1
|
Niu S, Ao L, Gao Y, Zhou F, He W, Tao J, Guo S, Wang B, Ai X, Li H, Ma X, Zhang X, Huang J, Zhang X. Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 64:2-8. [PMID: 38694878 PMCID: PMC11058071 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used because of the many advantages of a robotic approach. The da Vinci Si robot is one of the most commonly used surgical robot systems, but it may be associated with higher costs owing to the use of consumable surgical supplies. Our aim was to conduct a preliminary investigation of the capability of the MP1000 system for RARP. Methods In this prospective, multicentre, single-blinded study, we randomly assigned 42 patients scheduled to undergo RARP between April and September 2021 to a da Vinci Si group (control) or an MP1000 group (intervention). Patients underwent RARP performed using the assigned robotic system and were followed up at 3-mo intervals. The primary outcome was the rate of conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were installation and operation times, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative surgical margin status, hospital stay, incontinence, complications, safety indicators, and surgeon ergonomics. Key findings and limitations All procedures were successfully completed without conversion to open/laparascopic surgery or major complications. Secondary outcomes, including oncological and ergonomic indicators, did not differ significantly between the groups over the study period. One patient in the control group experienced dysuria (Clavien-Dindo grade 3). No patients had incontinence at 3 mo. A limitation of the study is the small sample size. Conclusions and clinical implications RARP with the MP1000 system is feasible, safe, and effective in the management of localised prostate cancer. Patient summary We assessed the effectiveness and safety of the new MP1000 robot system for robot-assisted removal of the prostate in comparison to the da Vinci Si robot. We found no difference in effectiveness or safety among 42 patients with prostate cancer who were assigned randomly to one of the two systems. We conclude that the MP1000 is a suitable robot for this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoxi Niu
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Liyan Ao
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
- Graduate School of Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wang He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Tao
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baojun Wang
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xing Ai
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Hongzhao Li
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xuepei Zhang
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan X, Cai T, Wang Y, Wu Z, Zhou Q, Guo S, Li J, Yuan G, Liu Z, Li Z, Liu Z, Tang Y, Zou Y, Luo S, Qin Z, Zhou F, Lin C, Han H, Yao K. Regional lymph node mapping in patients with penile cancer undergoing radical inguinal lymph node dissection - a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2865-2873. [PMID: 38329065 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical inguinal lymph node dissection (rILND) is the most available treatment to cure penile cancer (PC) with limited inguinal-confined disease. However, guidelines regarding acceptable boundaries of rILND are controversial, and consensus is lacking. The authors aimed to standardize the surgical boundaries of rILND with definite pathological evidence and explore the distribution pattern of inguinal lymph nodes (ILNs) in PC. METHODS A total of 414 PC patients from two centers who underwent rILND were enrolled. The ILN distribution was divided into seven zones anatomically for pathological examination. Student's t test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used. RESULTS ILNs displayed a funnel-shaped distribution with high density in superior regions. ILNs and metastatic nodes are present anywhere within the radical boundaries. Positive ILNs were mainly concentrated in zone I (51.7%) and zone II (41.3%), but there were 8.7% and 12.3% in inferior zones V and VI, respectively, and 7.1% in the deep ILNs. More importantly, a single positive ILN and first-station positive zone was detected in all seven regions. Single positive ILNs were located in zones I through VI in 40.4%, 23.6%, 6.7%, 18.0%, 4.5%, and 1.1%, respectively, and 5.6% presented deep ILN metastasis directly. CONCLUSIONS The authors established a detailed ILN distribution map and displayed lymphatic drainage patterns with definite pathological evidence using a large cohort of PC patients. Single positive ILNs and first-station metastatic zones were observed in any region, even directly with deep ILN metastasis. Only rILND can ensure tumor-free resection without the omission of positive nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingliang Tan
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Taonong Cai
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Yanjun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Zhiming Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Qianghua Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou
| | - Gangjun Yuan
- Department of Urology Oncological Surgery, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing
| | - Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Zhicheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Yi Tang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Yuantao Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Sihao Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Zike Qin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Chunhua Lin
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gao Y, Yang Y, Niu S, He W, Tao J, Guo S, Li H, Ma X, Ai X, Huang J, Zhou F, Zhang X, Zhang X. Suitability of the MP1000 system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2803-2809. [PMID: 38349210 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the MP1000 surgical system with the da Vinci Si robot system in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) through a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 62 patients who were scheduled to undergo RAPN were randomly assigned to either the da Vinci Si robot or MP1000 group. A noninferiority test was conducted with a noninferior intermediate value of 10%. The study compared installation and operation times, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time, postoperative surgical margin, rate of conversion to open surgery, eGFR level, complications, and other safety indicators between the two groups. RESULTS All procedures were successfully completed without the need for conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery, and no major complications were observed during the process. The test of noninferiority was achieved. There were no significant differences in median installation time, operation time, complication rate at 3 months, rate of positive surgical margin, and eGFR level at 3 months between the groups. Additionally, no evidence of recurrence was found on imaging in both groups. No difference in National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index results for ergonomic considerations. A limitation of this study was its small sample size. CONCLUSIONS The MP1000 system is a suitable platform for RAPN with safety and effectiveness compared with da Vinci Si system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Gao
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
- Medical School of Chinese PLA
| | - Shaoxi Niu
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Wang He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District
| | - Jin Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
| | - Hongzhao Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Xing Ai
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
| | - Xuepei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang T, Wang J, Liu R, Wei W, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Guo S, Han H, Zhou F, He L, Dong P. Safety and Efficacy of Second-Line TKI Plus Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:252-260.e3. [PMID: 38061977 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines recommend clinical trials or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the first-line option for systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) with limited efficacy. However, the preferred subsequent options remain unclear when patients progress after first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy as the second-line regimen in nccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020. The baseline characteristics of the patients and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The current study enrolled 65 patients, with a median age of 48 (interquartile 37-60) years. Among all patients, 21 received TKI monotherapy while 44 patients received combination therapy (TKI plus anti-PD1). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 38.5% and 56.9%, respectively. ORR (50.0% vs. 14.3%, P = .006) and DCR (70.5% vs. 28.6%, P = .001) were improved in the combination group compared with the TKI group. The overall second-line PFS was 7.7 (95% CI: 6.1-9.3) months and OS was 25.2 (19.5-30.8) months. Patients receiving combination therapy had a longer PFS compared with those receiving TKI monotherapy [median PFS (95% CI): 9.2 (5.9-12.4) vs. 5.4 (2.6-8.2) m, Log-rank P = .002]. The incidence of treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher was comparable between the 2 groups (56.8% vs. 52.4%). CONCLUSION Anti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy appeared effective and safe in the treatment of patients with metastatic nccRCC who progressed after first-line TKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingxuan Huang
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiong L, Zou X, Luo X, Yin S, Huang Y, Ning K, Wen D, Zhou Z, Wang J, Li Z, Chen J, Li J, Peng W, Guo S, Dong P, Zhou F, Han H, Peng Y, Yu C, Zhang Z. Longitudinal changes in renal parenchymal volume and function status after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:984-991. [PMID: 38000077 PMCID: PMC10871623 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ipsilateral renal parenchymal volume (RPV) experiences a sharp decrease shortly after partial nephrectomy (PN), mainly due to surgical remove or devascularization of kidney tissue. However, the subsequent change of RPV and its association with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) fast decline remains unknown. Our objective was to investigate the change of ipsilateral RPV and renal function status from new baseline (1-12 months after PN) to latest follow-up (≥1 year) after PN, and to explore factors associated with ipsilateral RPV decrease rate and correlation between RPV decrease and GFR fast decline. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 367 patients with PN was conducted. Three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography (CT)/MRI images was performed for RPV calculation. Spectrum score was used to assess the degree of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the operated kidney after PN. GFR decline greater than 3 ml/min/1.73 m 2 /year was defined as GFR fast decline. One hundred fourteen patients underwent abdominal surgery was used as control. Predictive factors for subsequent decrease of RPV rate and GFR fast decline were evaluated by linear and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS With a median interval time of 21.1 (interquartile range:13.8-35.5) months, median ipsilateral RPV significantly decreased from 118.7 (interquartile range:100.7-137.1) ml at new baseline to 111.8 (IQR: 92.3-131.3) ml at latest follow-up. The interval time [β: 1.36(0.71-2.01), P <0.001] and spectrum score [β: 5.83 (2.92-8.74), P <0.001] were identified as independent predictors of ipsilateral RPV decrease rate. GFR fast decline was observed in 101 (27.5%) patients. Annual ipsilateral RPV decrease rate [odds ratio:1.67 (1.05-2.67), P =0.03] and overweight [odds ratio:1.63 (1.02-2.60), P =0.04] were independent predictors of GFR fast decline. CONCLUSIONS Ipsilateral RPV experienced a moderate but significant decrease during follow-up after PN, especially in those with severer acute kidney injury. The presence of GFR fast decline was found to be associated with reduction of ipsilateral RPV, particularly in overweight individuals.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yan XQ, Ye MJ, Zou Q, Chen P, He ZS, Wu B, He DL, He CH, Xue XY, Ji ZG, Chen H, Zhang S, Liu YP, Zhang XD, Fu C, Xu DF, Qiu MX, Lv JJ, Huang J, Ren XB, Cheng Y, Qin WJ, Zhang X, Zhou FJ, Ma LL, Guo JM, Ding DG, Wei SZ, He Y, Guo HQ, Shi BK, Liu L, Liu F, Hu ZQ, Jin XM, Yang L, Zhu SX, Liu JH, Huang YH, Xu T, Liu B, Sun T, Wang ZJ, Jiang HW, Yu DX, Zhou AP, Jiang J, Luan GD, Jin CL, Xu J, Hu JX, Huang YR, Guo J, Zhai W, Sheng XN. Toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: RENOTORCH, a randomized, open-label, phase III study. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:190-199. [PMID: 37872020 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard treatments for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase III RENOTORCH study compared the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for the first-line treatment of patients with intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with intermediate-/poor-risk unresectable or metastatic RCC were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive toripalimab (240 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) plus axitinib (5 mg orally twice daily) or sunitinib [50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle) or 2 weeks (3-week cycle)]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 421 patients were randomized to receive toripalimab plus axitinib (n = 210) or sunitinib (n = 211). With a median follow-up of 14.6 months, toripalimab plus axitinib significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 35% compared with sunitinib as assessed by an IRC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.86; P = 0.0028]. The median PFS was 18.0 months in the toripalimab-axitinib group, whereas it was 9.8 months in the sunitinib group. The IRC-assessed ORR was significantly higher in the toripalimab-axitinib group compared with the sunitinib group (56.7% versus 30.8%; P < 0.0001). An OS trend favoring toripalimab plus axitinib was also observed (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92). Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 61.5% of patients in the toripalimab-axitinib group and 58.6% of patients in the sunitinib group. CONCLUSION In patients with previously untreated intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC, toripalimab plus axitinib provided significantly longer PFS and higher ORR than sunitinib and had a manageable safety profile TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04394975.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Q Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing
| | - M J Ye
- Department of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha
| | - Q Zou
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | - P Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi
| | - Z S He
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Peking University, Beijing
| | - B Wu
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang
| | - D L He
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - C H He
- Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou
| | - X Y Xue
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou
| | - Z G Ji
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
| | - H Chen
- Department of Urology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin
| | - S Zhang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Y P Liu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang
| | - X D Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
| | - C Fu
- Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang
| | - D F Xu
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai
| | - M X Qiu
- Department of Urology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu
| | - J J Lv
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan
| | - J Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - X B Ren
- Department of Immunology and Biotherapy, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin
| | - Y Cheng
- Department of Medical Thoracic Oncology, Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changchun
| | - W J Qin
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an
| | - X Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
| | - L L Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing
| | - J M Guo
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai
| | - D G Ding
- Department of Urology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou
| | - S Z Wei
- Department of Urology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan
| | - Y He
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing
| | - H Q Guo
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - B K Shi
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan
| | - L Liu
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan
| | - F Liu
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou
| | - Z Q Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan
| | - X M Jin
- Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan
| | - L Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - S X Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou
| | - J H Liu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming
| | - Y H Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou
| | - T Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing
| | - B Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou
| | - T Sun
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang
| | - Z J Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | - H W Jiang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai
| | - D X Yu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei
| | - A P Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
| | - J Jiang
- Department of Urology, The PLA General Hospital Army Characteristic Medical Center, Chongqing
| | - G D Luan
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd., Shanghai
| | - C L Jin
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd., Shanghai
| | - J Xu
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd., Shanghai
| | - J X Hu
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd., Shanghai
| | - Y R Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - J Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing
| | - W Zhai
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - X N Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou Z, Xiong L, Yao K, Ma H, Wei W, Zhang Z, Guo S, Dong P, Li X, Jiang L, Chen D, Qin Z, Han H, Ye Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Wu Z, Tian L, Yu C, Zhou F, Li Z, Liu Z. Extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit decreases the risk of parastomal hernia: A single-center, randomized clinical trial. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101343. [PMID: 38154462 PMCID: PMC10829722 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication in patients receiving ileal conduit urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we validate our previous finding that extraperitonealization of ileal conduit decreases incidence of PSH. In total, 104 consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center are randomized 1:1 to receive either modified (extraperitonealized) ileal conduit (n = 52) or conventional ileal conduit (n = 52). Primary endpoint is incidence of radiological PSH during follow-up. Incidence of radiological PSH is lower in the modified group than in the conventional group (11.5% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.028) after a median follow-up of 32 months, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.374 (95% confidence interval: 0.145-0.965, p = 0.034) in the modified conduit group. The results support our previous finding that extraperitonealization of the ileal conduit is effective for reducing risk of PSH in patients receiving ileal conduit diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Zhou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Kai Yao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Huali Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Pei Dong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Lijuan Jiang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Dong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zike Qin
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hui Han
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yonghong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhiming Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Li Tian
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zou X, Xiong L, Guo Z, Li Y, Ning K, Liu X, Xie Y, Peng Y, Liu Y, Cai X, Zhao B, Zhou F, Yu C, Zheng X, Campbell SC, Zhang Z. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and predicted risk of cardiovascular events after partial nephrectomy. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:281-288. [PMID: 37673746 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emerging evidence suggests that uremic toxins, in particular trimethylamine-N-oxide(TMAO), indoxyl-sulfate(IS), and p-cresyl-sulfate(PCS), may associate with increased risk of cardiovascular events(CVe). However, whether uremic toxins increase after partial nephrectomy(PN) and their correlation with risk for CVe remains unknown. METHODS 100 patients managed with PN were retrospectively reviewed. TMAO/IS/PCS levels were examined by liquid chromatography-mass-spectrometry. Renal-parenchymal-volume-preservation(RPVP) was estimated from CT scans. Predicted risks for CVe were obtained using the Framingham score. Linear regression assessed association between uremic toxins, GFR and risk of CVe. Logistic regression evaluated factors associated with post-PN TMAO. RESULTS TMAO, IS and PCS increased from 1.7, 3.7 and 3.5 μmol/L before PN to 3.6, 5.4 and 7.4 μmol/L at latest follow-up, respectively, while GFR declined from 102 to 93 ml/min/1.73 m2 (all p<0.001). TMAO, IS and PCS levels all negatively correlated with GFR(all p<0.001). Predicted 10-year risk of CVe increased from 1.1% pre-PN to 1.7% post-PN(p<0.001), primarily due to increased age(p<0.001), blood pressure(p = 0.002) and total cholesterol(p = 0.003). TMAO(β = 0.038) and GFR (β = -0.02) were independent predictors for predicted 10-year CVe risk on multivariable-analysis. Increased TMAO was an early and sustained finding maintained through 5 years, unlike IS, PCS and eGFR. On multivariable analysis, increased pre-PN TMAO(OR = 2.79) and decreased RPVP(OR = 3.23) were identified as independent risk factors for higher post-PN TMAO, while ischemia type/duration failed to correlate. CONCLUSION Uremic toxin levels increased after PN correlating with reduced GFR. Higher TMAO independently associated with greater predicted 10-year CVe risk. Parenchymal mass preserved rather than ischemia time or type associated with increased TMAO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhixing Guo
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yuchen Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xiaohua Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ye Xie
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yixuan Liu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xinyang Cai
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Boxin Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Urology, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Xia Zheng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Steven C Campbell
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang YX, Zou XP, Zhang ZL, Ning K, Luo X, Xiong LB, Peng YL, Zhou ZH, Dong P, Guo SJ, Han H, Zhou FJ. [Relation factor analysis for the short-term preservation of ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2023; 61:1099-1103. [PMID: 37932147 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230228-00086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the factors relative to the short-term preservation of ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 83 patients who were treated with partial nephrectomy from December 2014 to December 2019 in the Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. There were 54 males and 29 females, aging (M (IQR)) 49 (17) years (range: 27 to 74 years). The ischemia time in operation was 25 (18) minutes (range: 10 to 67 minutes). Emission computed tomography scan and CT scan were performed before (within 1 month) and after (3 to 12 months) surgery. The volume of the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney was measured on the basis of preoperative and postoperative CT scans. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) specifically in each kidney was estimated by emission computed tomography. Recovery from ischemia is determined by the formula: GFR preservation/volume saved×100%. Linear regression was used to explore the factors ralative to the short-term preservation of ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy. Results: The GFR preservation of the ipsilateral kidney was 80.9 (25.2) % (range: 31.0% to 109.4%). The volume loss of the kidney resulted in a decrease of 12.0% (5.8 ml/(min×1.96 m2)) of GFR, while the ischemic injury resulted in a decrease of 6.5% (2.5 ml/(min×1.96 m2)) of GFR. The volume saved from the ipsilateral kidney was 87.1 (12.9) % (range: 27.0% to 131.7%). Recovery from ischemia was 93.5 (17.5) % (range:44.3% to 178.3%). In multivariate analysis, GFR preservation of the ipsilateral kidney was significantly correlated with the volume saved of the ipsilateral kidney (β=0.383, 95%CI: 0.144 to 0.622, P=0.002). It was not related to the ischemia time (β=0.046, 95%CI:-0.383 to 0.475, P=0.831). Conclusion: In the condition of limited ischemic time, in the short term ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy is mainly determined by the loss of kidney volume, while ischemic injury only plays a minor role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y X Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X P Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - K Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L B Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y L Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z H Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S J Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu Z, Xie J, Gao X, Lin Y, Sun M, Sun Y, Peng D, Xie H, Li X, Li Z, Cai T, Chen P, Wu Z, Guo S, Li Y, Zhang Z, Qin Z, Han H, He Z, Liu J, Fu W, Li S, Xia D, Wang X, Deng C, Xu Z, Zhou F, Yao K, Yu W, Ye Y, Liu Z. SAVE Testis-sparing score: a multicenter retrospective study of a novel predictive tool for quantifying testicular tumors. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4185-4198. [PMID: 37738014 PMCID: PMC10720877 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is a safe treatment for patients with benign testicular tumors. Presently, assessments for evaluating the suitability of TSS are poorly standardized, partially because testicular anatomical elements cannot be quantitatively described. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors developed a scoring method known as the SAVE testis-sparing score based on four critical and accessible anatomical features of a testicular tumor. The SAVE score ranges from 0 to 8 and is divided into four risk classes ( low , medium , high , and extremely high ) to evaluate the feasibility of TSS, wherein low-risk indicates high feasibility and vice versa. This study included 444 testicular tumor patients from eight centers. Among them, 216 patients (model group: 151 patients, validation group: 65 patients) were included in the modeling analysis, and the other 228 patients from children's centers were included in the proportion analysis. Using retrospective data, patient characteristics associated with surgical methods were identified. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was built quantify the associations between these characteristics and the surgery method. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the classification efficiency of SAVE. RESULTS The SAVE testis-sparing score includes size (tumor size as maximal diameter), available testicular tissue volume, volume ratio of the tumor to the testis, and the exophytic / endophytic properties of the tumor. The SAVE scoring system accurately classified the suitability of TSS based on the complexity of benign testicular tumors. CONCLUSION The SAVE score is a reproducible and robust tool for quantitatively describing the anatomical characteristics of benign testicular tumors and guide the preoperative evaluation of TSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Junyi Xie
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Xiaofeng Gao
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health
| | - Yuan Lin
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Mengkui Sun
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Yubo Sun
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai
| | - Ding Peng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
| | - Haibiao Xie
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Taonong Cai
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Pengyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Zhiming Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Yonghong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhilin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zike Qin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Jiumin Liu
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou
| | - Wen Fu
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health
| | - Shoulin Li
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Dan Xia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai
| | | | - Zhe Xu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Gansu Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
An X, Xue C, Chen M, Ni M, Ma H, Tian L, Huang R, Li X, Ye Y, Qin T, Dong P, Li Z, Peng J, Yao K, Zhou F, Liu Z, Shi Y. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs gemcitabine/carboplatin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2023. [PMID: 38009394 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare in a phase III trial the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GA) with that of carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GCb) as a first-line treatment for patients with cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Treatment-naive, cisplatin-ineligible patients with mUC were assigned randomly to either the GA (both nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or GCb group (carboplatin area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve of 4.5 on Day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS The trial was terminated early because of slow accrual after 54 patients were enrolled: 26 in in the GA group and 28 in the GCb groups. The median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.9 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.248). The median OS time was 12.1 vs 10.7 months for the GA and GCb groups, respectively (P = 0.837). The ORR and DCR were 40% vs 46.4% (P = 0.637) and 72% vs 68% (P = 0.188) in the GA and GCb groups, respectively. Patients treated with GA showed significantly lower incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and does reduction and delay. Although peripheral sensory neuropathy was higher in the GA arm, no Grade 3 neuropathy occurred. There was no difference in the PROs between the two groups. CONCLUSION While not powered for comparison, first-line GA showed similar efficacy and better tolerability and might be considered a rational alternative to GCb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meiting Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengqian Ni
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huali Ma
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Tian
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Riqing Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tao Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Peng
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zou XP, Ning K, Zhang ZL, Zou L, Xiong LB, Peng YL, Zhou ZH, Liu HM, Yu CP, Dong P, Guo SJ, Han H, Zhou FJ. [Long-term survival analysis of 1 367 patients treated with radical nephrectomy from a single center]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2023; 45:981-987. [PMID: 37968085 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220614-00420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To report the long-term survival of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with radical nephrectomy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, pathological and follow-up records of 1 367 non-metastatic RCC patients treated with radical nephrectomy from 1999 to 2020 in this center. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival rate. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were compared through Log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were fit to determine the clinical and pathological features associated with overall survival rate. Results: A total of 1 367 patients treated with radical nephrectomy with complete follow-up data were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 52.6 months, and 1 100 patients survived and 267 died, with the median time to overall survival not yet reached. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 82.8% and 74.9%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of Leibovich low-risk patients were 93.3% and 88.2%, respectively; of Leibovich intermediate-risk patients were 82.2% and 72.3%, respectively; and of Leibovich high-risk patients were 50.5% and 30.2%, respectively. There were significant differences in the long-term survival among the three groups (P<0.001). The 10-year overall survival rates for patients with pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 RCC were 83.2%, 73.6%, 55.0% and 31.4%, respectively. There were significant differences among pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 patients(P<0.001). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of patients with lymph node metastasis were 48.5% and 35.6%, respectively, and those of patients without lymph node metastasis were 85.1% and 77.5%, respectively. There was significant difference in the long-term survival between patients with lymph node metastasis and without lymph node metastasis. The 10-year overall survival rate was 96.2% for nuclear Grade 1, 81.6% for nuclear Grade 2, 60.5% for nuclear Grade 3, and 43.4% for nuclear Grade 4 patients. The difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the long-term survival between patients with localized renal cancer (pT1-2N0M0) who underwent open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (10-year overall survival rate 80.5% vs 85.6%, P=0.160). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age≥55 years (HR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.50-2.96, P<0.001), T stage(T3+ T4 vs T1a: HR=2.37, 95% CI: 1.26-4.46, P=0.008), local lymph node metastasis (HR=3.04, 95%CI: 1.81-5.09, P<0.001), nuclear grade (G3-G4 vs G1: HR=4.21, 95%CI: 1.51-11.75, P=0.006), tumor necrosis (HR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.17-2.37, P=0.005), sarcomatoid differentiation (HR=2.39, 95% CI: 1.31-4.35, P=0.005) and BMI≥24kg/m(2) (HR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.39-0.80, P=0.001) were independent factors affecting long-term survival after radical nephrectomy. Conclusions: The long-term survival of radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma is satisfactory. Advanced age, higher pathological stage and grade, tumor necrosis and sarcomatoid differentiation were the main adverse factors affecting the prognosis of patients. Higher body mass index was a protective factor for the prognosis of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X P Zou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - K Ning
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L Zou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L B Xiong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y L Peng
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z H Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H M Liu
- Department of Imaging, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - C P Yu
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S J Guo
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Z, Ning K, Zhao D, Zhou Z, Zhao J, Long X, Yang Z, Chen D, Cai X, Hong L, Zhang L, Zhou F, Wang J, Li Y. Targeting the Metabolic Enzyme PGAM2 Overcomes Enzalutamide Resistance in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Inhibiting BCL2 Signaling. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3753-3766. [PMID: 37676279 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
The next-generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor enzalutamide is the mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. Unfortunately, resistance occurs rapidly in most patients, and once resistance occurs, treatment options are limited. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify effective targets to overcome enzalutamide resistance. Here, using a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 library screen, we found that targeting a glycolytic enzyme, phosphoglycerate mutase PGAM2, significantly enhanced the sensitivity of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells to enzalutamide both in vivo and in vitro. Inhibition of PGAM2 together with enzalutamide treatment triggered apoptosis by decreasing levels of the antiapoptotic protein BCL-xL and increasing activity of the proapoptotic protein BAD. Mechanistically, PGAM2 bound to 14-3-3ζ and promoted its interaction with phosphorylated BAD, resulting in activation of BCL-xL and subsequent resistance to enzalutamide-induced apoptosis. In addition, high PGAM2 expression, which is transcriptionally regulated by AR, was associated with shorter survival and rapid development of enzalutamide resistance in patients with prostate cancer. Together, these findings provide evidence of a nonmetabolic function of PGAM2 in promoting enzalutamide resistance and identify PGAM2 inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer. SIGNIFICANCE PGAM2 promotes resistance to enzalutamide by activating antiapoptotic BCL-xL and suppressing apoptosis, indicating that PGAM2 is a potential target for overcoming enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Diwei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junliang Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xingbo Long
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - XinYang Cai
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lexuan Hong
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Luyao Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huang R, Chen M, Li H, An X, Xue C, Hu A, Shu D, Yang W, Zhou F, Sui D, Yao K, Li Y, Wu Z, Li Z, Liu Z, Shi Y. Effect of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma: a real-world retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1002. [PMID: 37858093 PMCID: PMC10585742 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11473-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genitourinary small cell carcinoma is rare, and has a poor prognosis. However, effective treatment options for this disease are limited. We present a study to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic genitourinary small cell carcinoma (GSCC). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC from Jan 2013 to September 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The survival and safety profiles were analyzed. RESULTS Forty-two GSCC patients were enrolled, which included 20 with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and 22 with chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up time was 15.13 months (95% CI, 8.84-21.42). The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy demonstrated no significant difference in median progression-free survival (p = 0.37). However, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.97 and 14.03 months with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.08-0.55, p = 0.017). Two patients with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy achieved clinical complete remission. The overall response rate for patients receiving chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy was 65%, which was higher in comparison to those treated with chemotherapy alone (50%). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy independently achieved favorable OS. Four patients experienced immunotherapy-related adverse events, with one developing grade 3 hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with locally advanced or metastatic GSCC, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy might be thought of as a potentially effective treatment option for patients with GSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riqing Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Meiting Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Haifeng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xin An
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Cong Xue
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Anqi Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ditian Shu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Wei Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Sui
- The Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang, 110031, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Yao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yonghong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiming Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yanxia Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Dongfeng Road East 651, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou Z, Li Z, Ning K, Xiong L, Liu H, Huang Y, Luo X, Peng Y, Chen L, Ma B, Zou X, Wei W, Luo C, Han H, Guo S, Dong P, Zhou F, Yu C, Zhang Z. Long-term effect of acute ischemic injury on the kidney underwent clamped partial nephrectomy. iScience 2023; 26:107610. [PMID: 37664597 PMCID: PMC10474450 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
GFR reaches a new baseline, primarily correlating with nephron-mass preservation, 1-12 months after partial nephrectomy (PN). However, does the ipsilateral GFR experience subsequent decline, and does acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney? 319 patients with two kidneys and unilateral clamped PN were analyzed. All had preoperative, new-baseline, and latest follow-up imaging/serum creatinine levels. Annual ipsilateral GFR decline rate (AIGDR) was defined as new-baseline GFR minus latest follow-up GFR normalized by new-baseline GFR, per year. Spectrum score was used to reflect the degree of acute ischemic injury in the operated kidney. 100 subjects searching for health screening served as controls. Predictive factors for AIGDR were assessed. The median AIGDR was 2.25%, significantly higher than controls (0.88%, p = 0.036). With some contralateral hypertrophy, the global annual GFR decline was similar to that of controls (0.81% vs. 0.88%, p = 0.7). Spectrum score correlated significantly with AIGDR (p = 0.037). These results support that acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiming Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijie Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binglei Ma
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Urology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ning K, Peng Y, Jiang Y, Li Z, Luo X, Lin L, Deng M, Wu Y, Huang T, Huang Y, Xie Y, Yang X, Zhang M, Xiong L, Zou X, Zhou Z, Zhou F, Dong P, Yu C, Zhang Z. Sex differences in renal cell carcinoma: a single-cell analysis reveals exhausted CD8 + T-cells highly infiltrated in males. Biol Sex Differ 2023; 14:58. [PMID: 37715192 PMCID: PMC10503187 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-023-00540-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although sex bias has been reported in the development and progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the underlying mechanisms remain enigmatic. Here, we investigated the sex differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of RCC and explored a promising combination drug regimen to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. METHODS Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from four published datasets were analyzed to investigate the sex differences in RCC patients, and tumor tissues were collected to validate the sex differences using multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) and flow cytometry (FCM). The function of the androgen-androgen receptor axis in sex differences was explored in vivo and in vitro experiments. RESULTS Our analysis of scRNA-seq data from 220,156 cells, as well as MxIF and FCM assays, revealed that CD8+ T-cells infiltrated highly in the TME of male RCC, but were mostly in an exhausted and dysfunctional state. In vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that the dysfunction and exhaustion of CD8+ T-cells in male TME were induced by androgen. Clinically, higher serum androgen was significantly associated with a worse prognosis in male RCC patients receiving immunotherapy. Androgen receptor inhibitors could activate tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cells and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy of RCC in vivo. CONCLUSIONS Our study delineated the difference in TME between male and female patients with RCC, and demonstrated that the androgen-androgen receptor axis plays an important role in immunosuppression in male RCC. Our findings suggest that androgen receptor inhibitors in combination with immunotherapy may be a promising treatment option for male RCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Research Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lede Lin
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Minhua Deng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tingxuan Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Manhuai Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Chunping Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Institute of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huang KB, Cao Y, Yao K, Zhou FJ, Liu ZW, Li XD. [Diagnosis and treatment of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis: a series of 7 cases]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2023; 61:812-817. [PMID: 37491176 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20221129-00504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical features, diagnosis, prognosis of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis (MMTVT). Methods: The clinicopathological data of 7 patients with MMTVT who treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2010 and October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were first diagnosed at (M (IQR)) 49 (23) years old (range: 27 to 64 years old). The main clinical manifestations were scrotal enlargement (7 cases) and hydrocele (2 cases). Results: Three patients underwent radical orchiectomy as initial treatment, 2 cases underwent hydrocelectomy due to diagnosis of hydrocele, followed by radical orchiectomy at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, and 2 cases underwent transscrotal orchiectomy. Common tumor markers of testicular cancer were not significantly elevated in MMTVT. The expression of tumor PD-L1 was positive in 2 out of the 3 cases. One patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and 2 patients received first-line chemotherapy after tumor recurrence. Chemotherapy regimens used include cisplatin+pemetrexed. Up to October 2022, 3 cases relapsed, of which 2 cases died. The median overall survival was 35 months (range: 4 to 87 months) and the median progression-free survival was 6 months (range: 2 to 87 months). Conclusions: MMTVT at early stage should be treated with early radical orchiectomy and followed up closely after surgery. The cisplatin+pemetrexed regimen is a common option for the treatment of metastatic MMTVT, while whether immune checkpoint inhibitors could serve as a second-line treatment option deserves further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Huang
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y Cao
- Department of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - K Yao
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z W Liu
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X D Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang J, Wei WS, Jiang LJ, Zhang ZL, Guo SJ, Han H, Zhou FJ, Dong P. [Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2023; 45:704-708. [PMID: 37580277 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220330-00220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, P=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, P=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), P=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - W S Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L J Jiang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S J Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xiong LB, Zou XP, Ning K, Luo X, Peng YL, Zhou ZH, Wang J, Li Z, Yu CP, Dong P, Guo SJ, Han H, Zhou FJ, Zhang ZL. [Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival after radical nephrectomy]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2023; 45:681-689. [PMID: 37580273 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20221027-00722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To establish a nomogram prognostic model for predicting the 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival (OS) of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients managed with radical nephrectomy (RN), compare the modelled results with the results of pure pathologic staging, the Karakiewicz nomogram and the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) score commonly used in foreign countries, and stratify the patients into different prognostic risk subgroups. Methods: A total of 1 246 non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients managed with RN in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from 1999 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen the variables that influence the prognosis for nomogram establishment, and the bootstrap random sampling was used for internal validation. The time-receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the calibration curve and the clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to evaluate the nomogram. The prediction efficacy of the nomogram and that of the pure pathologic staging, the Karakiewicz nomogram and the SSIGN score was compared through the area under the curve (AUC). Finally, patients were stratified into different risk subgroups according to our nomogram scores. Results: A total of 1 246 patients managed with RN were enrolled in this study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, smoking history, pathological nuclear grade, sarcomatoid differentiation, tumor necrosis and pathological T and N stages were independent prognostic factors for RN patients (all P<0.05). A nomogram model named SYSUCC based on these factors was built to predict the 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rate of the participating patients. In the bootstrap random sampling with 1 000 iterations, all these factors occurred for more than 800 times as independent predictors. The Harrell's concordance index (C-index) of SYSUCC was higher compared with pure pathological staging [0.770 (95% CI: 0.716-0.823) vs 0.674 (95% CI: 0.621-0.728)]. The calibration curve showed that the survival rate as predicted by the SYSUCC model simulated the actual rate, while the clinical DCA showed that the SYSUCC nomogram has a benefit in certain probability ranges. In the ROC analysis that included 857 patients with detailed pathological nuclear stages, the nomogram had a larger AUC (5-/10-year AUC: 0.823/0.804) and better discriminating ability than pure pathological staging (5-/10-year AUC: 0.701/0.658), Karakiewicz nomogram (5-/10-year AUC: 0.772/0.734) and SSIGN score (5-/10-year AUC: 0.792/0.750) in predicting the 5-/10-year OS of RN patients (all P<0.05). In addition, the AUC of the SYSUCC nomogram for predicting the 15-year OS (0.820) was larger than that of the SSIGN score (0.709), and there was no statistical difference (P<0.05) between the SYSUCC nomogram, pure pathological staging (0.773) and the Karakiewicz nomogram (0.826). The calibration curve was close to the standard curve, which indicated that the model has good predictive performance. Finally, patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups (738, 379 and 129, respectively) according to the SYSUCC nomogram scores, among whom patients in intermediate- and high-risk subgroups had a worse OS than patients in the low-risk subgroup (intermediate-risk group vs. low-risk group: HR=4.33, 95% CI: 3.22-5.81, P<0.001; high-risk group vs low-risk group: HR=11.95, 95% CI: 8.29-17.24, P<0.001), and the high-risk subgroup had a worse OS than the intermediate-risk group (HR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.88-3.68, P<0.001). Conclusions: Age, smoking history, pathological nuclear grade, sarcomatoid differentiation, tumor necrosis and pathological stage were independent prognostic factors for non-metastasis renal cell carcinoma patients after RN. The SYSUCC nomogram based on these independent prognostic factors can better predict the 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS than pure pathological staging, the Karakiewicz nomogram and the SSIGN score of patients after RN. In addition, the SYSUCC nomogram has good discrimination, agreement, risk stratification and clinical application potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B Xiong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X P Zou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - K Ning
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X Luo
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y L Peng
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z H Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - J Wang
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - C P Yu
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S J Guo
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li Z, Huang Y, Zhao D, Luo X, Wu Z, Zheng X, Xie Y, Liu Y, Wu J, Peng Y, Li Y, Zhou F. Development and internal validation of a novel nomogram for predicting lymph node invasion for prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1186319. [PMID: 37223684 PMCID: PMC10202171 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1186319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have focused on the performance of Briganti 2012, Briganti 2017 and MSKCC nomograms in the Chinese population in assessing the risk of lymph node invasion(LNI) in prostate cancer(PCa) patients and identifying patients suitable for extended pelvic lymph node dissection(ePLND). We aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram based on Chinese PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy(RP) and ePLND for predicting LNI. Methods We retrospectively retrieved clinical data of 631 patients with localized PCa receiving RP and ePLND at a Chinese single tertiary referral center. All patients had detailed biopsy information from experienced uropathologist. Multivariate logistic-regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with LNI. The discrimination accuracy and net-benefit of models were quantified using the area under curve(AUC) and Decision curve analysis(DCA).The nonparametric bootstrapping were used to internal validation. Results A total of 194(30.7%) patients had LNI. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 13(range, 11-18). In univariable analysis, preoperative prostate-specific antigen(PSA), clinical stage, biopsy Gleason grade group, maximum percentage of single core involvement with highest-grade PCa, percentage of positive cores, percentage of positive cores with highest-grade PCa and percentage of cores with clinically significant cancer on systematic biopsy differed significantly. The multivariable model that included preoperative PSA, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason grade group, maximum percentage of single core involvement with highest-grade PCa and percentage of cores with clinically significant cancer on systematic biopsy represented the basis for the novel nomogram. Based on a 12% cutoff, our results showed that 189(30%) patients could have avoided ePLND while only 9(4.8%) had LNI missing ePLND. Our proposed model achieved the highest AUC (proposed model vs Briganti 2012 vs Briganti 2017 vs MSKCC model: 0.83 vs 0.8 vs 0.8 vs 0.8, respectively) and highest net-benefit via DCA in the Chinese cohort compared with previous nomograms. In internal validation of proposed nomogram, all variables had a percent inclusion greater than 50%. Conclusion We developed and validated a nomogram predicting the risk of LNI based on Chinese PCa patients, which demonstrated superior performance compared with previous nomograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Diwei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zeshen Wu
- Department of Urology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Shenzhen, China
| | - Xinyi Zheng
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye Xie
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixuan Liu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianwei Wu
- School of Clinical Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zou XP, Ning K, Zhang ZL, Xiong LB, Peng YL, Zhou ZH, Huang YX, Luo X, Li JB, Dong P, Guo SJ, Han H, Zhou FJ. [Efficacy of partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal carcinoma: a 20-year experience of 2 046 patients in a single center]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2023; 61:395-402. [PMID: 36987674 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20221002-00416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze the long-term survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma after partical nephrectomy. Methods: The clinicopathological records and survival follow-up data of 2 046 patients with localized renal cell carcinoma, who were treated with partial nephrectomy from August 2001 to February 2021 in the Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 1 402 males and 644 females, aged (M(IQR)) 51 (19) years (range: 6 to 86 years). The primary end point of this study was cancer-specific survival. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference test was performed by Log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were fitted to determine factors associated with cancer-specific survival. Results: The follow-up time was 49.2 (48.0) months (range: 1 to 229 months), with 1 974 patients surviving and 72 dying. The median cancer-specific survival time has not yet been reached. The 5- and 10-year cancer specific survival rates were 97.0% and 91.2%, respectively. The 10-year cancer-specific survival rates for stage pT1a (n=1 447), pT1b (n=523) and pT2 (n=58) were 95.3%, 81.8%, and 81.7%, respectively. The 10-year cancer-specific survival rates of patients with nuclear grade 1 (n=226), 2 (n=1 244) and 3 to 4 (n=278) were 96.6%, 89.4%, and 85.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival rates among patients underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery (96.7% vs. 97.1% vs. 97.5%, P=0.600). Multivariate analysis showed that age≥50 years (HR=3.93, 95%CI: 1.82 to 8.47, P<0.01), T stage (T1b vs. T1a: HR=3.31, 95%CI: 1.83 to 5.99, P<0.01; T2+T3 vs. T1a: HR=2.88, 95%CI: 1.00 to 8.28, P=0.049) and nuclear grade (G3 to 4 vs. G1: HR=2.81, 95%CI: 1.01 to 7.82, P=0.048) were independent prognostic factors of localized renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy. Conclusions: The long-term cancer-specific survival rates of patients with localized renal cancer after partial nephrectomy are satisfactory. The type of operation (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) has no significant effect on survival. However, patients with older age, higher nuclear grade, and higher T stage have a lower cancer-specific survival rate. Grasping surgical indications, attaching importance to preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, and postoperative follow-up, could benefit achieving satisfactory long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X P Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - K Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L B Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y L Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z H Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y X Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - J B Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S J Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen M, Yao K, Cao M, Liu H, Xue C, Qin T, Meng L, Zheng Z, Qin Z, Zhou F, Liu Z, Shi Y, An X. HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate RC48 alone or in combination with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter, real-world study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023:10.1007/s00262-023-03419-1. [PMID: 36897337 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03419-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phase II trials showed the efficacy of anti-HER2 RC48-ADC (disitamab vedotin) for HER2-positive metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study evaluated RC48 alone verses in combination with immunotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic UC using real-world data. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter, real-world study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received RC48 in five hospitals in China between July 2021 and April 2022. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included. The patients were 47-87 years, and 26 (72.2%) were male. Eighteen patients received RC48 alone, and 18 received RC48 combined with a programmed death-1 antibody. The median PFS was 5.4 months. The median OS was not reached. The 6-month and 1-year PFS rates were 38.8% and 15.5%, respectively. The 1-year OS rate was 79.6%. Fourteen (38.9%) patients achieved a partial response, and the ORR was 38.9%. Eleven patients had stable disease, and the DCR was 69.4%. The median PFS for patients who received RC48 combined with immunotherapy and those who received RC48 alone was 8.5 and 5.4 months, respectively. The main treatment-related adverse events included anemia, hypoesthesia, fatigue, and elevated transaminase. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION RC48 alone or combined with immunotherapy might benefit patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC, regardless of impaired renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiting Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Manming Cao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Yuexiu District, 107 Yanjiangxi Road, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Tao Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yanjiangxi Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China
| | - Lingru Meng
- Ward 2, Department of Oncology, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Zhousan Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zike Qin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651, Dongfeng East Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li Z, He L, Li X, Yao K, Liu Y, Qin Z, Ye Y, Zhou F, Liu Z. Preliminary results from a phase II study of tislelizumab combined with radiotherapy as bladder-preserving treatment for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC) unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
510 Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) was recommended to patients (pts) with HR NMIBC BCG-unresponsive papillary tumors. Clinical unmet need was to explore non-surgical treatment options for pts who were ineligible for or refused RC. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with radiotherapy as bladder-preserving treatment for pts with HR NMIBC unresponsive to BCG. Methods: This open-label, single arm phase II study enrolled pts with HR NMIBC BCG-unresponsive papillary tumors (high-grade Ta or T1 tumors without carcinoma in situ). The papillary tumors should be removed all visible lesions by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Within 2 weeks after TURBT, eligible pts received tislelizumab 200 mg in day 1 (D1), every 21 days for eight cycles and a total radiotherapy dose of 60-66 GY in 30-33 fractions over seven weeks. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 12 months (defined as no reappearance of high grade or T1 tumors or clinical stage development after the therapy). Secondary end points were bladder-preservation rate, OS and safety. Our study anticipated a DFS rate at 12 months was 45% and the study would enroll 32 pts to meet the primary endpoint. Results: By Sep. 2022, 14 eligible pts were enrolled. Ten pts have completed therapy and were analyzed (male 90.0%; median age 58 years (31-79); pure TCC 100%; median tumor size 1.0 cm (0.5-2.0); 40% multiple papillary tumours; median eGFR, 91.1 mL/(min•1.73m2) (46.1-115.5); high-grade Ta 40.0%, T1 60.0%; median of 11 previous BCG instillations (9-19)). Median follow-up was 20.3 months (9.9-28.1), the median number of tislelizumab cycles was 8 (2-8) and radiotherapy doses was 60 GY (60-66) in 30 fractions. The DFS rate at 12 month was 80.0% (95%CI, 67.4%-92.6%), at 24 month was 60.0% (95%CI, 40.3%-79.7%). Two pts showed reappearance of high-grade Ta and received TURBT, one patient showed stage development from T1N0M0 to M1 disease and received systemic treatment. The bladder-preservation rate at 24 months was 100% (95%CI, 100%-100%). The OS rate at 24 months was 100% (95%CI, 100%-100%). Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were rash (40.0%), neutropenia (10.0%), hyperthyroidism (10.0%), AST/ALT increased (10.0%) and hyperglycaemia (10.0%). 5 pts experienced immune related AEs, including rash (n=4, G1-2), hyperthyroidism (n=1, G2), hyperglycaemia (n=1, G3) and AST/ALT increased (n=1, G3). Conclusions: Our preliminary results supported the use of tislelizumab combined with radiotherapy as a promising bladder-preserving therapy for pts with BCG-unresponsive HR NMIBC who were ineligible for or refused RC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000035275 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zike Qin
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yan R, Ma H, Jiang L, Guo S, Shi Y, Sheng X, Zhang Y, Spiess PE, Liu T, Xue T, Chen X, Li Z, An X, Yao K, Zhou F, Han H. First-line programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade, combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, for stage IV penile cancer. BJU Int 2023; 131:198-207. [PMID: 35704436 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the anti-tumour activity and safety of anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody plus epidermal growth factor receptor blockade combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (PEP) as first-line therapy for stage IV penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 17 patients with stage IV PSCC undergoing first-line PEP at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2018 and September 2021. Clinical responses were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS Of 17 patients who received first-line PEP, 13 were observed to have partial responses. Twelve patients subsequently received consolidated surgery. Nine of these achieved pN0 status, of whom six with locally advanced PSCC achieved pathological complete response. The median (range) follow-up time was 24.87 (3.63-29.40) months. Median PFS and median OS were not reached, with 2-year PFS and OS rates being 68.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.7-96.1) and 62.9% (95% CI 41.6-95), respectively. Eight patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs. No Grade 5 AEs or death associated with treatment was observed. CONCLUSIONS Anti-PD-1 antibody plus epidermal growth factor receptor blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising anti-tumour activity, acceptable toxicity, and satisfying long-term survival for stage IV PSCC. Larger clinical trials are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru Yan
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huali Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijuan Jiang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinan Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yijun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tingyu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Xue
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofeng Chen
- Department of Urology, The First People's Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin An
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yao K, Chen Y, Ye Y, Wu Z, Chen D, Han H, Li Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Qin Z, Li Y, Li Z, Zhou F. Expression of Concern: Lymph Node Mapping in Patients with Penile Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Urol 2023:101097JU0000000000003191. [PMID: 36722209 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Yao
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Chen
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiming Wu
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Chen
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zaishang Li
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zike Qin
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Li
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- From the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wu C, Guo S, Zhuo S, Wang Y, Ye Y, Li Z, Mou Y, Yang X, Zhang Z, Dong P, Zhou F, Han H. Better specificity and less ischemia: three-dimensional reconstruction is superior to routine computed tomography angiography in navigation of super-selective clamping robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:97-111. [PMID: 36760875 PMCID: PMC9906112 DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Available technologies could be used to guide surgeons in controlling highly selective tumor-bearing arteries robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN). Methods Patients undergoing RALPN (from September 2018 to January 2020) for intermediate-high complex renal tumor (R.E.N.A.L. score ≥7) who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with angiography and hyper-accuracy 3-dimensional reconstruction (H3DR). All patients underwent high-resolution CT scan with angiography and H3DR with special software, based on which two kinds of highly selective arterial clamp protocols were made for each patient and analyzed independently by two urologists and two radiologists to confirm which renal arterial branch was supplying the tumor. We chose the optimized clamping protocol with the principle of the minimized ischemic regions. During the operation, meticulous microdissection and clip ligation of the specific vascular branch was guided by optimized protocol [H3DR or computed tomography angiography (CTA) reconstruction], according to the in vivo anatomy (identified by intraoperative ultrasound). Results Of 82 patients, the minimum-ischemic regions planning completed rate (MIRPCR) of preoperative planning with H3DR (90.2%) was higher than that with CTA (34.1%) (P<0.01). H3DR identified 78 high-order arteries (70.3%), whereas CTA identified 33 (29.7%) high-order arteries (P<0.001). H3DR detected a more optimal blocking option in 51 cases that were either missed (n=13) or misclassified by CTA (n=38). A total of 18 cases (56.3%) were converted to H3DR-guided occurred in CTA-guided surgery [5 (10.0%) occurred in group H3DR to CTA, P<0.01]. Moreover, in the CTA-guided group, the separation of renal hilum was avoided in 14 of 19 (73.7%) cases, whereas in the H3DR-guided group, it was avoided in 60 of 63 (95.3%) cases. Conclusions For patients undergoing RALPN, H3DR-guided surgery compared with standard CTA-guided surgery has higher accuracy and feasibility in controlling arterial branches supplying the tumor and intraoperative surgical navigation. Additionally, it reduces the ischemic lesion area and simplifies vascular isolation steps, thus decreasing procedural difficulty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuiqing Zhuo
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zaishang Li
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The Second Clinic Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China;,Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Minimally Invasive Urology of Shenzhen Research and Development Center of Medical Engineering and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yonggao Mou
- Department of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangyun Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li Y, Zheng R, Zhang Y, Huang C, Tian L, Liu R, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Han H, Zhou F, He L, Dong P. Special issue "The advance of solid tumor research in China": 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for evaluating primary and metastatic lesions in different histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:42-50. [PMID: 35751420 PMCID: PMC9796964 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Conventional imaging examinations are not sensitive enough for the early detection of recurrent or metastatic lesions in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. We aimed to explore the role of 68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in such patients. We retrospectively analyzed 50 RCC patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT from November 2017 to December 2020. We observed a higher median accuracy and tumor-to-background maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax ) ratio (TBR) of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in clear cell RCC (ccRCC; 96.57% and 6.00, respectively) than in non-clear cell RCC (ncRCC; 82.05% and 2.99, respectively). The accuracies in detecting lesions in the renal region, bone, lymph nodes and lungs in ccRCC were 100.00%, 95.00%, 98.08% and 75.00%, respectively, and those in the renal region, bone and lymph nodes in ncRCC were 100.00%, 86.67% and 36.36%, respectively. The median TBRs of the lesions from the above locations were 0.38, 10.96, 6.69 and 13.71, respectively, in ccRCC and 0.13, 4.02 and 0.73, respectively, in ncRCC. The PSMA score evaluated with immunohistochemistry was correlated with the SUVmax (P = .046) in RCC. Higher PSMA scores were observed in ccRCC than in ncRCC (P = .031). 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT resulted in changes in clinical management in 12.9% (4/31) of cases because of the discovery of new metastases not detected with conventional imaging. These results indicate that 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is a promising method for the detection of metastatic lesions in ccRCC, especially for those in the bone and lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Li
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Rongliang Zheng
- Department of Nuclear MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yijun Zhang
- Department of PathologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Chaoyun Huang
- Department of PathologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Li Tian
- Department of RadiologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Ruiqi Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sheng X, Ye D, Zhou A, Yao X, Luo H, He Z, Wang Z, Zhao Y, Ji Z, Zou Q, He C, Guo J, Tu X, Liu Z, Shi B, Liu B, Chen P, Wei Q, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Jiang K, Zhou F, Wu D, Fu C, Li X, Wu B, Wang L, Qin S, Li G, Liu Y, Guo H, Chen K, Zhang D, Wang G, Ding L, Wang Y, Yuan X, Guo J. Efficacy and safety of vorolanib plus everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A three-arm, randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase III study (CONCEPT). Eur J Cancer 2023; 178:205-215. [PMID: 36459768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vorolanib is a highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. This three-arm, randomised, registered study aimed to assess the combination of vorolanib and everolimus or vorolanib alone versus a control arm of everolimus as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who had received one prior VEGFR-TKI were randomised (1:1:1) to receive the combination of vorolanib and everolimus or either monotherapy. Patients with brain metastases were excluded. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. RESULTS Between 10th March 2017 and 30th May 2019, 399 patients (133 in each group) were enrolled. By the cutoff date (30th April 2020), a significant improvement in PFS was detected in the combination group compared with the everolimus group (10.0 versus 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.70; P = 0.0171). PFS was similar between the vorolanib group and the everolimus group (median: 6.4 versus 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.94; P = 0.6856). A significantly higher objective response rate was observed in the combination group than in the everolimus group (24.8% versus 8.3%; P = 0.0003), whereas there was no significant difference between the vorolanib group and the everolimus group (10.5% versus 8.3%; P = 0.5278). The overall survival data were immature. A total of 96 (72.2%), 52 (39.1%) and 71 (53.4%) grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in the combination group, vorolanib group and everolimus group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The addition of vorolanib to everolimus as 2nd-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who have experienced cancer progression after VEGFR-TKI therapy provided a better objective response rate and PFS than everolimus alone with a manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03095040; Chinadrugtrials, CTR20160987.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinan Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zengjun Wang
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yingchao Zhao
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Urology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Zou
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Chaohong He
- Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinhua Tu
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Province Tumor Hospital, Nanchang, China
| | - Ziling Liu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ben Liu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medical, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhiquan Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Gastroenterology Department II, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Kui Jiang
- Department of Gynecological and Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dapeng Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Cheng Fu
- Department of Urology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Xingya Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lijie Wang
- Department of Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Oncology, Qinhuai Medical Area, Theater General Hospital of PLA, Nanjing, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yunpeng Liu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Kehe Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology II, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Dahong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Lieming Ding
- Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaobin Yuan
- Betta Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tian L, Li Z, Wu K, Dong P, Liu H, Wu S, Zhou F. The clinical significance of computed tomography texture features of renal cell carcinoma in predicting pathological T1–3 staging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:2415-2425. [PMID: 37064352 PMCID: PMC10102748 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Precise T staging is an important prerequisite for the treatment decisions of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to predict the pathological T1-3 staging of RCC with an automatic multiclass T staging prediction mode. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients with pathologically proven RCC that was newly diagnosed and untreated from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and randomly split these patients into a training set (70%) and an internal testing set (30%). We enrolled additional 29 patients with pathologically proven RCC from The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University as the external testing set. We used the training set data to establish a prediction model for pathological T1-3 staging of RCC and validated the effect of the training model using the internal and external testing sets. Quantitative decomposition of the prediction model was conducted to explore the contribution of each extracted feature. Results The computed tomography (CT) images of 100 patients (37, 29, and 34 patients with T1, T2, and T3 staging, respectively, according to the eighth tumor-node-metastasis staging system) were used to establish the prediction model for T staging using delineation of the target area, image segmentation, and feature extraction. The micro area under the curve (AUC) and macro-AUC of the model were 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-1.00] and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-1.00), respectively. In terms of validation with the external testing set, the micro-AUC and macro-AUC were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.84) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.88), respectively. Conclusions Our prediction model showed good performance in predicting the pathological T1-3 staging of RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Tian
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhe Li
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, China
| | - Kai Wu
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanlin Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, China
| | - Song Wu
- Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Guo SJ, Wei LC, Zhuo SQ, Wang YJ, Yang XY, Zhang ZL, Dong P, Zhou FJ, Han H. [Clinical analysis of three-dimensional surgical planning system for guiding robot-assisted selective artery clamping partial nephrectomy in completely endophytic renal tumor]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2022; 60:992-998. [PMID: 36323581 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211216-00608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the safety and feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning system for guiding robot-assisted selective artery clamping partial nephrectomy (RASPN) in completely endophytic renal tumor. Methods: Clinical data of 32 patients who suffered from completely endophytic renal tumor and underwent RASPN associated with 3D surgical planning system in Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center from November 2018 to August 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 21 males and 11 females, with the age (M (IQR)] of 45.0 (17.5) years (range: 30 to 68 years). Fifteen tumors were located on the left and 17 on the right. Maximum tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L. Score and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 27.5 (13.0) mm (range: 14 to 50 mm), 10.0 (1.8) (range: 7 to 11), and 105.5 (15.7) ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 (range: 71.1 to 124.8 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1), respectively. The 3D reconstruction before RASPN was performed in all patients to formulate surgical planning, mainly including stereo localization of renal mass, confirmation of tumor feeding artery, and injury prediction of collecting system or vessel via "2 mm distance method" defined as probable damage of renal pelvis/calyx and artery/vein when these tissues were less than 2 mm away from tumor. Results: Totally 32 patients successfully underwent RASPN guided by 3D surgical planning system, without conversion to open operation or radical nephrectomy. Rapid location of tumor and selective clamping of artery were achieved in all cases and no one encountered global ischemia, with branch occlusion time of 24.5 (15.4) min (range: 12 to 60 min) and coincidence rate of 95.0% (57/60) between planned and actual clamping vessels. The sensitivity and specificity of 2 mm distance method for predicting the injury of collecting system were 13/15 and 17/17, respectively. The operating time of 185 (48) minuetes (range: 76 to 295 minutes) and estimated blood loss of 200 (350) ml (range: 20 to 800 ml) were observed, without intraoperative transfusion case. There was one patient performed with renal vein repair. Clavien-Dindo postoperative grade Ⅱ and Ⅲa bleeding complications occurred in 2 cases, and no postoperative urinary fistula was found. The length of hospitalization was 3 (0) days (range: 2 to 10 days). The pathological diagnosis demonstrated 4 chromophobe cell carcinomas and 2 angiomyolipomas, besides 26 clear cell carcinomas including one positive surgical margin. The postoperative latest eGFR was 103.9(18.5) ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 (range: 75.8 to 122.3 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1) and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was detected during the follow-up time of 15.4 (13.9) months (range: 3 to 35 months). Conclusion: For RASPN in completely endophytic renal tumor, 3D surgical planning system is contributed to determining mass position, defining tumor feeding artery, and predicting collecting system/vessel injury, which benefited precise tumor resection, postoperative renal function preservation, and perioperative urinary fistula and bleeding complication decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - L C Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - S Q Zhuo
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y J Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X Y Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z L Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - H Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhao DW, Zhou ZH, Zhao JL, Chen D, Yang ZY, Wang J, Long XB, Zhang YJ, Yang P, Cao Y, Li JB, Zhou FJ, Li YH. [Landscape and metastases of the lymph nodes in prostatic anterior fat pad at radical prostatectomy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2022; 60:999-1003. [PMID: 36323582 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220224-00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the landscape and metastases of the lymph nodes in prostatic anterior fat pad (PAFP) at radical prostatectomy (RP), and to describe the clinical characteristic of the patients with lymph node metastases in PAFP. Methods: The clinical and pathological data of 287 prostate cancer patients underwent RP from December 2019 to August 2021 in Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were collected and analyzed retrospectively. All patients were male, aging (66±7) years (range: 42 to 83 years). The preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (M(IQR)) were 16.00(29.64) μg/L (range: 0.01 to 99.90 μg/L). There were 244 patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer and 43 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. All PAFP were dissected at RP routinely and were sent for pathologic analysis respectively. The PAFP was dissected from the prostate apex caudally toward the bladder neck and dissection extended to the joint of the prostate and the endopelvic fascia bilaterally. All the specimen of PAFP were examined and reported by subspecialty pathologists of genitourinary tumors. Statistical analysis was performed by Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results: There were 8.0% (23/287) patients with lymph nodes in PAFP, 3.8% (11/287) patients with PAFP lymph node metastases. Pathologically upstaged occurred in 1 patient due to the PAFP lymph node as the solitary metastatic lesion. Patients with lymph node metastases in PAFP presented higher preoperative PSA (M(IQR): 48.2(73.0) μg/L vs. 15.4(26.5) μg/L, Z=3.158, P=0.002), clinical T stage and N stage (Z=2.977, P=0.003; Z=2.780, P=0.005) and preoperative Gleason score (Z=2.205, P=0.027). Conclusions: Routine dissection of PAFP at RP and separately pathological analysis may allow more lymph nodes and lymph node metastases detection. More accurate pathological N stage may be acquired and consequently may improve the survival of patients by offering more appropriate adjuvant or salvage therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z H Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - J L Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - D Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Z Y Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - J Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - X B Long
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y J Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - P Yang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y Cao
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - J B Li
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - F J Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Y H Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collabrative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dong P, Zhang X, Peng Y, Zhang Y, Liu R, Li Y, Pan Q, Wei W, Guo S, Zhang Z, Han H, Zhou F, Liu Y, He L. Genomic Characteristics and Single-Cell Profiles After Immunotherapy in Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4807-4819. [PMID: 36074152 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHRCC) is highly malignant, but the urgent need for effective treatment remains unmet. We aimed to analyze the genomic characteristics and microenvironment of FHRCC and the cause of heterogeneous response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment at single-cell level. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Whole-exome sequencing and IHC staining analyses were performed in 30 advanced FHRCC patients. Single-cell RNA sequencing following ICI-based treatment was conducted in 4 patients. The clinical characteristics, therapeutic effect, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS The median tumor mutation burden was only 0.14 mutations per megabase. IHC staining showed an immune-active tumor microenvironment characterized by extensive CD8+ T-cell infiltration. ATM expression was inversely correlated with percentage of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Trajectory analysis indicated gradually upregulated exhausted markers and an increased apoptotic trend of CD8+ T cells despite continuous exposure to ICI-based treatment. ICI-based treatment was associated with improved overall response rate (17.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.046) and disease control rate (DCR; 64.7% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.004) compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Among patients with germline mutation, the ORR (16.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.086) and the DCR (66.7% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.011) were higher after ICI-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS Immune infiltration is frequent in FHRCC. ICI-based treatment is a promising regimen, and treatment response depends on the functional status of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. ICI-based treatment cannot reverse the exhaustion of CD8+ T cells in patients with progressive disease, highlighting the need for additional therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyue Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yijun Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yilin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiwen Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhou FJ, Wu HZ, Li JW, Feng HY, Huang SS, Chen L, Liao QH, Wen WP. [Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in Guangdong province from 2016 to 2020]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2022; 43:1568-1574. [PMID: 36456488 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20220121-00059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Guangdong province from 2016 to 2020 and provide evidence for the prevention and control of pulmonary TB. Methods: Descriptive epidemiological methods were used to analyze the incidence data of pulmonary TB reported in Guangdong from 2016 to 2020. Dynamic geometric series averaging and circular distribution methods were used to reveal the epidemic pattern. Results: A total of 356 748 pulmonary TB cases were reported in Guangdong from 2016 to 2020. The reported incidence of pulmonary TB decreased from 71.82/100 000 to 50.40/100 000 (trend χ2=6 905.57,P<0.001) , with an annual decline rate of 8.47%. Results from the circular distribution methods showed that the incidence peak would occur on May 4th-5th (Z=1 176.96,P<0.05), and the incidence was relatively higher in May compared with other months. The area distribution of the pulmonary TB epidemic was uneven, and the reported average annual incidence was in the order of the eastern area (72.15/100 000), the northern area (68.14/100 000), the western area (65.31/100 000) and the Pearl River Delta area (60.05/100 000). Results of dynamic geometric series averaging analysis showed a declining trend in the reported incidence of pulmonary TB in all areas, except Dongguan, with the average growth rate less than 0.00. The decline rate in the eastern area (-10.90%) and northern area (-10.63%) was higher than the provincial average (-8.47%). The male to female ratio of the cases was 2.63∶1 (258 562∶98 186). The reported average annual pulmonary TB incidence in men (88.37/100 000) was higher than that in women (36.86/100 000), the difference was significant (χ2=75.19, P<0.001). The reported incidence of pulmonary TB generally increased with age (trendχ2=123 849.44, P<0.001), and reached peak in age group ≥65 years (164.54/100 000). Dynamic geometric series averaging analysis showed an increasing trend of the reported pulmonary TB incidence in age groups 5-14 years and 15-24 years, with the average growth rate of 0.05% and 3.60%. Conclusions: The reported annual incidence of pulmonary TB showed a declining trend year by year in Guangdong from 2016 to 2020. However, an increasing incidence was reported in children and adolescents. Active case finding should be strengthened in the elderly and other key populations. With comprehensive TB prevention and control measures, it is still necessary to pay attention to the prevention and control of pulmonary TB in men, low-income groups and less developed areas in Guangdong and strengthen the comprehensive prevention and control in winter and spring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F J Zhou
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - H Z Wu
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - J W Li
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - H Y Feng
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - S S Huang
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - L Chen
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Q H Liao
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - W P Wen
- Department of Control and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Center for Tuberculosis Control, Guangzhou 510630, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yuan G, Chen X, Liu Z, Wei W, Shu Q, Abou-Hamdan H, Jiang L, Li X, Chen R, Désaubry L, Zhou F, Xie D. Correction: Flavagline analog FL3 induces cell cycle arrest in urothelial carcinoma cell of the bladder by inhibiting the Akt/PHB interaction to activate the GADD45α pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022; 41:291. [PMID: 36180869 PMCID: PMC9524036 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02502-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
35
|
Ning K, Li Z, Liu H, Tian X, Wang J, Wu Y, Xiong L, Zou X, Peng Y, Zhou Z, Zhou F, Yu C, Luo J, Zhang H, Dong P, Zhang Z. Perirenal Fat Thickness Significantly Associated with Prognosis of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-VEGF Therapy. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14163388. [PMID: 36014894 PMCID: PMC9412489 DOI: 10.3390/nu14163388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although high body mass index (BMI) was reported to associate with a better prognosis for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, it is an imperfect proxy for the body composition, especially in Asian patients with a lower BMI. The role of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and perirenal fat thickness (PRFT) in mRCC patients was still unknown. Therefore, a multicenter retrospective study of 358 Chinese mRCC patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy was conducted and their body composition was measured via computed tomography. We parameterized VAT, SAT and PRFT according to their median value and BMI according to Chinese criteria (overweight: BMI ≥ 24). We found VAT, SAT, and PRFT (all p < 0.05) but not BMI, significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate Cox analysis identified PRFT was the independent predictor of OS and PFS, and IMDC expanded with PRFT showed the highest C-index in predicting OS (OS:0.71) compared with VAT, SAT, and BMI. PRFT could increase the area under the curve of the traditional International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model in OS (70.54% increase to 74.71%) and PFS (72.22% increase to 75.03%). PRFT was introduced to improve the IMDC model and PRFT-modified IMDC demonstrated higher AIC in predicting OS and PFS compared with the traditional IMDC model. Gene sequencing analysis (n = 6) revealed that patients with high PRFT had increased angiogenesis gene signatures (NES = 1.46, p = 0.04) which might explain why better drug response to anti-VEGF therapy in mRCC patients with high PRFT. The main limitation is retrospective design. This study suggests body composition, especially PRFT, is significantly associated with prognosis in Chinese mRCC patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy. PRFT-modified IMDC model proposed in this study has better clinical predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Huiming Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xi Tian
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 201102, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Junhang Luo
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Hailiang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 201102, China
- Correspondence: (H.Z.); (P.D.); (Z.Z.); Tel.: +86-13512738496 (P.D.); +86-13929527746 (Z.Z.); Fax: +86-87342318 (P.D.); +020-8734-3952 (Z.Z.)
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Correspondence: (H.Z.); (P.D.); (Z.Z.); Tel.: +86-13512738496 (P.D.); +86-13929527746 (Z.Z.); Fax: +86-87342318 (P.D.); +020-8734-3952 (Z.Z.)
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510080, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Correspondence: (H.Z.); (P.D.); (Z.Z.); Tel.: +86-13512738496 (P.D.); +86-13929527746 (Z.Z.); Fax: +86-87342318 (P.D.); +020-8734-3952 (Z.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu Q, Li Z, He L, Li K, Hu C, Chen J, Zhou F, Wang J, Li Y, Xiao H. Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of N6-Methyladenosine Regulators in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:914692. [PMID: 35814454 PMCID: PMC9257042 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.914692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a leading malignancy in the male population globally. N6-methylation of adenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent mRNA modification and plays an essential role in various biological processes in vivo. However, the potential roles of m6A in metastatic prostate cancer are largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated and identified two m6A modification patterns based on 21 m6A regulators in four public metastatic prostate cancer datasets. Different modification patterns correlated with distinct molecular characteristics. According to m6A-associated genes, we constructed a prognostic model, called m6Ascore, to predict the outcomes of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We found that high m6A score level was related to dismal prognosis and characterized by higher cell cycle, DNA repair and mismatch repair pathway score. In vitro experiments confirmed that upregulation of METTL14, an m6A writer, enhanced the invasion, metastasis, and sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Conversely, down-regulation of potential target genes of m6A had the opposite effect. Finally, we validated that a higher m6A score was associated with a worse prognosis and a higher Gleason score in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) cohort. This work illustrated the nonnegligible role of m6A modification in multiple biological processes of metastatic prostate cancer. Evaluating the m6A risk scores of individual tumours will guide more effective judgement of prognosis as well as treatments for metastatic prostate cancer in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Liu
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Plastic Surgery Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lizhao He
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ke Li
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Hu
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jialiang Chen
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jun Wang, ; Yonghong Li, ; Hengjun Xiao,
| | - Yonghong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jun Wang, ; Yonghong Li, ; Hengjun Xiao,
| | - Hengjun Xiao
- Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jun Wang, ; Yonghong Li, ; Hengjun Xiao,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tang H, Li X, Jiang L, Liu Z, Chen L, Chen J, Deng M, Zhou F, Zheng X, Liu Z. RITA1 drives the growth of bladder cancer cells by recruiting TRIM25 to facilitate the proteasomal degradation of RBPJ. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:3071-3084. [PMID: 35701858 PMCID: PMC9459252 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, but it lacks effective targeted therapy due to its elusive molecular mechanism. Therefore, it is important to further investigate the molecular mechanisms that mediate BC progression. By performing a tumor tissue–based gene microarray and shRNA library screening, we found that recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJ) interacting and tubulin associated 1 (RITA1) is crucial for the growth of BC cells. Moreover, RITA1 is aberrantly highly expressed in BC tissues and is also correlated with poor prognosis in patients with BC. Mechanistically, we determined that RITA1 recruits tripartite motif containing 25 (TRIM25) to ubiquitinate RBPJ to accelerate its degradation via proteasome, which leads to the transcriptional inhibition of Notch1 downstream targets. Our results suggest that aberrant high expression of RITA1 drives the growth of BC cells via the RITA1/TRIM25/RBPJ axis and RITA1 may serve as a promising therapeutic target for BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huancheng Tang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijuan Jiang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zefu Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiawei Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minhua Deng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xianchong Zheng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651, Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Qu W, Fu C, Han W, Sun Y, Quan J, Chen L, Luo H, Hu H, Niu Y, Xu D, Liao Y, Chen M, Hu C, Liu Y, Chen J, Liu L, Shi B, Chen G, Zhou F, Zhou AP. MRG002-006: A multicenter phase II clinical trial of MRG002-ADC for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4570 Background: Overexpression of HER-2 is associated with poor prognosis of urothelial cancer, and anti-HER-2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) has shown a promising efficacy among the UC patients (pts) in recently studies. MRG002 is a novel HER2-targeted ADC being investigated in the MRG002-006 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety in HER2 positive UC pts. Methods: This is a single-arm, multicenter phase II study. Eligibility criteria included: histologically HER2-positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) UC pts confirmed by a central-laboratory, ECOG PS 0-1, prior received ≥1 standard treatment. Approximately 40 pts will be enrolled. In the initial dose finding stage, pts were assigned to receive MRG002 at a dose of 2.6 mg/kg or 2.2 mg/kg administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The dose expanding stage was subsequentially performed based on preliminary results. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1, secondary endpoints are safety, DOR, PFS and, OS. Results: As of December 31, 2021, a total of 39 pts were enrolled. Enrollment is estimated be completed in February 28, 2022, and results are expected to be updated before publication. Nine pts were dosed at 2.6 mg/kg and 26 pts were dosed at 2.2 mg/kg. Based on safety analysis, 2.2 mg/kg was adopted as the recommended dosage. At baseline, 80% pts (28/35) had visceral metastasis. Most pts (28/35) received ≥ 2 lines of treatment and 29 (83%) pts had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. By the cut-off date, 23 pts were evaluable and the ORR was 65% (15/23, 95% CI: 44.9%–81.2%), with 9% CR, and the DCR was 91% (21/23, 95% CI: 73.2%–97.6%). The estimated median PFS for the 23 pts was 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.7–NR). Among the evaluable pts, 1 CR responder achieved a response duration of more than 9.5 months. Subgroup analysis indicated that the ORR was 65% among the 17 pts post ≥ 2 lines of treatment, and 78% among the 18 pts failed platinum-containing chemotherapy and ICI treatment. Most common treatment-related AEs determined by investigators were anemia (34%), alopecia (34%), AST increased (31%), neutrophil count decreased (26%), neuropathy peripheral (23%), constipation (17%), decreased appetite (17%); most were grade 1 or 2 per CTCAE 5.0. The incidence of SAE was 17% (6/35). At the dose of 2.6mg/kg, 1 pts discontinued the treatment due to hypotension and 1 pts experienced ileus, which was considered caused by neurotoxicity of MRG002. There were no similar events described above happened among the pts at the dose of 2.2mg/kg. Conclusions: Preliminary results of MRG002 demonstrated a clinically meaningful response in pretreated HER-2 positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC patients, especially in those progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy and ICI therapy. MRG002 at 2.2mg/kg showed a manageable safety profile in these pts. Further evaluation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04839510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Qu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Cheng Fu
- LiaoningCancerHospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Weiqing Han
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan Cancer Center, Changsha, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | - Lijun Chen
- Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hailong Hu
- Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yinong Niu
- Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Danfeng Xu
- Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Liao
- Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China
| | | | - Yongda Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jimin Chen
- The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lian Liu
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Guojun Chen
- Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ai-Ping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ye DW, Gu W, Han W, Luo H, Zhou F, He D, Ma L, Guo H, Liang C, Chong T, Jiang J, Chen Z, Wang Y, Zou Q, Tian Y, Xiao J, Huang J, Yang X, Li J, Jin C. A phase 3 trial of SHR3680 versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5005 Background: Both TITAN and ARCHES studies have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) plus ADT versus placebo plus ADT in the treatment of mHSPC. However, first-generation ARIs plus ADT is also widely used in clinic and how superior second-generation ARIs is to first-generation ones remains to be determined. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of SHR3680, a novel oral ARI, versus bicalutamide (Bica) in high-volume mHSPC. Methods: CHART is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study (NCT03520478). Patients (pts) with mHSPC were randomized 1:1 to ADT plus either SHR3680 (240 mg/d) or Bica (50 mg/d). All pts had high-volume disease adapted from the CHAARTED study. The primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by independent review committee (IRC) and overall survival (OS). As of May 16, 2021, 209 rPFS events per IRC and 153 deaths occurred and a preplanned interim analysis for rPFS was done. Results: 654 pts were randomized to receive SHR3680 (n = 326) or Bica (n = 328). At data cutoff, the median follow-up duration was 22.1 mo in SHR3680 group and 20.4 mo in Bica group. SHR3680 significantly reduced the risk of radiographic progression or death than Bica (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; p < 0.0001; median, not reached vs 25.1 mo). OS data were immature but an improved OS was observed in SHR3680 group compared to Bica group (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.80; p = 0.0009). All secondary efficacy endpoints favored SHR3680 plus ADT (Table). Frequencies of adverse events of any cause in any grade were similar between groups. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.2% and 13.9% of pts in SHR3680 and Bica groups, respectively. No seizure occurred in SHR3680 group. Conclusions: SHR3680 plus ADT significantly improved rPFS versus Bica plus ADT in pts with high-volume mHSPC, with a desirable safety profile. New drug application has been submitted to seek approval based on the data presented here. Clinical trial information: NCT03520478. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding-Wei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Weijie Gu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiqing Han
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Hunan Cancer Center, Changsha, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dalin He
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lulin Ma
- Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Chaozhao Liang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Tie Chong
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jun Jiang
- Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiwen Chen
- The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong Wang
- The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Qing Zou
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Beijing Friendly Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Xiao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinfeng Yang
- Clinical Research & Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Junliang Li
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Chunlei Jin
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
An X, Yan R, Guo S, Xue T, Ma H, Chen M, Zhou F, Yao K, Dong P, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Shi Y, Han H. Anti-EGFR antibody plus anti-PD-1 antibody and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen for patients with locally-advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5037 Background: Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. We performed a monocentric, Simon’s two-stage phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade plus anti-EGFR target therapy and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced PSCC. We previously reported promising results in the first stage. The enrollment of the second stage had been completed by January 2022, herein we reported the updated results. Methods: Patients with chemotherapy-naive, locally-advanced PSCC (cT4 or cTxN3M0) were enrolled. The neoadjuvant regimen consists of anti–PD-1 antibody toripalimab, anti–EGFR antibody nimotuzumab, and chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel plus cisplatin and ifosfamide). Curative surgery was performed following a maximum of four cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint is the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in two stages, with a median age of 57 (range 31-71) years. Till January 2022, 21 patients had completed the neoadjuvant treatment, 17 (81%) achieved an objective response, (CR 5, PR 12), 2 had SD, and 2 showed PD. Among 18 patients who underwent radical surgery, 11 showed no residual tumor on histopathology, with a pCR rate of 61.1% (11/18). The median follow-up time was 10.6 months. Two patients with PD died from disease, and 2 patients who experienced disease relapsed after radical surgery, in which 1 with SD, and 1 with PR. No relapse was observed among patients with pCR. The survival data are still immature. No unexpected toxicities and treatment-related death were recorded. Five out of 21 (23.8%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 (14.3%) patients with 10 used G-CSF prophylaxis. No febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grades 3 toxicities included 1 case of peripheral sensory neuropathy and 1 anemia. The most common grade 1/2 TRAEs were alopecia (100%), decreased appetite (85.7%), nausea (71.4%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (66.7%), anemia (66.7%), neutropenia (33.3%), and infusion-related reactions (28.6%). The most common immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) were grade 1/2 hypothyroidism (19.0%), and grade 1 hyperthyroidism (4.8%). No severe IRAEs including pneumonitis, colitis, and myocarditis were observed. Conclusions: The triple combination is a provoking safe and efficacious neoadjuvant regimen for patients with advanced PSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04475016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ru Yan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Huali Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meiting Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Yao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chen H, Sheng X, Hu B, Yao X, Liu Z, Yao X, Guo H, Hu Y, Ji Z, Luo H, Shi B, Liu J, WU J, Zhou F, He Z, Fan J, Huang Y, Guo J. Toripalimab (anti-PD-1) monotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (POLARIS-03): Two-year survival update and biomarker analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
4566 Background: Patients with advanced metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who experience disease progression after standard therapy have limited treatment options. Toripalimab was approved for the 2nd line treatment of mUC based on a phase II clinical study (POLARIS-03) in Chinese patients with mUC (NCT03113266). Here we report the two-year efficacy update and biomarker analysis of the study. Methods: Metastatic UC Patients received toripalimab 3 mg/kg Q2W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or voluntary withdrawal. Clinical response was assessed every 8 weeks by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. Tumor PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other biomarkers were evaluated for correlation with clinical response. Results: From May 2017 to September 2019, 151 patients were enrolled from 15 participating centers. By cutoff date of September 8, 2021, no emergent of new safety signal was identified compared with the previous one-year report. By the cutoff date, 3 CR, 37 PR and 28 SD were observed among the ITT population for an ORR of 26.5% and a DCR of 45.0% as assessed by the IRC. The response was durable as the median duration of response was 25.8 months. The median OS was 14.6 months. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on tumor biopsies and paired PBMCs and the results were available from 135 patients. The median TMB value was 4.1 mutations per million base pairs (Mb) in the cohort. Using 10 mutations/Mb as the cut off, TMB-high patients (n = 27) had better ORR than TMB low patients(n = 108) (48% versus 22%, p = 0.014). The TMB-high group also showed better PFS (12.9 versus 1.8 months, HR = 0.48 [95% CI:0.31-0.74], p < 0.001) and OS (not reached versus 10.0 months, HR = 0.53 [95% CI:0.32-0.88], p = 0.013) than the TMB low group. Patients with mutations in chromatin remodelers SMARCA4/PBRM1 or tumor suppressor RB1 were associated with better responses to toripalimab than patients with wild-type genes. The ORR was 30% (6/20) in patients with FGFR2/FGFR3 mutations or FGFR2/FGFR3 gene fusions, and 42% (5/12) in patients with NECTIN4 genomic alternations. The mutational signature characterized by exposure to aristolochic acid (A:T to T:A transversion) is present in both upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and lower tract urothelial carcinoma (LTUC), but enriched in UTUC (p = 0.003). Similar clinical responses were observed in UTUC and LTUC. Conclusions: Toripalimab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging clinical activity in metastatic UC patients refractory to 1st line chemotherapy. WES analysis identified divergent mutations in the study. We report the utility of TMB to predict not only the response rate but also the PFS and OS benefits in patients with mUC in response to an ICI monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03113266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haige Chen
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinan Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Hu
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institution, Shenyang, China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziling Liu
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Tianjin Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Yi Hu
- Department of Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiyan Liu
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin WU
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jinhai Fan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yiran Huang
- Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education, Beijing), Department of Melanoma & Sarcoma,Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liu Y, Zhang X, Ma H, Tian L, Mai L, Long W, Zhang Z, Han H, Zhou F, Dong P, He L. Locoregional recurrence after nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: Feasibility and outcomes of different treatment modalities. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4430-4439. [PMID: 35506551 PMCID: PMC9741970 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locoregional recurrence after nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare with diverse manifestations. The selection criteria and efficacy of different treatments are unanswered. The objective was to compare different treatment modalities and present data on stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for recurrent RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with locoregional recurrence after nephrectomy without distant metastasis were identified from institutional big data intelligence platform between 2001 and 2020. Patients receiving local therapy (surgery or SBRT) or systemic therapy alone (targeted therapy or PD-1 inhibitors) were divided into two groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression model. Patients were matched with propensity score matching. RESULTS Among 106 patients, 33 (31.1%) received systemic therapy alone and 73 (68.9%) received local therapy. Local therapy was surgery in 34 patients (32.1%) and SBRT in 39 (36.8%) patients. Patients treated with systemic therapy alone had more non-clear cell type (p = 0.044), more advanced T stage (p = 0.006), higher number (p = 0.043) but smaller size of lesions (p = 0.042). Patients receiving local therapy had significantly longer PFS than systemic therapy (19.7 vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.001). After matching, the PFS in the local therapy group remained higher (23.9 vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.001). The 2-year OS of the local therapy group and systemic therapy group was 91.6% and 71.8%, respectively (p = 0.084). Local therapy was associated with better PFS (HR 0.37; p = 0.0003) and OS (HR 0.23; p = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. Grade 2 or higher toxicities related to local therapy occurred in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS Local therapy could delay disease progression compared with systemic therapy alone. SBRT is safe and effective for locally recurrent RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Xinyue Zhang
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Huali Ma
- Department of RadiologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Li Tian
- Department of RadiologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Lixin Mai
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Wen Long
- Department of Nuclear MedicineSun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Hui Han
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of UrologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Li Y, Wang N, Zhao D, Wang J, Jiang L, Wang Y, Chen D, Wu Z, Zhou F, Yang Z. Cytoreductive prostate cryoablation and metronomic cyclophosphamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2373-2380. [PMID: 35440168 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study reports the outcomes of cytoreductive prostate cryoablation and metronomic cyclophosphamide for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Methods: Patients with mHSPC from the authors' prostate cancer database who had received cytoreductive prostate cryoablation and metronomic cyclophosphamide were identified retrospectively. Results: Eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients tolerated combination therapy. The median metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival was 62.5 months. Seven patients (87.5%) had a prostate-specific antigen nadir <0.1 ng/ml. Dysuria and hematuria before prostate cryoablation disappeared within 1 month after cryosurgery, and no incontinence was seen after prostate cryoablation. No local therapy was needed during follow-up. Conclusion: Cytoreductive prostate cryoablation and metronomic cyclophosphamide prove an effective and safe combination therapy for mHSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Diwei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Lijuan Jiang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yanjun Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhiming Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhenyu Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liu M, Li Y, Xing W, Zhang Y, Xie X, Pang J, Zhou F, Yang J. Monosaccharide-mediated rational synthesis of a universal plasmonic platform with broad spectral fluorescence enhancement for high-sensitivity cancer biomarker analysis. J Nanobiotechnology 2022; 20:184. [PMID: 35399094 PMCID: PMC8995057 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01359-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Effective and accurate screening of oncological biomarkers in peripheral blood circulation plays an increasingly vital role in diagnosis and prognosis. High-sensitivity assays can effectively aid clinical decision-making and intervene in cancer in a localized status before they metastasize and become unmanageable. Meanwhile, it is equally pivotal to prevent overdiagnosis of non-life-threatening cancer by eliminating unnecessary treatment and repeated blood draws. Unfortunately, current clinical screening methodologies can hardly simultaneously attain sufficient sensitivity and specificity, especially under resource-restrained circumstances. To circumvent such limitations, particularly for cancer biomarkers from early-onset and recurrence, we aim to develop a universal plasmonic platform for clinical applications, which macroscopically amplifies multiplexed fluorescence signals in a broad spectral window and readily adapts to current assay setups without sophisticated accessories or expertise at low cost.
Methods
The plasmonic substrate was chemically synthesized in situ at the solid–liquid interface by rationally screening a panel of reducing monosaccharides and tuning the redox reactions at various catalyst densities and precursor concentrations. The redox properties were studied by Benedict’s assay and electrochemistry. We systemically characterized the morphologies and optical properties of the engineered plasmonic Ag structures by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and spectroscopy. The structure-fluorescence enhancement correlation was explicitly explained by the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation and a computational model for gap distribution. Next, we established an enhanced fluoroimmunoassay (eFIA) using a model biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) and validated it in healthy and PCa cohorts. Prognosis was explored in patients subject to surgical and hormonal interventions following recommended PCa guidelines.
Results
The monosaccharide-mediated redox reaction yielded a broad category of Ag structures, including sparsely dispersed nanoparticles (NPs) of various sizes, semi-continuous nanoislands, and crackless continuous films. Optimal broad-spectral fluorescence enhancement from green to far-red was observed for the inhomogeneous, irregularly-shaped semi-continuous Ag nanoisland substrate (AgNIS), synthesized from a well-balanced redox reaction at a stable rate mediated by mannose. In addition, different local electric field intensity distributions in response to various incident excitations were observed at the nanoscale, elucidating the need for irregular and inhomogeneous structures. AgNIS enabled a maximized 54.7-fold macroscopically amplified fluorescence and long-lasting photostability. Point-of-care availability was fulfilled using a customized smartphone prototype with well-paired optics. The eFIA effectively detected the PCa marker in cell lines, xenograft tumors, and patient sera. The plasmonic platform rendered a diagnostic sensitivity of 86.0% and a specificity of 94.7% and capably staged high-grade PCa that the clinical gold standard test failed to stratify. Patient prognosis of robotic-assisted surgeries and hormone therapies was non-invasively monitored following efficient medical interventions. The assay time was significantly curtailed on the plasmonic platform upon microwave irradiation.
Conclusions
By investigating the effects of reducing monosaccharides on the seed-mediated chemical synthesis of plasmonic Ag structures, we deduced that potent multiplexed fluorescence enhancement originated from both an adequate reducing power and a steady reduction rate. Furthermore, the inhomogeneous structure with adequate medium gap distances afforded optimal multiwavelength fluorescence enhancement, thus empowering an effective eFIA for PCa. The clinically validated diagnostic and prognostic features, along with the low sample volume, point-of-care feasibility with a smartphone, and microwave-shortened assay time, warrant its potential clinical translation for widespread cancer biomarker analysis.
Graphical Abstract
Collapse
|
45
|
Wu Z, Peng Y, Xiong L, Wang J, Li Z, Ning K, Deng M, Wang N, Wei W, Li Z, Dong P, Yu C, Zhou F, Zhang Z. Role of Sam68 in Sunitinib induced renal cell carcinoma apoptosis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:3674-3686. [PMID: 35476809 PMCID: PMC9554455 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Sunitinib is one of the first‐line targeted drugs for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with dual effects of antiangiogensis and proapoptosis. Sam68 (Src‐associated in mitosis, 68 KDa), is found being involved in cell apoptosis. This article reveals that Sam68 impacts the sensitivity to sunitinib by mediating the apoptosis of RCC cells. Immunohistochemical staining indicated that the Sam68 expression levels in sunitinib sensitive tumor tissues were markedly higher than those in sunitinib resistant tumor tissues. Sunitinib induced RCC cell apoptosis in a concentration‐dependent manner and inhibited the expression of total and phosphorylated Sam68 (p‐Sam68). Downregulation of Sam68 expression inhibited RCC cell apoptosis induced by sunitinib. While upregulation of Sam68 expression could enhance apoptosis induced by sunitinib. Xenograft models showed that tumors in the Sam68‐knockdown group did not shrink as much as those in the control group after treatment with sunitinib for 4 weeks. Together, our results suggest that Sam68 expression is associated with the sensitivity of ccRCC patients to sunitinib. Sam68 may promote cell apoptosis induced by sunitinib, and the Sam68 expression level may be a biomarker for predicting sunitinib sensitivity in ccRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeshen Wu
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Minhua Deng
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China Guangzhou China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ning K, Wu Z, Zou X, Liu H, Wu Y, Xiong L, Yu C, Guo S, Han H, Zhou F, Dong P, Zhang Z. Immune checkpoint inhibitors further aggravate proteinuria in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after long-term targeted therapy. Transl Androl Urol 2022. [PMID: 35402197 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-1015.pmid:35402197;pmcid:pmc898497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing number of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are receiving subsequent programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combination therapy following tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance. To explore whether PD-1 inhibitor would further deteriorate proteinuria and renal function, we observed their proteinuria's and renal function's condition since the administration of PD-1 inhibitor. METHODS To assess the change in proteinuria and renal function, the data of 141 patients with mRCC treated with TKI were collected, 66 of whom were further prescribed PD-1 inhibitor. Proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured and analyzed. Logistic regression models were established to identify the predictors of proteinuria deterioration and significant eGFR decline (≥15%). RESULTS Of the 141 patients, 74 (52%) had an increase in proteinuria level after an average of 22.98 months of TKI treatment. In multivariate analysis, longer duration of TKI (>12 months) and administration of PD-1 inhibitor were independent predictors for proteinuria deterioration. The median eGFR decreased from 81.56 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 66.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 after TKI treatment. Logistic regression identified older age (>60 years old) and longer duration of TKI (>12 months) as independent predictors for significant eGFR decline. Finally, of the 66 patients who received subsequent PD-1 inhibitor, 34 had sufficient proteinuria and eGFR data at follow-up. The level of proteinuria increased further after the administration of PD-1 inhibitor, although the decrease in eGFR was not statistically significant (P=0.182). Log-rank analysis identified proteinuria deterioration and eGFR decline were both significantly associated with patent's survival (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Targeted therapy was associated with an increase in proteinuria level and a decrease in eGFR in patients with mRCC. The administration of PD-1 inhibitor contributed to exacerbation in proteinuria, but no significant difference in a decrease of eGFR was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zeshen Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiming Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sheng X, Chen H, Hu B, Yao X, Liu Z, Yao X, Guo H, Hu Y, Ji Z, Luo H, Shi B, Liu J, WU J, Zhou F, He Z, Fan J, Huang Y, Guo J. Recombinant humanized Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody toripalimab in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (POLARIS-03 study): Two-year survival update and biomarker analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
508 Background: Patients with advanced metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who experience disease progression after standard therapy have limited treatment options. Toripalimab was approved for the 2nd line treatment of mUC based on a phase II clinical study (POLARIS-03) in Chinese patients with mUC (Clinical trial ID: NCT03113266). Here we report the two-year OS update and biomarker analysis of the study. Methods: Metastatic UC Patients received toripalimab 3 mg/kg Q2W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or voluntary withdrawal. Clinical response was assessed every 8 weeks. Tumor PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other biomarkers were evaluated for correlation with clinical response. Results: From May 2017 to September 2019, 204 patients were screened and 151 patients were enrolled from 15 participating centers. By cutoff date of September 8, 2021, no emergent of new safety signal was identified compared with the previous one-year report. By the cutoff date, 91 patients have died, and the median OS was 14.6 months. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on tumor biopsies and paired PBMCs and the results were available from 135 patients. Patients with mutations in chromatin remodelers SMARCA4/PBRM1 or tumor suppressor RB1 were associated with better responses to toripalimab than patients with wild-type genes. The ORR was 30% (6/20) in patients with FGFR2/FGFR3 mutations or FGFR2/FGFR3 gene fusions, and 42% (5/12) in patients with NECTIN4 genomic alternations. The median TMB value was 4.1 mutations per million base pairs (Mb) in the cohort. Using 10 mutations/Mb as the cut off, TMB-high patients (n = 27) had better ORR than TMB low patients(n = 108) (48% versus 22%, p = 0.014). The TMB-high group also showed better PFS (12.9 versus 1.8 months, HR = 0.48 [95% CI:0.31-0.74], p < 0.001) and OS (not reached versus 10.0 months, HR = 0.53 [95% CI:0.32-0.88], p = 0.013) than the TMB low group. Conclusions: Toripalimab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging clinical activity in metastatic UC patients refractory to 1st line chemotherapy. WES analysis identified divergent mutations in the study. We report the utility of TMB to predict not only the response rate but also the PFS and OS benefits in patients with mUC in response to an ICI monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03113266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinan Sheng
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Haige Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Hu
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institution, Shenyang, China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziling Liu
- Department of Cancer Centre, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Tianjin Cancer Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Urinary Surgery Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Oncology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Ji
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Department of Urology Surgery, Chongqing Cancer hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiyan Liu
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin WU
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jinhai Fan
- First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’An Jiao Tong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yiran Huang
- Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chen B, Zhou FJ, Yang F, Lian JJ, Ye TR, Wu HY, Wang LM, Song N, Liu YY, Hui AY. Enhanced sequestration of molybdenum(VI) using composite constructed wetlands and responses of microbial communities. Water Sci Technol 2022; 85:1065-1078. [PMID: 35228354 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The molybdenum (Mo) non-point source pollution in the mining area has an irreversible impact on the surrounding water and soil ecosystems. Herein, three integrated vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands (CWs) were constructed to assess the effects of combination substrates and plant on the removal of Mo(VI). Results showed that CW1 with combination substrates and cattail exhibited a favorable removal performance for Mo(VI) at 80.90%. Moreover, most Mo(VI) retained in the CWs was retained in the substrate (58.13-88.04%), and the largest fraction of Mo(VI) retained was the water-soluble fraction on the surface of the combination substrates. Mo(VI) removal was also influenced by the microbial community composition in substrate, especially their co-occurrence networks. The species that showed significant positive correlation with Mo(VI) removal were Planctomycetes, Latescibacteria, Armatimonadetes, and Gemmatimonadetes. Moreover, CWs added plants showed that more co-occurrences interaction between taxa occurs, which means that the wetlands efficiently select recruitment of potential microbial consortia and change the co-occurrences to remove pollution in the substrate. These results could be useful in providing an ecology-based solution for the treatment of Mo(VI) in wastewater, especially in adjusting the microbial communities for Mo(VI) removal at the genetic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Chen
- Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Emission Reduction & Resources Recycling (Anhui University of Technology), Ministry of Education, Ma'anshan 243002, China; College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - F J Zhou
- College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - F Yang
- Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China
| | - J J Lian
- Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Emission Reduction & Resources Recycling (Anhui University of Technology), Ministry of Education, Ma'anshan 243002, China; College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - T R Ye
- College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - H Y Wu
- College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - L M Wang
- Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China
| | - N Song
- College of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China E-mail:
| | - Y Y Liu
- College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| | - A Y Hui
- College of Energy and Environment, Anhui University of Technology, Anhui 243002, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Yang Y, Dong P, He L, Zhou F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy-induced abscopal effect twice after pembrolizumab failure in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma: a case report with genetic and immunologic analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2022; 10:4304-4312. [PMID: 34984195 PMCID: PMC8661262 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is a rare but aggressive disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been an indispensable component for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has offered additional immunological effect boost for improving the treatment outcomes of the patients. However, the synergistic effect of ICIs with SBRT in HLRCC remains largely unexplored. We present the case of a 34-year-old woman with advanced HLRCC who underwent radical nephrectomy but soon relapsed at the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (RPLN). She was prescribed sunitinib but still progressed on twenty cycles with bulky RPLN and ascites. She was then treated with axitinib and pembrolizumab for twenty months, and received SBRT for the progression of RPLN upon which the first abscopal effect was observed via significant shrinkage of in-field and out-field tumor lesions. Five months later, she underwent a second course of SBRT for pelvic mass progression and the second abscopal effect was observed. Genetic and immunologic characteristics revealed a large number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and high levels of PD-L1 expression. This case report demonstrates the synergistic effect of ICIs and SBRT in HLRCC and the potential mechanism for the repeated SBRT-induced abscopal effect, supporting the application of SBRT to oligometastatic lesion during ICIs treatment to delay disease progression. Further studies are needed to verify the strategy of combining ICIs and SBRT in advanced HLRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyue Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yijun Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuanzhong Yang
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li Z, Zhang Z, Ma H, Yao K, Qin Z, Han H, Ye Y, Li Y, Dong P, Jiang L, Tian L, Liu Z, Zhou F. Extraperitonealization of ileal conduit reduces parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:162.e17-162.e23. [PMID: 34920945 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication of ileal conduit diversion after radical cystectomy. Novel surgical techniques for preventing PSH formation are needed. We aimed to evaluate surgical technique of extraperitonealizing the ileal conduit (modified ileal conduit) for preventing PSH. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 375 consecutive patients who underwent ileal conduit after cystectomy at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1, 2000 and June 31, 2019 was conducted. 214 patients had modified ileal conduit diversion and 161 patients conventional ileal conduit (Bricker) diversion. The demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients in the 2 groups were compared using the t test and Chi square test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to predict the risk of PSH formation. RESULTS The 2 groups were comparable in regard to all demographic and clinicopathologic variables. The incidence of PSH diagnosed by CT scan was 7.5% in the modified group and 21.1% in the conventional group (P < 0.001). High BMI and history of prior abdominal surgery was identified by univariable analysis as risk factors of PSH formation. Multivariable analyses revealed that technique of extraperitonealizing ileal conduit significantly reduced incidence of PSH in patients with or without risk factors of PSH formation (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.54, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Technique of extraperitonealizing ileal conduit appeared to be effective in reducing PSH formation after ileal conduit diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Huali Ma
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Kai Yao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zike Qin
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hui Han
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yonghong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Pei Dong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lijuan Jiang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Li Tian
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou, P. R. China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|