Impact of the obesity on lymph node status in operable breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Although many studies have shown association of obesity and tumor size, the association with the lymph node status is not clear. We examined the relationship of the lymph node status and obesity and other possible factors in early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 1295 breast cancer patients who had axillary dissection were included. Patients were grouped according to their body mass index (BMI) values at the time of diagnosis. We analyzed the relationship between BMI and patient and tumor characteristics, especially lymph node status.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 48 years (range 20- 84). Of the patients 69.6% had modified radical mastectomy and the remaining 30.4% had breast-conserving surgery and axillary dissection. Median BMI of the patients was 27.2 kg/m(2) and 33.1% (N-429) of them had normal BMI, 36% (N-471) were overweight and 30.5% (N=395) were obese at the time of the diagnosis. Of the patients, 44.2% had N0 disease, and 55.8% had lymph node metastasis. N1 disease had 28.3% (N=367), 13.8% (N=179) had N2 and 13.7% (N=177) had N3 disease. When patients were classified as normal (≤24.9 kg/m(2)) and obese (>24.9 kg/m(2)) group, the total number of lymph nodes removed was higher in the obese group and this difference was statistically significant (18.12±10.48 and 20.36±11.37, respectively, p= 0.001). There was strong correlation between the number of the dissected lymph nodes and BMI (r=0.11; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and BMI. The mean number of the dissected and involved lymph nodes was higher in the HER2 positive group compared to the negative ones (21 vs 19, p=0.008; 6 vs 3, p<0.001; respectively)

CONCLUSION

The number of the dissected lymph nodes was slightly higher in obese patients but there was no correlation between metastatic lymph node number and BMI. The number of the dissected and involved lymph nodes was higher in the HER2 positive group.

Metaplastic breast carcinoma: case series and review of the literature

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MpBC) is a rare disease entity, accounting for less than 1% of all breast carcinomas. Furthermore, it is a heterogenous disease with different subgroups, including malignant epithelial (carcinoma) and stromal (sarcoma) features. Here we evaluated, retrospectively, 14 female MpBC patients admitted to Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital between 2005 and 2011. Median age was 45.5 (range:16.0-76.0) and tumor size 57.5 mm (range: 20.0-80.0 mm). Histopathological subtypes were as follows: 5 carcinosarcoma, 5 squamous and 4 adenosquamous carcinoma. All but one with upfront lung metastasis, had their primary breast tumor operated. Axillary lymph nodes were involved in 64.3%. The most common sites of metastasis were lungs and brain. Chemotherapy including antracycline, taxane and even platinium was planned for adjuvant, neoadjuvant and palliative purposes in 9, 3 and 1 patient, respectively. Median cycles of chemotherapy was 6 (range:4-8). Median follow-up of the patients was 52 months (95%CI 10.4-93.6 month). Median 3 year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this patients cohort were 33% and 56%, respectively. In conclusion, MpBC is a rare and orphan disease without standardized treatment approaches and the prognosis is poor so that larger studies to investigate different treatment schedules are urgently needed.

The number of metastatic lymph node in N3M0 breast cancer and influence on survival

e12563

Background: To evaluate the impact of the number of metastatic lymph node (MLN) in N3M0 breast cancer patients with a sufficient lymph node sampling. Methods: 200 patients with histopathologically confirmed N3M0 breast cancer were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the MLN; i) MLN:10-15, ii) MLN:16-20, iii) MLN:>20. Pearson Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier test were used. Results: 25 patients had T1, 91 had T2, 69 had T3 and 15 had T4 tumor. The number of median MLN was 15 (10-48). HER-2, ER and PR status were similar. There were no significant differences in age at diagnosis, menopausal status, stage, grade and treatment among groups (p>0,05). The median follow-up period was 41.5 months. The median OS was 100, 98 and 58 months in group I, II and III, respectively (p=0.06). When we analyzed for two groups; the median OS was significantly shorter in patients with >20 MLN than patients with 10-15 MLN (98 vs. 58 months; p=0.04). We found no significant difference in DFS (p=0.52). The patients with >20 MLN had increased risk of mortality compared to patients with 10-15 MLN (adjusted-HR 1.96 (95%CI 1.1-3.5); p=0.025). Conclusions: To define the subgroups according to MLN in N3 disease may help determining the high-risk patients and making decision in clinical practice. However this finding should be supported by larger studies.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of pure papillary breast carcinoma

e12521

Background: Pure papillary breast carcinoma (PPBC) is a very rare entity which usually occurs in older women with a favorable prognosis. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the demographic, clinicopathologic characteristics and survival rates of PPBC compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods: A total of 2451 invasive breast cancer patients from a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 24 patients were PPBC (1%) and 1785 (73%) patients were pure IDC. Results: PPBC were significantly different from IDC with respect to the age at diagnosis, menopausal status, tumor size, grade and lymph node involvement (p<0.05) (Table 1). The median follow-up period was 26,5 months (4-400 months). Only one patient with PPBC had lung and bone metastasis, others were alive with no evidence of disease. PPBC was associated with a better 5-year overall survival (100 vs. 84%) and disease-free survival (75 vs. 54%) compared to IDC. Conclusions: Compared to IDC, PPBC is a small, low-grade tumor and less likely to involve the lymph nodes. Cases are usually older, postmenopausal women and have a better prognosis. [Table: see text]

The prognostic impact of obesity on molecular subtypes of breast cancer in premenopausal women

PURPOSE

The increasing incidence of obesity throughout the world will result in expansion of the number of women at risk for developing breast cancer. Obesity is associated with adverse outcomes in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. In premenopausal women, the association is less clear. We investigated the impact of obesity on tumor features, hormonal status, recurrence and mortality in premenopausal breast cancer patients, classified according to molecular subtypes.

METHODS

818 premenopausal women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were analysed. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to body mass index (BMI): i) normal body weight (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)); ii) overweight (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/ m(2)); and iii) obese (BMI:>30 kg/ m(2)). Clinocopathologic characteristics and survival rates were analyzed for triple negative, HER-2 overexpressing and luminal subtypes.

RESULTS

Obese patients compared with normal-weight women were older at diagnosis (p<0.001) and more often had high grade tumor (57.1 vs 42.3%; p=0.04) with lymphovascular invasion (79.5 vs 63.9%; p=0.03). The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 29 months. According to the molecular subtypes, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were significantly shorter in obese patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (p=0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Obesity (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.1; p=0.04) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3- 3.3; p=0.02) were found to be independent prognostic factors for TNBC mortality.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated with estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative tumors and poor OS in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Association between family history and clinicopathologic characteristics in 1987 breast cancer patients: single institution experience from Turkey

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with family history of breast/ ovarian cancer (FHBOC).

METHODS

In this study with 1987 breast cancer patients, we analyzed their tumor characteristics and outcomes, as well as the total number, degree and age of affected relatives, and their type of cancer. Results were assessed using Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

24.1% (n=479) of the patients had FHBOC. Patients with FHBOC were younger (47.7 vs. 49.1 years; p=0.03) and tended to have node-negative breast cancer (45.4 vs. 39.8%; p=0.006). The median overall survival (OS) was shorter in patients with FHBOC with a borderline p-value (p=0.063), compared to patients with no family history. The median OS was shorter in patients who had ≥ 2 relatives with breast cancer (p=0.014), in those having first degree relatives with breast cancer, presenting with metastatic disease (p= 0.020). FHBOC patients with triple negative breast cancer had the highest risk of death (p<0.0001) and recurrence (p<0.0001). Patients who had at least one relative with breast cancer aged ≤ 50 years were also at increased risk of recurrence (p7equals;0.006).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients with FH7horbar;BOC are younger, tend to have small tumor size, node-negative disease and their survival is shorter compared to patients without family history. This is the first study evaluating the clinicopathologic differences of patients with and without FHBOC in Turkish population.

Association between common risk factors and molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and characterized its by molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Gene expression profiling studies have classified breast cancers into five subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 overexpressing, basal-like, and normal breast-like. Although clinical differences between subtypes have been well described in the literature, etiologic heterogeneity have not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to assess the associations between several hormonal and nonhormonal risk factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study consisted of 1884 invasive breast cancer cases. Variables studied included family history, age at first full-term pregnancy, number of children, duration of lactation, menstruation history, menopausal status, blood type, smoking, obesity, oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy and in vitro fertilization. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thousand two-hundred and forty nine patients had luminal A, 234 had luminal B, 169 had HER-2 overexpressing and 232 had triple negative breast cancer. The age of ≥40 years was found to be a risk factor for luminal A (OR 1.41 95% CI 1.15-1.74; p=0.001) and HER-2 overexpressing subtype (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01-2.25; p=0.04). Women who were nulliparous (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03-2.13; p=0.03) or who had their first full-term pregnancy at age 30 years or older (OR 1.25 95% CI 0.83-1.88; p=0.04) were at increased risk of luminal breast cancer, whereas women with more than two children had a decreased risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97; p=0.03). Breast-feeding was also a protective factor for luminal subtype (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53-1.04; p=0.04) when compared to non-luminal breast cancer. We found increased risks for postmenopausal women with HER-2 overexpressing (OR 2.20, 95% CI 0.93-5.17; p=0.04) and luminal A (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.93-3.90, p=0.02) breast cancers, who used hormone replacement therapy for 5 years or more. Overweight and obesity significantly increased the risk of triple negative subtype (OR 1.89 95% CI 1.06-3.37; p=0.04 and OR 1.90 95% CI 1.00-3.61; p=0.03), on the contrary, decreased the risk of luminal breast cancer (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.43-0.95; p=0.02 and OR 0.50 95% CI 0.32-0.76; p=0.002, respectively) in premenopausal women. There were no significant differences between risk of breast cancer subtypes and early menarche, late menopause, family history, postmenopausal obesity, oral contraseptive use, smoking, in vitro fertilization, blood groups and use of hands.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproductive and hormonal characteristics (breastfeeding, parity, age at first full-term birth, hormone replacement therapy) were associated with luminal subtype, compared to non-luminal breast cancer, as consistent with previous studies. Obesity and overweight increased the risk of triple negative subtype, particularly in premenopausal women. Older age and use of hormone replacement therapy were related to the risk of HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer. Our data suggest a significant heterogeneity in association of traditional breast cancer risk factors and tumor subtypes.