1
|
Baumgartner P, Kook L, Altersberger VL, Gensicke H, Ardila-Jurado E, Kägi G, Salerno A, Michel P, Gopisingh KM, Nederkoorn PJ, Scheitz JF, Nolte CH, Heldner MR, Arnold M, Cordonnier C, Della Schiava L, Hametner C, Ringleb PA, Leker RR, Jubran H, Luft AR, Engelter ST, Wegener S. Safety and effectiveness of IV Thrombolysis in retinal artery occlusion: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur Stroke J 2023; 8:966-973. [PMID: 37421135 PMCID: PMC10683723 DOI: 10.1177/23969873231185895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) may lead to irreversible blindness. For acute RAO, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) can be considered as treatment. However, due to the rarity of RAO, data about IVT safety and effectiveness is limited. METHODS From the multicenter database ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP), we retrospectively analyzed visual acuity (VA) at baseline and within 3 months in IVT and non-IVT treated RAO patients. Primary outcome was difference of VA between baseline and follow up (∆VA). Secondary outcomes were rates of visual recovery (defined as improvement of VA ⩾ 0.3 logMAR), and safety (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) according to ECASS II criteria, asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial bleeding). Statistical analysis was performed using parametric tests and a linear regression model adjusted for age, sex and baseline VA. RESULTS We screened 200 patients with acute RAO and included 47 IVT and 34 non-IVT patients with complete information about recovery of vision. Visual Acuity at follow up significantly improved compared to baseline in IVT patients (∆VA 0.5 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and non-IVT patients (∆VA 0.40 ± 1.1, p < 0.05). No significant differences in ∆VA and visual recovery rate were found between groups at follow up. Two asymptomatic ICH (4%) and one (2%) major extracranial bleeding (intraocular bleeding) occurred in the IVT group, while no bleeding events were reported in the non-IVT group. CONCLUSION Our study provides real-life data from the largest cohort of IVT treated RAO patients published so far. While there is no evidence for superiority of IVT compared to conservative treatment, bleeding rates were low. A randomized controlled trial and standardized outcome assessments in RAO patients are justified to assess the net benefit of IVT in RAO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Baumgartner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lucas Kook
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Data Analysis and Process Design, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Valerian L Altersberger
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Gensicke
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Georg Kägi
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Salerno
- Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrik Michel
- Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kiran M Gopisingh
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J Nederkoorn
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan F Scheitz
- Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian H Nolte
- Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mirjam R Heldner
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Arnold
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Cordonnier
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France
| | - Lucie Della Schiava
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France
| | | | - Peter A. Ringleb
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ronen R Leker
- Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hamza Jubran
- Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Andreas R Luft
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Cereneo Center for Neurology and Rehabilitation, Vitznau, Switzerland
| | - Stefan T Engelter
- Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Wegener
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|