Robotic surgery for the treatment of achalasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of the robotic approach for achalasia surgery in a tertiary center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with achalasia who underwent robotic surgery between May 2010 and April 2019 were analyzed. The study variables were collected in a prospective database and a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 44 years were included. The main symptom at diagnosis was dysphagia. 19 patients (42.2%) received endoscopic treatment prior to surgery, mostly pneumatic dilation (84.2%). Heller's myotomy associated with Toupet fundoplication was the surgical technique of choice, with a mean operative time of 211 min. The average stay was 5 days. There were 2 postoperative perforations (4.4%). Perioperative mortality was 0%. The mean follow-up was 64 months. At 3 and 5 years, a significant decrease in the Eckardt score was observed and the manometric study showed a decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure at rest of 58% and 70%, respectively, with persistence of hypomotility of the esophageal body. Pathological gastroesophageal reflux was diagnosed in two patients (5.4%) and 4 (10.8%) presented recurrence of symptoms, requiring endoscopic pneumatic dilations. In 2 cases, the dilations were not effective, so an endoscopic myotomy was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, robotic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of achalasia.

Robotic surgery for the treatment of achalasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of the robotic approach for achalasia surgery in a tertiary center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with achalasia who underwent robotic surgery between May 2010 and April 2019 were analyzed. The study variables were collected in a prospective database and a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 44 years were included. The main symptom at diagnosis was dysphagia. 19 patients (42.2%) received endoscopic treatment prior to surgery, mostly pneumatic dilation (84.2%). Heller's myotomy associated with Toupet fundoplication was the surgical technique of choice, with a mean operative time of 211minutes. The average stay was 5 days. There were 2 postoperative perforations (4.4%). Perioperative mortality was 0%. The mean follow-up was 64 months. At 3 and 5 years, a significant decrease in the Eckardt score was observed and the manometric study showed a decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure at rest of 58% and 70%, respectively, with persistence of hypomotility of the esophageal body. Pathological gastroesophageal reflux was diagnosed in two patients (5.4%) and 4 (10.8%) presented recurrence of symptoms, requiring endoscopic pneumatic dilations. In 2 cases, the dilations were not effective, so an endoscopic myotomy was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, robotic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of achalasia.

Minimally invasive and robotic surgery in the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction cancer

Minimally invasive surgery provides for the treatment of esophagogastric junction tumors under safe conditions, reducing respiratory and abdominal wall complications. Recovery is improved, while maintaining the oncological principles of surgery to obtain an optimal long-term outcome. It is important to have a sufficient volume of activity to progress along the learning curve with close expert supervision in order to guarantee R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy. Minimal invasiveness ought not become an objective in itself. Should total gastrectomy be performed, the risk of a positive proximal margin makes intraoperative biopsy compulsory, without ruling out a primary open approach. Meanwhile, minimally invasive esophagectomy has been gaining ground. Its main difficulty, the intrathoracic anastomosis, can be safely carried out either with a mechanical side-to-side suture or a robot-assisted manual suture, thanks to the 3-D vision and versatility of the instruments.

Laser in situ keratomileus using the LaserSight 200 laser: results of 950 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

To examine the refractive outcome in 950 consecutive eyes having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by 1 surgeon with experience in keratomileusis.

SETTING

Outpatient excimer laser surgical facility.

METHODS

This study comprised 950 consecutive eyes of 475 patients having LASIK as a primary procedure with a LaserSight 200 excimer laser (8.51 software). A nasal hinged flap and a Chiron microkeratome were used. Preoperative cycloplegic refraction was done only in patients younger than 25 years and in all hyperopic cases. Subjective preoperative and postoperative manifest refractions were done after autorefractometry in all cases. In cases of hyperopia, the software was modified by adding 30% to the refractive error. Enhancement results are not included.

RESULTS

Of the 950 eyes, 893 (94.00%) were myopic and 57 (6.00%), hyperopic. In the low myopia group (1.00 to 3.99 D) of 223 eyes (24.97%), mean spherical equivalents (SEs) were -2.90 D +/- 0.56 (SD) preoperatively, -0.46 +/- 0.6 D 3 months postoperatively, and -0.41 +/- 0.5 D 6 months postoperatively. In the moderate myopia group (4.00 to 5.99 D) of 205 eyes (22.96%), respective mean SEs were -4.90 +/- 0.7 D, -0.90 D +/- 0.9 D, and -0.67 +/- 0.7 D. In the high myopia group (6.00 to 9.99) of 266 eyes (25.30%), the respective means were -7.70 +/- 1.3 D, -0.76 +/- 0.99 D, and -0.60 +/- 0.8 D. In the extreme myopia group (10.21 to 30.00) of 199 eyes (22.28%), the respective means were -13.30 +/- 2.9 D, -1.30 +/- 1.4 D, and -1.13 +/- 1.3 D. For the entire myopic group, the mean astigmatism was +1.55 +/- 1.38 D, +1.09 +/- 0.92 D, and +0.87 +/- 0.77 D, respectively. The low hyperopia group (1.00 to 2.99 D) of 39 eyes (68.42%) had a mean preoperative SE of +1.80 +/- 0.59 D and mean postoperative SEs of +1.00 +/- 0.76 D at 3 months and +1.16 +/- 0.52 D at 6 months. The respective means in the moderate hyperopia group (3.00 to 6.00) of 18 eyes (31.57%) were +4.62 +/- 1.19 D, +3.71 +/- 1.12 D, and +4.00 +/- 1.07 D.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser in situ keratomileus for myopia using the LaserSight 200 excimer laser was stable with time and safe for the correction of different degrees of myopia. In the hyperopic group, marked regression occurred in a large percentage of patients. Thus, we will not perform LASIK for hyperopia until the software improves.