1
|
Echeverria GV, Ge Z, Seth S, Jeter-Jones SL, Zhang X, Zhou X, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Peoples M, Lau R, Shao J, Sun Y, Bristow C, Carugo A, Ma X, Harris A, Wu Y, Moulder S, Symmans WF, Marszalek JR, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract GS5-05: Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs5-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Approximately 50% of patients with localized triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have substantial residual cancer burden following treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), resulting in distant metastasis and death for most of these patients. While genomic and phenotypic intra-tumor heterogeneity are pervasive features of TNBCs at the time of diagnosis, the functional contributions of heterogeneous tumor cell populations to chemoresistance have not been elucidated.
To investigate tumor evolution accompanying NACT, we employed orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of treatment-naïve TNBC, which retain intra-tumor heterogeneity characteristic of human TNBC. We discovered that some PDX models initially exhibited partial sensitivity to standard front-line NACT (Adriamycin plus Cytoxan, AC). Following AC, residual tumors were resistant to chemotherapy but repopulated tumors with chemo-sensitive cells if left untreated, indicating that tumor cells possessed inherent plasticity. To identify the tumor cell subpopulation(s) conferring chemoresistance, we conducted barcode-mediated clonal tracking in three independent PDX models by introducing a high-complexity pooled lentiviral barcode library into PDX tumor cells which were then orthotopically engrafted into recipient mice. Strikingly, residual tumors maintained the same heterogeneous clonal architecture as naïve tumors. Concordantly, whole-exome sequencing revealed conservation of genomic subclonal architecture throughout treatment. These results were corroborated by genomic sequencing of serial biopsies pre- and post-AC obtained directly from TNBC patients enrolled on an ongoing clinical trial at MD Anderson (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). Together, these studies revealed that genomically distinct pre-treatment subclones were equally capable of surviving AC to reconstitute tumors after treatment.
To identify functional addictions of residual tumor cells, we conducted histologic and transcriptomic profiling. Residual tumors following AC-treatment exhibited extensive fibrotic desmoplasia and tumor cell pleomorphism in both PDX models and in serial biopsies obtained from TNBC patients enrolled on the ARTEMIS trial. Strikingly, these AC-induced features were reverted upon regrowth of residual tumors in PDXs and in patients' tumors. Similarly, residual tumors exhibited unique transcriptomic features, many of which are also de-regulated in cohorts of human TNBCs undergoing chemotherapy treatment. These features were nearly completely reverted after tumors regrew, suggesting that the residual tumor state may be a unique and transient therapeutic window. Gene set enrichment analyses revealed that residual tumors had increased activation of oxidative phosphorylation and decreased glycolytic signaling. Pharmacologic targeting of oxidative phosphorylation with a small-molecule inhibitor of mitochondrial electron transport chain complex I (IACS-010759) significantly delayed the regrowth of AC-treated residual tumors in three independent PDX models. Collectively, these studies reveal that a reversible phenotypic state can confer chemoresistance in the absence of genomic selection and that the residual tumor state is a novel therapeutic window for chemo-refractory TNBC.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Ge Z, Seth S, Jeter-Jones SL, Zhang X, Zhou X, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Peoples M, Lau R, Shao J, Sun Y, Bristow C, Carugo A, Ma X, Harris A, Wu Y, Moulder S, Symmans WF, Marszalek JR, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Z Ge
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - SL Jeter-Jones
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Zhang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Zhou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Cai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Tu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A McCoy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - M Peoples
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Shao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - C Bristow
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Carugo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Ma
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Harris
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Wu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JR Marszalek
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - TP Heffernan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Echeverria GV, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Lau R, Redwood A, Rauch G, Adrada B, Candelaria R, Santiago L, Thompson A, Litton J, Moulder S, Symmans F, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract P5-05-01: A molecularly annotated collection of breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models aligned with ongoing clinical trials built from fine needle aspiration samples throughout neoadjuvant treatment. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-05-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of breast cancer replicate the diverse histologic and molecular features of patient tumors and provide a renewable source of human tumor tissue. However, collection of tissue by core needle biopsy is problematic due to patient discomfort, bleeding risk and the limited number of passes a patient can tolerate. Several studies have catalogued the maintenance of molecular features of patient tumors in PDX models of breast cancer.
METHODS: To support the neoadjuvant molecular diagnostic and drug development program in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), a pilot study was conducted to determine if fine needle aspiration (FNA) could be used for building PDX models. Subsequently, PDX models are being established in alignment with ongoing clinical trials at MDACC. The molecular evolution of patient's tumors, matched with PDXs engrafted from their tumors, is under study throughout the neoadjuvant treatment of TNBC using RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, deep sequencing of cancer genes, and histologic analyses.
RESULTS: To date, 20 established PDX models have been developed and stable PDX models continue to be generated at a rate of 2-3 per month. Several of these models are derived from serial FNAs derived from patients throughout neoadjuvant treatment. These models retain histologic and molecular features of the original patient tumors. Serial patient biopsies, matched with PDX models, have enabled measurement of the mutational and transcriptomic evolution in vivo of TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.
We have standardized the use of FNAs to generate PDX models both pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy in the following ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials:
1. MDACC 2014-0185 (PI Stacy Moulder, 360 patients), 'ARTEMIS: A Randomized TNBC-Enrolling trial to confirm Molecular profiling Improves Survival'
2. MDACC 2014-0045 (PI Jennifer Litton, 20+ patients), 'A pilot study of BMN673 as a neoadjuvant study in patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and a deleterious BRCA mutation'
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that PDX models from tissue collected by FNA recapitulate the biology and clinical course of the patient's tumor. Sequencing analyses revealed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy and PDX engraftment enrich for cancer gene mutations. We observe association of the rate of successful PDX engraftment with clinical parameters such as the patient's residual cancer burden (RCB) status at the time of surgery (upon completion of neoadjuvant treatment). In addition, we observe that PDX models derived from serial patient biopsies throughout treatment are more resistant to chemotherapy treatment. These models recapitulate the variety of chemotherapy responses observed in patients with TNBC and serve as powerful tools for preclinical biomarker and discovery studies.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Lau R, Redwood A, Rauch G, Adrada B, Candelaria R, Santiago L, Thompson A, Litton J, Moulder S, Symmans F, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. A molecularly annotated collection of breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models aligned with ongoing clinical trials built from fine needle aspiration samples throughout neoadjuvant treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Cai
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Tu
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A McCoy
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Redwood
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - G Rauch
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - B Adrada
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Candelaria
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Santiago
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Thompson
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Litton
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - F Symmans
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Echeverria GV, Seth S, Ge Z, Sun Y, DiFrancesco E, Lau R, Marszalek J, Moulder S, Symmans F, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract P4-03-02: Characterizing and targeting chemoresistant subclones in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-03-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Fifty percent of all triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients harbor significant residual tumor burden following treatment with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), resulting in poor prognosis. Recent studies in TNBC have revealed extensive intra-tumoral heterogeneity at the time of diagnosis and throughout disease progression, but the relative contributions of these heterogeneous populations of tumor cells to chemoresistance are not well understood.
The primary tumor, dermal metastasis, and germline reference were obtained from a patient with untreated metastatic TNBC. Tumor cells were engrafted into the humanized mammary fat pads of NOD/SCID mice to establish PDX models of the primary (PIM001-P) and metastatic (PIM001-M) tumors. RNA sequencing and whole-exome sequencing (WES), performed on the patient's primary and metastatic tumors and the first- and third- passage PDX models revealed transcriptomic profiles and subclonal heterogeneity of the patient's tumors were recapitulated in the PDX models.
Treatment of mice engrafted with PIM001-P tumors with NACT (Adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide, AC) resulted in partial response, the magnitude of which was diminished in mice bearing PIM001-M tumors. Tumor subclones were tracked during chemotherapy treatment in mice engrafted with PIM001-P tumors using lentiviral non-targeting DNA barcodes. Residual tumors maintained the clonal architecture of untreated tumors, and deep WES revealed stable maintenance of somatic mutant allele frequencies throughout treatment. Therefore, selection of pre-existing resistant clones did not lead to AC resistance in this model. Interestingly, only 25% of residual tumor clones contributed to primary relapse once treatment was halted, suggesting only a subpopulation of tumor cells was able to reconstitute the tumor.
RNA sequencing and reverse phase protein array revealed that while vehicle-treated and regrown tumors were highly similar, residual tumors harbored a unique profile characterized by numerous significant alterations in RNA and protein levels. Together, these results suggest that residual tumors enter into a transient drug-resistant state that is reversible. Residual tumors were enriched for alterations in pathways such as metabolism, extracellular matrix remodeling, and cell-cell communication. Pharmacologic targeting of the residual tumor state with an inhibitor of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation led to significant inhibition of tumor regrowth following AC treatment. Additional vulnerabilities identified in residual tumors are being targeted therapeutically with the goal of eradicating residual tumor cells.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Seth S, Ge Z, Sun Y, DiFrancesco E, Lau R, Marszalek J, Moulder S, Symmans F, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Characterizing and targeting chemoresistant subclones in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Seth
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Z Ge
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Sun
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - E DiFrancesco
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Marszalek
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - F Symmans
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - TP Heffernan
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Teas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Powell E, Shao J, Picon HM, Ge Z, Echeverria GV, Peoples M, Bristow C, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy AM, Piwnica-Worms D, Draetta G, Edwards JR, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Heffernan TP, Liang H, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract GS6-06: Identifying metastatic drivers in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-gs6-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Metastases are responsible for the vast majority of deaths due to breast cancer. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by high rates of metastasis and poor prognosis. We are employing patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of TNBC to identify drivers of metastasis. Tumor samples are obtained from the breast tumors of patients with TNBC and engrafted immediately into the humanized mammary fat pads of immune compromised mice. Lentiviral transduction was employed to express bioluminescent and fluorescent markers in two independent PDX models of TNBC. Using these models, we demonstrated that human breast tumors are capable of completing all stages of the metastatic cascade in mice, and metastatic lesions are observed in organs normally found in patients with metastatic breast cancer including lung, liver, bone, brain, and lymph nodes. Dynamic and reversible epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was observed as tumors metastasized to lung and were re-passaged to recipient mouse mammary glands. Lung metastases were isolated using bioluminescence imaging and lung metastasis gene expression signatures were generated. Metastasis signatures from two independent PDX models were compared to identify genes that were commonly de-regulated in lung metastases relative to corresponding mammary tumors. Comprehensive gain-of-function screens were then conducted in vivo to identify functional drivers of TNBC metastasis. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) was identified as a metastatic driver in this screen. CEACAM5 mRNA and protein levels were elevated in lung metastases relative to corresponding mammary gland tumors in mice. In addition, we demonstrated that CEACAM5 expression was upregulated in the lung metastases of breast cancer patients, and its expression inversely correlated with patient survival. Our data indicate that the metastatic function of CEACAM5 is to promote growth of breast tumors in the lung by inducing MET (mesenchymal to epithelial transition).
Citation Format: Powell E, Shao J, Picon HM, Ge Z, Echeverria GV, Peoples M, Bristow C, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy AM, Piwnica-Worms D, Draetta G, Edwards JR, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Heffernan TP, Liang H, Piwnica-Worms H. Identifying metastatic drivers in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Powell
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - J Shao
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - HM Picon
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Z Ge
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - GV Echeverria
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - M Peoples
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - C Bristow
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - S Cai
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Y Tu
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - AM McCoy
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - D Piwnica-Worms
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - G Draetta
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - JR Edwards
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - SL Moulder
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - WF Symmans
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - TP Heffernan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - H Liang
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Echeverria GV, Chang JT, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Lau R, Redwood A, Kaffiabasabadi S, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Jennifer L, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract P4-06-03: An annotated collection of pre- and post-therapy breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models built from fine needle aspiration samples aligned with ongoing clinical trials documenting response to treatment. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-06-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of breast cancer replicate the diverse histologic and molecular features of patient tumors and provide a renewable source of human tumor tissue; however collection of tissue by core needle biopsy is problematic due to patient discomfort, bleeding risk and the limited number of passes a patient can tolerate. In addition, FDA guidelines caution that multiple core needle biopsies could lead to an overestimation of the true pCR rate in neoadjuvant trials.
METHODS: To support the neoadjuvant molecular diagnostic and drug development program in TNBC, a pilot study was conducted to determine if fine needle aspiration (FNA) could be used for building PDX models. Prior to engraftment, FNA samples were analysed for cell number and viability.
RESULTS: Six PDX models were successfully generated from eight individual tumor samples. These models retain histologic and molecular features of the original patient tumors as determined by immunohistochemistry, RNA expression profiling, and deep whole-exome and targeted gene sequencing. In addition, the tested PDX models recapitulate the responses to therapies across multiple chemotherapeutic agents.
Based on this success, we have standardized the use of FNAs to generate PDX models both pre- and post-therapy in two ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials:
1. MDACC 2014-0185 (PI Stacy Moulder, 360 patients), 'Improving outcomes in TNBC using molecular triaging and diagnostic imaging to guide neoadjuvant therapy'
2. MDACC 2014-0045 (PI Jennifer Litton, 20+ patients), 'A pilot study of BMN673 as a neoadjuvant study in patients with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer and a deleterious BRCA mutation'
FNA cells (x10^4)Cell viability (%)Total viable cells (x10^4)Study entry biopsy (n=67)144.5050.6544.14Post treatment biopsy (n=16)47.0732.5428.38
To date, treatment-naïve primary tumor samples from 67 patients enrolled onto these neoadjuvant trials, and 16 matched non-responsive post treatment tumor samples have been analysed for cell count and viability (table below) prior to being engrafted into the humanized mammary fat pads of NOD/SCID mice.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated success in using FNAs to build PDX models that recapitulate the biology and clinical course of the original tumor. In our pilot study, we successfully generated six PDX models using FNA for TNBC, including some harboring deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. Because of the high concordance in histologic, genomic, and clinical attributes, we are now using this approach to develop a rich resource of pre- and post-treatment PDX models for the investigation of therapeutic resistance.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Chang JT, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Lau R, Redwood A, Kaffiabasabadi S, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Jennifer L, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Piwnica-Worms H. An annotated collection of pre- and post-therapy breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models built from fine needle aspiration samples aligned with ongoing clinical trials documenting response to treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Cai
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Tu
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A McCoy
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Redwood
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Kaffiabasabadi
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - GM Rauch
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - BE Adrada
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Jennifer
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - SL Moulder
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Werden SJ, Sphyris N, Sarkar TR, Paranjape AN, LaBaff AM, Taube JH, Hollier BG, Ramirez-Peña EQ, Soundararajan R, den Hollander P, Powell E, Echeverria GV, Miura N, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H, Rosen JM, Mani SA. Phosphorylation of serine 367 of FOXC2 by p38 regulates ZEB1 and breast cancer metastasis, without impacting primary tumor growth. Oncogene 2016; 35:5977-5988. [PMID: 27292262 PMCID: PMC5114155 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic competence is contingent upon the aberrant activation of a latent embryonic program, known as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which bestows stem cell properties as well as migratory and invasive capabilities upon differentiated tumor cells. We recently identified the transcription factor FOXC2 as a downstream effector of multiple EMT programs, independent of the EMT-inducing stimulus, and as a key player linking EMT, stem cell traits and metastatic competence in breast cancer. As such, FOXC2 could serve as a potential therapeutic target to attenuate metastasis. However, as FOXC2 is a transcription factor, it is difficult to target by conventional means such as small-molecule inhibitors. Herein, we identify the serine/threonine-specific kinase p38 as a druggable upstream regulator of FOXC2 stability and function that elicits phosphorylation of FOXC2 at serine 367 (S367). Using an orthotopic syngeneic mouse tumor model, we make the striking observation that inhibition of p38-FOXC2 signaling selectively attenuates metastasis without impacting primary tumor growth. In this model, circulating tumor cell numbers are significantly reduced in mice treated with the p38 inhibitor SB203580, relative to vehicle-treated counterparts. Accordingly, genetic or pharmacological inhibition of p38 decreases FOXC2 protein levels, reverts the EMT phenotype and compromises stem cell attributes in vitro. We also identify the EMT-regulator ZEB1-known to directly repress E-cadherin/CDH1-as a downstream target of FOXC2, critically dependent on its activation by p38. Consistent with the notion that activation of the p38-FOXC2 signaling axis represents a critical juncture in the acquisition of metastatic competence, the phosphomimetic FOXC2(S367E) mutant is refractory to p38 inhibition both in vitro and in vivo, whereas the non-phosphorylatable FOXC2(S367A) mutant fails to elicit EMT and upregulate ZEB1. Collectively, our data demonstrate that FOXC2 regulates EMT, stem cell traits, ZEB1 expression and metastasis in a p38-dependent manner, and attest to the potential utility of p38 inhibitors as antimetastatic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Werden
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - N Sphyris
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - T R Sarkar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A N Paranjape
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A M LaBaff
- Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J H Taube
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B G Hollier
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E Q Ramirez-Peña
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R Soundararajan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P den Hollander
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E Powell
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G V Echeverria
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - N Miura
- Department of Biochemistry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - J T Chang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J M Rosen
- Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S A Mani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Metastasis Research Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Center for Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Echeverria GV, Seth S, Moulder S, Symmans W, Chang J, Cai S, Heffernan T, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract P3-06-04: Investigating clonal dynamics in triple negative breast cancer chemoresistance. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-06-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Approximately 50% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have extensive residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). These patients have a four-fold increase in mortality risk and an increased risk of distant metastases within three years (1). Understanding the molecular basis of resistance to NAC is expected to provide opportunities to better treat patients in the primary setting. Extensive intratumoral subclonal heterogeneity has been well documented in primary, treatment-naïve TNBC (2). Subclonal populations harboring distinct molecular profiles may confound targeted therapy strategies, yet the functional impact of subclonal heterogeneity in TNBC resistance to therapy is unknown. We are implementing DNA barcoding to quantitatively track changes in subclonal architecture pre- and post-treatment in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of TNBC in order to design novel combination therapies. Such barcoding strategies have been used to monitor clonal dynamics in breast cancer PDXs with great sensitivity (3).
We have established an orthotopic PDX from a treatment-naïve TNBC patient (PIM1, procured from a patient later found to have chemoresistant disease). In order to model chemoresistance, we treated PIM1 with Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), standard of care NAC for TNBC patients, which resulted in partial response but left residual disease. To characterize subclonal dynamics in response to NAC, we transduced freshly isolated PIM1 cells with a lentiviral library expressing 25 million unique DNA barcodes (Cellecta) using conditions to ensure each transduced cell contained a single unique barcode. Transduced cells were selected with puromycin, then orthotopically implanted into immuno-compromised mice. High-throughput barcode sequencing revealed reproducible maintenance of greater than 60,000 unique barcodes in PDX tumors. Comparison of barcode distribution in tumors treated with vehicle or NAC will reveal whether NAC selects for a subpopulation of cells during the development of resistance. Future directions will include whole-exome and RNA sequencing to characterize genomic changes associated with alterations in barcode distribution in response to NAC treatment. Our ultimate goal is to identify novel combination therapies to eliminate subclones that contribute to chemoresistance in primary TNBC.
References
1. Cortazar P, et al. (Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. The Lancet 384(9938):164-172.
2. Shah SP, et al. (2012) The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature 486(7403):395-399.
3. Nguyen LV, et al. (2014) DNA barcoding reveals diverse growth kinetics of human breast tumour subclones in serially passaged xenografts. Nat Commun 5.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Seth S, Moulder S, Symmans W, Chang J, Cai S, Heffernan T, Piwnica-Worms H. Investigating clonal dynamics in triple negative breast cancer chemoresistance. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Seth
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - W Symmans
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Chang
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Cai
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - T Heffernan
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|