1
|
Uleri A, Farré A, Izquierdo P, Angerri O, Kanashiro A, Balaña J, Gauhar V, Castellani D, Sanchez-Martin F, Monga M, Serrano A, Gupta M, Baboudjian M, Gallioli A, Breda A, Emiliani E. Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)00012-5. [PMID: 38290963 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Thulium fiber laser (TFL) emerged as a competitor of holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for the treatment of urinary stones. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy between Ho:YAG and TFL for laser lithotripsy of renal and ureteral stones. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify reports published until May 2023. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) between Ho:YAG and TFL for laser lithotripsy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria, and data from 1286 and 880 patients who underwent, respectively, Ho:YAG and TFL laser lithotripsy were reviewed. Most studies included ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgeries as procedures, two included percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and one included URS exclusively. Only two studies reported results in pediatric patients. TFL was associated with a higher SFR (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-3.20; p = 0.031) when no residual fragment is considered, but not when SFR refers to the presence of fragments <3 mm (OR 2.48, 95% CI: 0.98-6.29; p = 0.055) or when only Ho:YAG with MOSES is considered (p = 0.068). According to the stones' location, TFL was associated with higher SFRs than Ho:YAG for renal (OR 3.14, 95% CI: 1.69-5.86; p < 0.001) but not for ureteral (p = 0.8) stones. TFL was associated with a lower intraoperative complication rate (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.63; p < 0.001). No difference was found in major (p = 0.4) or overall (p = 0.4) complication rate, operative time (p = 0.051), and laser time (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS TFL is a promising laser for the treatment of urinary stones with some advantages over Ho:YAG. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and optimize the surgical settings. PATIENT SUMMARY The use of thulium fiber laser rather than holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet permits to reach a higher stone-free rate in stones located in the kidney rather than in the ureter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alba Farré
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Izquierdo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Angerri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Kanashiro
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Balaña
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Division of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Polytechnic University Le Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Manoj Monga
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Adolfo Serrano
- Department of Urology, Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Mantu Gupta
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, North Academic Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esteban Emiliani
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emiliani E, Kanashiro AK, Balaña J, Fontanet S, Aumatell J, Calderón-Cortez J, Iregui-Parra J, Sanchez-Pui A, Sanchez-Martin F, Millan F, Angerri O. Use of Moses 2.0 with extended frequency and optimized Moses vs. high-power laser in MiniPCNL: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 2023; 51:75. [PMID: 37074477 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare standard high-power laser (with < 80 Hz) to extended frequency (> 100 Hz) lithotripsy during miniPCNL. 40 patients were randomized in to two groups undergoing MiniPCNL. For both groups, the Holmium Pulse laser Moses 2.0 (Lumenis) was used. For group A, standard high-power laser with < 80 Hz, with Moses distance was set using up to 3 J. For Group B, extended frequency (100-120 Hz) was used allowing up to 0.6 J. All patients underwent MiniPCNL using an 18 Fr balloon access. Demographics were comparable between groups. Mean stone diameter was 19 mm (14-23) with no differences between groups (p = 0.14). Mean operative time was 91 and 87 min for group A and B (p = 0.71), mean laser time was similar in both groups, 6.5 min and 7.5 min, respectively (p = 0.52) as well as the number of laser activations during the surgery (p = 0.43). Mean Watts used was 18 and 16 respectively being similar in both groups (p = 0.54) as well as the total KJoules (p = 0.29). Endoscopic vision was good in all surgeries. The endoscopic and radiologic stone free rate was achieved in all patients expect for two in both groups (p = 0.72). Two Clavien I complications were seen, a small bleeding for group A and a small pelvic perforation in group B. The use of high-power holmium laser with extended frequency and optimized Moses was effective and safe being comparable to standard high-power laser for MiniPCNL allowing more versatility with the setting range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban Emiliani
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Andres Koey Kanashiro
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Balaña
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sofía Fontanet
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julia Aumatell
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Calderón-Cortez
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Iregui-Parra
- Department of Urology, Clinica nueva de Cali. Department of Epidemiology, Interdisciplinary Group of Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (GIESP), Libre University, Cali, Colombia
| | - Antoni Sanchez-Pui
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Martin
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Felix Millan
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Angerri
- Department of Urology, Fundación Puigvert. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Calle Cartagena 340, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|