[Treatment of juvenile scoliosis: Increasing the lengthening interval with the growing rod technique should not necessarily compromise thoracic growth]

OBJECTIVE

Serial lengthening with growing rods is recommended every six months for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal growth of the thorax and control of the deformity in a series of patients with juvenile scoliosis when time intervals were increased between lengthenings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of eight patients. The following variables were measured: the Cobb angle, the apical vertebral translation, the coronal balance, thoracic T1-L1 length, thoracic T5-T12 kyphosis, the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) angle, and the lumbar lordosis. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Five idiopathic and three syndromic scoliosis cases (mean age 9.4 ± 1.5 years) were evaluated. The initial surgery was followed by with an average of two distractions per patient. The mean time between distractions was 15.7 months. The final coronal main curve correction was 58%. Apical translation and coronal balance were improved and maintained after the surgeries. The thoracic (T1-L1) preoperative length was 20.8 cm, the postoperative length was 24.4 cm, and the final length was 26 cm. At the end of follow-up, the average growth of the thorax was 5.2 cm. The preoperative (T5-T12) kyphosis was 33.5°, and final 32.1°. The change in the PJK angle was 2.5° at the end of follow-up. Most complications were related to instrumentation. Two superficial wound infections were encountered.

CONCLUSION

For less severe juvenile scoliosis patients treated with growing rods, spacing out lengthenings over more than a year can decrease the number of surgeries, while still controlling the deformity and allowing longitudinal thoracic growth.

[Is local bone graft sufficient to maintain the surgical correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves?]

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative clinical and radiological results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves treated by posterior arthrodesis using autogenous bone graft from iliac crest (CI) versus only local autograft bone (HL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted on 73 patients (CI n=37 and HL n=36) diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and treated surgically by posterior arthrodesis. The mean post-operative follow-up was 126 months in the CI group vs. 66 months in the HL group. The radiographic data collected consisted of preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up antero-posterior and lateral full-length radiographs. Loss of correction and quality of arthrodesis were evaluated by comparing the scores obtained from the Spanish version of the SRS-22 questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the post-operative results as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve (HL 61 ± 15% vs. CI 51 ± 14%, P<.004), however a greater loss of correction was found in the local bone group (CI 4.5 ± 7.3° vs. HL 8.5 ± 6.3°, P=.02). There were no significant differences as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve at the end of follow-up. There were no clinical differences between the two groups in the SRS-22 scores.

CONCLUSION

At 5 years of follow-up, there was a statistically significant greater loss of radiographic correction at the end of final follow-up in the local bone graft group. However clinical differences were not observed as regards the SRS-22 scores.

[Prognostic factors of the crankshaft phenomenon in patients with scoliosis and open triradiate cartilage. Is the double approach the solution?]

OBJECTIVE

To study young patients after scoliosis surgery in order to determine risk and prevention factors for developing a crankshaft phenomenon (CP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of a cohort of 26 skeletally immature patients. Six were excluded due to progression of various conditions. Crankshaft was defined as an increase in the Cobb angle >10°, or an increase in the Mehta angle (DAVC) >10°, or any decrease in the apex-rib thoracic distance, or increase in the apical vertebral translation (AVT). Patients with and without CP development were compared in order to analyse preoperative, surgical and postoperative risk factors, as well as the influence of different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 83.9 months. Nine patients (45%) developed the crankshaft phenomenon. Only immaturity parameters were associated with development of CP. No preoperative or postoperative radiographic parameters appeared to influence its development. The amount of correction may be a protective factor (41.4 vs. 61.4%; P=.06). The double approach was able to prevent the development of CP (0%) compared with single posterior instrumentation (44%), P=.02.

DISCUSSION

None of these preoperative factors seemed to predispose to CP: gender or aetiology, T5-T12 kyphosis or apical hypokyphosis, coronal Cobb, vertebral rotation, or DAVC. The residual postoperative Cobb, achieved kyphosis, or wired instrumentation versus hooks, also seemed to have no influence.

CONCLUSION

In patients with open triradiate cartilage under 11 years of age, it seems advisable to correct by double approach to avoid the appearance of the crankshaft phenomenon.

[Relationship between clinical results and sagittal profile in adult scoliosis. Value of the spinal-sacral angle and the spinal inclination angle]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical validity of two new recently described parameters (spinal-sacral angle (SSA) and spinal inclination angle (SIA) in adult scoliosis (AS) for evaluating the spinal-pelvic sagittal profile, as well as their still undefined role in AS.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A non-concurrent prospective radiographic and clinical study was conducted on 59 primary surgeries of AS (Cobb>40°), with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. The available X-rays and health questionnaires of 49 patients were used in the study. The changes in X-ray parameters after surgery were evaluated (Wilcoxon test), as well as the correlations as regards the clinical-radiography-age parameters (Spearman test and multiple linear regression).

RESULTS

The median post-surgical follow-up was 8.5 years, and the median age of the patients was 49.5 years. There was a statistically significant change with the surgery in the SSA and SIA (less than 5° in both), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic rotation, sagittal balance (SB) and frontal Cobb. There was no correlation between pain and SSA-ST. There was a significant relationship between activity and SSA, ST, LL, SB, and age. After the multivariate analysis only age (not SSA or SIA) remained as a possible predictor of lower activity.

DISCUSSION

When frontal deformity predominates, the sagittal radiographic parameters, including the newest angles, although they have an influence patient activity when analysed individually, they lose this influence when they are analysed together and with other clinical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSA and SIA hardly change with surgery. They only correlate with activity, but cannot be considered predictors of this. Thus they do seem to be useful measurements in AS.