Moukarzel J, Guevara E, Casciaro ME, Guilenea FN, Pascaner AF, Craiem D. Echocardiographic measurements of the left heart chambers size in a large cohort of subjects: comparison of body surface area and height indexation to account for effects of obesity.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2022;
35:1159-1167.e2. [PMID:
35953008 DOI:
10.1016/j.echo.2022.08.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The assessment of cardiac chamber size in the obese population is a challenging subject. Values usually indexed to body surface area (BSA) are smaller in obese subjects and prone to overcorrection. This study aimed to find reference thresholds to account for effects of obesity from a large cohort of patients and to evaluate the indexation by height as an alternative to BSA.
METHODS
The last 10-years records of our Echocardiography Unit were retrospectively analyzed and 14,007 subjects without known cardiac disease were included (45±15 years, 54% women, 20% obese). Measurements included left atrial diameter, area and volume (LAD, LAA and LAV), left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameters (LVESD), aortic root diameter (ARD) and LV mass (LVM). Absolute, BSA and height indexed maximum thresholds (mean+1.96.SD) were calculated. An allometric indexation of the form variable/Heightβ was tested. Correlation coefficients between indexed and absolute values were calculated to evaluate their proportional association (ideally r=1). Correlations between indexed values and body size represented residual associations to be minimized (ideally r=0).
RESULTS
The strongest association of echocardiographic measurements with body size was observed for BSA (r=0.36-0.63), whereas the isometric and allometric height models showed lower comparable values (r=0.28-0.48). Positive correlations with BMI were mostly observed for LA size (r≈0.36) and LVM (r≈0.36) measurements. Scaling exponents β for the allometric height indexation were 1.72 for LAV and 2.33 for LVM. Correlations between indexed and absolute values were higher for height than BSA (0.80-0.98 vs 0.44-0.92). Correlations between indexed values and height were closer to zero than for BSA, particularly using the allometric model. The overcorrection observed with increasing obesity class after BSA indexation was avoided after height indexation.
CONCLUSIONS
Unlike BSA, height indexing provided an adequate body size scaling of left heart chambers size avoiding overcorrection using allometric models in particular.
Collapse