Making the case for lead safe housing: Downstream effects of lead exposure on outcomes for children and youth

Lead based paint is a predominate source of lead exposure in children, which has a documented negative effect on their health and development. Despite public health efforts, the housing stock in disinvested neighborhoods in many cities continues to present significant risk of childhood lead exposure. In this article, we describe how a multi-agency integrated data system was used to document the impact of lead exposure on indicators of child and youth development as recorded in educational and human service systems. By tracking administrative data for two cohorts of Cleveland, Ohio children from birth to early adulthood and using rigorous matching methods to reduce confounders when comparing those with and without elevated blood lead levels, we document negative effects on developmental, behavioral and socio-economic outcomes due to early childhood lead exposure. The magnitude of disparities between individuals who had elevated blood lead levels (≥5 μg/dL) in early childhood, compared to their matched counterparts, is in the ranges of 20-40%. The analysis is framed by clarifying the context, assumptions and limitations associated with the use of administrative data. This type of information has been useful in illuminating the burden of lead exposure for children, families and youth serving agencies and engaging public officials, landlords and residents in initiatives to bring housing up to lead safe standards.

SROI in the pay for success context: Are they at odds?

The Pay For Success (PFS) and Social Impact Bond (SIB) movements to date have focused heavily on shorter-term outcomes that can be monetized and show clear savings to government entities. In part, this focus derives from the need to specify contract payments based on a narrow set of well measured outcomes (e.g., avoided days in jail and foster care, decreased use of behavioral health services). Meanwhile efforts to measure the social return on investment (SROI) of interventions have sought to expand the view of relevant outcomes to include domains that lend themselves less clearly to monetization. This paper explores the intersection between these two movements with illustrations from a SIB initiative underway focused on homeless families with children in foster care. Challenges and potential for SROI in a third-party payor environment will be discussed as well as opportunities to better leverage the strengths of both types of initiative.