Ostium Ratio and Neck Ratio Could Predict the Outcome of Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow Diverters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Incompletely occluded flow diverter treated aneurysms remain at risk of rupture and thromboembolic complications. Our aim was to identify the potential for incomplete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverters. We investigated whether aneurysm ostium size in relation to parent artery size affects angiographic outcomes of flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms were divided into "occluded" and "residual" (incomplete occlusion) groups based on 6-month angiographic follow-up. We calculated the ostium ratio, a new parameter defined as the aneurysm ostium surface area versus the circumferential surface area of the parent artery. We also calculated the neck ratio, defined as clinical aneurysm neck diameter versus parent artery diameter from pretreatment 2D DSA, as a 2D surrogate. We compared the performance of these ratios with existing aneurysm morphometrics (size, neck diameter, volume, aspect ratio, size ratio, undulation index, nonsphericity index, ellipticity index, bottleneck factor, aneurysm angle, and parent vessel angle) and flow diverter-related parameters (metal coverage rate and pore density). Statistical tests and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify significantly different parameters between the 2 groups and test their predictive performances.

RESULTS

We included 63 flow diverter-treated aneurysms, 46 occluded and 17 residual. The ostium ratio and neck ratio were significantly higher in the residual group than in the occluded group (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively), whereas all other parameters showed no statistical difference. As discriminating parameters for occlusion, ostium ratio and neck ratio achieved areas under the curve of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.838-0.985) and 0.707 (95% CI, 0.558-0.856), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High ostium ratios and neck ratios could predict incomplete occlusion of flow diverter-treated sidewall aneurysms. Neck ratio can be easily calculated by interventionists to predict flow-diverter treatment outcomes.

Grandmultiparae in a modern setting

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of antenatal and intrapartum complications and neonatal outcomes among women who had previously delivered five or more times (grandmultiparous) with that of age-matched control women who had previously delivered two or three times (multiparous).

DESIGN

A matched cohort study.

SETTING

An inner city university maternity hospital in the United Kingdom.

SAMPLE

Three hundred and ninety-seven grandmultiparous women were compared with three hundred and ninety-seven age-matched multiparous women.

METHODS

Data on the subjects were obtained from a computerised maternity information system (SMMIS). Characteristics and complications occurring in the two groups were compared. Data validation was performed with a 10% randomised sample of the casenotes in both groups. Nineteen relevant data fields were abstracted and compared with the matched SMMIS record. Results The overall incidence of intrapartum complications for grandmultiparous women was 16% compared with 18% in the control multiparous women (odds ratio 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.3). Grand multiparity was associated with a significantly higher body mass index at booking (P < 0.01) and the last antenatal clinic (P < 0.05), an increased incidence of antenatal anaemia (22% vs 16%, odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8) and a decreased incidence of elective caesarean section (6% vs 11%, odds ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Agreement was greater than 95% in all the data fields reviewed except three. In the 14 categorical variables reviewed the Cohen's kappa results were in excess of 0.6.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that in a developed country with satisfactory health care conditions, grandmultiparity should not be considered dangerous,and risk assessment should be based on past and present history and not simply on the basis of parity.

Bruising in non-accidental head injured children; a retrospective study of the prevalence, distribution and pathological associations in 24 cases

Non-accidental head injury, be it shaking, impact(s) or a combination of the two, is characterised by subdural and/or subarachnoid haemorrhages with retinal haemorrhages, but minimal or absent external cranio-facial trauma. The classical assault scenario depicts the infant being gripped around the head, face, chest and abdomen and shaken or being gripped by a limb and swung. This gripping might be expected to leave physical evidence in the form of bruising. A study was undertaken to establish the prevalence, distribution and pathological association of external bruising in 24 cases of fatal non-accidental head injury in children. At autopsy, 17 cases had new external bruises, 15 old external bruises and 13, a combination of both. However, seven (29%) cases showed no fresh external bruising and five (21%) showed no external bruising at all. Thus, external bruising may be absent in children with fatal intracranial injury. The face was shown to be the commonest site of bruising followed by the forehead and buttocks. Limb, chest and abdominal bruising were found to be uncommon. Retinal haemorrhages were confirmed in 23 (96%) cases. It is hypothesised that bruising, when present, may be a result of abuse in the form of punches and slaps rather than due to gripping during the assault. We discuss why gripping does not necessarily result in external bruising.