Modified ante situm liver resection without use of cold perfusion nor veno-venous bypass for treatment of hepatic lesions infiltrating the hepatocaval confluence

PURPOSE

Treatment of malignancies invading the hepatic veins/inferior vena cava is a surgical challenge. An ante situm technique allows luxation of the liver in front of the situs to perform tumor resection. Usually, cold perfusion and veno-venous bypass are applied. Our experience with modified ante situm resection relying only on total vascular occlusion is reported.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis on an almost 15-year experience with ante situm resection without application of cold perfusion or veno-venous bypass RESULTS: The ante situm technique was applied on eight patients. Five individuals were treated due to intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer and one case each for mixed cholangio-/hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal liver metastasis, and pheochromocytoma. Trisectorectomy (n = 4), left hemihepatectomy, right hepatectomy, atypical resection, or mesohepatectomy (each n = 1) were performed, combined with dissection of suprahepatic/retrohepatic vena cava/hepatic veins. Venous reconstruction was achieved by reimplantation of hepatic veins with/without vascular replacement using allogeneic donor veins or PTFE grafts. Median total vascular occlusion of the liver was 23 min. Severe morbidity occurred in three patients (Dindo-Clavien > 3A). R0 status was achieved in six cases with a median overall survival of 33.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Ante situm liver resection can be applied without cold perfusion nor veno-venous bypass with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, this procedure remains challenging even for the experienced hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeon.

Pubic and inguinal venous collaterals mimic inguinal hernia

Herein we report a case of a 38-year-old men who presented with acute suprapubic pain caused by a tubular, hypoechoic, non-compressible, inguinal mass with no flow evident on color Doppler sonography. The history of the patient, the clinical signs of local inflammation and tenderness on palpation as well as the results of the Doppler ultrasound examination led to the diagnose of an inguinal hernia with bowl incarceration. However, due to a remaining uncertainty whether a bilateral or unilateral hernia was immanent and whether the bowl incarceration was caused by a right or left sided hernia the on-call surgeon initiated a computed tomography (CT) scan. Surprisingly, this CT scan revealed extensive suprapubic venous collaterals with thrombophlebitis that mimicked a bilateral inguinal hernia secondary to an acute unilateral femoral vein thrombosis. Instead of undergoing surgery the patient was treated with antibiotics, pain killer and heparin and was discharged from hospital after 8 days.

Use of the liver maximum function capacity test (LiMAx) for the management of liver resection in cirrhosis - A case of hypopharyngeal cancer liver metastasis

•

A patient with a liver metastasis of pharyngeal cancer and aspect of severe cirrhosis is presented.

•

Conventional laboratory tests are surrogate parameters and might underestimate cirrhosis.

•

The LiMAx test provides a direct measurement of the liver function capacity even in cirrhosis.

•

Safe resection was performed after LiMAx test proved operability.

Introduction

The presence of liver cirrhosis goes along with a higher chance for the need of liver resection. As established laboratory parameters often underestimate the degree of cirrhosis this is associated with an increased risk for postoperative liver failure due to the preoperatively impaired liver function. Known liver function tests are unlikely to be performed in daily use because of high cost or expenditure of time. Liver maximum function capacity test (LiMAx) provides a novel tool for measurement of liver function and references for the safety of liver resection.

Presentation of case

A 63-year old patient presented at our hospital with a large, solitary liver metastasis from hypopharyngeal cancer in segments VII/VIII with infiltration of the diaphragm. Liver resection was unsuccessful in a peripheral hospital 10 months before due to considerable macroscopic liver cirrhosis (CHILD B). Upon presentation conventional laboratory parameters revealed sufficient liver function. LiMAx was performed and showed regular liver function (354 μg/kg/h; at norm >315 μg/kg/h). Consequently, atypical liver resection (R0) was performed resulting in a postoperative LiMAx value of 281 μg/h/kg (>150 μg/kg/h). The patient was discharged from hospital 37 days after surgery without any signs of postoperative liver failure.

Conclusion

The LiMAx-test enables determination of liver function at a so far unavailable level (metabolism via cytochrome P450 1A2) and hence might provide crucial additional diagnostic information to allow for safe liver resection even in cirrhotic patients.