Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is not superior to endoscopic variceal band ligation for prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with variceal band ligation (VBL) in the prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

METHODS

Fifty-four cirrhotic patients (21 Child-Pugh class A, 27 class B, 6 class C) were randomized to TIPS (n = 28) or VBL (n = 26) within 2 months after control of esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Statistical analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 2 years. Mortality risk at 1 and 2 years of follow-up was 7.8% +/- 5.3% and 19.9% +/- 8.8% in the TIPS group and 16.5% +/- 7.6% and 16.5% +/- 7.6% in the VBL group, respectively (n.s.); actuarial probability of remaining free from rebleeding was 83.7% +/- 77.4% and 71.4% +/- 10.4% in the TIPS group and 83.9% +/- 7.3% and 78.1% +/- 8.8% in the VBL group at 1 and 2 years, respectively (n.s.). Hepatic encephalopathy within 1 month after randomization was observed in 2 patients in the TIPS group and in 1 in the VBL group.

CONCLUSION

TIPS is not superior to VBL in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Furthermore, similar mortality rates in patients treated with TIPS or VBL negate TIPS as the preferred strategy for prevention of variceal rebleeding.

Manometry of esophageal varices: comparison of an endoscopic balloon technique with needle puncture

BACKGROUND

A noninvasive technique of pressure measurement in esophageal varices using an endoscopic balloon has been shown to be reliable in vitro. In the present study, this method was tested in vivo.

METHODS

Thirty-seven pressure measurements in esophageal varices were performed in 34 patients by two independent operators (A and B) using an endoscopic balloon and compared with measurements performed by needle puncture by a third operator (C).

RESULTS

Three measurements performed with the endoscopic balloon were rejected because they were noninterpretable. Measurements performed by A and B correlated well (correlation coefficient, 0.90); interobserver variability (r) was 0.88. Of 37 punctures performed for pressure measurements, 4 resulted in bleeding and 8 measurements were rejected as uninterpretable. Regression analysis showed a good correlation between the needle puncture and balloon techniques for pressure measurements performed by both operators (y = 5.3 + 1.0x, r = 0.8; y = 6.2 + 0.9x, r = 0.8), and analysis of variability showed a measurement bias of -5.3 +/- 4.1 and -4.1 +/- 3.5 cm H2O. No significant difference in variceal size measured with the endoscopic balloon or endoscopic forceps was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic balloon allows measurement of pressure in esophageal varices without hazard to the patient; in addition, it may be used to assess the varix size.

Reduction of transmural oesophageal variceal pressure by metoclopramide

In nineteen patients with portal hypertension and oesophageal varices, transmural variceal blood pressure was determined endoscopically by direct puncture of the varices before and after intravenous administration of 20 mg metoclopramide or placebo. No change in pressure was observed after placebo (mean difference -1.3 +/- 24.5%, N.S.), however, metoclopramide reduced the pressure by 17.6 +/- 18.6% (p = 0.02). Our results suggest that metoclopramide may be beneficial for the prevention or treatment of variceal haemorrhage.