Real-world outcomes among patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers initiating second-line treatment

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding second-line (2 L) treatment for advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) in the US real-world setting. This study explores the rapidly evolving and growing treatment landscape in the 2 L setting for advanced or metastatic BTC with a large cohort of patients treated in a community oncology setting.

METHODS

Adult patients with BTC initiating 2 L treatment after a platinum-containing first-line between 1/1/10- and 6/30/19 were identified from the US Oncology Network electronic healthcare record database and followed through 12/31/19. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed descriptively, including overall response rate (ORR) in the real-world clinical setting. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The overall population (N = 160) included 74 patients (46.3%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 41 (25.6%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 45 (28.1%) with gallbladder cancer. Thirty unique 2 L regimens were recorded for the study population, with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 34.4%) and capecitabine monotherapy (20.0%) being the most common. ORR was 7.5% (95% CI, 3.9%-12.7%). From 2 L initiation, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.4-3.3 months), and median OS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7 months).

CONCLUSION

Results from this study provide real-world evidence that although patients treated in the community oncology setting receive a wide variety of 2 L treatments, the regimens are consistent with those recommended by guidelines. Although responses are observed with 2 L treatment, duration is brief and associated with poor OS in patients with advanced or metastatic disease.

Second-line treatments in advanced biliary tract cancer: systematic literature review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety

Background: A systematic review was conducted to understand clinical, economic and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in second-line biliary tract cancer. Materials & methods: The review followed established recommendations. The feasibility of network meta-analysis revealed limited networks, thus synthesis was limited to a summary of reported ranges, percentiles and medians. Results: The review included 62 trials and observational studies highly variable with respect to key baseline characteristics. Commonly evaluated second-line treatments included fluoropyrimidine-, gemcitabine- and S-1-based regimens. Across active treatment arms, median overall survival ranged from 3.5 to 15.0 months (median: 6.9), median progression-free survival from 1.4 to 6.5 months (median: 2.9) and objective response from 0 to 36.4%. Outcomes were similar between study types, with a few notable outliers. Treatment-related/-emergent adverse events were infrequently reported; no studies reported economic or health-related quality-of-life outcomes. Conclusions: Biliary tract cancer is a difficult-to-treat disease with poor prognosis. Despite evolving treatment landscapes, more recent studies did not show clinical outcome improvement, highlighting an unmet need among advanced/metastatic patients.

Health care resource utilization and costs associated with advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from 2015 onward, since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Considering this shift, there have been limited prior analyses that assess the economic burden of NSCLC within the current treatment landscape. OBJECTIVE: To present an analysis of health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC in the United States between 2010 and 2019. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who initiated first-line (1L) systemic treatment between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019, were included from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database using a previously developed claims-based predictive model algorithm. Mean total HCRU and costs and mean per-person-per-year (PPPY) HCRU and costs were estimated for 2 follow-up periods: the time during the entire follow-up period and the time during the 1L treatment period. Distribution of treatment classes (defined as chemotherapy, ICIs, targeted therapies, and others) were also analyzed by index year. RESULTS: 27,257 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean duration of follow-up for all patients was 16.6 months (median 10.6 months), and the median time to discontinuation of 1L treatment was 2.8 months. The number of outpatient visits accounted for the majority of HCRU across the entire study follow-up (mean 97.7 in total and 147.1 PPPY) and for the 1L treatment period (mean 46.3 in total and 167.5 PPPY). The total mean cost across the entire study follow-up was $158,908 ($250,942 PPPY). For the 1L treatment period, the total mean cost was $72,760 ($271,590 PPPY). Total mean outpatient costs for systemic anticancer treatment were $61,797 for the entire study follow-up ($85,609 PPPY) and $27,138 during the 1L treatment period ($92,412 PPPY). Total costs increased over the study duration, which were mainly due to increasing outpatient costs for systemic therapy. In both follow-up periods, inpatient costs, other outpatient costs (nonsystemic therapy-related costs), and pharmacy costs remained relatively stable but still accounted for more than 60% of the total costs. Analysis of treatment classes over time showed that chemotherapy was the most frequently used treatment, regardless of line of therapy. A trend was observed for increased ICI use from 2015 onward. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvement in treatment options, a high economic burden associated with the treatment of NSCLC still exists. The total costs have been increasing, mainly driven by outpatient costs for systemic therapy, which might reflect the greater use of ICIs for advanced NSCLC. Costs for inpatient services, other outpatient services, and pharmacy services remained stable but still accounted for the majority of the economic burden. Further studies are required to assess the impact of innovative treatments on the disease management costs of advanced NSCLC. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) as part of an alliance between the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer. Zhang, Liu, and Yang are employees of EMD Serono. Beachler, Dinh, and Jamal-Allial are employees of HealthCore Inc., which received funding from the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer for the implementation of this study. Masters and Kolitsopoulos are employees of Pfizer. Lamy was an employee of the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, at the time this study was conducted.

High-dose corticosteroid use and risk of hospitalization for infection in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors--A nationwide register-based cohort study

High‐dose corticosteroids have been associated with increased risk of serious infection in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen 4. This potential association needs to be examined further among patients with other cancer types and for other immune checkpoint inhibitors. We examined whether receipt of high‐dose corticosteroids was associated with increased rates of hospitalization for infection among 981 Danish renal, urothelial, and lung cancer patients followed from first administration of programmed death receptor 1 (PD‐1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our cohort analysis was based on the information from national medical registries. During follow‐up, 522 patients (53.2%) initiated treatment with high‐dose corticosteroids and 317 patients (32.3%) experienced at least one hospitalization for infection. In analyses adjusted for age, sex, and previous use of chemotherapy/targeted therapy, initiation of high‐dose systemic corticosteroids was associated with increased rate of hospitalization for infections (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.41–3.65) even in patients not receiving any chemotherapy/targeted therapy (HR = 3.66, 95% CI = 2.25–5.96). Our findings showed that high‐dose corticosteroid initiation is associated with hospitalization for infection in patients treated with PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clinicians and patients should be aware of this risk of infection when initiating treatment with high‐dose corticosteroids.

Real-world healthcare resource utilization and costs of weekly versus every-2-week cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs (HC) for every-2-week (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients & methods: Patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy in a line-agnostic setting. Cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy in IBM MarketScan. Analyses were weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity score. Results: HRU was numerically lower with the Q2W versus Q1W regimen (weighted mean, 8.1 vs 9.5 encounters per-patient-per-month). The weighted average of HC was $17,653 and $16,469 per-patient-per-month for the Q2W and Q1W regimens, respectively; the difference between regimens decreased when restricting to CRC-related claims. Conclusion: HRU was lower and HC were similar between the Q2W and Q1W regimens.

Noninferiority of cetuximab every-2-weeks versus standard once-weekly administration schedule for the first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM

This study assessed whether cetuximab 500 mg/m² administered every 2 weeks (Q2W), when combined with chemotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment, was noninferior to the approved dose (400 mg/m² followed by 250 mg/m² once weekly [Q1W]) for overall survival (OS) in adults with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

This pooled analysis included patients receiving 1L treatment with cetuximab Q1W or Q2W in combination with chemotherapy from post-authorisation studies with patient-level data available to the sponsor. Baseline characteristics were adjusted with a propensity score using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Noninferiority in terms of OS was tested with a noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and rates of lung/liver metastases resection and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

OS time was noninferior in the Q2W cohort (n = 554) compared to the Q1W cohort (n = 763), with a HR after IPTW (95% confidence interval) of 0.827 (0.715-0.956) and median OS times of 24.7 (Q1W) and 27.9 (Q2W) months. There were no major differences in PFS (HR: 0.915 [0.804-1.042]). The odds ratios (ORs) after IPTW for ORR (1.292 [1.031-1.617]) and the rates of lung/liver metastases resection (1.419 [1.043-1.932]) favoured the Q2W regimen. No differences were noted in the occurrence rate of any SAE between groups; the OR after IPTW was 1.089 (0.858-1.382).

CONCLUSIONS

The cetuximab Q2W regimen was noninferior to the Q1W regimen for OS in the 1L treatment of mCRC.

Comparative effectiveness of weekly versus every-2-weeks cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a US-insured population

Aim: To test the noninferiority of cetuximab administered every 2 weeks (Q2W) versus once weekly (Q1W) in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with regard to overall survival (OS). Patients: Patients receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy for mCRC in a line-agnostic setting. Methods: This cohort study in IBM MarketScan followed patients from initiation of cetuximab for mCRC until the end of the data availability period, proxy-based death or loss of insurance coverage for >30 days. Results: The hazard ratio for OS was 0.94 (0.85-1.03), and the inferiority hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.001. No significant differences were noted in rates of safety events between Q2W and Q1W. Conclusion: Our real-world study confirmed the noninferiority of cetuximab administered Q2W versus Q1W for OS.

A real-world study on characteristics, treatments and outcomes in US patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer

Background

Detailed epidemiologic descriptions of large populations of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients have been lacking to date. This study aimed to describe the patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, and incidence rates of health outcomes of interest (HOI) in a large cohort of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients in the United States (US).

Methods

This cohort study identified incident advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian cancer patients in the US diagnosed from 2010 to 2018 in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD) using a validated predictive model algorithm. Descriptive characteristics were presented overall and by treatment line. The incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals for pre-specified HOIs were evaluated after advanced stage diagnosis. Overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation or death (TTD), and time to next treatment or death (TTNT) were defined using treatment information in claims and linkage with the National Death Index.

Results

We identified 12,659 patients with incident advanced stage ovarian cancer during the study period. Most patients undergoing treatment received platinum agents (75%) and/or taxanes (70%). The most common HOIs (> 24 per 100 person-years) included abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, anemia, and serious infections. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 4.5 years, while approximately half of the treated cohort had a first-line time to treatment discontinuation or death (TTD) within the first 4 months, and a time to next treatment or death (TTNT) from first to second-line of about 6 months.

Conclusions

This study describes commercially insured US patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer from 2010 to 2018, and observed diverse treatment patterns, incidence of numerous HOIs, and limited survival in this population.

Real-world costs of cetuximab + chemotherapy administered every two weeks versus weekly for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

22

Background: Cetuximab (CET) 250 mg/m2 weekly (q1w) after an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 added to chemotherapy (CT) is licensed for treatment of (K)RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In practice, administration of CET 500 mg/m2 plus CT every 2 weeks (q2w) is common. We compared healthcare costs between q2w and q1w regimens in a US claims database study. Methods: A cohort of 2,943 mCRC patients CET-treated between 2010 and 2016, identified in IBM MarketScan, was analyzed for costs associated with CET+CT q2w vs q1w. All-category costs (ACC), stratified by overall outpatient (OO), inpatient (OI), and pharmacy (OP) claimed costs during the exposure period, were compared between groups. Additionally, subcategories of CRC- and skin toxicity (ST)–related claims were explored, and imputation of capitated claim costs was performed. Patients were weighted by the stabilized inverse probability of treatment (IPTW) based on a high-dimensional propensity score to control for confounding. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with gamma distributions were used to compare regimens. Inflation-adjusted costs (2016 US dollars) are presented per patient per month ($PPPM) with 95% CIs. Results: 1,779 and 951 patients were classified as q1w and q2w, respectively. Median ACC were 14,089 (q2w) vs 14,034 (q1w) $PPPM. Mean ACC and OO, OI, and OP costs are summarized in the table. CIs overlapped in each category, with GLMs showing no statistically significant differences. This finding was similar for CRC and ST subcategories. Conclusions: No cost differences were found between q2w and q1w regimens. In line with published noninferiority of overall survival with the q2w regimen, it represents an effective, cost-neutral option for treating mCRC patients.

[Table: see text]

Overall survival of cetuximab administered every two weeks versus weekly in real-world data of U.S. patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

23

Background: Cetuximab (CET) administered weekly (q1w) at 250 mg/m², after an initial dose of 400 mg/m², is approved in combination with chemotherapy (CT) for the treatment of (K) RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The use of CET 500 mg/m2 administered with CT every 2 weeks (q2w) is according to US clinical practice guidelines and observed routinely. In this study, we compared q2w vs q1w regimens on overall survival (OS) in a presumed first-line (1L) treatment subcohort and present updated data on the noninferiority of q2w vs q1w in line-agnostic (1L+) treatment using US real-world data. Methods: Using IBM MarketScan, a large US insurance claims database, we classified a cohort of mCRC patients treated between 07/2010 and 12/2016 with CET+CT as q1w or q2w based on observed infusion patterns. Absence of mCRC-related treatment claims preceding CET initiation date (defined as the index date) qualified as CET treated in 1L. A validated algorithm was used to determine patient death. Confounding was accounted for using high-dimensional propensity scoring (hdPS) with inverse probability of treatment weights. OS was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Imbalanced confounders after hdPS were added to the Cox model. In 1L+, noninferiority of the q2w regimen was tested with a margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25. However, noninferiority could not be tested in 1L due to the small sample size; a test for difference was used instead. Results: Of 2,730 CET-exposed mCRC patients (updated), 1,779 (65.2%) and 951 (34.8%) were classified in q1w and q2w groups, respectively, among which 557 (31.3%) and 316 (33.2%) received CET in 1L. The HR (95% CI) for OS of q2w vs q1w in 1L was 1.10 (0.92-1.31; crude), and 1.05 (0.86-1.29; adjusted; p for difference: 0.625). In 1L+, crude and adjusted HRs were 1.05 (0.94-1.18) and 0.94 (0.85-1.03), respectively, rejecting the inferiority hypothesis at p < 0.001. Conclusions: Only a third of patients received CET in 1L in this study. OS was statistically noninferior in q2w vs q1w in 1L+, and adjusted results in 1L suggest no differences between both treatment schedules. However, more data would be needed to formally test the noninferiority hypothesis in 1L.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival from three cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients using health care claims data in the United States

129

Background: Our main objective was to identify, in healthcare claims data, patients with advanced or metastatic: urothelial carcinoma (amUC), gastric cancer (amGC) and non-small cell lung cancer (amNSCLC) and to report on their characteristics, treatments, and survival rates using contemporaneous real-world data. Methods: This cohort study was conducted in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), from January 2010 to January 2018, which contains healthcare claims data from commercial health plans across the US (60 million lives). We applied algorithms, previously validated on registry data, to the HIRD to define 3 cohorts of advanced stage cancer. Cohort characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Patient vital status was captured through probabilistic linkage with the National Death Index (NDI) and survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Algorithms to predict advanced stage cancer resulted in the following cohorts: 1,501 amUC, 6,253 amGC and 38,451 amNSCLC cases. Most patients in each cohort were de novo advanced or metastatic, but subsets were diagnosed at early stage and progressed to advanced stage (ranging from 15.1% for amNSCLC to 23.1% for amUC). Patient characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes are described in Table 1. Not all received systemic treatment; Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were used in 5.3%, 2.2% and 10.8% of treated amUC, amGC and amNSCLC patients, respectively. Conclusions: In these cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients, median survival time was limited despite most receiving treatment: radiation, systemic therapy or surgery. Treatment with ICI was low despite recent data in amUC and amNSCLC.[Table: see text]

Development of predictive models to identify advanced-stage cancer patients in a US healthcare claims database

BACKGROUND

Although healthcare databases are a valuable source for real-world oncology data, cancer stage is often lacking. We developed predictive models using claims data to identify metastatic/advanced-stage patients with ovarian cancer, urothelial carcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with ≥1 diagnosis of a cancer of interest were identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), a United States (US) healthcare database (2010-2016). Data were linked to three US state cancer registries and the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment Oncology database to identify cancer stage. Predictive models were constructed to estimate the probability of metastatic/advanced stage. Predictors available in the HIRD were identified and coefficients estimated by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with cross-validation to control overfitting. Classification error rates and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to select probability thresholds for classifying patients as cases of metastatic/advanced cancer.

RESULTS

We used 2723 ovarian cancer, 6522 urothelial carcinoma, 1441 gastric adenocarcinoma, 109 MCC, and 12,373 NSCLC cases of early and metastatic/advanced cancer to develop predictive models. All models had high discrimination (C > 0.85). At thresholds selected for each model, PPVs were all >0.75: ovarian cancer = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.94-0.96), urothelial carcinoma = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86), gastric adenocarcinoma = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88), MCC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.89), and NSCLC = 0.91 (95% CI 0.90 - 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Predictive modeling was used to identify five types of metastatic/advanced cancer in a healthcare claims database with greater accuracy than previous methods.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival from three cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients using healthcare claims data in the United States

e13082

Background: Our main objective was to identify, in healthcare claims data, patients with advanced or metastatic: urothelial carcinoma (amUC), gastric cancer (amGC) and non-small cell lung cancer (amNSCLC) and to report on their characteristics, treatments, and survival rates using contemporaneous real-world data. Methods: This cohort study was conducted in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), from January 2010 to January 2018, which contains healthcare claims data from commercial health plans across the US (60 million lives). We applied algorithms, previously validated on registry data, to the HIRD to define 3 cohorts of advanced stage cancer. Cohort characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Patient vital status was captured through probabilistic linkage with the National Death Index (NDI) and survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Algorithms to predict advanced stage cancer resulted in the following cohorts: 1,501 amUC, 6,253 amGC and 38,451 amNSCLC cases. Most patients in each cohort were de novo advanced or metastatic, but subsets were diagnosed at early stage and progressed to advanced stage (ranging from 15.1% for amNSCLC to 23.1% for amUC). Patient characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes are described in Table. Not all received systemic treatment; Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were used in 5.3%, 2.2% and 10.8% of treated amUC, amGC and amNSCLC patients, respectively. Conclusions: In these cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients, median survival time was limited despite most receiving treatment: radiation, systemic therapy or surgery. Treatment with ICI was low despite recent data in amUC and amNSCLC. Characteristics, treatments, and survival from estimated advanced stage date. [Table: see text]

Real-world study of cetuximab used every other week versus weekly in US patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

e15087

Background: After an initial dose of 400 mg/m², cetuximab (CET) at a dose of 250 mg/m² in combination with chemotherapy (CT) is approved for once-weekly (q1w) use in the treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, off-label use of CET 500 mg/m2 administered every other week (q2w) has been observed in clinical practice. This study aimed to test the noninferiority of q2w vs q1w administration on overall survival (OS) using US claims data. Methods: Using IBM MarketScan, a large US insurance claims database, a cohort of patients with mCRC treated with CET + CT between 2010 and 2016 was identified and classified as q1w or q2w based on observed infusion patterns. The initial CET prescription was defined as the index date, and patient death was determined using a previously published algorithm. Confounding was accounted for using high-dimensional propensity scoring (hdPS) methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). OS for both groups was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Confounders that remained imbalanced after hdPS with IPTW were added to the Cox model. The noninferiority of the q2w regimen was tested with a margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 for q2w vs q1w. Results: 2,869 patients with mCRC exposed to CET were identified of which 1,865 (65.0%) and 1,004 (35.0%) were classified in the q1w and q2w groups, respectively. The mean age of patients was 60.1±11.7 years for q1w and 58.1±11.1 years for q2w. Most patients were male: 57.5% and 60.8% in q1w and q2w, respectively. Approximately 70% of patients in both groups had received prior treatment for mCRC. The most frequently used CT with CET was irinotecan based (64.5% in q1w and 76.5% in q2w). There were 1,628 deaths observed during follow-up (56.7%). After hdPS with IPTW adjustment, differences remained in associated CT (standardized difference <0.25). Crude HR for OS was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.94-1.18), and adjusted HR for OS was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.17). The inferiority hypothesis was rejected at p<0.001. Conclusions: In this large US claims database, when assessing OS, the q2w administration schedule was found to be noninferior to the q1w schedule in patients with mCRC.

The use of adjunctive antipsychotics to treat depression in UK primary care

OBJECTIVE

Adjunctive antipsychotic therapy can be prescribed to patients with depression who have inadequate response to antidepressants. This study aimed to describe the use of adjunctive antipsychotics over a time period that includes the authorization in 2010 of prolonged-release quetiapine as the first adjunct antipsychotic to be used in major depressive disorder in the UK.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Adults with an episode of depression between January 1, 2005 and July 31, 2013 were identified from antidepressant prescriptions and depression diagnoses in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients with prior records of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or antipsychotic prescriptions were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of adjunct antipsychotic initiation and characteristics and management of patients with adjunct antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Of 224,353 adults with depression, 5,807 (2.6%) initiated adjunct antipsychotic therapy. Overall incidence of antipsychotic initiation was 7.4 per 1,000 patient-years (95% CI = 7.2-7.6). Between 2005-2013, the overall rate did not change, although initiation of typical antipsychotic prescribing decreased (57.7% to 29.1%), while atypical antipsychotics, especially quetiapine (14.1% to 49.7%), increased. Of those who initiated antipsychotics, 59.4% were women (typical antipsychotics = 62.8%, atypical antipsychotics = 56.1%) and median age was 46 years (typicals = 49 years, atypicals = 44 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotics were rarely used to treat depression between 2005-2013 in UK primary care. The choice of adjunctive antipsychotic therapy changed over this time, with atypical antipsychotics now representing the preferred treatment choice. However, information on patients strictly cared for in other settings, such as by psychiatrists or in hospitals, potentially more severe patients, was unavailable and may differ. Nonetheless, the high off-label use in primary care, even after the authorization of quetiapine, suggests that there is a need for more licensed treatment options for adjunctive antipsychotic therapy in major depressive disorder.

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for patients treated for depression in UK primary care: a database analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term patterns of antidepressant treatment in patients in primary care in the UK, and to assess their healthcare resource use and disease outcomes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The study population comprised patients aged ≥18 years with depression receiving a prescription for antidepressant monotherapy between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2011 with no antidepressants within the preceding 6 months. Recovery was defined by timing of antidepressant prescriptions (≥6 months without treatment). Treatment lines and strategies (switching, combining, augmenting and resuming medication) were analyzed. Healthcare resource use for the different treatment strategies and periods of no therapy was assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 123,662 patients (287,564 treatment lines) were analyzed. Switching and resumption of treatment were more frequent than other strategies. Recovery was highest with first-line monotherapy (45% of patients), while as a second-line strategy switching was more successful (43%) than combination or augmentation. In subsequent lines of treatment, switching was associated with successively lower rates of recovery (31% in the third line and 24% from the fourth line onwards). Similar rates were observed for resumption. Healthcare resource use was greater during antidepressant use than treatment-free periods. Augmentation was associated with the highest proportions of patients with a psychiatrist referral, psychologist referral and psychiatric hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides extensive real-world information on the prescribing patterns and treatment outcomes for a large cohort of patients treated for depression with antidepressants in primary care. Switching is more frequently used than augmentation or combination treatment, with decreasing effectiveness across successive lines. Key limitations of the study were: (i) risk of selection bias due to the use of inclusion criteria based on depression diagnoses recorded by the practitioner; and (ii) reliance on prescribing patterns as proxies for clinical outcomes, such as recovery.

Epidemiology of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in adult kidney and kidney pancreas recipients: report of the French registry and analysis of subgroups of lymphomas

A registry of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) was set up for the entire population of adult kidney transplant recipients in France. Cases of PTLD were prospectively enrolled between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007. Ten-year cumulative incidence was analyzed in patients transplanted after January 1, 1989. PTLD risk factors were analyzed in patients transplanted after January 1, 1998 by Cox analysis. Cumulative incidence was 1% after 5 years, 2.1% after 10 years. Multivariate analysis showed that PTLD was significantly associated with: older age of the recipient 47-60 years and >60 years (vs. 33-46 years, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.87, CI = 1.22-2.86 and AHR = 2.80, CI = 1.73-4.55, respectively, p < 0.0001), simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (AHR = 2.52, CI = 1.27-5.01 p = 0.008), year of transplant 1998-1999 and 2000-2001 (vs. 2006-2007, AHR = 3.36, CI = 1.64-6.87 and AHR = 3.08, CI = 1.55-6.15, respectively, p = 0.003), EBV mismatch (HR = 5.31, CI = 3.36-8.39, p < 0.001), 5 or 6 HLA mismatches (vs. 0-4, AHR = 1.54, CI = 1.12-2.12, p = 0.008), and induction therapy (AHR = 1.42, CI = 1-2.02, p = 0.05). Analyses of subgroups of PTLD provided new information about PTLD risk factors for early, late, EBV positive and negative, polymorphic, monomorphic, graft and cerebral lymphomas. This nationwide study highlights the increased risk of PTLD as long as 10 years after transplantation and the role of cofactors in modifying PTLD risk, particularly in specific PTLD subgroups.