1
|
Llenas-García J, Wikman-Jorgensen P, Gil-Anguita C, Ramos- Sesma V, Torrús-Tendero D, Martínez-Goñi R, Romero-Nieto M, García-Abellán J, Esteban-Giner MJ, Antelo K, Navarro-Cots M, Buñuel F, Amador C, García-García J, Gascón I, Telenti G, Fuentes-Campos E, Torres I, Gimeno-Gascón A, Ruíz-García MM, Navarro M, Ramos-Rincón JM. Chagas disease screening in pregnant Latin American women: Adherence to a systematic screening protocol in a non-endemic country. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0009281. [PMID: 33760816 PMCID: PMC8021187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chagas disease (CD) is a chronic parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi and is endemic to continental Latin America. In Spain, the main transmission route is congenital. We aimed to assess adherence to regional recommendations of universal screening for CD during pregnancy in Latin American women in the province of Alicante from 2014 to 2018. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Retrospective quality study using two data sources: 1) delivery records of Latin American women that gave birth in the 10 public hospitals of Alicante between January 2014 and December 2018; and 2) records of Chagas serologies carried out in those centers between May 2013 and December 2018. There were 3026 deliveries in Latin American women during the study period; 1178 (38.9%) underwent CD serology. Screening adherence ranged from 17.2% to 59.3% in the different health departments and was higher in Bolivian women (48.3%). Twenty-six deliveries (2.2%) had a positive screening; CD was confirmed in 23 (2%) deliveries of 21 women. Bolivians had the highest seroprevalence (21/112; 18.7%), followed by Colombians (1/333; 0.3%) and Ecuadorians (1/348; 0.3%). Of 21 CD-positive women (19 Bolivians, 1 Colombian, 1 Ecuadorian), infection was already known in 12 (57.1%), and 9 (42.9%) had already been treated. Only 1 of the 12 untreated women (8.3%) was treated postpartum. Follow-up started in 20 of the 23 (87.0%) neonates but was completed only in 11 (47.8%); no cases of congenital transmission were detected. Among the 1848 unscreened deliveries, we estimate 43 undiagnosed cases of CD and 1 to 2 undetected cases of congenital transmission. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Adherence to recommendations of systematic screening for CD in Latin American pregnant women in Alicante can be improved. Strategies to strengthen treatment of postpartum women and monitoring of exposed newborns are needed. Currently, there may be undetected cases of congenital transmission in our province.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jara Llenas-García
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela, Spain
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Clinical Medicine Department, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Philip Wikman-Jorgensen
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | - Diego Torrús-Tendero
- Reference Unit of Imported Diseases and International Health, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
- Biomedical and Health Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- Parasitology Area, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
| | | | - Mónica Romero-Nieto
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Clinical Medicine Department, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
- Internal Medicine Department, Elda General University Hospital, Elda, Spain
| | - Javier García-Abellán
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Unit. Elche General University Hospital, Elche, Spain
| | | | | | - María Navarro-Cots
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela, Spain
| | - Fernando Buñuel
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Microbiology Department, University Hospital San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| | - Concepción Amador
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Marina Baixa, Villajoyosa, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Gascón
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Elda General University Hospital, Elda, Spain
| | - Guillermo Telenti
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Unit. Elche General University Hospital, Elche, Spain
| | | | | | - Adelina Gimeno-Gascón
- Biomedical and Health Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | - María Montserrat Ruíz-García
- Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of the Valencia Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Microbiology Department, Elche General University Hospital, Elche, Spain
| | - Miriam Navarro
- Department of Public Health, Science History and Gynaecology, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
| | - José-Manuel Ramos-Rincón
- Clinical Medicine Department, University Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
- Reference Unit of Imported Diseases and International Health, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
- Biomedical and Health Research Institute of Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Infante A, Ortiz de la Tabla V, Martín C, Gázquez G, Buñuel F. Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 40:151-157. [PMID: 32860091 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-04014-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Shortening the turnaround time of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria permits a significant reduction of patient morbidity, mortality, and cost. Conventional blood culture methods are the gold standard diagnostic test to guide management of patient with sepsis, but the conventional process requires at least 12 to 24 h after the blood culture has been flagged as positive due to requirement for pure colonies. We describe a simple and inexpensive method to obtain faster AST with MicroScan system (Beckman Coulter) directly from positive blood cultures. Conventional and direct identification and AST were performed simultaneously by both methods in 1070 blood cultures, and 9106 MICs were determinated. About 96.5% were correctly identified with the direct method. Overall, categorical agreement was 92.86%. We found 46 very major errors, but globally the results showed a good correlation with the standard method, particularly favorable for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, except amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam. For P. mirabilis, betalactams antibiotics (except second- and third-generation cephalosporines) showed a good correlation, and also a good correlation was found for ciprofloxacine and gentamicine in P. aeruginosa and amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacine, gentamicine, and cotrimoxazole in E. cloacae. This method has the main advantage of providing reliable results 1 day earlier, being a simple, fast, and cheap method for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from positive blood cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Infante
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
| | - V Ortiz de la Tabla
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - C Martín
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - G Gázquez
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - F Buñuel
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ortiz de la Tabla V, Gázquez G, Infante A, Martin C, Buñuel F, Gutiérrez F. Performance of the cobas u 701 Analyzer in Urinary Tract Infection Screening. Ann Lab Med 2019; 39:464-469. [PMID: 31037865 PMCID: PMC6502947 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Negative urine cultures to rule out urinary tract infections (UTI) generate a considerable laboratory workload; thus, a rapid screening test is desirable. We evaluated the performance of a new automated microscopy analyzer, cobas u 701 (Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) for the screening of UTI, and developed a rule-out strategy to reduce the number of samples requiring culture. We also assessed squamous epithelial cell (SEC) count as a predictor of culture contamination. Methods In total, 1,604 urine samples from outpatients were analyzed with cobas u 701 and culture. Bacterial (BAC) and white blood cell (WBC) counts were used for sample interpretation. To determine a useful cut-off point to predict negative cultures, we selected the highest sensitivity and specificity values obtained from ROC curves. Diagnostic accuracy by age and gender was evaluated. Results Urine culture showed growth of ≥104 colony forming units (CFU)/mL in 256 samples (16.0%). The highest sensitivity (91.8%) and specificity (68.4%) were obtained for cut-off points of 119 BAC/µL and 22 WBC/µL. The combination of BAC and WBC improved the performance of the rule-out strategy with a low rate of false-negative results (1.5%) and a high negative predictive value (NPV, 97.3%). Fifty-seven percent of the samples would not have required culture. SEC count was a poor predictor of culture contamination. Conclusions cobas u 701 can substantially reduce the number of urine samples requiring culture, with a low false-negative rate and a high NPV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregoria Gázquez
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ana Infante
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Coral Martin
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Fernando Buñuel
- Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Félix Gutiérrez
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|