EFW40w, gestational age (GA), ferritin level and cigarettes smoked.
RESULTS
A multivariate model was created for the NW group to estimate the fetal weight (EFWme), resulting in R2=0.727 (p<0.001). The differences of the averages obtained between EFW40w and EFWme, with the newborn's weight were significant (p<0.001). EFWme underestimates birth weight by 0.07 g (mean error 0.53%), and EFW40w overestimates it by 300.89 g (mean error 10.12%). In order to evaluate the predictive model and verify the predictions we used the Bland-Altman analysis. The average error in estimating the birth weight with EFWme was 1.94% underestimating the result, whereas the ultrasound error overestimated the result 10.93%.
CONCLUSION
The multivariate model created for the NW group improves the accuracy of the ultrasound.
Collapse