Parents' experiences of having their children take part in participatory action research creating a serious game about radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of several treatment modalities used for children diagnosed with cancer. Several studies have designed interventions aimed to alleviate the stress that can occur in conjunction with RT. To include children in the design of interventions is rare and dependent on the parents giving consent to participation in research on their children's behalf. The aim was to illuminate, from the parents' perspective, the experience of their children being part in the co-creation of a serious game and their previous experiences of RT.

METHODS

Ten parents of children taking part in a participatory action research study of the development of a serious game were invited to an interview and seven parents consented. An inductive, manifest content analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The analysis resulted in an overarching theme: Parents' pre-understanding from their child's cancer treatment created a sensitivity to their child's wishes and a willingness to contribute to science. Four categories are presented: Intrinsic factors influenced the intent to participate, Extrinsic factors that had an effect on participation, Parents role in the game development, and Radiotherapy impinged the child and the parent.

CONCLUSION

To be able to pay it forward to healthcare and other families with a child diagnosed with cancer was a contributing factor for parents' willingness to consent to participation after their children had undergone RT, especially since their children wanted to do so. Parents indicated interest in the developmental process and in following their children being part of the creation of a serious game about RT.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

To understand why parents allow their children to participate in studies creates opportunities for the research community to structure studies that facilitate participation.

Young children with severe congenital malformations (VACTERL) expressed mixed feelings about their condition and worries about needles and anaesthesia

AIM

Our knowledge of the perceptions that children with severe congenital malformations have of their health, treatment and how to improve hospital care is limited. This study focused on patients with vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, renal anomalies and limb abnormalities (VACTERL).

METHODS

We interviewed 10 children aged five to eight years with VACTERL association who were treated in a Swedish tertiary paediatric surgical centre, using a computer-assisted technique called In My Shoes. The interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The children described their awareness of their health history and said they felt proud but different due to their physical dysfunction. They were happy to visit the hospital to meet familiar staff, but expressed negative feelings about missing normal life. They were afraid of needle-related procedures and not wakening up after anaesthesia. Various ways of coping with difficult situations were expressed, and suggestions to improve hospital care were voiced.

CONCLUSION

Careful follow-up of these children by multidisciplinary teams is crucial to optimise their health and functional status. Fear of medical procedures may be reduced by carefully delivered information, listening to the children, providing continuity of care and creating individual care strategies.

Findings on how adolescents cope with cancer--a matter of methodology?

OBJECTIVES

The various conclusions drawn from previous studies on how adolescents cope with cancer might partly be explained by methodological issues. The aim was to explore how adolescents recently diagnosed with cancer report that they cope with disease- and treatment-related distress in response to closed- and open-ended questions, respectively.

METHODS

Adolescents diagnosed with cancer 4-8 weeks ago (N=56) answered closed- and open-ended questions over the telephone about which coping strategies they use to cope with physical concerns, personal changes, feelings of alienation, and worries.

RESULTS

In response to closed-ended questions, most adolescents reported using emotion-focused coping (Accepting and Minimising) while, in response to open-ended questions, meaning-based (i.e. Positive thinking) and problem-focused (i.e. Problem solving) coping were most often mentioned. A majority reported using Minimising and Seeking support in response to closed-ended questions, but very few adolescents mentioned using these strategies in response to open-ended questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents' reports of how they cope with disease- and treatment-related distress vary depending on antecedent closed- and open-ended questions. Responses to closed-ended questions appear to be more indifferent to aspects of distress than responses to open-ended questions. Strategies representing meaning-based coping should be included in future studies investigating how adolescents recently diagnosed with cancer cope with disease- and treatment-related distress.