Advanced imaging shows extra-articular abscesses in two out of three adult patients with septic arthritis of the native hip joint

Background: Septic arthritis (SA) of the native adult hip is a rare orthopaedic emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. As clinical presentation and laboratory findings are frequently atypical, advanced imaging is often requested. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the prevalence and pattern of extra-articular infectious manifestations and their implications for pre-operative advanced imaging in patients with proven SA of the native hip joint. Methods: Out of 41 patients treated surgically for SA of the native hip during a 16-year period at our tertiary referral hospital, 25 received advanced imaging (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET-CT)) prior to initial intervention. For each investigation, a specific set of variables was systematically interpreted, and the most suitable surgical approach was determined. The prognostic value was evaluated by comparing specific outcome measures and the extent of extra-articular involvement. Results: It was found that 32 % of patients had an abscess in one anatomical region, 32 % of patients had abscesses in multiple anatomical regions, and only 36 % of patients had no substantial abscess. Gluteal abscesses were especially common in patients with SA due to contiguous spread. Abscesses in the iliopsoas region were more common in patients with SA due to hematogenous seeding. A combination of several different surgical approaches was deemed necessary to adequately deal with the various presentations. No significant prognostic factors could be identified. Conclusion: We recommend performing advanced imaging in patients with suspected or proven septic arthritis of the native hip joint, as extra-articular abscesses are present in 64 % and might require varying anatomical approaches.

Should treatment decisions in septic arthritis of the native hip joint be based on the route of infection?

Background: Surgical management of septic arthritis (SA) of the hip aims at treating the infection by either preserving, resecting or replacing the joint. In some cases, joint preservation should be attempted, whereas other cases would benefit from immediate joint resection or replacement. Prognostic factors have been proposed to guide decision-making. We hypothesized that most of these factors can be simplified to three subgroups based on the route of infection: contiguous spreading, direct inoculation or hematogenous seeding. Methods: A total of 41 patients have been treated surgically for SA of the native hip at our tertiary hospital during the last 16 years. Medical records were studied, and various patient and disease characteristics were collated. Results: Significant differences between (1) level of fitness, (2) condition of the hip joint, (3) micro-organisms and (4) chance of femoral head preservation were found for patients with SA of the native hip resulting from the three aforementioned subgroups. Femoral head resection was necessary at one point in 85 % of patients. Patients with hematogenous infections of undamaged hips had a reasonable chance (53 %) of avoiding joint resection or replacement. Hip arthroplasty was performed on 46.3 % of patients, with an infection rate of 10.5 %. Conclusion: Patients with SA of the native hip resulting from contiguous spreading, hematogenous seeding or direct inoculation differ significantly and should be considered distinct clinical entities. Route of infection is directly related to the chance of femoral head preservation and should, therefore, guide decision-making. Only patients with hematogenous infection to a previously healthy hip had the possibility of femoral head preservation.